Analysis of Incremental Sheet Forming of Aluminum Alloy.

Recent developments in incremental sheet forming have resulted in the creation of novel manufacturing processes that are highly adaptable and could bring significant economic benefits for advanced technologies and low-volume production. In this manuscript, the following variables were examined: the variation in the deformation forces for a part with a pyramidal trunk shape; the variation in the deformations and thinning of the Al 3003 material during the incremental forming process; and the variation in the accuracy of the incrementally formed part and the quality of the surfaces (surface roughness). The components of the forces in the incremental forming have increasing values from the beginning of the process to the maximum value due to the hardening process. The TiN-coated tool ensures lower values of the forming components. Due to the kinematics of the forming process, deviations, especially in shape, from the part in the drawing are observed, which are shown by the radius of curvature of the side wall of the part, the appearance of a radius of connection between the wall and the bottom of the part, as well as dimensional deviations that are expressed by the variation in the forming depth. Concerning the smoothness of the surfaces, it was observed that the best roughness results were obtained in the case of the TiN-coated tool.

Quantifying the Functional Stiffness of Pullthrough Wires Used for Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs Using Comparative Tension Dynamometry.

Objective: There are only few studies on the stiffness of guidewires used to deliver devices during endovascular procedures, particularly abdominal/thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. In certain situations, tensioned pullthrough wires are also used, but no studies have examined their effective/functional stiffness. The objective of this study was to assess the radial stiffness characteristics of pullthrough wires compared with standard stiff wires. Methods: Two types of stiff guidewires (Lunderquist Extra-Stiff and Amplatz Super Stiff; 0.035″ × 260 cm), were compared with a floppy guidewire (Radifocus Stiff M; 0.035″ × 260 cm) in two configurations: standard (non-tensioned) and pullthrough (tensioned). Radial stiffness was defined as the peak deformation force (PDF; newtons [N]) needed to deform the wires on an electromechanical dynamometer; data were logged on proprietary dynamometric software and peak load values assessed per wire. Three experimental runs were performed on three fresh sets of each wire per configuration. PDFs from straight configuration to midwire deformation at 15 mm were translated into Microsoft Excel for statistical analysis in Minitab 19 for Windows. Results: Mean ± SD PDFs were 7.83 ± 0.23 N for the Lunderquist and 9.87 ± 0.92 N for the Amplatz. This was 7.84 ± 0.52 N for the Radifocus wire in standard configuration, which increased to 15.48 ± 0.33 N when the Radifocus wire was in pullthrough configuration. This was significantly higher than both the Lunderquist and Amplatz Super Stiff wires (p < .001, one way analysis of variance). Conclusion: This study affirmed that a pullthrough wire becomes functionally more rigid than typical stiff wires used for endovascular procedures, and it is this stiffness that allows device delivery.