[Psychometric Testing of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised in Patients With Stroke].

BACKGROUND: No tool is currently available to evaluate the ability of patients with stroke to return to being productive members of their community. PURPOSE: This study was designed to translate the Community Integration Scale-Revised into traditional Chinese (TC-CIQR) and to verify the reliability and validity of this scale in patients with stroke. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design using convenient sampling was adopted in this study. All of the participants were patients undergoing treatment at neurological outpatient clinics and a rehabilitation department of a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. The eligibility criterion was having been diagnosed with stroke for more than three months. The measurement tools used to collect data included an information sheet, the Chinese versions of the Franche Activity Index, EuroQol-5 dimensions, and TC-CIQR. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four stroke survivors with a mean age of 67.48 years were enrolled as participants. Approximately 60% of the participants were male and over 80% had experienced a stroke of mild severity. The 18-item TC-CIQR yielded strong correlations with the total score of the Franche Activity Index (r = .49 to .83) and CEQ-visual analogue scale (r = .52). The internal consistency of the TC-CIQR (Cronbach's α coefficients = .91) was excellent, and test-retest reliability was .99, indicating the tool has acceptable reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The TC-CIQR was shown to have acceptable reliability and validity. Healthcare providers may integrate the TC-CIQR into clinical practice as an effective tool for evaluating the ability of patients with stroke who are undergoing rehabilitation to return to the community.

Validation study of the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for individuals with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Chinese version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R-C) for individuals with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center. PARTICIPANTS: 317 adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation center in Mainland China. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. METHODS: The CIQ-R-C (including an additional e-shopping item), global QoL, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were administered. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Good item-domain correlations were found for 15 of the 16-item original CIQ-R, except for item 10 (leisure alone or with others). Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a construct of the CIQ-R-C (excluding item 10) as made of four domains (CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.06): home, social engagement, digital social networking, and traditional social networking. Good internal consistency and test-retest reliability were observed in the total and the home subscale of the CIQ-R-C. Satisfactory construct validity was shown by the correlation analysis among the CIQ-R-C Scale, SAS/SDS, global QoL, and MSPSS. CONCLUSION: The CIQ-R-C Scale is valid and reliable, and can be used to assess community integration of individuals with spinal cord injury in China.

Utility of the Croatian translation of the community integration questionnaire-revised in a sample of adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: To examine the utility of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised, translated into Croatian, in a sample of adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. METHOD: The Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised was administered to a sample of 88 adults with traumatic brain injury and to a control sample matched by gender, age and education. Participants with traumatic brain injury were divided into four subgroups according to injury severity. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised was satisfactory. The differences between the group with traumatic brain injury and the control group were statistically significant for the overall Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised score, as well as for all the subscales apart from the Home Integration subscale. The community Integration Questionnaire-Revised score varied significantly for subgroups with different severity of traumatic brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the Croatian translation of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised is useful in assessing participation in adults with traumatic brain injury and confirm previous findings that severity of injury predicts community integration. Results of the new Electronic Social Networking scale indicate that persons who are more active on electronic social networks report better results for other domains of community integration, especially social activities. Implications for rehabilitation The Croatian translation of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised is a valid tool for long-term assessment of participation in various domains in persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury Persons with traumatic brain injury who are more active in the use of electronic social networking are also more integrated into social and productivity domains. Targeted training in the use of new technologies could enhance participation after traumatic brain injury.