Ureteral reimplantation after deflux failure for vesicoureteral reflux in renal transplant.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of ureteral reimplantation (UR) after failure of endoscopic treatment for symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study that included all renal transplant recipients with failure of Deflux™ as first-line treatment of VUR from January 2007 to December 2020. Failure of Deflux™ was defined by: VUR on retrograde cystography and at least one acute pyelonephritis of the renal graft. The preferred surgical treatment was native ureteropyelostomy (NPUS) in the recent years. If the native ureter could not be used, ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) was performed. The primary outcome was the clinical efficacy of UR defined as the absence of acute graft pyelonephritis during follow-up. RESULTS: Out of 1565 kidney transplantations, 119 (7.6%) had symptomatic VUR treated with bulking agent. 35 (29.4%) had Deflux™ failure and were addressed to UR: 21/35 (60%) NPUS and 14/35 (40%) UNC. The median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay were 120 mL, 90 min, and 7 days, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.1 (IQR 4.1-9.8) years, UR was clinically successful in a total of 32 patients (91.4%): 20 (95.2%) and 12 (85.7%) patients in the NPUS and UNC groups, respectively (p = 0.55). Three (8.5%) high-grade complications have been reported. No nephrectomy of native kidney was required in the NPUS group. CONCLUSIONS: After failure of Deflux™ for VUR of renal graft, surgical treatment with native ureteropyelostomy or ureteroneocystostomy is associated to a high success rate and few high-grade complications.

Long-term results of endoscopic treatment in vesicoureteral reflux after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term clinical outcomes and identify factors predicting success of endoscopic treatment for symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who had a symptomatic VUR after renal transplantation at our centre between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. VUR was documented by retrograde cystography and was determined by at least one episode of acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN). Endoscopic injections of polydimethylsiloxane (MacroPlastique™) or dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux™) were performed by expert urologists via rigid cystoscopy with a bevelled needle system. The results of endoscopic treatment were evaluated by cystography at three months. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy as defined by the absence of AGPN during follow-up. Radiological success was defined by the absence of VUR at the three months follow-up cystography. RESULTS: Out of 2135 kidney transplantations, a total of 117 (5.5%) patients had symptomatic VUR: 100 (85.5%) underwent Deflux™ and 17 (14.5%) MacroPlastique™. Preoperative high-grade VUR was recorded in 71% of patients. One postoperative complication was observed, Clavien > II. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (IQR 6.5-14.4), clinical success was achieved in 73 patients (62.4%). Radiological success was obtained in 42 patients (36%). Multivariable analysis failed to identify predictors of endoscopic treatment success, which was independent of the preoperative grade of VUR and the type of bulking agent used. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of VUR is a simple and well-tolerated procedure with long-term clinical efficacy.

Ureteral Obstruction After Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Does the Type of Injected Bulking Agent Matter?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endoscopic injection of bulking agents for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has become a therapeutic alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis and ureteral reimplantation. Although considered as a safe and efficient procedure, several studies have reported cases of ureteral obstruction (UO) after endoscopic correction of VUR. This review article evaluates the present VUR literature to estimate the incidence of UO following endoscopic injection of different substances, while also discussing the impact of injection technique and implant volume. RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-five publications were identified that provided detailed information on 64 females and 32 males (age range, 7 months-48 years) that developed UO after endoscopic treatment of VUR using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA), polyacrylate polyalcohol (PP), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or collagen. There was some variation in the reported incidence of UO among these materials: Dx/HA (0.5-6.1%), PP (1.1-1.6%), PDMS (2.5-10.0%), CaHA (1.0%), and PTFE (0.3%). Postoperative UO was described following subureteric transurethral injection (STING), intraureteric hydrodistension implantation technique (HIT), combined HIT/STING and double HIT. The injected volume ranged widely, also depending on the type of bulking agent: Dx/HA (0.3-3.0 mL), PP (0.3-1.2 mL), PDMS (1.0-2.2 mL), CaHA (0.4-0.6 mL), and PTFE (1.5-2.0 mL). The timing of UO varied from immediately after the procedure to 63 months. Over half of patients showed asymptomatic hydroureteronephrosis on follow-up imaging, whereas the remaining presented with symptoms of acute UO or fever. UO remains a rare complication after endoscopic correction of VUR, generally reported in less than 1% of treated cases, which appears to be independent of the injected substance, volume, and technique. However, long-term follow-up is recommended as asymptomatic or delayed UO can occur, potentially leading to deterioration of renal function.

Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid as First Line Treatment in 851 Consecutive Children with High Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux: Efficacy and Long-Term Results.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid is widely acknowledged as first line treatment of lower grade vesicoureteral reflux. We demonstrate its long-term efficacy and safety in eradicating high grade reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 518 girls and 333 boys with a median age of 2.3 years (range 2 months to 13.7 years) underwent endoscopic correction of high grade vesicoureteral reflux using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid. Reflux was unilateral in 415 cases and bilateral in 436, comprising 1,287 refluxing units. Reflux was grade IV in 1,153 ureters (89.6%) and grade V in 134 (10.4%). 99mTechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy identified renal scarring in 317 patients (37.3%). Followup ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram were performed 3 months after intervention and renal ultrasound yearly thereafter. Median followup was 8.5 years (range 6 months to 16 years). RESULTS: Overall resolution rate after the first endoscopic injection was 69.5% (895 of 1,287 cases), with resolution in 70.4% of grade IV and 61.9% of grade V cases. Reflux resolved after a second injection in 259 cases (20.1%) and after a third injection in 133 (10.4%). Persistent reflux after initial treatment was significantly more common in patients younger than age 1 year and in individuals with renal scarring. No significant postoperative complications were observed and no patient required ureteral reimplantation. Following reflux resolution febrile urinary tract infection developed in 43 children (5.1%), including 24 (55.8%) during the first year, 15 (34.9%) during the second year and 4 (9.3%) during year 3 or later. Of these patients 6 had reflux recurrence and 8 had neocontralateral grade III reflux, which was successfully treated with a single endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid is an efficient and safe long-term treatment for grade IV and V vesicoureteral reflux, and can easily be repeated in patients with treatment failure with a high subsequent resolution rate.

[Transurethral Injection Using Deflux for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Three Adult Women with Frequent Febrile Urinary Tract Infections].

We report three patients with frequent febrile urinary tract infections (fUTI) who underwent transurethral injection therapy with Deflux for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The first case was in a 52-yearold woman who was initially diagnosed with right grade II and left grade I VUR at 18 years of age. She frequently experienced fUTI due to VUR. The second case was in a 29-year-old woman. At age 23,she was diagnosed with right grade III VUR when she developed fUTI. After that,she repeatedly developed fUTI. The third case was in a 40-year-old woman who had frequently experienced fUTI since 25 years of age and had gradually become antibiotics-resistant. She was diagnosed with right grade III VUR when she was referred to our hospital. No visible reflux was confirmed by postoperative voiding cystourethrography after the patients underwent transurethral injection using Deflux. One patient developed fUTI once after surgery,but there were no perioperative complications and no recurrences. Transurethral injection using Deflux for VUR might therefore be safe and effective for treating VUR in adult female patients.

[A CASE OF DEXTRANOMER-HYALURONIC ACID COPOLYMER (Deflux®) IMPLANTS CALCIFICATION MIMICKING DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI].

Since 2011, endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux using dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux®) has been widely accepted in Japan due to its safety and minimally invasive nature. However, long-term complications are unknown. We present a case of Deflux® implants calcification mimicking distal ureteral calculi in a 12-year-old boy with a history of Deflux® injection performed at three years of age for primary VUR. We should be aware of this complication to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary invasive examination such as radiological imaging or endoscopy.

Ureteric patency after Deflux® injection for the treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in children confirmed by a novel epidural catheter-assisted endoscopic technique.

PURPOSE: We present EDCAT (epidural catheter-assisted Deflux(®) treatment) for treating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and confirming ureteric patency after Deflux(®) treatment. METHODS: We treated 147 ureters in 101 children (M:F 62:39; VUR ≤ grade III: n = 72; VUR ≥ grade IV: n = 75) using EDCAT between 2011 and 2014. EDCAT involves injecting 1-3 mL of diluted indigo carmine solution through an epidural anesthesia catheter inserted into the Deflux(®)-treated ureter and observing for up to 15 min to confirm patency. RESULTS: For EDCAT, mean age was 4.9 years and mean operative time was 30.1 ± 12.1 min; overall cure of VUR after initial treatment was 87.7 % for VUR grades I-V, 88.9 % for VUR ≤ grade III, and 86.6 % for VUR ≥ grade IV; VUR was cured in 129/147 after 1 treatment, 7/18 after 2 treatments, 7/11 after 3 treatments, and persistent in 4/4. We experienced 1 case of obstruction after an EDCAT catheter was removed before confirming patency. EDCAT catheters were left overnight in 2 ureters in 2 cases when patency could not be confirmed after 15 min to prevent obstruction. Both did not develop obstruction. Four ureters with recurrence of VUR (all grade ≤ II) are being observed. CONCLUSION: EDCAT allows ureteric patency to be confirmed immediately and prevents obstruction.

The Effectiveness of Deflux® Treatment for Vesicoureteral Reflux Following Pediatric Renal Transplantation: A Single-Institution Challenging Experience.

PURPOSE: To validate the effectiveness of Deflux® treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) following pediatric renal transplantation (RT), based on our single-institution experience. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of pediatric patients who underwent Deflux® treatment for VUR after RT from April 2008 to March 2022. RESULTS: Sixty-eight pediatric patients underwent RT. VUR was subsequently detected in 22 (32 %) of these patients. Seven of the 22 patients (32 %) underwent Deflux® treatment to avoid renal dysfunction due to urinary infection (UTI). The median age at the time of RT was 4 years (range:2-12). All 7 patients had urinary UTIs before Deflux® treatment. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before Deflux® treatment was 67 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range:42-138 ml/min/1.73 m2). After Deflux® treatment, VUR was downgraded in three cases (43 %). Four patients (57 %) experienced postoperative UTI, two of who underwent a second Deflux® treatment, one underwent submuscular tunnel reconstruction, and the other one experienced UTI without VUR after 1st Deflux® treatment but did not reoccur. All seven patients continued prophylactic medication after Deflux® treatment, without any history of recurrent UTIs during the observation period after treatment (median 37 months [range 7-86 months]). Furthermore, the eGFRs did not significantly decrease after Deflux® treatment (median eGFR 58 ml/min/1.73 m2 [range:33-99 ml/min/1.73 m2], p > 0.1). CONCLUSION: Deflux® treatment for VUR after RT is technically challenging because the new ureteral orifice is ventrally anastomosed at the bladder. We believe our results indicate the possibility of reducing the frequency of UTIs and contributing to preservation of the renal function after RT. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Recurrence of vesico-ureteral reflux in children: is still the endoscopic injection the best option?

Background: Endoscopic injection (EI) is a safe treatment for vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) in children, but recurrences are not insignificant. This study aims to show if multiple EI is still the best first line management even if in case of recurrences. Methods: All patients affected by primary VUR, treated with at least one EI and with at least 5 years follow up were included. All general data were analyzed. Recurrence rate after one, two and three EIs were calculated. Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients (total number =210) were healed after 1 injection, 28 after 2 and 4 after 3 with a global success rate of 91.90%. Recurrence rate is higher in patients older than 3 years old and with IV and V reflux grade. Even if 67.7% of recurrent VUR after one injection was symptomatic, diagnosis of recurrences after multiple EI was mainly radiological. Only 8% of the patients underwent EI need an anti-reflux surgery. Conclusions: Thanks to its low costs and the acceptable recurrence rate, Deflux EI should be proposed as the first therapeutic approach for children affected by VUR, especially in those with low and moderate grades of VUR. Multiple injections could be contraindicated only in older children thank 1 year with high-grade VUR (IV symptomatic and V grade).

Endoscopic treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux: Experience of 99 ureteric moieties.

AIMS: To study the outcome of endoscopic hyaluronic acid/dextranomer injection in patients with vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three children were evaluated with a median follow up of 18 months (12-55 months) before injecting hyaluronic acid/dextranomer in a total of 99 ureteric moieties. Median age at presentation was 24 months (6-72 months). Primary VUR was the main presenting diagnosis in 60%. Patients were monitored for urinary tract infection (UTI), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal scarring, persistence, or appearance of contra-lateral reflux. RESULTS: Grade III VUR was the most common (38%) followed by Grade IV (24%), Grade V (17%), Grade II (14%), and Grade I (7%). Most common cause for VUR was Primary (60%), followed by posterior urethral valve (PUV) (19%), bladder exstrophy (5%), anorectal malformation (ARM), epispadias, and duplex system. Analysis of patients characteristics at presentation revealed renal scarring (40%), split renal functions <35% (35%), recurrent UTI (15%), GFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (15%), serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL (10%). Complete resolution (100%) of Grade I and Grade II VUR was achieved after single injection. For Grade III VUR, single injection resolved reflux in 85.5% ureters, 100% resolution was seen after 2(nd) injection. In Grade IV VUR, 1(st) injection resolved VUR in 83.3% ureters, 95.8% ureters were reflux free after 2(nd) injection, and 100% resolution was seen after 3(rd) injection. In Grade V VUR, 94% ureters showed absent reflux after three injections. CONCLUSION: Hyaluronic acid/dextranomer injection holds promise even in higher grades of VUR.

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux): Single-surgeon experience with 48 ureters.

PURPOSE: VUR is a common urologic problem in children. Cystoscopic injection of bulking agents (most commonly Deflux) has gained popularity as the first line treatment in the west. However, primarily due to cost factors, it has not gained much popularity in our country. We present our initial experience with cystoscopic Deflux injection for VUR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our 3-yr experience with the use of Dx/HA (Deflux) for correction of VUR in children and adolescents. All children were evaluated with Ultrasound, MCUG and DMSA renal cortical scan. The indications for surgical correction of VUR included breakthrough infections while on antibiotic prophylaxis, persistent high-grade VUR beyond 3 yrs of age, and presence of significant renal damage on DMSA at diagnosis (in those children presenting with UTI). All children underwent cystoscopic Deflux injection using the standard technique of subureteral injection (0.4-1 ml per ureter). All children received antibiotic prophylaxis for 3-6 months after the injection. USG was done at 1 month and MCUG at 3-6 months after the injection. RESULTS: 33 patients (48 ureters) underwent cystoscopic Deflux injection for correction of VUR. Mean age was 4.5 yrs (1-17 yrs); there were 12 boys and 21 girls. Thirteen children had antenatally diagnosed HDN, while 20 children presented with febrile UTI. All children had primary VUR except one child with persistent VUR 4 yrs after PUV fulguration. The VUR was grade 1-2 in 8, grade 3-4 in 37, and grade 5 in 3 ureters. Every child had at least one ureter with dilating reflux (grades 3,4 or 5). When present, low grade VUR (grade 1or 2) was always on the contralateral side. Only one child received a 2(nd) injection after 6 months. Follow-up MCUG was done in 28 children (41 ureters). Complete reflux resolution was achieved in 27 ureters (65%), and the reflux was downgraded in 2 (5%). There were no complications of Deflux injection. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic correction of VUR in children is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for VUR. It stops or downgrades VUR in 70% of ureters. At present, we recommend it as a first-line treatment for grades 1-4 VUR requiring surgical management. Cost is the major factor limiting its use in our country.

A Rare and Late Complication of Subureteric Teflon Injection With Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid/Dextranomer Gel.

Primary non-syndromic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the commonest paediatric anomaly of the urinary tract. Complications of high-grade VUR include recurrent urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, reflux nephropathy, and irreversible renal failure. The primary aim of its management centres on minimizing the number of urinary tract infections and renal scarring via surgical correction or continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. A rare complication of surgical treatment by subureteric Teflon injection with non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel (NASHA/Dx) is ureteric obstruction. We report the case of a 38-year-old female who was diagnosed with ureteric obstruction secondary to subureteric injection with Deflux injection 30 years after endoscopic correction of VUR. She was successfully treated with ureteric reimplantation. Although considered efficient and safe, subureteric injection of bulking agent Deflux can be associated with delayed ureteric obstruction. This case highlights the need for long-term follow-up to allow timely detection and management of delayed ureteric obstruction. The possibility of late complication must also be addressed when obtaining pre-operative informed consent.

Deflux® Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) in Japan.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to present the results of a multi-institutional outcome analysis conducted to determine the extent of endoscopic Deflux® injection for treating primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan. Methods: A 22-question survey was distributed to 174 certified pediatric urologists (Ninteii in Japanese) and councilors of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Urology working at 140 centers to determine the usage and clinical efficacy of Deflux® for treating primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan. Results: Forty-three of 140 (30.7%) centers participated, which exceeded participation rates of 27.9 and 18.0% for similar surveys conducted in America in 2006 and 2014, respectively. Deflux® was administered at 43 centers using subureteral transurethral injection (n = 19; 44.2%), hydrodistention implantation (n = 5; 11.6%), or double hydrodistention implantation (n = 19; 44.2%) and was the first-line treatment for primary vesicoureteral reflux at 39 (90.7%) centers. Overall, 1,563 ureters were treated in 1,076 patients. The male:female ratio was 527:549; mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range: 3.2-8 years); mean age at diagnosis of primary vesicoureteral reflux was 4.2 years, and mean age at first Deflux® treatment was 6.2 years. Overall cure rates were 65.3% after one Deflux® treatment, 75.3% after two, and 77.3% after three. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-institutional outcome analysis of Deflux® usage for primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan.

High-grade vesicoureteral reflux in infants: Our experience with endoscopic subureteric injections.

BACKGROUND: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urological anomaly in pediatric patients. Management options for VUR vary from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) to surgery via either endoscopic subureteric injection of a bulking agent or open anti-reflux surgery. In this study, we assess the efficacy of subureteric injections of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid Copolymer (Deflux) in managing primary VUR in infant patients with high-grade VUR. METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, children less than 1-year-old with primary high-grade VUR were observed prospectively following the administration of endoscopic subureteric injections of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux). The diagnosis of VUR was based on MCUG, and all patients underwent a holistic clinical, laboratory, and radiological assessment before and after the intervention. Complete success was defined as the resolution of VUR on follow up 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 30 infants (50 renal units) with high-grade VUR (grades IV and V) were included in the study. The mean age at surgery was 6.3 ± 2.5 months. Most of the patients presented with a urinary tract infection (90%). Complete symptomatic relief was achieved in 27 patients (90%) at the first post-operative follow-up. Forty-four renal units received one injection, while six required a second injection as they did not meet our treatment success criteria. No patients required a third injection or referral for open surgery. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid Copolymer (Deflux) at the vesicoureteral junction is an effective minimally invasive intervention to treat high grades VUR (IV-V) infants.

A systematic review of outcomes of Deflux® treatment for vesicoureteral reflux following pediatric renal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after renal transplant in the pediatric population may be associated with an increased incidence of urinary tract infection (UTIs) leading to increased morbidity, including graft dysfunction and graft loss. The non-orthotopic location of the transplanted ureter, and lack of submucosal tunnel may pose challenges in correcting the VUR using endoscopic injection techniques. Herein we report the results of a systematic review evaluating the outcomes of endoscopic treatment of VUR using Deflux® in this population. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched from October 2001 to April 2019. Full-text English articles involving patients less than 18 years old at the time of transplant, with a diagnosis of VUR post-transplantation, who underwent Deflux® treatment were included. Figure 1 outlines our PRISMA-compliant search strategy. RESULTS: We found 6 eligible studies describing Deflux® treatment outcomes in 67 pediatric patients with post-transplant VUR where voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) confirmed the diagnosis and resolution of VUR. The mean success rate was 36.8%. Ureteral obstruction occurred in 7/67 cases (10.4%). In all these 7 cases of obstruction, ureteric stenting was the initial management, but was only successful in 1 patient. Open ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) was performed in 4/7 cases, while 2/7 were managed expectantly (unknown outcomes). Persistent VUR with UTI despite Deflux® were reported in 20 out of 67 cases. Of these, 7 were managed with prophylactic antibiotics, and 13 with UNC. Success rates were consistently low for UNC after failed Deflux® in comparison to redo UNC in transplant ureters without prior injection. CONCLUSION: Low success rates are seen following injection techniques for VUR after pediatric renal transplant. Although an appealing option, Deflux® may prove counterintuitive due to the high rate of obstruction and suboptimal results if open reimplantation is required. A multi-institutional prospective study with a larger population size may further elucidate these results.

Trends in the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in Finland in 2004-2014.

OBJECTIVES: Previous data on the trends of surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux outside USA are scarce. The aim of this study was to clarify the national trends of operative treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in Finland. METHODS: We analyzed national data from Finnish Care Register for Health Care on children (<16 years of age) surgically treated for VUR in 2004-2014. RESULTS: Endoscopic injections of the ureteral orifices were primarily performed for 1212 and open ureteral reimplantation for 272 children. The use of both types of surgery decreased during the study period (p = 0.0043 and p < 0.001, respectively). The median age at surgery for VUR was lower in those treated with open ureteral reimplantation than those with endoscopic injections of the ureteral orifices [3 and 4 years, respectively] (p = 0.0001). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer (median 9.9 days) with open ureteral reimplantation compared to that (median 1.3 days) with endoscopic injections (p < 0.0001) and did not change during the study period. Reoperations were significantly more common in patients who were primarily treated with endoscopic injections (n = 146/1072, 14%) than with ureteral reimplantation (n = 7/230, 3%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While the best treatment options for VUR remain debatable, operative treatment of VUR has become less common in Finland. HIGHLIGHTS Recent data on the trends of treatment of vesicoureteral reflux outside USA are scarce. Surgical treatment for vesicoureteral reflux decreased in Finland during the study period. The length of stay was longer but reoperations were needed less often with ureteral reimplantation compared to endoscopic injections.

Asymptomatic bilateral delayed ureteral obstruction following dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) injection for vesicoureteral reflux.: A case report.

We here present a case of a 4-year-old girl who exhibited an asymptomatic bilateral de novo hydroureteronephrosis seven months after undergoing endoscopic treatment for bilateral vesicoureteral reflux. The child underwent an open bilateral reimplantation. Intraoperatively, a 14 mm nodule on the right and a 16 mm on the left located periureteral orifice were observed. When a small incision was made on nodules, a yellowish-white mucinous fluid flowed out.

The color Doppler twinkling artifact of implants after endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: A common finding with high potential for misdiagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common therapeutic procedure in children. Over the last years several studies reported on calcified deflux implants that were misinterpreted as ureteral stones leading to unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. OBJECTIVE: Based on an own case, where a calcified implant with a strong twinkling artifact was misdiagnosed as a ureteral stone, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the sonographic imaging appearance of implants after endoscopic VUR repair with special emphasis on the color twinkling artifact. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 40 children (mean age 9.5 years) with 62 treated ureteral units follow-up sonography was performed after a mean time interval of 48.8 months after surgery. The injected deposit was evaluated with B-mode sonography and color Doppler sonography and deposit volume, posterior acoustic shadowing and the appearance and extension of the twinkling artifact were evaluated. RESULTS: 47 of 62 injected units (75.8%) could be identified on follow-up sonography. In 13 of 47 units (27.7%) posterior acoustic shadowing was noted. On color Doppler sonography a twinkling artifact appeared in 26 of the 47 visible cases (55.3%). There was a statistically significant correlation between a positive twinkling sign and the deposit age. CONCLUSION: In conclusion our study shows that the twinkling artifact is a common finding in follow-up sonography of children after endoscopic treatment of VUR. As the twinkling artifact is a sensitive imaging sign for the detection of ureteral calculi the risk of misinterpretation and mistreatment is given.

A rare and unusual complication of the STING procedure.

An 8-year-old boy underwent a STING procedure for vesicoureteric reflux. 11 years later, at 19-years-old he presented with the passage of sediment per urethra every 7 weeks. CT scan demonstrated a lesion at the right VUJ. Cystoscopy revealed a 2cm suburothelial mass adjacent to the VUJ, with normal urothelium overlying it. Resection of the area revealed a white plastic-like substance, consistent with the bulking agent Deflux, which was scraped away. The patient made an uneventful recovery and at review, 3 months later, is symptom free. Our case demonstrates a rare and unusual complication of the STING procedure. SECTION HEADINGS: Endourology, General Urology, Paediatrics.

Restoration of antegrade ejaculation after transurethral bladder neck injection of Deflux for retrograde ejaculation: a case report of natural conception.

Retrograde ejaculation contributes to male infertility. Pharmacotherapy has a limited role in retrograde ejaculation. Deflux, a viscous substance, consists of two components: dextranomer microspheres and stabilized hyaluronic acid for the treatment of children with vesicoureteral reflux. According to the published articles, the authors described the first case achieved not only restoration of antegrade ejaculation but also followed conception of the spouse after transurethral bladder neck injection of Deflux. A 30-year-old male kept infertile after 3 years of marriage. The patient reported that he could not ejaculate in an antegrade direction after puberty when he reached sexual climax. There was no semen expulsed from the urethral meatus. Medicine prescribed by a local hospital didn't restore normal ejaculation. Four embryos fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection developed well until transplantation, but none survived. The local reproductive center confirmed that his spouse preserved full capacity of fertility. He was diagnosed as retrograde ejaculation by real-time monitoring of transrectal ultrasound. He received transurethral bladder neck injection of Deflux. One month later, the patient restored antegrade ejaculation and the spouse of the patient conceived. During 18 months of follow-up, no related complications of the surgery have been observed. Transurethral bladder neck injection of Deflux can be considered as an alternative treatment method for retrograde ejaculation, and natural conception is possible thereafter.