RESUMO
A 50-year-old gentleman with old anterior wall myocardial infarction with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD, Abbott Medical, Fortify ST VR 1235-40) presented with recurrent appropriate ICD shock. The ICD stored EGM indicated a possibility of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) rather than ventricular tachycardia (VT) when the morphology match was found high. Bundle brunch re-entry (BBR) VT was another differential. An EP study conducted on antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) induced reproducible but only ill-sustained tachycardia too short to perform any SVT maneuvers during tachycardia. However, critical analysis of the tachycardia electrograms suggested atypical AVNRT as the most likely mechanism. The other differentials were atrial tachycardia (AT) and BBR VT. Manoeuvres during sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing excluded other diagnosis. A single point radiofrequency ablation (RFA) near the SP region cured the arrhythmia. The reason for misclassification of SVT as VT was also sought for. It was found that the shocks were received due to fulfilment of 2/3 criteria (sudden onset and regular tachycardia). Hence, he received therapy despite an appropriate morphology match favouring SVT. This is one of the known limitations of ICDs where regular SVTs (AVNRT/AVRT or AT) may receive inappropriate ICD therapies. After slow pathway modification there was no further recurrence of either SVT or VT; hence , a substrate modification was deferred.