A multicenter randomized-controlled trial of nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) are the standard and mostly lifelong treatment for chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis B, as functional cure (loss of HBsAg) is rarely achieved. Discontinuation of NUC treatment may lead to functional cure; however, to date, the evidence for this has been based on small or non-randomized clinical trials. The STOP-NUC trial was designed with the aim of increasing the HBsAg loss rate using a NUC treatment interruption approach. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized-controlled trial, 166 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on continuous long-term NUC treatment, with HBV DNA <172 IU/ml (1,000 copies/ml) for ≥4 years, were randomized to either stop (Arm A) or continue NUC treatment (Arm B) for a 96-week observation period. In total, 158 patients were available for final analysis, 79 per arm. The primary endpoint was sustained HBsAg loss up to week 96. RESULTS: Our study met its primary objective by demonstrating HBsAg loss in eight patients (10.1%, 95% CI 4.8%-19.5%) in Arm A and in no patient in Arm B (p = 0.006). Among patients with baseline HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml, seven (28%) achieved HBsAg loss. In Arm A, re-therapy was initiated in 11 (13.9%) patients, whereas 32 (40.5%) patients achieved sustained remission. A decrease of HBsAg >1 log IU/ml was observed in 16 patients (20.3%) in Arm A and in one patient (1.3%) in Arm B. No serious adverse events related to treatment cessation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Cessation of NUC treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of HBsAg loss than continued NUC treatment, which was largely restricted to patients with end of treatment HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: As HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) rarely achieve functional cure, treatment is almost always lifelong. The STOP-NUC trial was conducted to investigate whether discontinuing long-term NUC treatment can increase the cure rate. We found that some patients achieved functional cure after stopping NUCs, which was especially pronounced in patients with HBsAg levels <1,000 at the end of NUC treatment, and that many did not need to resume therapy. The results of the Stop-NUC trial provide evidence for the concept of stopping NUC treatment as a therapeutic option that can induce functional cure.

GAL-021, a new intravenous BKCa-channel blocker, is well tolerated and stimulates ventilation in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Potassium-channels in the carotid body and the brainstem are important regulators of ventilation. The BKCa-channel contains response elements for CO, O2, and CO2. Its block increases carotid body signalling, phrenic nerve activity, and respiratory drive. GAL-021, a new BKCa-channel blocker, increases minute ventilation in rats and non-human primates. This study assessed the single-dose safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of GAL-021 in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Thirty subjects participated in a nine-period, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover, ascending dose, first-in-human study with i.v. infusions of 0.1-0.96 mg kg(-1) h(-1) for 1 h and intermediate doses up to 4 h. RESULTS: Adverse event rates were generally similar among dose levels and between placebo- and GAL-021-treated subjects. At higher GAL-021 doses, a mild/moderate burning sensation at the infusion site occurred during the infusion. No clinically significant changes in vital signs or clinical chemistries were noted. Minute ventilation increased (AUE0-1 h ≈ 16%, P<0.05) and end-tidal carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) decreased (AUE0-1 h ≈ 6%, P<0.05) during the first hour at 0.96 mg kg(-1) h(-1) with 1/2-maximal [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]-change occurring by 7.5 min. Drug concentration rose rapidly during the infusion and decreased rapidly initially (distribution t1/2 of 30 min) and then more slowly (terminal t1/2 of 5.6 h). CONCLUSIONS: GAL-021 was safe and generally well tolerated with adverse events comparable with placebo except for an infusion site burning sensation. GAL-021 stimulated ventilation at the highest doses suggesting that greater infusion rates may be required for maximum PD effects. GAL-021 had PK characteristics consistent with an acute care medication.

An open-label phase 2 study treating patients with first or second relapse of multiple myeloma with carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd): SELECT study.

Once-weekly carfilzomib at 56 mg/m2 plus immunomodulatory drugs and dexamethasone has shown efficacy and tolerability treating early relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The phase 2 SELECT study (NCT04191616) evaluated efficacy/safety of weekly carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) in early RRMM patients refractory to lenalidomide. All 52 treated patients were refractory to prior treatment, and 19 (37%) were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate (ORR; primary endpoint) was 58% (35% ≥ very good partial response, 6% ≥ complete response); median response duration was 20.3 months. Minimal residual disease negativity (10-5) was achieved in 10% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months; median overall survival was 18.8 months. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile including grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs reported in 67% of patients. Although the primary endpoint of ORR was not met, KPd showed meaningful clinical benefits in lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients, including those who were daratumumab-refractory and/or triple-class refractory.

Patient-reported outcomes are under-utilised in evaluating supportive therapies in paediatric oncology - A systematic review of clinical trial registries.

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer suffer from numerous symptoms and side-effects, making supportive interventions indispensable to improve their quality of life. The gold standard for evaluating the latter is patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment. This systematic review investigates the current practice of clinical outcome assessment (COA) in clinical trials on supportive interventions. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT were searched for trials including children and adolescents (≤21 years) with cancer receiving supportive care registered 2007-2020. The use of different types of COAs was analysed, focusing on PRO assessment and the domains measured with PRO measures (PROMs). Associations with trial characteristics were investigated using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 4789 identified trials, 229 were included. Among them, 44.1 % relied on PROMs, the most commonly used COA. The proportion of trials using PROMs did not significantly differ over time. In the multivariable analysis, intervention type (higher PROM use in behavioural vs. medical interventional trials) and cancer type (higher PROM use in mixed and solid tumour samples vs. haematological samples) were significant predictors of PROM use. The majority of trials using PROMs (59.6 %) measured more than one health domain. 'Physical health' was the most frequently assessed domain (92.6 %). CONCLUSION: Less than half of registered clinical trials investigating supportive interventions for children with cancer used PROMs. This result is striking since supportive care explicitly focuses on patients' quality of life, which is best assessed using PROMs. Our systematic review underlines the need to identify barriers for PROM implementation and to improve PRO research in paediatric oncology.

European non-commercial sponsors showed substantial variation in results reporting to the EU trial registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trial results reporting behavior of leading European non-commercial sponsors by country and over time. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis describing results reporting rates to the European Clinical Trials Registry among the top sponsors across Europe as of May 2021 and a comparison of reporting trends for a cohort of major sponsors between January 2018 and May 2021. RESULTS: Fifty-nine highly active sponsors from 10 countries and 9 collaborative groups had 1,916 trials due to report, representing 14% of all due trials on the registry (n = 13,709); of these, 1,058 had reported results (55.2%). Sponsors in the UK, Belgium and Germany had the highest compliance at 94%, 69% and 58%; those in Spain, France and the Netherlands, had the lowest, ranging from 4% to 21%. Collaborative groups had a reporting rate of 50%. In the major sponsors cohort (n = 49), those with no reporting to the registry decreased from 27 (55%) in 2018 to 10 (20%) in 2021. Thirteen of these sponsors (27%) reached a 90-100% reporting rate in 2021 compared to 0 in 2018. CONCLUSION: Compliance with EU regulations by non-commercial sponsors is highly variable between countries. Enforcement of EU reporting regulations should be prioritized.

Rare use of patient-reported outcomes in childhood cancer clinical trials - a systematic review of clinical trial registries.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are the gold standard to assess the patients' subjective health status. While both the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency recommend the use of PROs as end-points in paediatric clinical trials to support claims for medical product labelling, it is not known how often PROs are actually used. The aim of this study was to assess the usage of PRO instruments in childhood cancer clinical trials investigating anti-cancer medication. METHODS: In June 2020 ClinicalTrials and EudraCT were systematically searched for all trials including children and adolescents (≤21 years) with cancer registered between 2007 and 2020. The use of PRO measures and trials characteristics were analysed. To investigate which trial characteristics are associated with the use of PROs, a binary logistic regression was calculated. RESULTS: Of 4789 identified trials, 711 were included. The most frequent reason for exclusion was age limitation (age >21 years). Of all included trials, only 8.2% used PROs as end-points; .6% as the primary end-point. The most commonly used questionnaire was the PedsQL™ (32.8%), followed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales (12.1%). No association was observed between the use of PROs and trial region, number of centres, trial phase, time period or intervention type (all p > .05). The use of PROs did not substantially increase over time. Only 20.3% of the closed studies had published their results. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations of regulatory agencies, PRO assessment is extremely rare in paediatric oncology clinical trials. More efforts should be undertaken to facilitate implementation of PRO in paediatric trials to guarantee patient-centred research and treatments.

Acute administration of roflumilast enhances immediate recall of verbal word memory in healthy young adults.

The need for new and effective treatments for dementia remains indisputably high. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-Is) have proven efficacy as cognitive enhancers based on their positive effects in numerous preclinical studies. Especially the PDE4 subfamily is of interest due to its expression in the hippocampus, the key structure for memory formation. The current study investigates the memory enhancing effects of the clinically approved PDE4-I roflumilast in a test battery including the Verbal Learning Task (VLT) combined with electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This acute study was conducted according to a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover design. Three capsulated dosages of roflumilast HCl (Daxas) and a placebo were administered in four study periods. Administration occurred 1 h before testing to reach maximal plasma concentrations. Memory performance was assessed using a 30 word Verbal Learning Task. The number of words recalled both immediately and after 45 min and 24 h were included as outcome measures. EEG was recorded during the cognitive tasks on the first day. Different event-related potentials (ERPs) were considered with special emphasis on P600, as this peak has been related to word learning. Memory performance was significantly improved after acute administration of 100 µg roflumilast. Specifically, immediate recall performance on the VLT increased 2-3 words, accompanied by an enhanced P600 peak during word presentation at the third learning trial. No side effects typical for PDE4-Is were reported for the lowest and effective dose of 100 µg roflumilast. The current proof-of-concept study shows for the first time the potential of low-dose roflumilast administration as a memory enhancer in humans.

Effects of levomilnacipran ER on noradrenergic symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and functional impairment in adults with major depressive disorder: Post hoc analysis of 5 clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of levomilnacipran extended-release (LVM-ER; 40-120mg/day) on noradrenergic (NA) and anxiety-related symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and explore the relationship between these symptoms and functional impairment. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N=2598). Anxiety and NA Cluster scores were developed by adding selected item scores from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17). A path analysis was conducted to estimate the direct effects of LVM-ER on functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] total score) and the indirect effects through changes in NA and Anxiety Cluster scores. RESULTS: Mean improvements from baseline in NA and Anxiety Cluster scores were significantly greater with LVM-ER versus placebo (both P<0.001), as were the response rates (≥50% score improvement): NA Cluster (44% vs 34%; odds ratio=1.56; P<0.0001); Anxiety Cluster (39% vs 36%; odds ratio=1.19; P=0.041). Mean improvement in SDS total score was also significantly greater with LVM-ER versus placebo (-7.3 vs -5.6; P<0.0001). LVM-ER had an indirect effect on change in SDS total score that was mediated more strongly through NA Cluster score change (86%) than Anxiety Cluster score change (18%); the direct effect was negligible. LIMITATIONS: NA and Anxiety Cluster scores, developed based on the face validity of individual MADRS and HAMD17 items, were not predefined as efficacy outcomes in any of the studies. CONCLUSION: In adults with MDD, LVM-ER indirectly improved functional impairment mainly through improvements in NA symptoms and less so via anxiety symptoms.

Estimation of the optimum dose of vitamin D for disease prevention in older people: rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the BEST-D trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous large trials of vitamin D for prevention of fractures and other disease outcomes have reported conflicting results, possibly because the doses tested were insufficient to maintain optimum blood levels of vitamin D (25[OH]D) predicted by the observational studies. This report describes the design and baseline characteristics of the BEST-D (Biochemical Efficacy and Safety Trial of vitamin D) trial which aims to establish the best dose of vitamin D to assess in a future large outcome trial. METHODS: The BEST-D trial will compare the biochemical and other effects of daily dietary supplementation with 100 µg or 50 µg vitamin D3 or placebo, when administered for 12 months, in 305 ambulant community-dwelling older people living in Oxfordshire, England. The primary analyses will compare 12-month mean plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D as well as the proportion of participants with a 12-month concentration >90 nmol/L between participants allocated 100 µg and participants allocated 50 µg daily. Secondary analyses will compare the two active doses (both separately and when combined) with placebo. Additional end-points include biochemical assessments of safety, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, falls, fractures, heel and wrist bone density, grip strength and physical performance and echocardiographic assessments of cardiac function in a random sample of participants. RESULTS: About one-third of eligible participants agreed to participate in the trial. The mean age was 72 (SD 6) years with equal numbers of men and women. About one third reported a prior history of fracture or hypertension, one-fifth reported a prior cardiovascular event, and one tenth reported diabetes or a fall in the previous 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial will help determine the optimum dose of vitamin D to test in a larger trial investigating whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of fractures, cardiovascular disease or cancer.