Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A Single Center Experience. / [Artículo traducido]Eficacia y seguridad de dupilumab para el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica grave en la práctica clínica: experiencia en un centro terciario.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.

Spanish Version of the RECAP Questionnaire to Assess Control of Atopic Eczema: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Correlations with Other Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. / Traducción, adaptación transcultural, correlación con otros PRO y validación del cuestionario RECAP sobre el grado de control de la dermatitis atópica.

BACKGROUND: The 7-item RECAP (Recap of Atopic Eczema) questionnaire is used to assess the control of different degrees of eczema severity in patients of all ages. Long-term control of eczema is one of the 4 core outcome domains to be assessed in clinical trials of eczema therapies. After the RECAP was developed in the United Kingdom, it was translated into Chinese, German, Dutch, and French. OBJECTIVES: To produce a validated Spanish version of the RECAP questionnaire and, secondarily, to test its content validity in a group of Spanish patients with atopic eczema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a 7-step process we produced 2forward translations and 1back translation of the RECAP questionnaire. Experts then held two meetings to reach consensus and draft a Spanish version of the questionnaire. Fifteen adult patients with atopic eczema were interviewed to evaluate the comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the drafted items. These patients also completed the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Stata software (version 16) was then used to explore the correlations between the patients' scores on these tools and the RECAP. RESULTS: The patients found the Spanish version of the RECAP to be comprehensible and easy to answer. We observed a strong correlation between results on the Spanish RECAP and the ADCT, and highly significant correlations between the RECAP and the DLQI and POEM tools. CONCLUSIONS: The culturally adapted Spanish version of the RECAP is linguistically equivalent to the original version of the questionnaire. RECAP scores correlate highly with other patient-reported outcome measures.

Epidemiological, Clinical, and Allergy Profile of Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and Hand Eczema: Evaluation of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC). / Perfil epidemiológico, clínico, y alérgico en pacientes con dermatitis atópica y dermatitis de las manos. Evaluación del Registro Español de Dermatitis de Contacto (REIDAC).

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but few studies have described the characteristics of these patients in large, representative populations from different geographic regions and occupational settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological, clinical, and allergy profile of patients with hand eczema who underwent patch testing and compare patients with and without AD. METHODS: Analysis of data from the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry, a multicenter registry of patients who undergo patch testing in Spain. RESULTS: We included 1466 patients with hand eczema who were patch tested between January 2018 and June 2020. Those with AD were younger and had had symptoms for longer before testing. They were also more likely to have been exposed to occupational triggers (38% vs 53% for patients without AD). The only profession for which significant differences were found was hairdressing. The most common allergens were nickel sulfate, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, cobalt chloride, potassium dichromate, fragrance mixes I and II, and formaldehyde. The most common diagnoses were allergic contact dermatitis (24% vs 31% in patients with and without AD, P=.0224) and irritant contact dermatitis (18% and 35% respectively, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: AD is common in patients with predominant hand eczema who undergo patch testing. Patients with hand eczema and AD have different clinical and epidemiological characteristics to hand eczema patients in general and their final diagnosis following patch testing is also different.

Treatment of Human Scabies with Oral Ivermectin. Eczematous Eruptions as a New Non-Reported Adverse Event.

BACKGROUND: Oral ivermectin is an alternative therapy for human scabies infection due to its ease of administration and good safety profile. However, there is no definitive consensus on the optimal dosing regimen. OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment of human scabies with different dosages of oral ivermectin and the possible adverse events. METHODS: 23 patients with human scabies were treated with oral ivermectin: 10 patients received a single oral dose of 200µg/kg and 13 a dose of 400µg/kg. A second, or even a third dose, was administered in cases of treatment failure. RESULTS: A complete clinical response was achieved by all of the patients. The first ten patients required at least two (80%) or three (20%) doses of ivermectin for complete resolution of the infection. The remaining cases resolved with a single 400µg/kg oral dose. Within the first 72h after the administration of oral ivermectin, new cutaneous lesions were observed in eleven patients (47.8%). Cutaneous biopsies showed signs of subacute eczema. The eruption was treated with topical corticosteroids and emollient therapy. There was no other new drug administration or a history of irritants. There was no history of atopic diathesis except for one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ivermectin is an effective therapy for the treatment of human scabies. A single 400µg/kg oral dose demonstrated high efficacy and good tolerance. However, the appearance of eczematous cutaneous lesions induced by oral ivermectin has not previously been reported in the literature. Dermatologists should be aware of this possible adverse event.

Differential Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders Associated with Moderate to Severe Refractory Eczema and Elevated Immunoglobulin E.

The association of moderate to severe eczema and elevated plasma levels of immunoglobulin E is a characteristic not only of atopic dermatitis but also of various genodermatoses: hyperimmunoglobulin E syndromes, Omenn syndrome, Netherton syndrome, peeling skin syndrome type B, severe dermatitis, multiple allergies, and metabolic wasting syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, prolidase deficiency, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, IPEX syndrome, STAT5B deficiency, and pentasomy X. The clinical presentation of these genodermatoses -typically in children- is consistent with severe atopic dermatitis. Immunoglobulin E is elevated from birth and response to conventional treatments is poor. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that these genodermatoses often share other clinical manifestations and laboratory findings. We present practical guidelines for differentiating among these various entities, with the aim of helping physicians decide what type of genetic test should be carried out -and when- in order to establish a definitive diagnosis.

Hair cosmetics: dyes.

Hair plays a significant role in body image, and its appearance can be changed relatively easily without resort to surgical procedures. Cosmetics and techniques have therefore been used to change hair appearance since time immemorial. The cosmetics industry has developed efficient products that can be used on healthy hair or act on concomitant diseases of the hair and scalp. Dyes embellish the hair by bleaching or coloring it briefly, for temporary periods of longer duration, or permanently, depending on the composition of a dye (oxidative or nonoxidative) and its degree of penetration of the hair shaft. The dermatologist's knowledge of dyes, their use, and their possible side effects (contact eczema, cancer, increased porosity, brittleness) can extend to an understanding of cosmetic resources that also treat hair and scalp conditions.

Management of refractory telaprevir-induced dermatitis using oral corticosteroids.

We present a series of 12 patients with telaprevir-induced skin toxicity. Some patients presented eczematous lesion, while others presented nonscaling macular lesions that became more purpuric in the lower limbs. Seven of the 12 patients had skin lesions affecting more than 50% of the body surface area, but none had systemic manifestations. Oral corticosteroids, prescribed in 7 patients, produced symptomatic improvement, and the response to the antiviral treatment in these patients was good. The 3 biopsies performed showed a superficial perivascular dermatitis with foci of red cell extravasation. Monitoring is central to the management of skin reactions secondary to the protease inhibitors, as severe drug eruptions have been reported. Treatment is usually symptomatic. We describe 7 cases in which oral corticosteroids-whose use continues to be controversial -were administered as a last resort for the control of pruritus.

Allergic contact dermatitis due to nickel: descriptive study in a tertiary hospital, 2000-2010.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study based on the records of the dermatology department of a tertiary referral hospital was to describe patients treated for allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel between 2000 and 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From records of the skin allergy section of the dermatology department we extracted and analyzed information for patients who underwent patch testing with the standard series of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group (GEIDAC), which includes a patch with 5% nickel sulfate in petroleum jelly. The possibility that nickel release from various objects might have triggered the patient's dermatitis was assessed with the dimethylglyoxime spot test, which reveals a reddish precipitate if the metal is present. RESULTS: A total of 3,404 patients underwent GEIDAC patch testing during the study period; 24.2% had positive reactions to the patch containing 5% nickel sulfate in petroleum jelly. However, the contact dermatitis could be attributed to nickel in only 57 of the 824 patients (6.9%) who showed sensitization to nickel. CONCLUSIONS: Patch-test evidence of sensitization was found to be clinically relevant in only a small percentage of patients. We emphasize the usefulness of the dimethylglyoxime test to help establish the relevance of a positive nickel patch test. This test is even useful for identifying the specific object responsible for a patient's dermatitis.

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cosmetic products.

Contact dermatitis due to cosmetic products is a common dermatologic complaint that considerably affects the patient's quality of life. Diagnosis, treatment, and preventive strategies represent a substantial cost. This condition accounts for 2% to 4% of all visits to the dermatologist, and approximately 60% of cases are allergic in origin. Most cases are caused by skin hygiene and moisturizing products, followed by cosmetic hair and nail products. Fragrances are the most common cause of allergy to cosmetics, followed by preservatives and hair dyes; however, all components, including natural ingredients, should be considered potential sensitizers. We provide relevant information on the most frequent allergens in cosmetic products, namely, fragrances, preservatives, antioxidants, excipients, surfactants, humectants, emulsifiers, natural ingredients, hair dyes, sunscreens, and nail cosmetics.

[Eccema herpético en una paciente con dermatitis atópica].

Background: Eczema herpeticum is an infection caused by herpes simplex virus in patients with atopic dermatitis, among its complications we can find meningitis, encephalitis, acute liver failure, and Staphylococcus aureus infection. Case report: We report the case of a female patient of 5 years of age, with a history of atopic dermatitis complicated by eczema herpeticum, who was treated initially without relief. Her hospital stay was complicated with cross infections, which prolonged her course. Dermatology diagnosed eczema herpeticum. Immediately after the start of treatment, the patient showed improvement. Conclusions: Eczema herpeticum is a rare complication of atopic dermatitis, it must be suspected based on patient history and physical examination. Therefore, early recognition and diagnosis are of clinical importance. Without an appropriate approach, these patients can present shock, sepsis, and death.

Antecedentes: El eccema herpético es una infección causada por el virus del herpes simple, que afecta a pacientes con dermatitis atópica. Las principales complicaciones son meningitis, encefalitis, insuficiencia hepática aguda e infección por Staphylococcus aureus. Reporte de caso: Paciente pediátrica de 5 años, con antecedente de dermatitis atópica complicada con eccema herpético, que recibió tratamiento sin reacción satisfactoria. Durante la hospitalización tuvo infecciones nosocomiales que prolongaron su estancia. Luego de la evaluación por personal del servicio de Dermatología se estableció el diagnóstico de eccema herpético, con adecuado tratamiento, seguimiento y egreso sin complicaciones. Conclusiones: El eccema herpético es una complicación rara de la dermatitis atópica, que debe diagnosticarse con base en los antecedentes personales patológicos y la exploración física adecuada. La atención oportuna es de relevancia clínica, pues los pacientes pueden tener complicación serias (choque, sepsis, incluso la muerte). Palabras clave: Eccema herpético; dermatitis atópica; infección nosocomial; Staphylococcus aureus.

Predictive Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Patients With Hand Eczema. / Modelo predictivo de dermatitis alérgica de contacto en pacientes con eccema de manos.

INTRODUCTION: Patch tests are only indicated for hand eczema when it is diagnosed as chronic. A positive reaction of current relevance requires a change in treatment strategy. Knowing which clinical factors are associated with current relevance would allow tests to be performed sooner. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for predicting currently relevant patch test positivity in patients with hand eczema only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with hand eczema only. We collected data on age, sex, time since onset, occupation, and history of atopic dermatitis. We built a predictive logistic regression model and assessed discrimination by computing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: We included 262 patients; 66.03% had positive patch tests (28.6% of current relevance). Univariate analysis detected significant associations between positivity of current relevance and employment as a hairdresser-aesthetician, a personal history of atopy, male sex, and a time since onset of over 6 months. Multivariate analysis confirmed employment as a hairdresser-aesthetician as an independent risk factor and male sex and a personal history of atopy as protective factors. The score suggested by the predictive model was 2.316(hairdresser-aesthetician)-1.792(atopic dermatitis)-0.601(male sex). CONCLUSIONS: Occupation, sex, and a history of atopy influence the likelihood of patch test positivity of current relevance in patients with hand eczema in Spain. Our model suggests that a diagnosis of chronic eczema is not necessarily an indication for patch testing. Future studies with larger samples are needed to determine the true usefulness of predictive models in this setting.

Is p-Phenylenediamine Still a Prevalent Contact Allergen in Spain? / ¿Sigue siendo la parafenilendiamina un alérgeno de contacto prevalente en España?

OBJECTIVES: To analyze trends in the prevalence of contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine between 2004 and 2014, taking into consideration that the concentration of this product in cosmetics was regulated in 2009. To explore risk factors for contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients suspected of having contact dermatitis from allergy to p-phenylenediamine during the years between 2004 and 2015 in 8 tertiary level hospitals. The patients underwent patch testing (TRUE-test) with the standard series of the Spanish Research Group on Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergies. This series included p-phenylenediamine 1%. We followed international recommendations for the statistical analysis of data related to contact allergies. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-six out of 9341 patients (4.1%) had positive reactions to p-phenylenediamine. The prevalence tended to decrease in the early years (2004-2007) and then leveled off at around 4%. Risk factors for developing contact dermatitis from p-phenylenediamine were sex, age over 40 years, multiple sensitivities, and profession, notably workers in hair salons and those who handle rubber and plastics. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of p-phenylenediamine allergy remains high among patients with contact eczema. Risk factors for p-phenylenediamine contact allergy are consistent with previous reports.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hand Eczema. / Guía para el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y la prevención del eccema de manos.

Hand eczema is a common condition associated with significantly impaired quality of life and high social and occupational costs. Managing hand eczema is particularly challenging for primary care and occupational health physicians as the condition has varying causes and both disease progression and response to treatment are difficult to predict. Early diagnosis and appropriate protective measures are essential to prevent progression to chronic eczema, which is much more difficult to treat. Appropriate referral to a specialist and opportune evaluation of the need for sick leave are crucial to the good management of these patients. These guidelines cover the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic hand eczema and highlight the role that primary care and occupational health physicians can play in the early management of this disease.

Eczema and Urticaria in the Adult Population in Portugal: A Prevalence Study. / Eccema y urticaria en la población adulta en Portugal: un estudio de prevalencia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eczema and urticaria are both inflammatory skin diseases. The prevalence of both diseases varies worldwide and the reasons are unknown. We aimed to investigate the eczema and urticaria prevalence in the Portuguese adult (≥16 years-old) population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A telephone interview survey was performed in the last quarter of 2017. To calculate the prevalences, subjects should have been previously diagnosed with eczema/urticaria by a health professional, be aged ≥16 years-old, and reside in Portugal. The sample had a proportion that was approximately representative by population, region, gender, and age group. Odds ratios were performed to measure associations with prevalences. SPSS statistics and values of p<0.05 with 95% confidence intervals were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 5,000 phone calls were analysed. The prevalence of eczema and urticaria in Portugal is 4.4% and 3.4%, respectively. Algarve is the region with the highest prevalence for both diseases. Being a female is the factor that most influenced these diseases with an OR=1.99 (p<0.001; CI 1.49-2.66) for eczema and 1.73 (p=0.001; CI 1.25 - 2.40) for urticaria, with also higher prevalences (5.7% and 4.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalences found are higher than in previous studies in Portugal and comparable to results from other countries. Comparisons among prevalence of eczema are affected by several obstacles. Regarding urticaria, our results seem to be in the same line as others. Being female with eczema and urticaria is more common and represents a higher risk factor than male subjects. According to Harrop et al., 2007, in Europe, atopic eczema is 0.14-0.60% of general eczema. In this way, we can estimate that prevalence of atopic eczema in Portugal is around 0.61-2.64%.

A Retrospective Study of Systemic Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Azathioprine: Effectiveness and Tolerance in 11 Pediatric Patients. / Estudio retrospectivo del tratamiento sistémico de la dermatitis atópica grave con azatioprina. Eficacia y tolerancia en 11 pacientes pediátricos.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that typically affects children. Severe forms may have a profound effect on patients' quality of life. Some forms are resistant to conventional treatment and require the use of systemic immunosuppressants such as azathioprine (AZA) to adequately manage the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of AZA in children with severe AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of children with severe AD treated with AZA between January 2007 and May 2017. RESULTS: We reviewed the cases of 11 patients (6 boys and 5 girls) with a mean age of 13 years (range, 8-18 years). The mean (SD) age at start of treatment was 10.9 (2.2) years (95% CI 8.6-13.1). The mean initial dosage of AZA was 1.8 (0.2) mg/kg/d. We evaluated treatment response after 4 weeks, 12 to 16 weeks, and 6 months. Mean treatment duration was 10.8 (5.7) months. Treatment had to be suspended in 2 patients because of adverse effects. Seven of the 9 remaining patients presented complete or almost complete clearance of the AD after 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: In our experience, AZA is well tolerated and may be considered as a treatment option in children with severe AD resistant to conventional treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A Single Center Experience / Eficacia y seguridad de dupilumab para el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica grave en la práctica clínica: experiencia en un centro terciario

Background Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. Objective Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. Material and method Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. Results Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. Conclusion Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance (AU)

Antecedentes Dupilumab es una nueva terapia dirigida para la dermatitis atópica (DA) grave con una evidencia en la vida real aún limitada. Objetivo Explorar nuestra experiencia con dupilumab para la DA en práctica clínica en un centro terciario. Material y método Estudio observacional retrospectivo y unicéntrico que incluye pacientes adultos y pediátricos con DA grave en tratamiento con dupilumab entre diciembre de 2017 y diciembre de 2021. La gravedad y la respuesta se evaluaron con las escalas Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale y Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale. Resultado Cincuenta y nueve pacientes recibieron dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 y 13 pacientes alcanzaron los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses de tratamiento, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI-75 fue del 94,2; 95,8; 92,3 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI-90 fue del 63,5; 72,9; 84,6 y 92,3% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI <7 fue del 92,3; 91,7; 88,5 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 fue del 86; 87,5; 92,3 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de reducción Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 fue del 82,7; 85,4; 100 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. Los eventos adversos fueron leves y ocurrieron en el 20,3% de los pacientes, todos adultos. Conclusión Nuestros hallazgos apoyan el perfil favorable de eficacia y tolerabilidad de dupilumab en práctica clínica real. Dupilumab ofrece una respuesta rápida y mantenida, independientemente del uso de terapia combinada. Se requieren seguimientos más prolongados para evaluar su funcionamiento a largo plazo (AU)

[Artículo traducido]Eficacia y seguridad de dupilumab para el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica grave en la práctica clínica: experiencia en un centro terciario / Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A Single Center Experience

Antecedentes Dupilumab es una nueva terapia dirigida para la dermatitis atópica (DA) grave con una evidencia en la vida real aún limitada. Objetivo Explorar nuestra experiencia con dupilumab para la DA en práctica clínica en un centro terciario. Material y método Estudio observacional retrospectivo y unicéntrico que incluye pacientes adultos y pediátricos con DA grave en tratamiento con dupilumab entre diciembre de 2017 y diciembre de 2021. La gravedad y la respuesta se evaluaron con las escalas Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale y Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale. Resultados Cincuenta y nueve pacientes recibieron dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 y 13 pacientes alcanzaron los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses de tratamiento, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI-75 fue del 94,2; 95,8; 92,3 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI-90 fue del 63,5; 72,9; 84,6 y 92,3% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de EASI <7 fue del 92,3; 91,7; 88,5 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 fue del 86; 87,5; 92,3 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. La tasa de reducción Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 fue del 82,7; 85,4; 100 y 100% a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses, respectivamente. Los eventos adversos fueron leves y ocurrieron en el 20,3% de los pacientes, todos adultos. Conclusión Nuestros hallazgos apoyan el perfil favorable de eficacia y tolerabilidad de dupilumab en práctica clínica real. Dupilumab ofrece una respuesta rápida y mantenida, independientemente del uso de terapia combinada. Se requieren seguimientos más prolongados para evaluar su funcionamiento a largo plazo (AU)

Background Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. Objective Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. Material and method Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. Results Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. Conclusion Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance (AU)

Trasplante de médula ósea haploidéntico en un paciente pediátrico con síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich. A propósito de un caso / Haploidentical bone marrow transplantation in a pediatric patient with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. A case report

El síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich es un error innato de la inmunidad de herencia ligada al cromosoma X, producido por variantes en el gen que codifica la proteína del síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich (WASp). Reportamos el caso clínico de un paciente de 18 meses con diagnóstico de Wiskott-Aldrich que no presentaba donante antígeno leucocitario humano (HLA) idéntico y recibió un trasplante de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas (TCPH) con donante familiar haploidéntico. La profilaxis para enfermedad de injerto contra huésped incluyó ciclofosfamida (PT-Cy). El quimerismo del día +30 fue 100 % del donante y la evaluación postrasplante de la expresión de la proteína WAS fue normal. Actualmente, a 32 meses del trasplante, presenta reconstitución hematológica e inmunológica y quimerismo completo sin evidencia de enfermedad injerto contra huésped. El TCPH haploidéntico con PT-Cy se mostró factible y seguro en este caso de síndrome de WiskottAldrich en el que no se disponía de un donante HLA idéntico.

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is an X-linked genetic disorder caused by mutations in the gene that encodes the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp). Here, we report the clinical case of an 18-month-old boy diagnosed with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, who did not have an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor and was treated successfully with a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a haploidentical family donor. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis included post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). At day +30, the peripheral blood-nucleated cell chimerism was 100% and the WAS protein had a normal expression. Currently, at month 32 post-transplant, the patient has hematological and immune reconstitution and complete donor chimerism without evidence of GvHD. HSCT with PT-Cy was a feasible and safe option for this patient with WAS, in which an HLA matched donor was not available.