RESUMO
Journal clubs in nursing practice: An online survey of German university hospitals Abstract. Background: Journal clubs (JCs) are an evidence-based method for enabling nursing professionals to develop a scientifically based practice. Research results can be made available to nurses to directly influence their nursing practice. The level of implementation in German university hospitals is currently unknown. Aim: This study surveyed the current state of JCs at German university hospitals. The aim is to develop recommendations for the implementation of JCs for nursing practice. Methods: The online survey of all 27 representatives of the "Network of Nursing Science and Practice Development" of the VPU e.V. was conducted from October to November 2020. The questionnaire was developed based on literature. The data analysis was descriptive. Results: 15 of the 19 clinics surveyed currently implement, or have previously implemented, a JC (response rate 70,4%). In approximately half of the clinics, JC is an established structure that is also offered as part of advanced training and continuing education (46,6%) and is used to develop and expand methodological, scientific competencies (86,6%). Positive experiences, but also structural problems in the implementation of a JC were reported. Approximately one quarter of the clinics evaluate their JC regularly (26,7%). Conclusions: JCs at German university hospitals are currently being established. In order to establish JCs on a permanent basis, EBN knowledge must be continuously imparted in further education and training; in addition, JCs should be an essential component of academic role profiles.
Assuntos
Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides an important basis for improving both the quality of care and patient safety. Formulating a research question, searching the literature, and critical appraisal are crucial to developing evidence-based practice. The aim of this survey was to provide an overview of how these topics are integrated into bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We also aimed to show how teachers implement these subjects and how they experience and assess the implementation. METHOD: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online survey sent out to program directors and teaching staff of all 58 bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For data collection, a questionnaire was developed containing items on general teaching conditions, contents, and methods of evidence-based nursing practice, as well as on the estimated thematic interest of students. The data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The program directors returned 24 questionnaires (41%). Of 75 questionnaires forwarded to the faculty, 17 (23%) were received from nine programs. On average, 5.6 teaching units (SD 2.6) are used for formulating a research question, 10 teaching units (SD 4.1) for literature review, and 11.3 teaching units (SD 6.9) for critical appraisal. Half of the teaching staff indicated that linkages between education and nursing care practice have been established. The traditional teaching method of frontal teaching is used predominantly. Student interest in topics was rated as moderate by most teachers. CONCLUSIONS: Topics on evidence-based practice are an integral part of bachelor's degree programs in nursing in German-speaking countries. An increase in teaching units, active learning methods and the growing interconnection between education and practice could improve the acquisition of competencies and attitudes of students regarding EBP and further advance its implementation in practice.