Machine learning identifies esophageal luminal temperature patterns associated with thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is widely used to reduce the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesion (EDEL). We sought to assess whether specific patterns of LET variation are associated with EDEL. METHODS: A high-fidelity multisensor probe was used to record LET in AF patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Explainable machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis were used to predict EDEL and assess feature importance. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients (38.3% persistent AF, 71.3% male, 72 RFA, and 22 CBA) were included. EDEL was detected in 11 patients (10 RFA and one CBA). In the RFA group, the highest LET recorded was similar between patients with and without EDEL (40.6 [40.1-41]°C vs. 40.2 [39.1-40.9]°C; p = .313), however, the rate of LET rise for the highest recorded peak was higher (0.08 [0.03-0.12]°C/s vs. 0.02 [0.01-0.05]°C/s; p = .033), and the area under the curve (AUC) for the highest peak was smaller (412.5 [206.8-634.1] vs. 588.6 [380.4-861.1]; p = .047) in patients who had EDEL. In case of CBA, the patient with EDEL had a faster LET decline (0.12 vs. 0.07 [0.02-0.14]°C/s), and a smaller AUC for the lowest trough (2491.3 vs. 2629.3 [1712.6-5283.2]). SHAP analysis revealed that a rate of LET change higher than 0.05°C/s and an AUC less than 600 were more predictive of EDEL in RFA. CONCLUSION: The rate of LET change and AUC for the recorded temperature predicted EDEL, whereas absolute peak temperatures did not.

Prevention of esophageal lesions during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using esophageal temperature monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) for the prevention of esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often advocated. However, evidence supporting its use is scarce and controversial. We therefore aimed to review the evidence assessing the efficacy of ETM for the prevention of esophageal injury. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature from inception to December 31, 2022. All studies comparing the use of ETM, versus no ETM, during radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation and which reported the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 1112 patients undergoing RF AF ablation were identified. Of those patients, 627 were assigned to ETM (56%). The overall incidence of EDELs was 9.8%. The use of ETM during AF ablation was associated with a non significant increase in the incidence of EDELs (12.3% with ETM, vs. 6.6 % without ETM, odds ratio, 1.44, 95%CI, 0.49, 4.22, p = .51, I2 = 72%). The use of ETM was associated with a significant increase in the energy delivered specifically on the posterior wall compared to patients without ETM (mean power difference: 5.13 Watts, 95% CI, 1.52, 8.74, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ETM does not reduce the incidence of EDELs during RF AF ablation. The higher energy delivered on the posterior wall is likely attributable to a false sense of safety that may explain the lack of benefit of ETM. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive results.

Incidence of ablation-induced esophageal lesions and gastroparesis in patients undergoing ablation index guided high power short duration atrial fibrillation ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ablation-induced endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and gastroparesis in patients undergoing high-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using different target ablation index (AI) values. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were included. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed using HPSD ablation (50 W, target AI of 320 and 350 (group 1) and 380 (group 2) at posterior wall). Postablation endoscopy was performed in all patients. In total, 233 patients (66.8 ± 10 years; 52% male) were included consecutively (n = 137 patients in group 1 and n = 96 patients in group 2). Mean AI values und RF time at posterior wall was significantly higher and longer in group 2 compared to group 1 patients (413 ± 9 vs. 392 ± 19 AI, p < 0.01; 9.0 ± 0.8 s vs. 7.8 ± 0.7 s, p < 0.01). Esophageal endoscopy revealed esophageal lesions or gastroparesis in 43 of 233 patients (18.5%) in the total cohort (13.1% in group 1 and 26.0% in group 2; p = 0.02). Incidence of EDEL was 8.0% and 13.5% in group 1 and group 2, respectively. According to logistic analysis incidence of EDEL and/or gastroparesis was significantly lower in patients with a higher body mass index and higher in group 2 patients compared to group 1 patients. CONCLUSION: The incidence of EDEL or gastroparesis in patients undergoing HPSD AF ablation was 18.5% in the total cohort. The risk of EDEL and gastroparesis was associated with a higher AI target value of 380 compared to 320 and 350 at posterior wall and was reversely associated with body mass index.

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation-50 W or 90 W?

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the short and midterm efficacy and safety of the novel very high power very short duration (vHPvSD) 90 W approach compared to HPSD 50 W for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation as well as reconnection patterns of 90 W ablations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation with vHPvSD (90 W; predefined ablation time of 3 s for posterior wall ablation and 4 s for anterior wall ablation) were compared to patients using HPSD (50 W; ablation index-guided; AI 350 for posterior wall ablation, AI 450 for anterior wall ablation) retrospectively. A total of 84 patients (67.1 ± 9.8 years; 58% male; 47% paroxysmal AF) were included (42 with 90 W, 42 with 50 W) out of a propensity score-matched cohort. 90 W ablations revealed shorter ablation times (10.5 ± 6.7 min vs. 17.4 ± 9.9 min; p = .001). No major complication occurred. 90 W ablations revealed lower first pass PVI rates (40% vs. 62%; p = .049) and higher AF recurrences during blanking period (38% vs. 12%; p = .007). After 12 months, both ablation approaches revealed comparable midterm outcomes (62% vs. 70%; log-rank p = .452). In a multivariable Cox regression model, persistent AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.442, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.035-2.010, p = .031) and increased procedural duration (HR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.005-1.017, p = .001) were identified as independent predictors of AF recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation using 90 W vHPvSD reveals a similar safety profile compared to 50 W ablation with shorter ablation times. However, vHPvSD ablation was associated with lower rates of first-pass isolations and increased AF recurrences during the blanking period. After 12 months, 90 W revealed comparable efficacy results to 50 W ablations in a nonrandomized, propensity-matched comparison.

Esophageal safety in CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation: The PREHEAT-PVI-registry.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RF) is emerging as the standard of care for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). While procedural short-term to midterm efficacy and efficiency are very promising, this registry aims to investigate esopahgeal safety using an optimized ablation approach. METHODS: In a single-center experience, 388 consecutive standardized first-time AF ablation were performed using a CLOSE-guided-fixed-50 W-circumferential PVI and substrate modification without intraprocedural esophageal temperature measurement. Three hundred patients underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy to diagnose and grade endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and were included in the analysis. RESULTS: EDEL were detected in 35 of 300 patients (11.6%), 25 of 35 were low-grade Kansas-city-classification (KCC) 1 lesions with fast healing tendencies. Six patients suffered KCC 2a lesions, 4 patients had KCC 2b lesions (1.3% of all patients). No esophageal perforation or fistula formation was observed. Patient baseline characteristics, especially patients age, gender, and body mass index did not influence EDEL incidence. Additional posterior box isolation did not increase the incidence of EDEL. In patients diagnosed with EDEL, mean catheter contact force during posterior wall ablation was higher (11.9 ± 1.8 vs. 14.7 ± 3 g, p < .001), mean RF duration was shorter (11.9 ± 1 vs. 10.7 ± 1.2 s, p < .001), while achieved ablation index was not different between groups (434 ± 4.9 vs. 433 ± 9.5, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Incidence of EDEL after CLOSE-guided-50 W-HPSD PVI is lower compared to historical cohorts using standard-power RF settings. Catheter contact force during posterior HPSD ablation should not exceed 15 g.

Safety aspects of very high power very short duration atrial fibrillation ablation using a modified radiofrequency RF-generator: Single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: High power short duration (HPSD) ablation proved to be an effective and safe ablation technique for atrial fibrillation (AF). In former case series, a significant amount of postablation coagulation at the catheter tip as well as silent cerebral lesions (SCL) in postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance (cMRI) have been identified in patients undergoing de-novo AF ablations with very high power 90 W short duration (vHPvSD) ablations using the QDot ablation catheter in combination with a novel RF generator (nGEN, Biosense Webster). Therefore, the RF generator software has been recently modified. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing a first AF ablation including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with vHPvSD (90 W, with a predefined ablation time of 3 s at posterior left atrium (LA) wall sites and 4 s at other ablation sites) using the QDOT Micro ablation catheter (Biosense Webster) in conjunction with the technically modified nGEN RF generator (software V1c; Biosense Webster) were included. Procedural characteristics including first-pass isolation per pulmonary vein (PV) pair and early reconnection location within the 30-min waiting period were recorded. In all patients postablation endoscopy to document any thermal esophageal injury (EDEL) and in eligible patients a cMRI to detect silent cerebral events (SCEs)/lesions were performed. All acute procedure-related complications were recorded during the time until hospital discharge. Furthermore, short-term and midterm success after 3 and 6-12 months of follow-up was investigated. In total, 34 consecutive patients (67 ± 9 years; 62% male; 68% paroxysmal AF) were included. First-pass isolation of all PVs was achieved in 6/34 (18%) patients. First-pass isolation was seen in 37/68 (54%) of PV pairs. Early reconnection occurred in 11 (32%) patients (including reconnections at posterior LA wall sites n = 6 and at nonposterior sites n = 5). No patient had an EDEL (0%). In 6/23 (26%) patients undergoing postablation cerebral MRI SCEs were identified. In six patients, coagulation on the catheter tip was detected at the end of the procedure. No further peri- or postprocedural complications were detected. Early AF recurrence before discharge was seen in 1/34 (3%) of the patients included in this study. Within 3 months 10/34 (29%) revealed AF recurrence during blanking period. After a mean follow-up of 7 months, 31/34 (88%) patients revealed sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: AF ablation using 90 W vHPvSD with a specialized ablation catheter in conjunction with a recently modified RF generator was associated with no EDEL in the whole study cohort and 26% SCEs in a subgroup of patients undergoing acute postablation cerebral MRI. Accordingly, to our previously published results, a relevant number of catheter tip coagulations was identified in this patient cohort even after modifications of the RF generator. The vHPvSD ablation technique using the present and the previous generator seems to be associated with a very low rate of esophageal injury. However, the recently revised generator software also produced a relevant number of catheter tip coagulum formation and SCEs.

Incidence of ablation-induced esophageal injury associated with high-power short duration temperature-controlled pulmonary vein isolation using a specialized open-irrigated ablation catheter: A retrospective single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate short-term efficacy and incidence of ablation-induced endoscopically detected esophageal injury in patients undergoing high-power, short-duration (HPSD) pulmonary vein isolation using a novel irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter and ablation generator setup. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, who underwent AF ablation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter specifically designed for a HPSD ablation approach (50 W, with a target Ablation Index of 350 at posterior wall), received postablation esophageal endoscopy after ablation. In total 45 consecutive patients (67 ± 10 years; 58% male; 42% paroxysmal AF) undergoing AF ablation using a specialized ablation catheter (QDOT) were included in the study. Thirty-one of 45 patients (69%) underwent a first-time pulmonary vein isolation (Group 1, 67 ± 11 years; 55% male; 48% paroxysmal AF). Fourteen patients (31%) underwent a redo AF procedure (Group 2, 66 ± 8 years; 64% male; 29% paroxysmal AF). Patients undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation were included in the final analysis. In these patients an endoscopically detected esophageal lesion (EDEL) was detected in 5 of 31 (16%) patients (erosion n = 2, ulcer n = 3). Mean contact force at posterior wall ablation sites was significantly lower in patients with postprocedural EDEL compared with patients without EDEL (11.9 ± 0.8 g vs. 15.6 ± 4.7 g). CONCLUSION: PVI using a specialized high-power ablation catheter in conjunction with a HPSD ablation approach results in a 16% incidence of EDEL in first AF ablation candidates. Future studies evaluating high-power short duration ablation strategies should include esophageal endoscopy to estimate the risk of clinically relevant esophageal complications.

Esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Determinants of risk and protective strategies.

Catheter ablation has become an important element in the management of atrial fibrillation. Several technical advances allowed for better safety profiles and lower recurrence rates, leading to an increasing number of ablations worldwide. Despite that, major complications are still reported, and esophageal thermal injury remains a significant concern as atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is often fatal. Recognition of the mechanisms involved in the process of esophageal lesion formation and the identification of the main determinants of risk have set the grounds for the development and improvement of different esophageal protective strategies. More sensitive esophageal temperature monitoring, safer ablation parameters and catheters, and different energy sources appear to collectively reduce the risk of esophageal thermal injury. Adjunctive measures such as the prophylactic use of proton-pump inhibitors, as well as esophageal cooling or deviation devices, have emerged as complementary methods with variable but promising results. Nevertheless, as a multifactorial problem, no single esophageal protective measure has proven to be sufficiently effective to eliminate the risk, and further investigation is still warranted. Early screening in the patients at risk and prompt intervention in the cases of AEF are important risk modifiers and yield better outcomes.

Complete circular endoscopic resection using submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement for circumferential superficial esophageal lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, removing a circumferential superficial esophageal lesion (SEL) via en bloc resection is still a great challenge. Based on the previous success of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of complete circular endoscopic resection (CER) using a submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement for patients with circumferential SELs. METHODS: From August 2012 to June 2014, 23 patients with circumferential SELs were treated by CER using a submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement. The following steps were performed: (1) circular mucosa incisions were made at the anal and oral side of the lesion after marking the margin, (2) two submucosal tunnels were created from the oral to anal side using a hybrid knife, which was followed by submucosal dissection, and (3) following the completion of CER, a retrievable esophageal stent was placed to prevent postoperative stricture. RESULTS: CER using the submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement was successfully performed for all 23 cases. The complete resection and success rate were 100%, while the mean longitudinal diameter of the lesions was 65 mm. Mediastinal emphysema, pneumothorax, and postoperative stenosis were detected in 8.7% (2/23), 4.3% (1/23), and 17.4% (4/23) of the cases, respectively. Pathological diagnoses of the lesions included carcinomas (13/23) and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasias (10/23). No residual or recurrent tumors were detected in any patient during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: CER using the submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement seems to be a safe and effective procedure for treating patients with SELs that result in a higher en bloc resection rate with fewer or minor complications.

Cryoballoon-Assisted Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Roof Ablation Using a Simplified Sedation Strategy without Esophageal Temperature Monitoring: No Notable Thermal Esophageal Lesions and Low Arrhythmia Recurrence Rates after 2 Years.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly effective for managing heart rhythm but poses risks like esophageal fistulas. Minimizing esophageal thermal lesions while simplifying procedures is crucial. METHODS: This prospective study involved 100 consecutive AF patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation with simplified sedation, without esophageal temperature monitoring. Patients with paroxysmal AF (Group A) received pulmonary vein isolation only, while those with persistent AF (Group B) also had left atrial roof ablation. Gastroesophageal endoscopy was performed post-procedure to detect lesions, and cardiological follow-ups were conducted at 3, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: The cohort included 69% men, with a median age of 65.5 years. Post-ablation endoscopy was performed in 92 patients; esophageal lesions were found in 1.1% of Group A and none of Group B. GERD was diagnosed in 14% of patients, evenly distributed between groups and not linked to lesion occurrence. Gastric hypomotility was observed in 16% of patients, with no significant difference between groups. At 24 months, arrhythmia-free survival was 88% in Group A and 74% in Group B. CONCLUSION: Cryoballoon-assisted pulmonary vein isolation, with or without additional left atrial roof ablation and without esophageal temperature monitoring during a simplified sedation strategy, shows low risk of esophageal thermal injury and effective ablation outcomes.

Application of endoscopic ultrasonography for detecting esophageal lesions based on convolutional neural network.

BACKGROUND: A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning algorithm based on the principle of human brain visual cortex processing and image recognition. AIM: To automatically identify the invasion depth and origin of esophageal lesions based on a CNN. METHODS: A total of 1670 white-light images were used to train and validate the CNN system. The method proposed in this paper included the following two parts: (1) Location module, an object detection network, locating the classified main image feature regions of the image for subsequent classification tasks; and (2) Classification module, a traditional classification CNN, classifying the images cut out by the object detection network. RESULTS: The CNN system proposed in this study achieved an overall accuracy of 82.49%, sensitivity of 80.23%, and specificity of 90.56%. In this study, after follow-up pathology, 726 patients were compared for endoscopic pathology. The misdiagnosis rate of endoscopic diagnosis in the lesion invasion range was approximately 9.5%; 41 patients showed no lesion invasion to the muscularis propria, but 36 of them pathologically showed invasion to the superficial muscularis propria. The patients with invasion of the tunica adventitia were all treated by surgery with an accuracy rate of 100%. For the examination of submucosal lesions, the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was approximately 99.3%. Results of this study showed that EUS had a high accuracy rate for the origin of submucosal lesions, whereas the misdiagnosis rate was slightly high in the evaluation of the invasion scope of lesions. Misdiagnosis could be due to different operating and diagnostic levels of endoscopists, unclear ultrasound probes, and unclear lesions. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to recognize esophageal EUS images through deep learning, which can automatically identify the invasion depth and lesion origin of submucosal tumors and classify such tumors, thereby achieving good accuracy. In future studies, this method can provide guidance and help to clinical endoscopists.

Defining the Position of the Right Wall of the Esophageal Hiatus to Identify the Circumferential Distribution of Small Lesions of the Lower Esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of methods for identifying the circumferential position of small lower esophageal lesions is unknown. We prospectively investigated a new method that presents lesion positions as times on a clock face. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients were consecutively examined by endoscopy. After observing the esophagus, an endoscope was inserted into the stomach and fixed, and the greater curvature folds at the upper gastric corpus were set as horizontal on the endoscope monitor display. The scope was retrogressed into the lower esophagus. At this point, the right wall at the hiatus is at the 3 o'clock position (R-line). The scope was then retrogressed from the gastric angle to the cardia along the center of the lesser curvature in the retroflexed view to obtain the LC-line (the center of the lesser curvature at the cardia). The LC-line in the esophageal hiatus in the frontal view was then identified, and the angle between the R- and LC-lines (R-LC) was measured. RESULTS: After excluding 7 patients with hernias >2 cm and 3 with esophageal stenosis, data from 77 patients were analyzed. The R-LC angle ranged from -38° to +35°. The mean R-LC angle was -0.3°± 15.9°, and its 95% confidence interval was [-4.0°, 3.3°] within [-15°, + 15°]. When indicating lesion locations as times on a clock face, there was an error of ±30 min (±15°); therefore, R- and LC-lines were shown to be identical on an equivalence test. CONCLUSIONS: This new method allows the circumferential position of small lower esophageal lesions to be reliably represented as a clock face.

ELNet:Automatic classification and segmentation for esophageal lesions using convolutional neural network.

Automatic and accurate esophageal lesion classification and segmentation is of great significance to clinically estimate the lesion statuses of the esophageal diseases and make suitable diagnostic schemes. Due to individual variations and visual similarities of lesions in shapes, colors, and textures, current clinical methods remain subject to potential high-risk and time-consumption issues. In this paper, we propose an Esophageal Lesion Network (ELNet) for automatic esophageal lesion classification and segmentation using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs). The underlying method automatically integrates dual-view contextual lesion information to extract global features and local features for esophageal lesion classification and lesion-specific segmentation network is proposed for automatic esophageal lesion annotation at pixel level. For the established clinical large-scale database of 1051 white-light endoscopic images, ten-fold cross-validation is used in method validation. Experiment results show that the proposed framework achieves classification with sensitivity of 0.9034, specificity of 0.9718, and accuracy of 0.9628, and the segmentation with sensitivity of 0.8018, specificity of 0.9655, and accuracy of 0.9462. All of these indicate that our method enables an efficient, accurate, and reliable esophageal lesion diagnosis in clinics.

The Role and Impact of Deep Learning Methods in Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

At present, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) based on deep learning in the medical field has become more extensive and suitable for clinical practice compared with traditional machine learning. The application of traditional machine learning approaches to clinical practice is very challenging because medical data are usually uncharacteristic. However, deep learning methods with self-learning abilities can effectively make use of excellent computing abilities to learn intricate and abstract features. Thus, they are promising for the classification and detection of lesions through gastrointestinal endoscopy using a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on deep learning. This study aimed to address the research development of a CAD system based on deep learning in order to assist doctors in classifying and detecting lesions in the stomach, intestines, and esophagus. It also summarized the limitations of the current methods and finally presented a prospect for future research.

[Complications of lymph node dissection in thyroid cancer]. / Komplikationen der Lymphknotendissektion beim Schilddrüsenkarzinom.

Cervical lymphadenectomy in thyroid cancer is a frequent intervention with around 20,000 operations per year in Germany. Some of the complications are identical with those in thyroid surgery, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism as well as postoperative bleeding and wound infection. Specific complications of lateral lymphadenectomy are lesions of the accessory, phrenic and hypoglossal nerves, the sympathetic trunk and cervical plexus as well as lesions of the salivary glands and lymphatic vessels, in particular the thoracic duct. Most of these complications are rare with a frequency of less than 1%. Profound knowledge of the anatomy and a meticulous dissection technique make a decisive contribution to minimizing these complications.

Progression From Esophageal Thermal Asymptomatic Lesion to Perforation Complicating Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Single-Center Registry.

BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients demonstrate endoscopically detected asymptomatic esophageal lesions (EDEL) after atrial fibrillation ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing first atrial fibrillation ablation and postinterventional esophageal endoscopy were included in the study. Occurrence of esophageal perforating complications during follow-up was related to documented EDEL (category 1: erythema/erosion; category 2: ulcer). In total, 1802 patients underwent first atrial fibrillation ablation procedure between January 2013 and August 2016 at our institution. Out of this group, 832 patients (506 male patients, 61%; 64.0±10.0 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal (n=345; 42%) or persistent atrial fibrillation underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy. Patients were ablated using single-tip ablation with conventional or surround flow irrigation and circular ablation catheters with open irrigation (nMARQ). In 295 of 832 patients (35%), a temperature probe was used. EDEL occurred in 150 patients (18%; n=98 category 1 EDEL, n=52 category 2 EDEL). In 5 of 832 patients (0.6%), an esophageal perforation (n=3) or an esophagopericardial or atrioesophageal fistula (n=2) occurred 15 to 28 days (19±6 days) after ablation. Two patients (1 atrioesophageal fistula and 1 esophagopericardial fistula) died. Esophageal perforation occurred only in patients with category 2 lesions (absolute risk, 9.6%). In a logistic regression analysis, ulcers were identified to be a significant predictor for esophageal perforating complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postablation endoscopy seems to identify patients at high risk of esophageal perforating complications only occurring in patients with category 2 EDEL. One out of 10 postablation esophageal ulcers progressed to perforation, and no patient without esophageal thermal ulcers showed the occurrence of perforating esophageal complications.

Thermal Field in Cryoablation Procedures for Pulmonary Veins Isolation: Importance of Esophageal Temperature Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation procedures for pulmonary veins isolation have proved to be a successful treatment of atrial fibrillation, but exposure of surrounding organs to excessively low temperatures is potentially dangerous. Hence the importance of monitoring esophageal temperature and at the same time predicting the thermal field induced by the procedure, so to provide clinicians with a valuable tool to take critical decisions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We formulate a mathematical model for computing the temperature in the relevant region and we use numerical simulations to interpret recorded clinical data. The temperature at the outer esophageal surface can be much lower than the luminal one. Observing the esophageal lumen cooling rate at the early stage of the procedure it is possible to forecast whether temperature is bound to reach dangerous values; the same quantity has a correlation with the steepness of the transesophageal thermal gradient. CONCLUSION: Monitoring the time evolution of luminal esophageal temperature is of fundamental importance not only to realize but also to predict well in advance critical developments of the procedure.

Management of subtotal tracheal section with esophageal perforation: a catastrophic complication of tracheostomy.

Herein, we reported a catastrophic condition as the almost complete rupture of trachea associated with esophageal lesion following an urgent surgical tracheostomy performed for unexpected difficult intubation. The extent of lesions required a surgical management. We decided against a resection and an end to end anastomosis but preferred to perform a direct suture of the lesion due to the presence of local and systemic infection. Then, the diagnosis of a tracheal fistula led us to perform a direct suture of the defect that was covered with muscle flaps. Actually the patient is alive without problems. Emergency situations as unexpected airway difficult intubation increase morbidity and mortality rate of tracheostomy also in expert hands. Sometimes these events are unpredictable. Mastery with a number of advanced airway technique should be sought when faced dealing with unexpected difficult intubations and written consent of such a concern should be given to the patient.

Higher incidence of esophageal lesions after ablation of atrial fibrillation related to the use of esophageal temperature probes.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) have been identified in apparently asymptomatic patients after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of esophageal probes to monitor luminal esophageal temperature (LET) during catheter ablation to protect esophageal damage is currently controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the use of esophageal temperature probes during AF catheter ablation on the incidence of EDELs. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients (mean age 63.8 ± 11.36 years; 68.8% men) with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal (n = 52, 65%) or persistent AF who underwent left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation were prospectively enrolled. Posterior wall ablation was power limited (≤25 W). In the first 40 patients, LET was monitored continuously (group A), whereas no esophageal temperature probe was used in group B (n = 40 patients). Assessment of EDEL was performed by endoscopy within 2 days after radiofrequency catheter ablation. RESULTS: Overall, 13 patients (16%) developed EDELs after AF ablation. The incidence of EDELs was significantly higher in group A than group B (30% vs 2.5%, P < .01). Within group A, patients who developed EDEL had higher maximal LET during AF ablation than patients without EDEL (40.97 ± 0.92°C vs 40.14 ± 1.1°C, P = .02). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the use of an esophageal temperature probe as the only independent predictor for the development of EDEL (odds ratio 16.7, P < .01). CONCLUSION: The use of esophageal temperature probes in the setting of AF catheter ablation per se appears to be a risk factor for the development of EDEL.