Registry-based Research in Cerebral Palsy: The Cerebral Palsy Research Network.

Registries are a powerful tool for clinical research. Clinical registries for cerebral palsy can aid in comparative effectiveness research, especially using the practice-based evidence model. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN) was initiated in 2014 as a patient-centered, multidisciplinary registry. The leadership group initiated a 4-stage participatory action research process: listen, reflect, plan/analyze, and take action. CPRN also joined with CP NOW, an advocacy group, to create a research agenda for cerebral palsy. With more than 20 centers and growing, CPRN hopes to generate evidence for developing best practices and measure their implementation and impact for individuals with cerebral palsy throughout North America.

Cerebral Palsy Research Network Clinical Registry: Methodology and Baseline Report.

OBJECTIVE: To apply practice-based evidence to clinical management of cerebral palsy (CP). The process of establishing purpose, structure, logistics, and elements of a multi-institutional registry and the baseline characteristics of initial enrollees are reported. DESIGN: A consensus-building process among consumers, clinicians, and researchers used a participatory action process. SETTING: Community, hospitals, and universities. PARTICIPANTS: More than 100 clinicians, researchers, and consumers and more than 1858 enrollees in the registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Consensus was that the purpose of registry was to (1) quantify practice variation, (2) facilitate quality improvement (QI), and (3) perform comparative effectiveness research (CER). Collecting data during routine clinical care using the electronic medical record was determined to be a sustainable plan for data acquisition and management. Clinicians from multiple disciplines defined salient characteristics of individuals and interventions for the registry elements. The registry was central to the clinical research network, and a leadership structure was created. A leading electronic health record platform adopted the registry elements. Twenty-four sites have initiated the data collection process and agreed to export data to the registry. Currently 12 are collecting data. Number of enrollees and characteristics were similar to other population registers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multi-institutional CP registry that contains the patient and treatment characteristics needed for QI and CER. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network registry elements are implemented in a versatile electronic platform and minimize burden to clinicians. The resultant registry is available for any institution to participate and is growing rapidly.