Concomitant ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: combined energy versus cryoablation alone.

Background: Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation has been the most efficient treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Combined energy (CE) ablation and cryoablation alone (CA) are the most common energy modes used for ablation, however, comparative data is lacking. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of CE ablation with CA in the setting of concomitant biatrial ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 453 patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergone concomitant biatrial ablation from November 2007 to December 2022 during elective cardiac surgery using either combined bipolar radiofrequency with cryoenergy or cryoenergy alone was performed. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance the covariates in the groups. Results: There were 157 patients per group after matching. CE ablation was associated with lower odds of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.91, p = 0.040), a significantly lower rate of hospital readmissions due to rhythm disruption (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.65, p < 0.001), and lower cumulative incidence of stroke (SHR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.97, p = 0.043). No significant difference in permanent pacemaker implantation was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In the setting of concomitant biatrial ablation for non-paroxysmal AF, combined bipolar radiofrequency and cryoablation appear to be a superior treatment modality compared to cryoablation alone in achieving long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmias, in reducing arrhythmia-related hospital readmissions and ischemic strokes.

Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives. METHODS: Adult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included. RESULTS: Among 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported "very comfortable/frequently use" cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery With Concomitant Cox Maze Procedure Is as Effective as a Median Sternotomy With Decreased Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: A right minithoracotomy (RMT) is a minimally invasive surgical approach that has been increasingly performed for the concomitant Cox maze IV procedure (CMP) and mitral valve surgery (MVS). Little is known regarding whether long-term rhythm and survival outcomes are affected by the RMT as compared with the traditional median sternotomy (MS) approach. METHODS: Between April 2004 and April 2021, 377 patients underwent the concomitant CMP and MVS, of whom 38% had RMT. Propensity score matching yielded 116 pairs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) was assessed with prolonged monitoring annually for 8 years. Survival, rhythm, and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The unmatched RMT cohort had a greater freedom from ATA recurrence at 1 year (99% vs 90%, P = 0.001) and 3 years (94% vs 86%, P = 0.045). The matched RMT cohort had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (median: 215 [199 to 253] vs 170 [136 to 198] min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp (110 [98 to 124] vs 86 [71 to 102] min, P < 0.001) times but shorter intensive care time (48 [24 to 95] vs 71 [26 to 144] h, P = 0.001) and length of stay (8 [6 to 11] vs 10 [7 to 14] h, P < 0.001). More pacemakers (18% vs 4%, P < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (57% vs 41%, P = 0.014) occurred in the MS cohort. The 30-day mortality (P = 0.651) and 8-year survival (P = 0.072) was not significantly different between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Early 1-year and 3-year freedom from ATA recurrence was better in the RMT cohort compared with the MS cohort. Despite longer operative times, the RMT cohort had shorter lengths of stay, fewer postoperative transfusions, and fewer pacemakers placed.

Concomitant electromagnetic navigation transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is safe, time-saving, and cost-effective.

Objectives: Transbronchial microwave ablation of lung nodules using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is an emerging local therapy for lung oligometastases and multifocal lung cancers as part of a lung-preserving strategy. Concomitant ablation of multiple lung nodules in a single operating session may provide a one-stop solution. Methods: Between April 2019 and April 2023, 25 patients had 2 or more lung nodules ablated concomitantly in our hybrid operating room. Nodules were proven or highly suspicious of malignancies or metastases. Feasibility and safety were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 56 nodules in 25 patients received concomitant multi-nodular ablation. The mean age of patients was 60 years, and the reasons for the lung-preserving strategy were multifocal lung cancers (80%) and lung oligometastases (20%). Among those with multifocal disease, 65% had previous major lung resection for lung cancer. Two to 4 nodules were ablated in each session. The mean nodule size was 9.9 mm (range, 5-20 mm), and the mean minimal margin was 5.9 mm. When comparing concomitant nodule ablation with the 103 single-nodule ablations performed in our institute, a mean of 86 minutes of operative time and 131 minutes of anesthetic time were saved. There were no increased complications despite overlapping ablation zones, and the mean hospital stay was 1.23 days. The rate of pneumothorax was 8%, and that of pleural effusion, pain, and fever was 4% respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is feasible, safe, and associated with reduction in overall anesthetic and operative time. It is an important armamentarium in the contemporary lung-preserving strategy for battling multifocal lung cancers or lung oligometastases.

Permanent pacemaker implantation after valve and arrhythmia surgery in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Among patients referred for cardiac surgery, atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity and a risk factor for postoperative arrhythmias (eg, sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular heart block), including those requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and long-term survival of postoperative PPM implantation in patients with preoperative AF who underwent valve surgery with or without concomitant procedures. METHODS: Presented analysis pertains to the HEIST (HEart surgery In atrial fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia) registry. During the study period, 11,949 patients underwent valvular (aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve replacement or repair) surgery and/or surgical ablation (SA) and were stratified according to postoperative PPM status. RESULTS: PPM implantation after surgery was necessary in 2.5% of patients, with significant variation depending on the type of surgery (from 1.1% in mitral valve repair to 3.3% in combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery). In a multivariate logistic regression model, tricuspid intervention (P <.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = .024), and endocarditis (P = .014) were shown to be risk factors for PPM. Over long-term follow-up, PPM was not associated with increased mortality compared to no PPM (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.19; P = .679). SA was not associated with PPM implantation. However, SA improved survival regardless of PPM status (log rank P <.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with preoperative AF, the need for PPM implantation after valve surgery or SA is not an infrequent outcome, with SA not affecting its prevalence but actually improving long-term survival.

Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Procedures During Cardiac Surgery in a UK Center: Reflection of Worldwide Practice?

Background: Guidelines recommend concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation during cardiac surgery to restore normal sinus rhythm (NSR). The study determines, to what extent patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery at our institution received a concomitant AF procedure, what these procedures entailed, and short-term outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study of 2,984 patients undergoing cardiac surgery over 18 months. Patients who were in preoperative AF were identified and those who underwent a concomitant AF procedure (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). Results: Three hundred and thirteen (10.5%) patients had pre-operative AF; paroxysmal (19.5%), persistent (11.8%), longstanding (63%), unknown (5.8%). 116/313 (37.1%) patients had a concomitant AF procedure: 7.7% patients had a concomitant AF ablation and 29.4% had only a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO). Fewer patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF underwent concomitant AF procedures compared with the ones who had no AF procedures (6.7 vs. 12.8% and 17.6 vs. 31%, respectively). Greater in-hospital survival (99.1 vs. 93.9%, p = 0.025) and survival at a mean follow up of 6 weeks (97.4 vs. 89.3%, p = 0.09) was probably determined by patient's preoperative comorbidities. There were no differences in readmission rates, permanent pacemaker insertion, cerebral events or NSR at discharge or follow-up, between groups. Conclusions: In our center, concomitant AF ablation is performed only in 7.7% of cases, 29.4% had only an LAAO performed at the time of surgery. There was no difference in restoring NSR, cerebral events, or readmission rates compared with patients who had nothing done for their preoperative AF.