2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Edoxaban for 12 Months Versus 3 Months in Patients With Cancer With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis (ONCO DVT Study): An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point. RESULTS: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

Development and Validation of the DOAC Score: A Novel Bleeding Risk Prediction Tool for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical decision tools for assessing bleeding risk in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) have limited performance and were developed for individuals treated with warfarin. This study develops and validates a clinical risk score to personalize estimates of bleeding risk for individuals with atrial fibrillation taking direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS: Among individuals taking dabigatran 150 mg twice per day from 44 countries and 951 centers in this secondary analysis of the RE-LY trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy), a risk score was developed to determine the comparative risk for bleeding on the basis of covariates derived in a Cox proportional hazards model. The risk prediction model was internally validated with bootstrapping. The model was then further developed in the GARFIELD-AF registry (Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation), with individuals taking dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. To determine generalizability in external cohorts and among individuals on different DOACs, the risk prediction model was validated in the COMBINE-AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation) pooled clinical trial cohort and the Quebec Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec and Med-Echo Administrative Databases (RAMQ) administrative database. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The risk score, termed the DOAC Score, was compared with the HAS-BLED score. RESULTS: Of the 5684 patients in RE-LY, 386 (6.8%) experienced a major bleeding event, within a median follow-up of 1.74 years. The prediction model had an optimism-corrected C statistic of 0.73 after internal validation with bootstrapping and was well-calibrated based on visual inspection of calibration plots (goodness-of-fit P=0.57). The DOAC Score assigned points for age, creatinine clearance/glomerular filtration rate, underweight status, stroke/transient ischemic attack/embolism history, diabetes, hypertension, antiplatelet use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use, liver disease, and bleeding history, with each additional point scored associated with a 48.7% (95% CI, 38.9%-59.3%; P<0.001) increase in major bleeding in RE-LY. The score had superior performance to the HAS-BLED score in RE-LY (C statistic, 0.73 versus 0.60; P for difference <0.001) and among 12 296 individuals in GARFIELD-AF (C statistic, 0.71 versus 0.66; P for difference = 0.025). The DOAC Score had stronger predictive performance than the HAS-BLED score in both validation cohorts, including 25 586 individuals in COMBINE-AF (C statistic, 0.67 versus 0.63; P for difference <0.001) and 11 945 individuals in RAMQ (C statistic, 0.65 versus 0.58; P for difference <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with atrial fibrillation potentially eligible for DOAC therapy, the DOAC Score can help stratify patients on the basis of expected bleeding risk.

Effectiveness and Safety of Edoxaban Compared With Apixaban in Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-World Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The very elderly (≥80 years) are at high risk of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism. Given its recent approval, the comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in this population, relative to the commonly used apixaban, remain unknown. METHODS: Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified a cohort of patients aged ≥80 with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and newly treated with edoxaban or apixaban between 2015 and 2021. Cohort entry was defined as the first prescription for one of the 2 drugs. We used propensity score fine stratification and weighting for confounding adjustment. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism (primary effectiveness outcome) and of major bleeding (primary safety outcome) associated with edoxaban compared with apixaban. We also assessed the risk of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 7251 new-users of edoxaban and 39 991 of apixaban. Edoxaban and apixaban had similar incidence rates of thromboembolism (adjusted rates, 20.38 versus 19.22 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89-1.26]), although the rates of major bleeding were higher with edoxaban (adjusted rates, 45.57 versus 31.21 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.26-1.61]). The risk of the composite outcome was 21% higher with edoxaban (adjusted HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.07-1.38]). All-cause mortality was similar between edoxaban and apixaban (adjusted HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.96-1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: In very elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, edoxaban resulted in similar thromboembolism prevention as apixaban, although it was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. These findings may improve the management of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by informing physicians on the choice of anticoagulant for this vulnerable population.

Investigation of the electrochemical properties of edoxaban using glassy carbon and boron-doped diamond electrodes and development of an eco-friendly and cost effective voltammetric method for its determination.

In this study, the highly risky drug Edoxaban (EDX), which can threaten life and cause bleeding, was electro analytically evaluated. The electrochemical behavior of EDX was investigated using glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and boron-doped diamond electrode (BDDE). In this study, for the first time, a simple, rapid, sensitive, and selective voltammetric technique was developed by using different electrodes for the electrochemical characterization and detection of EDX. The optimized voltammetric technique showed anodic signals of EDX at +1.09 V and +1.08 V on GCE and BDDE, respectively, in BR (pH 5.0) solution. The developed voltammetric method provided a very good analytical working range for EDX in BR (pH 5.0) solution on GCE and BDDE, covering concentration ranges from 1.84 µM to 12.88 µM and from 3.68 µM to 14.72 µM, respectively. The limits of detection for EDX on GCE and BDDE under these experimental conditions were calculated as 0.24 µM and 0.57 µM, respectively. The developed voltammetric methods on both electrodes were successfully applied to urine and tablet samples. Additionally, the obtained voltammetric results were compared with UV-Vis spectroscopy results.

Prevalence, contemporary trends and associated factors of potentially inappropriate prescription of edoxaban in real-world clinical practice: A subanalysis of the SUNSHINE registry.

AIM: As the direct oral anticoagulant most recently approved in China, data pertaining to clinical edoxaban use are still scarce. This study investigated the prevalence of and contemporary trends in edoxaban prescription among Chinese patients as well as factors associated with its inappropriate use in a multicentre registry of patients treated in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This real-world, prospective, multicentre and non-interventional study included 1005 inpatients treated with edoxaban. According to National Medical Products Administration and European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines, edoxaban therapy was determined to be appropriate or inappropriate in each case. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70.0 years (interquartile range 61.0-78.0 years) and 46.3% were women. Overall, 456 (45.4%) patients received inappropriate edoxaban therapy, and common issues included an inappropriately low dosage (183, 18.2%) or wrong drug selection (109, 10.8%), high dosage (73, 7.3%), unreasonable off-label use (49, 4.9%), contraindicated medication combinations (27, 2.7%) and incorrect administration timing (16, 1.6%). Several factors, such as age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.921, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.355-2.723, P < 0.001), weight >60 kg (OR = 2.657, 95%CI 1.970-3.583, P < 0.001), severe renal insufficiency (OR = 1.988, 95% CI 1.043-3.790, P = 0.037), current anaemia (OR = 1.556, 95% CI 1.151-2.102, P = 0.004) and history of bleeding (OR = 2.931, 95% CI 1.605-5.351, P < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of inappropriate edoxaban therapy, whereas factors associated with cardiovascular specialties, such as admission to a cardiovascular department (OR = 0.637, 95% CI 0.464-0.873, P = 0.005), dronedarone use (OR = 0.065, 95% CI 0.026-0.165, P < 0.001) and amiodarone use (OR = 0.365, 95% CI 0.209-0.637, P < 0.001) decreased this risk. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, 45.4% of patients received an inappropriate treatment with edoxaban. Multiple clinical characteristics can help identify patients who should receive edoxaban. Further development and implantation of educational activities and management strategies are needed to ensure the correct use of edoxaban.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism Receiving Edoxaban in the Real World.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in unselected real-world patients have not been fully evaluated.Methods and Results: In the Japanese nationwide administrative database, we identified 6,262 VTE patients in whom edoxaban was initiated; these patients were divided into 3 groups based on their index doses: 15 mg/day (n=235), 30 mg/day (n=4,532), and 60 mg/day (n=1,495). We evaluated patient characteristics, recurrent VTEs, and a composite endpoint of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Patient characteristics among the 15-, 30-, and 60-mg edoxaban groups varied widely regarding several aspects, including age (mean 81.0, 76.2, and 65.0 years, respectively) and body weight (mean 49.5, 51.8, and 70.3 kg, respectively). At 180 days, the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTEs in the 15-, 30-, and 60-mg edoxaban groups was 4.4%, 2.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, whereas that of ICH or GI bleeding was 7.3%, 5.4%, and 3.3%, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the cumulative incidence of ICH or GI bleeding in patients in the 15-mg edoxaban group was 3.6% for patients aged ≥80 years, 8.4% for those with a body weight <60 kg, and 31.3% for those with renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of patients with VTEs received a super low dose (15 mg) of edoxaban, and these patients may be at higher risk of bleeding as well as VTE recurrence.

D-dimer cut-off value for predicting venous thromboembolism at the initial diagnosis in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The D-dimer level is used to predict venous thromboembolism; however, reports on an appropriate D-dimer cut-off value in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to calculate the D-dimer cut-off value for venous thromboembolism at the time of lung cancer diagnosis. METHODS: The Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study was a multicenter, prospective observational study. Patients with lung cancer who were contraindicated for radical resection or radiation were enrolled and followed up for 2 years. In the present study (jRCT no. 061180025), a receiver operating characteristic curve for D-dimer levels was created using the dataset of the Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study. RESULTS: The Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study included a total of 1008 patients, of whom 976, whose D-dimer levels had been measured at the time of cancer diagnosis, were included in the present study. At the time of lung cancer diagnosis, 62 (6.3%) and 914 (93.7%) patients presented with and without venous thromboembolism, respectively. The D-dimer values ranged from 0.1 to 180.1 µg/ml and from 0.1 to 257.2 µg/ml in patients with and without venous thromboembolism, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve was discriminative with a cut-off value of 3.3 µg/ml and an area under the curve of 0.794 (sensitivity, 0.742; specificity, 0.782; 95% confidence interval, 0.725-0.863). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to calculate the D-dimer cut-off value in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer. Patients with D-dimer levels ≥3.3 µg/ml at the time of initial diagnosis may have coexisting venous thromboembolism.

Pilot study on the probability of drug-drug interactions among direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and antiseizure medications (ASMs): a clinical perspective.

BACKGROUND: There is little and controversial information about changes in plasma concentrations (PCs) or clinical events during coadministration of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to explore possible determinants of dosage class among DOACs trough PCs when ASMs are co-administered and the relative risks. We also provided some clinical examples of patients' management. METHODS: Data on adult patients concomitantly treated with ASMs (grouped in enzyme-inducing [I-ASMs], non-inducing [nI-ASMs], and levetiracetam [LEV]) and DOACs with at least one measurement of DOACs' PC were retrospectively collected. The role of DOAC-ASM combinations in predicting PC class (ranging from I at ischemic/thromboembolic risk to IV at increased bleeding risk) was investigated by an ordered logit model, and the marginal probabilities of belonging to the four dosage classes were calculated. RESULTS: We collected 46 DOACs' PCs out of 31 patients. There were 5 (10.9%) determinations in class I (4 out of 5 with concomitant I-ASMs) and 5 (10.9%) in class IV. The rivaroxaban/I-ASM combination was associated with lower DOAC dosages than rivaroxaban/LEV (OR: 0.00; 95% CI: 0.00-0.62). Furthermore, patient's probability of being in class I was approximately 50% with the rivaroxaban/I-ASM combination, while apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban had the highest cumulative probability of being in class II or III despite the ASM used. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results confirm the reduction of DOAC's PC by I-ASMs and suggest a better manageability of apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban independently from the concomitant ASM, whereas rivaroxaban seems the most liable to PC alterations with I-ASMs.

The effectiveness and safety of Rivaroxaban and Edoxaban in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a medical condition characterized by forming a blood clot, or thrombus, in one of the deep veins, typically in the legs. It is a type of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which refers to the formation of blood clots in the veins. It is caused by Virchow's triad (stasis, hypercoagulation, and endothelial injury). OBJECTIVE: Our main objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of Rivaroxaban and Edoxaban in treating lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 406 patients subjected to DVT treatment using DOACs (Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban) at our hospital. We recruited adult patients (18 years and above) diagnosed with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and received treatment with either Rivaroxaban or Edoxaban as the primary anticoagulant therapy for DVT. We excluded patients who received treatment with other anticoagulant medications (warfarin heparin) as the primary therapy for DVT. RESULTS: The groups showed statistically significant differences in red blood cell count and haemoglobin levels, with the Edoxaban group having high values. However, the two groups observed no statistically significant differences in creatinine clearance, white blood cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels. The difference in the incidence of PE between the two groups was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). The Edoxaban group had fewer PE patients than the rivaroxaban group. The reduction in recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the Edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the major bleeding at various sites across the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetic profile includes rapid absorption and a relatively short half-life. It means that once administered, Rivaroxaban quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood and is subsequently eliminated from the body within a relatively short period. Edoxaban's pharmacokinetic profile may include slower absorption and a longer half-life than Rivaroxaban. It can result in a slower rate of achieving peak concentration and a more prolonged presence in the bloodstream. These results emphasize the need for careful consideration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with underlying cancer and underscore the importance of managing risks while providing adequate anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events.

A disposable edoxaban sensor chip using carbon paste electrode grafted with molecularly imprinted polymer.

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are generally safe and TDM is not required, blood levels of the drug are important information for response decisions in emergency care. In this study, an attempt was made to develop a disposable sensor chip for the rapid detection of edoxaban in blood, a type of DOAC. Molecularly imprinted polymers with edoxaban tosilate as a template and sodium p-styrene sulfonate as a functional monomer were grafted onto the surface of graphite particles, mixed with silicon oil dissolved in ferrocene to form a paste, and filled onto a substrate made of plastic film. Sensor chips were fabricated. The current obtained from this sensor by voltammetry within 150 s depended on the edoxaban concentration. Sensitivity to edoxaban was also confirmed in bovine whole blood. The potential of disposable sensors to rapidly detect edoxaban in whole blood was demonstrated in this study, although selectivity, reproducibility, and sensitivity need to be improved for practical use.

Real-world experience with edoxaban for anticoagulation in children at risk for coronary artery thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants have the potential to improve care in children requiring chronic anticoagulation. Edoxaban has favourable pharmacokinetics that could benefit younger patients but data on long-term safety and efficacy for specific paediatric indications are lacking. STUDY AIMS: We present a single-centre experience using edoxaban in children who require chronic anticoagulation for large coronary artery aneurysms secondary to Kawasaki disease. METHODS: Weight-based dosing of once-daily oral edoxaban was offered as alternative to standard anticoagulation for patients aged 1-18 years. Chart review was performed for a median follow-up period of 49 months on edoxaban. Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban were also explored. RESULTS: Sixteen patients on chronic therapy with edoxaban were included. No major bleeding events were reported. Two patients experienced coronary artery thrombosis after 23 and 38 months on edoxaban, 7 and 11 years after diagnosed with Kawasaki disease, respectively. This predicts 70% event-free rate at 12 years from diagnosis. Area under the curve estimates over the dosing interval of 24 hours were similar to those reported in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban use is feasible and well-tolerated for long-term use in paediatric population. We suggest appropriate exposure using weight-based once-daily dosing strategy that may be comparable to standard-of-care anticoagulation in prevention of coronary artery thrombosis. Larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of edoxaban in this population.

How to handle a delayed or missed dose of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation? A model-informed remedial strategy.

AIMS: Edoxaban is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) widely used for the long-term prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Adherence to NOAC therapy has been unsatisfactory and decreases over time. Remedial strategies are currently used to address the non-adherence events. Current recommendations, however, are generic and not well supported by evidence. The aim of this study was to explore appropriate remedial dosing regimens for non-adherent edoxaban-treated NVAF patients through Monte Carlo simulation. METHODS: Six regimens were compared with the current recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guide based on total deviation time. Both edoxaban plasma concentration and intrinsic Factor Xa activity were considered. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using RxODE based on a published population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. RESULTS: The proposed remedial strategies were different than the EHRA recommendations and were related to the delay time. However, it was found that the missed dose can be administered immediately if the delay time is within 11 h. When the delay is between 12 and 19 h, a half dose followed by a regular dosing schedule is recommended. When the delay time exceeds 19 h, a full dose followed by a half dose is preferred. CONCLUSION: PK/PD modelling and simulation are effective in developing and evaluating the remedial strategies of edoxaban, which can help maximise its therapeutic effect.

Outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation with and without heart failure: the ETNA-AF-Europe registry.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for major adverse events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether this risk persists on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and varies according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the relation of HF in the ETNA-AF-Europe registry, a prospective, multicentre, observational study with an overall 4-year follow-up of edoxaban-treated AF patients. We report 2-year follow-up for ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolic events (SEE), major bleeding, and mortality. Of the 13 133 patients, 1854 (14.1%) had HF. Left ventricular ejection fraction was available for 82.4% of HF patients and was <40% in 671 (43.9%) and ≥40% in 857 (56.1%). Patients with HF were older, more often men, and had more comorbidities. Annualized event rates (AnERs) of any stroke/SEE were 0.86%/year and 0.67%/year in patients with and without HF. Compared with patients without HF, those with HF also had higher AnERs for major bleeding (1.73%/year vs. 0.86%/year) and all-cause death (8.30%/year vs. 3.17%/year). Multivariate Cox proportional models confirmed HF as a significant predictor of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-2.26] and all-cause death [HF with LVEF <40% (HR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.95-3.00) and HF with LVEF ≥40% (HR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.45-2.23)] but not of ischaemic stroke/TIA/SEE. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulated patients with HF at baseline featured higher rates of major bleeding and all-cause death, requiring optimized management and novel preventive strategies. NOAC treatment was similarly effective in reducing risk of ischaemic events in patients with or without concomitant HF.

Clinical trial assessing the safety of edoxaban with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with gynecological cancer-associated thrombosis (EGCAT study).

BACKGROUND: Gynecological cancer is one of the highest risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended as an anticoagulant for treating CAT, recent studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an acceptable alternative. Patients with cancer require a series of chemotherapies concomitantly with DOAC administration; however, the extent to which these drugs influence DOAC blood concentrations is unknown. In this study, we measured the plasma concentration of edoxaban during chemotherapy for gynecological cancers to determine its safety. METHODS: Patients histologically diagnosed with ovarian or uterine corpus cancer and CAT were recruited after primary surgery and before the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, including paclitaxel. Patients were administered edoxaban (30 or 60 mg) orally for CAT. The plasma concentrations of edoxaban and active factor Xa were determined and their percentage change before and after chemotherapy was calculated. Additionally, blood coagulation tests were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with gynecological cancer (12 with ovarian cancer and 4 with uterine corpus cancer) were enrolled. Among these, 15 samples were collected one day after chemotherapy initiation. During chemotherapy, the trough concentration of edoxaban changed from 17.6 ± 10.6 to 20.0 ± 15.6 ng/ml, and the mean percentage change in edoxaban concentration was 14.5%. Therefore, the trough concentrations of edoxaban, which represent excretion capacity, were not significantly increased by chemotherapy with paclitaxel. The area under the plasma edoxaban concentration-time curve and the active factor Xa concentration were also unaffected. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAT and ovarian or uterine corpus cancer administered edoxaban orally showed no significant increase in the trough concentration of edoxaban while undergoing chemotherapy. This suggests the safety of edoxaban use during the treatment of gynecological cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EGCAT study; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051190024.

Management of edoxaban therapy and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major or nonmajor surgery: a subanalysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE study.

BACKGROUND: Optimising periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic treatment undergoing major surgeries is an important aspect of balancing the risk of surgery-related bleeding with the risk of thromboembolic events, which may vary by surgery type. METHODS: This subanalysis of the prospective EMIT-AF/VTE programme assessed periprocedural-edoxaban management, according to physicians' decisions, and bleeding and thromboembolic event rates in patients who underwent major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Edoxaban interruption and clinical outcomes were compared between major vs. nonmajor surgeries and between renal function subgroups (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≤ 50 mL/min vs. > 50 mL/min). RESULTS: We included 276 major and 512 nonmajor surgeries. The median pre- and postprocedural duration of edoxaban interruption in major vs. nonmajor surgeries was 4 vs. 1 days, whereas median duration of interruption for those with preprocedural-only and postprocedural-only interruption was 2 vs. 1 days and 2 vs. 0 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Rates of all bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were numerically higher in major vs. nonmajor surgeries. Event rates (number of events per 100 surgeries) were low overall (< 6 events per 100 surgeries), independent of renal function subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this subanalysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE programme, periprocedural-edoxaban interruption was significantly longer in patients undergoing major vs. nonmajor surgery. This clinician-driven approach was associated with low rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events following both major and nonmajor surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02950168, registered October 31, 2016; NCT02951039, registered November 1, 2016.

Direct Oral FXa Inhibitors Binding to Human Serum Albumin: Spectroscopic, Calorimetric, and Computational Studies.

Direct FXa inhibitors are an important class of bioactive molecules (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) applied for thromboprophylaxis in diverse cardiovascular pathologies. The interaction of active compounds with human serum albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in blood plasma, is a key research area and provides crucial information about drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties. This research focuses on the study of the interactions between HSA and four commercially available direct oral FXa inhibitors, applying methodologies including steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular dynamics. The HSA complexation of FXa inhibitors was found to occur via static quenching, and the complex formation in the ground states affects the fluorescence of HSA, with a moderate binding constant of 104 M-1. However, the ITC studies reported significantly different binding constants (103 M-1) compared with the results obtained through spectrophotometric methods. The suspected binding mode is supported by molecular dynamics simulations, where the predominant interactions were hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions (mainly π-π stacking interactions between the phenyl ring of FXa inhibitors and the indole moiety of Trp214). Finally, the possible implications of the obtained results regarding pathologies such as hypoalbuminemia are briefly discussed.

A Case of Diffuse Thyroid Hematoma after Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration.

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is an easy, safe, and efficient method of diagnosing thyroid diseases. Recent guidelines and studies have demonstrated that this test has a low incidence of complications; thus, most guidelines do not provide recommendations for post-exam care. However, the risk of serious and fatal bleeding in selected patients with bleeding tendency exists. Although screening tests for coagulation are not always necessary, a thorough assessment of past medical history needs to be made to identify disorders affecting coagulation function and bleeding risk factors, such as the use of antithrombotic drugs. This is a case report of a 70-year-old female patient who continued to take edoxaban and suffered bilateral thyroid hematoma a few hours after ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration. The patient successfully recovered after undergoing conservative treatment.

Stability of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Concentrations in Blood Samples for Accessibility Expansion of Chromogenic Assays.

Background and Objectives: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for minimising the risk of thromboembolic events. In clinical practice, there is no need to measure DOAC concentration in the routine. Nevertheless, there are cases where such measurements are necessary, as the European Society of Cardiology's guideline recommends. However, determining DOAC levels is not available for everyone due to chromogenic assay availability limitations from sample storage problems, as tests are performed only in a few healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess whether more applicable storage conditions could be used for transportation to provide chromogenic assays for outpatient healthcare and other hospitals' practices. Materials and Methods: Chromogenic assays measuring anti-FXa (for rivaroxaban and edoxaban) and anti-FIIa (for dabigatran) were used. Concentrations were determined immediately after blood collection as baseline value: (1) after the storage of citrated whole blood in refrigerator (+2-8 °C); (2) of citrated plasma in refrigerator (+2-8 °C); and (3) of citrated frozen plasma (-20 °C) on the third and seventh days of storage. Acceptable change limits were considered stable if the deviation did not exceed ±20% of the baseline value. Results: The median (Cl 95%) baseline value of rivaroxaban was 168 (147-236) ng/mL; of dabigatran 139 (99-178) ng/mL; and of edoxaban-174 (135-259) ng/mL. The median deviation from a baseline value stored as citrate whole blood samples (+2-8 °C) was 5.4% and 3.4%; as citrated plasma (+2-8 °C) was 0.4% and -0.6%; and as citrated frozen plasma (-20 °C) was -0.2% and 0.2% on the third and seventh days of storage, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that whole blood samples stored in a refrigerator, as well as citrated plasma samples stored in both the refrigerator and freezer, preserve DOAC concentration stable at +2-8 °C or -20 °C for up to 7 days, and are suitable for transportation, except for low-concentration samples.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Edoxaban in 8040 Women Versus 13 065 Men With Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban in women versus men. METHODS: The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) randomly assigned 21 105 patients (8040 women) with atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 score ≥2 either to a higher-dose edoxaban regimen, a lower-dose edoxaban regimen, or warfarin. The primary end points of the trial were the composite of stroke or systemic embolic events (efficacy), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined major bleeding (safety). RESULTS: In comparison with men, women were older, had lower body weight, were more likely to have hypertension and renal dysfunction, but less likely to smoke, drink alcohol, or have diabetes or coronary artery disease. Pretreatment endogenous factor Xa activity was significantly higher in women than in men (92.5% versus 86.1%, P<0.001). Treatment with edoxaban in women resulted in greater peak edoxaban concentration and inhibition of endogenous factor Xa in comparison with men, resulting in similar endogenous factor Xa activity between the sexes 2 to 4 hours after dose. Treatment with higher-dose edoxaban regimen (versus warfarin) resulted in similar reduction in the risk of stroke/systemic embolic events (women: hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.69-1.11], men: HR, 0.87 [0.71-1.06]; P-interaction=0.97) and major bleeding (women: HR, 0.74 [0.59-0.92], men: HR, 0.84 [0.72-0.99]; P-interaction=0.34) in women and men. However, women assigned to higher-dose edoxaban regimen experienced greater reductions in hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.59] versus HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.46-1.06]), intracranial bleeding (HR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10-0.39] versus HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44-0.89]), and life-threatening or fatal bleeding (HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.15-0.42] versus HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.96]) than men (each P-interaction<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite many differences in baseline characteristics between women and men and higher baseline endogenous factor Xa levels in women, the intensity of anticoagulation achieved with edoxaban between the sexes was similar. Treatment with higher-dose edoxaban regimen resulted in an even greater reduction in hemorrhagic stroke and several serious bleeding outcomes in women than in men, whereas the efficacy profile was similar between sexes.