A two-stage combined anterolateral and endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical study and clinical application.

OBJECT: The pretemporal transcavernous anterior petrosal (PTAP) approach and the combined petrosal (CP) approach have been used to resect petroclival meningiomas (PCMs). In this cadaveric anatomical study, a two-stage combined PTAP and endoscopic endonasal far medial (EEFM) approach (the PTAPE approach) was compared morphometrically to the CP approach. A case study provides a clinical example of using the PTAPE approach to treat a patient with a PCM. The key elements of the approach selection process are outlined. METHODS: Five cadaveric specimens underwent a CP approach and 5 underwent a PTAPE approach. The area of drilled clivus, length of multiple cranial nerves (CNs), and the area of brain stem exposure were measured, reported as means (standard deviations) by group, and compared. RESULTS: The total area of the clivus drilled in the PTAPE group (695.3 [121.7] mm2) was greater than in the CP group (88.7 [17.06] mm2, P < 0.01). Longer segments of CN VI were exposed via the PTAPE than the CP approach (35.6 [9.07] vs. 16.3 [6.02] mm, P < 0.01). CN XII (8.8 [1.06] mm) was exposed only in the PTAPE group. Above the pontomedullary sulcus, the total area of brain stem exposed was greater with the PTAPE than the CP approach (1003.4 [219.5] mm2 vs. 437.6 [83.7] mm2, P < 0.01). Similarly, the total exposure of the medulla was greater after the PTAPE than the CP exposure (240.2 [57.06] mm2 vs. 48.1 [19.9] mm2, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A combined open-endoscopic paradigm is proposed for managing large PCMs. This approach incorporates the EEFM approach to address the limitations of the PTAP and the CP approach in a systematic fashion. Understanding the anatomical findings of this study will aid in tailoring surgical approaches to patients with these complex lesions.

Techniques and challenges of the expanded endoscopic endonasal access to the ventrolateral skull base during the "far-medial" and "extreme medial" approaches.

BACKGROUND: Expanding the ventrolateral skull base corridor from the midline of lower clivus to the petroclival fissure is a challenging endonasal surgical task. Resection of lytic lesions like chondrosarcoma can cause cranial nerve morbidities and injury of ICA, necessitating accurate knowledge of correlative endoscopic anatomy with stereotactic landmarks. METHODS: We describe an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for a right petroclival chondrosarcoma with the demonstration of ipsilateral surgical landmarks with contralateral normal correlates, using a stepwise comparative image-guided cadaveric dissection study. CONCLUSION: EEA for lytic lesions like chondrosarcomas needs to address brain shift and displacement of ICA, posing a chance for cranial nerve morbidities and ICA injury. Meticulous utilization of intraoperative stereotactic landmarks can help avoid and mitigate surgical complications.

Successful treatment of recurrent extracranial hypoglossal schwannoma using the neuroendoscopic transnasal far-medial approach.

Background: Extracranial hypoglossal schwannomas are rare, and transcranial skull base surgery can be challenging due to their proximity to the lower cranial nerves, jugular vein, vertebral artery, and carotid artery. The application of neuroendoscopic surgery for extracranial hypoglossal schwannomas has rarely been reported. Case Description: A 53-year-old woman previously underwent lateral suboccipital surgery for a hypoglossal schwannoma when she was 25 years old. The patient had experienced aggravated dysphagia over the past month. Radiological examination revealed a recurrent extracranial hypoglossal schwannoma invading the left side of the clivus. The neuroendoscopic transnasal far-medial approach was performed, and the recurrent schwannoma was completely removed without any significant perioperative complications or recurrence for 3 years. Conclusion: Our report highlights the usefulness of the neuroendoscopic transnasal far-medial approach for the removal of recurrent extracranial hypoglossal schwannomas. The neuroendoscopic approach offers a viable and less invasive alternative to traditional transcranial skull-base surgery, especially in complex cases involving critical anatomical structures. The reported case study underscores the potential of neuroendoscopic surgery as a valuable tool in managing challenging skull-base tumors.

Anatomical Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Endoscopic Endonasal Middle-Inferior Clivectomy, Odontoidectomy, and Far-Medial Approach.

Introduction The clival, paraclival, and craniocervical junction regions are challenging surgical targets. To approach these areas, endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches (EETCAs) and their extensions (far-medial approach and odontoidectomy) have gained popularity as they obviate manipulating and working between neurovascular structures. Although several cadaveric studies have further refined these contemporary approaches, few provide a detailed step-by-step description. Thus, we aim to didactically describe the steps of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees. Methods Six formalin-fixed cadaveric head specimens were dissected. All specimens were latex-injected using a six-vessel technique. Endoscopic endonasal middle and inferior clivectomies, far-medial approaches, and odontoidectomy were performed. Results Using angled endoscopes and surgical instruments, an endoscopic endonasal midclivectomy and partial inferior clivectomy were performed without nasopharyngeal tissue disruption. To complete the inferior clivectomy, far-medial approach, and partially remove the anterior arch of C1 and odontoid process, anteroinferior transposition of the Eustachian-nasopharynx complex was required by transecting pterygosphenoidal fissure tissue, but incision in the nasopharynx was not necessary. Full exposure of the craniocervical junction necessitated bilateral sharp incision and additional inferior mobilization of the posterior nasopharynx. Unobstructed access to neurovascular anatomy of the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction was provided. Conclusion EETCAs are a powerful tool for the skull-base surgeon as they offer a direct corridor to the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction unobstructed by eloquent neurovasculature. To facilitate easier understanding of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees, we described the anatomy and surgical nuances in a didactic and step-by-step fashion.

A Contemporary Clinico-Anatomical Guide to Craniovertebral Junction Surgery.

Background Surgical treatment of ventral and ventrolateral lesions of the craniocervical junction are among the most challenging neurosurgical pathologies to treat. Three surgical techniques, the far lateral approach (and its variations), the anterolateral approach, and the endoscopic far medial approach can be used to approach and resect lesions in this area. Objective The aim of the study is to examine the surgical anatomy of three skull base approaches to the craniocervical junction and review surgical cases to better understand the indications and possible complications for each of these approaches. Methods Cadaveric dissections with standard microsurgical and endoscopic instruments were performed for each of the three surgical approaches, and key steps and surgically relevant anatomy were documented. Six patients with appropriate pre-, post-, and intraoperative imaging and video documentation are presented and discussed accordingly. Results Based on our institutional experience, all three approaches can be utilized to safely and effectively approach a wide variety of neoplastic and vascular pathology. Unique anatomical characteristics, lesion morphology and size, and tumor biology should all be considered when determining the optimal approach. Conclusion Preoperative assessment of surgical corridors with 3D illustrations helps to define the best surgical corridor. 360 degree knowledge of the anatomy of craniovertebral junction allows safe surgical approach and treatment of ventral and ventrolateral located lesions using one of the three approaches.

Approaching Intradural Lesions of the Anterior Foramen Magnum and Craniocervical Junction: Anatomical Comparison of the Open Posterolateral and Anterior Extended Endonasal Endoscopic Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Lesions of the foramen magnum (FM) and craniocervical junction area are traditionally managed surgically through anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral skull-base approaches. This anatomical study aimed to compare the usefulness of a modified extended endoscopic approach, the so-called far-medial endonasal approach (FMEA), versus the traditional posterolateral far-lateral approach (FLA). METHODS: Ten fixed silicon-injected heads specimens were used in the Skull Base ENT-Neurosurgery Laboratory of the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. A total of 20 FLAs and 10 FMEAs were realized. A high-resolution computed tomography scan was performed for quantitative analysis of the different approaches. The analysis aimed to estimate the extent of surgical exposure and freedom of movement (maneuverability) through the operating channel using a polygonal surface model to obtain a morphometric estimation of the area of interest (surface and volume) on postdissection computed tomography scans using Slicer 3D software. RESULTS: FMEA allows for a more direct route to the anterior FM, with wider brainstem exposure compared with the FLA and an excellent visualization of all anterior midline structures. The limitations of the FMEA include the deep and narrow surgical corridor and difficulty in reaching lesions located laterally over the jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal. CONCLUSIONS: The FMEA and FLA are both effective surgical routes to reach FM and craniocervical junction lesions. Modern skull base surgeons should have a good command of both because they appear complementary. This anatomical study provides the tools for comprehensive preoperative evaluations and selection of the most appropriate surgical approach.

Effect of Tunnel Drilling Portal on Femoral Tunnel Entry Aperture's Location in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Introduction Transportal techniques for femoral tunnel drilling have the advantage of anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which was earlier difficult to achieve through transtibial femoral tunnels. However, the medial arthroscopic portal used for femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has not been uniformly placed in different studies. Therefore, we performed a computed tomography-based analysis to compare the femoral tunnel entry aperture of the ACLR cases that used the standard AM portal and those using a far medial portal for femoral tunnel drilling. Methods We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography images of patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR in our institute with either standard anteromedial portal or the far medial portal used for the femoral tunnel drilling. The femoral tunnel aperture's depth and height, measured using the quadrant method, were compared between the two portal methods. Results A total of forty-two case records were reviewed, sixteen belonging to standard anteromedial portal technique and twenty-six belonging to far medial portal technique. The tunnels created through the far AM portal were significantly shallower (more anterior) and inferior than the standard AM portal-created femoral tunnels. Conclusion The choice of drilling portals can influence transportal femoral tunnel drilling. A tendency towards anterior and inferior positioning of the femoral tunnel entry aperture has been observed when a far medial arthroscopic portal is used for femoral tunnel drilling. Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that the drilling guide pin position does not change when the reamer is passed over it.

The Combined Endoscopic Endonasal Far Medial and Open Postauricular Transtemporal Approaches As a Lesser Invasive Approach to the Jugular Foramen: Anatomic Morphometric Study With Case Illustration.

BACKGROUND: Access to the jugular foramen (JF) requires extensive approaches. An endoscopic endonasal far medial (EEFM) approach combined with a postauricular transtemporal (PTT) approach may provide adequate exposure with limited morbidities. OBJECTIVE: To provide a quantitative anatomic comparison of the EEFM, the PTT, and the combined EEFM/PTT approaches. A clinical case of the combined approach is presented. METHODS: Five cadaveric heads were dissected. Each specimen received PTT and EEFM approaches on opposite sides followed by an EEFM approach on the side of the PTT approach. Morphometric and quadrant analyses were conducted. Three groups were obtained and compared: PTT (group A), EEFM (group B), and combined (group C). RESULTS: Group B had a significantly higher area of exposure of the JF as compared to group A (112.3 and 225 mm2, respectively, P = .004). The average degree of freedom (DOF) in the cranio-caudal plane for groups A and B was 63.6 and 12.6 degrees, respectively (P < .00001). Group A had a higher DOF in the medial-lateral plane than group B (49 vs 13.4 degrees, respectively, P < .00001. The average volume of exposure in groups A and B was 1469.2 and 1897.4 mm3, respectively (P = .02). By adding an EEFM approach to the PTT approach, an additional 56.1% of the anterior quadrant was exposed, representing a 584.4% increase in the anterior exposure. CONCLUSION: The PTT and EEFM approaches provide optimal exposures to different aspects of the JF and in combination may constitute a less invasive alternative to the more extensive approaches.

Comparative Analysis of the Subtonsillar, Far-Lateral, Extreme-Lateral, and Endoscopic Far-Medial Approaches to the Lower Clivus: An Anatomical Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: The lower clivus (LC) is one of the most difficult areas to access in neurosurgery. Several microsurgical approaches to the LC have been reported, including the subtonsillar, far-lateral (FL), extreme-lateral (EL), and endoscopic far-medial (Endo-FM). However, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal approach. We aimed to quantify and compare the surgical exposure and freedom (angle of attack) for various targets at the LC using these 4 surgical approaches. METHODS: The subtonsillar, FL, EL, and Endo-FM approaches were performed on 5 cadaveric specimens (total 10 sides). Surgical exposure and freedom were measured using the neuronavigation system. RESULTS: At the LC, the Endo-FM approach provided the greatest area of exposure (459.3 ± 82.2 mm2). For surgical freedom, the EL approach provided the greatest angle of attack at the jugular foramen (98.1° ± 9.2°) and hypoglossal canal (128.8° ± 26.1°). The Endo-FM was the only approach that provided access to the midline of the LC in all specimens. However, the surgical freedom at the midline (20.9° ± 2.4° at the level of the jugular foramen; 24.2° ± 2.9° at the level of hypoglossal canal) was limited by its deep surgical corridor (104.3 ± 11.2 mm) compared with the EL and FL approaches. CONCLUSION: The Endo-FM approach provided the greatest surgical freedom at the ventral aspect but the least freedom at the lateral aspect. The EL approach provided maximal values for most parameters among the open approaches; however, the craniotomy with the EL approach was the most complicated. Our quantitative results could guide neurosurgeons in preoperative planning for LC lesions, including awareness of the maximum exposure limits and the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical approach.

Analysis of the far-medial transoral endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To demonstrate anatomic relationships of the far-medial transoral endoscopic assisted approach (FMT-EAA) to the infratemporal fossa (ITF) and define the corridor dimensions, surgical freedom, and limitations associated with this approach. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. METHODS: Twenty ITFs (10 specimens) were dissected with the assistance of 0 °, 30 °, and 45 ° rod-lens endoscopes. Image guidance was used to confirm and measure the corridors' structural boundaries and document the anatomical relationships encountered in this approach. RESULTS: Access to the ITF via the FMT-EAA can be divided into two secondary surgical corridors: the superomedial and inferolateral triangles, each of which provides access to different areas. The superomedial triangle is bounded medially by the lateral pterygoid plate and posterolateral maxillary sinus wall, superiorly by the greater sphenoid wing, and inferolaterally by the lateral pterygoid muscle. The inferolateral triangle is bounded superiorly by the lower head of the lateral pterygoid muscle, inferiorly by the medial pterygoid muscle, and laterally by the mandible. Using a standard 19-mm endoscope, the FMT-EAA achieves a mean surgical freedom of 231 mm and 161 mm in the vertical and horizontal planes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FMT-EAA adequately exposes critical structures of the ITF. This technique is a viable option for the management of selected ITF lesions, either alone or in combination with alternative minimally invasive approaches to the region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 128:2273-2281, 2018.

The Safety of a Far Medial Arthroscopic Portal for Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: An arthroscopic technique for anatomic glenoid reconstruction has been proposed for the treatment of glenohumeral bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. This technique is proposed as an alternative to open techniques as well as to the technically challenging arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. In arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction, a distal tibial allograft is inserted through a novel far medial portal, superior to the subscapularis tendon and lateral to the conjoint tendon. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of the far medial arthroscopic portal for anatomic glenoid reconstruction in a cadaveric study. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Ten cadaveric shoulder specimens were dissected after inside-out medial arthroscopic portal insertion in the lateral decubitus position for arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction. A single observer performed 3 measurements on each specimen with a digital caliper (to the nearest 0.1 mm) from the medial portal to neurovascular structures, and the mean (±SD) and the range were calculated. The anthropometric data of the cadaveric specimens were also collected. RESULTS: The mean distances between the far medial arthroscopic portal and sensitive anatomic structures were as follows: 50.79 ± 13.69 mm from the musculocutaneous nerve, 46.28 ± 9.64 mm from the axillary nerve, 6.71 ± 8.52 mm from the cephalic vein, and 48.52 ± 7.22 mm from the subclavian artery and vein. The mean size of the medial arthroscopic portal was 25.60 mm. In all cases, the subscapularis muscle was intact. CONCLUSION: The far medial arthroscopic portal for anatomic glenoid reconstruction without a subscapularis split presents a minimal risk to most neurovascular structures during bony reconstruction of the glenoid surface in patients with anterior shoulder instability. The only anatomic structure at risk is the cephalic vein, while the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves are at a safe distance away from the portal, based on previous shoulder arthroscopic portal safety studies in the literature. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using a distal tibial allograft is increasing in popularity for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with significant bone loss. Being a relatively new technique, the safety of it has yet to be established. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety of a new portal used for arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction.

Combined Endoscopic Transoral and Endonasal Approach to the Jugular Foramen: A Multiportal Expanded Access to the Clivus.

BACKGROUND: The expanded endoscopic endonasal ("far medial") approach to the inferior clivus provides a unique surgical corridor to the ventral surface of the pontomedullary and cervicomedullary junctions. However, exposing neoplasms involving the jugular foramen (JF) through this approach requires extensive nasopharyngeal resection and lateral dissection beyond the boundaries of the endonasal corridor, limiting the extent of resection and restricting to use of this approach to expert surgeons. Here we describe a multiportal endoscopic transoral and endonasal approach to maximize surgical access to the JF and clivus. METHODS: A multiportal endoscopic transoral and endoscopic approach to the JF and lower clivus was simulated in 8 specimens. A transoral corridor was created through a soft palate incision. The JF and parapharyngeal space were dissected through the transoral trajectory under endoscopic endonasal view. The length of the corridor of the transnasal and transoral trajectories was measured. RESULTS: The JF was exposed intracranially and extracranially. The exposure extended superiorly to the sphenoid floor, inferiorly to the anterior atlanto-occipital space, and laterally to the internal acoustic meatus and parapharyngeal space. The cisternal parts of the cranial nerves VII-XII and C1 nerve bundles were accessible. Exposure of the JF contents and parapharyngeal space was possible using straight scopes, without Eustachian tube resection. The working corridor to the JF was significantly shorter through the mouth than through the nose (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This approach provides access to the JF from a ventromedial trajectory, enabling panoramic views, and outlines an expanded surgical exposure (superolateral intradural and inferolateral extracranial). It may provide optimal access for resection of dumbbell-shaped lesions of the JF.