Surgical management of spiral oblique fractures of the fifth metatarsal leads to faster return to play in athletes: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes following both operative and nonoperative management of spiral oblique fractures of the fifth metatarsal. METHODS: During November 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following operative and nonoperative management of dancer's fractures. Data regarding subjective clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, complications and failure rates were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this review. In total, 125 patients underwent operative treatment for dancer's fractures and 365 patients underwent nonoperative treatment for dancer's fractures. The weighted mean follow-up in the operative cohort was 15.3 ± 32.7 months and the weighted mean follow-up in the nonoperative cohort was 30.6 ± 24.3 months. The overall union rate in the operative cohort was 99.2% and the overall union rate in the nonoperative cohort was 98.6%. The weighted mean time to return to sport was 15.4 ± 6.7 and 22.4 ± 4.4 weeks in the operative cohort and nonoperative cohort, respectively. The complication rate in the operative cohort and nonoperative cohort was 12.0% and 15.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This current systematic review demonstrated comparable radiographic outcomes together with low failure rate and low complication rate following both operative and nonoperative management of dancer's fracture at short-term follow-up. However, faster return to sport rates was observed in the operative cohort, suggesting that surgical management of displaced spiral oblique fractures of the fifth metatarsal should be the mainstay treatment option. However, the under-reporting of data, marked heterogeneity between studies and paucity of comparative studies limits the generation of any robust conclusions; thus, further high-quality comparative studies are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Forefoot Adduction, Hindfoot Varus or Pes Cavus: Risk Factors for Fifth Metatarsal Fractures and Jones Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The origin of fractures of the fifth metatarsus and Jones fracture is not clear. The goal of this study was to investigate the evidence of anatomical deformities such as metatarsus adductus, hindfoot varus, or pes cavus as risk factors for this pathology. A literature search of records related to the review question was performed screening PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane library databases (last update: May 2020) according to PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed using the mean difference of the assessed angles (in patients with the fractures vs controls) as outcome measure to summarize literature findings about metatarsus adductus angle (MAA) indicating forefoot adduction, calcaneal pitch angle (CP) indicating hindfoot cavus and varus deformity and Talo-1st metatarsus angle/Meary's angle (T1stMA) for varus alignment. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis (296 patients), 5 in the quantitative synthesis (132 patients). The pooled mean difference of MAA between fracture versus control group on a per patient-based analysis was 4.62 (95% CI 1.31-7.92). Statistical heterogeneity among studies was detected (I-Square: 76.1%), likely due to different patient groups and low number of studies. The pooled mean differences of CP and T1stMA among fracture group versus controls did not show statistical significance. Despite limited literature data, metatarsus adductus deformity seems to be correlated with higher risk of proximal metatarsal fractures and Jones fracture. A significant relationship between hindfoot varus or pes cavus and these fractures was not demonstrated. Further studies and trials are warranted to shed more lights on this topic.

Is Surgical Treatment Necessary for the Treatment of a Jones Fracture?: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Jones fractures are common injuries that can be treated conservatively or surgically. However, the optimal treatment approach remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of conservative and operative treatments for Jones fractures and determine whether surgical treatment is necessary. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 69 patients with Jones fractures treated at our hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: conservative (C group; n = 46) and operative (O group; n = 23) treatments. Patients were followed up after 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter. However, outpatient follow-ups were conducted between 8 and 10 weeks as needed. The mean follow-up period was 14.5 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). In group C, the patients were treated with a non-weight-bearing cast for 4-6 weeks, followed by additional weight-bearing boot immobilization before returning to exercise. In group O, patients were treated surgically using a bicortical screw or intramedullary internal fixation. Time to radiologic union, clinical union, return to sports, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index-Revised Short Form (FFI-RS), and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were evaluated. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the time to radiologic union and return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. In group C, favorable outcomes were observed in terms of the time to return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. Contrastingly, in group O, better results were observed in time to radiologic union. The AOFAS score was excellent at the final follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Complication rates were 10.8% and 13% in groups C and O, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical treatment is sometimes necessary for Jones fractures, but conservative treatment should also be considered because of the favorable outcomes. Conservative treatment can be a good option for patients who are risk-averse and place a high value on fracture healing without surgery.

Intramedullary Screw versus Locking Plate Fixation for Traumatic Displaced Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Background/Objectives: Intramedullary screw fixation (IMS) and locking plate fixation (LPF) are currently recommended treatments for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures (PFMF). However, treating comminuted or small displaced avulsion PFMF with IMS poses challenges due to complications. A novel alternative fixation method, the locking compression plate for distal ulna hook plate fixation (LPF), has been introduced recently for distal ulna fractures and has shown improved clinical results. This scoping review aims to assess whether LPF yields superior outcomes, such as postoperative AOFAS scores and rate of postoperative complications, compared to IMS in PFMF treatment. Methods: This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, or case series involving patients with PFMF who underwent plate fixation or screw fixation. The primary outcome was the postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Studies were sourced from databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, with the search conducted up to February 2024. The Systematic Review protocol was registered in the CRD PROSPERO database (CRD42024532593). Results: Ten studies were included, comprising 3 cohort studies, 1 case-control study, and 6 case series, with a total of 309 patients (158 with LPF and 142 with IMS). The postoperative AOFAS scores showed no significant difference between LPF and IMS in treating PFMF. However, LPF demonstrated efficient surgical procedures and enhanced functional outcomes. Complications were minimal in both groups, with no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between LPF and IMS, LPF demonstrated efficient surgical procedures and enhanced functional outcomes, making it a reasonable alternative method for PFMF. Effective shared decision-making (SDM) with patients becomes paramount in choosing the optimal surgical approach. In the surgical landscape, thoughtful deliberation, patient engagement, and adherence to biomechanical principles are crucial for achieving successful outcomes in the treatment of PFMF.

Fifth Metatarsal Fractures.

Fifth metatarsal features are the most common fractures in the foot. They have a long history that has resulted in many classification systems and little consensus on appropriate treatment. Although there is some agreement among experts, there are also many questions yet to be answered. There is a general consensus that dancer's fractures and zone 1 fractures can generally be treated nonoperatively. There is much more debate about zone 2 and 3 fractures and appropriate treatment guidelines. The authors review the current literature and give the recommendation for treatment based on their experience in a community-based private practice.

Rare Reconstruction of Four Metatarsals Using Kirschner Wires After a Severe Crushing Injury: Surgical Decision Making and Prognosis.

Metatarsal fractures are one of the most common injuries after foot trauma. It is debilitating, as the metatarsals are one of the most crucial bones for any weight-bearing movement. This report demonstrates the beneficial outcome of using Kirschner wires (K-wires) in a trauma setting and the complicated healing process. A 56-year-old gentleman was brought into the emergency department after a reinforced cement pipe fell onto the patient's steel-toe boots, striking his left foot immediately proximal to the steel portion of the boot. The patient had sustained displaced comminuted fractures of the left second, third, fourth, and fifth metatarsals with an extensive open wound (Gustilo type II open fracture). Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) was performed using K-wires to restore and preserve the anatomical and functional integrity of the foot. Following the surgery, the patient developed a hammer toe of the left fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint two months after the ORIF; we performed resection arthroplasty to relieve discomfort and further aid the recovery process. Following the resection arthroplasty, eschar had formed at the surgical site, extending from the lateral aspect of the left foot to the plantar surface, for which we had performed a skin graft after excisional debridement of the necrotic tissue. After one year of close follow-ups with rigorous physical therapy exercises, the patient had a fair recovery process and is now able to ambulate without any assistive devices. As such, using K-wires remains a viable option for reducing misaligned metatarsal fractures and providing fairly good outcomes even in the setting of severe foot trauma.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Retrospective Study of 834 Fractures With a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common fractures. Treatment strategies have been debated. We wanted to investigate whether Lawrence and Botte's classification has prognostic value because of time to fracture union, and evaluate if weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) and nonweightbearing (NWB) treatment strategy had effect on time to fracture union in nonoperatively treated fractures. METHODS: Computerized database search, patients diagnosed between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015. RESULTS: We identified 834 fractures; 510 (61.2%) zone 1, 157 (18.8%) zone 2, and 167 (20.0%) zone 3. Most (94.4%) were treated nonoperatively; time to fracture union was 7.5 (SD 7.7), 7.7 (5.6), and 9.2 (8.1) weeks for zone 1, 2, and 3, respectively, which gave a significant longer time to union for zone 3 compared to zone 1 fractures (P = .04). There was no difference in time to fracture union when comparing WBAT and NWB for all fracture zones. Failure to union, defined as crossover to surgery and/or delayed union, was found in 13 (2.7%) zone 1, 5 (3.2%) zone 2, and 6 (3.8%) zone 3 fractures. Refracture during follow-up was found in 3 (0.6%) zone 1 and 14 (8.9%) zone 3 fractures. CONCLUSION: Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures have high union rates with nonoperative treatment. No difference in time to union could be found between WBAT and NWB treatment strategies for all fracture zones. We observed a significantly longer time to fracture union for zone 3 fractures compared to zone 1 fractures. Refracture occurs in a nonnegligible share of nonoperatively treated zone 3 fractures.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Athletes: Management of Acute and Chronic Conditions.

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common in the athlete and can be a source of significant, temporary disability and missed playing time. The pattern of fracture can vary, and the type of fracture leads to a significantly different prognosis and treatment. Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal are particularly common and difficult to treat in the athlete, can have recurrence and refracture, and require expertise to heal. Intramedullary screw fixation is currently the preferred method of fixation. Most other (non-Jones fractures and os vesalianum) proximal fifth metatarsal fractures can be treated successfully without surgery.

Peroneus brevis tendon in proximal 5th metatarsal fractures: Anatomical considerations for safe hook plate placement.

INTRODUCTION: The peroneus brevis tendon (PBT) inserts into the proximal aspect of the 5th metatarsal. Metatarsal bone fractures are encountered to be the most common fractures in the foot with predominantly fractures at the base of the fifth metatarsal bone. Mechanism of injury and treatment of the proximal 5th metatarsal fractures vary due to the complex anatomy and diverse biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to analyze the footprint of the PBT with regards to the proximal 5th metatarsal fractures and to define a "safe zone" for hook plate placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one (41) fixed human lower leg specimens were dissected to expose the PBT insertion. The following footprint characteristics were evaluated: area of insertion (AOI) (mm2), length (mm), width (mm), shape and insertional variations. The position of the main PBT footprint was localized according to the Lawrence and Botte classification for the proximal 5th metatarsal fractures (Zone I-III). A "safe zone" was defined for the fracture-specific hook plate placement. RESULTS: In 25 (61%) feet the PBT footprint was situated in Zone I and in 16 feet (39%) in Zone I&II. The mean AOI, length and width measured 54.5 mm2 (SD 16.5), 16.0 mm (SD 5.1) and 4.7 mm (SD 1.4), respectively. Analysis of the footprint shapes revealed four different shape types: kidney (29.3%), diamond (22.0%), crescent (31.7%) and oval (17.0%). A "safe zone" for hook plate placement without or minimal interference of the PBT at its insertion could be defined at the lateral aspect of the 5th metatarsal. CONCLUSION: The majority of the PBT footprints were found in Zone I. Hook plate placement demonstrated to be safe when placed strictly laterally at the proximal aspect of the 5th metatarsal. Precise knowledge of the peroneus brevis anatomy may help to better understand the biomechanical aspects of the proximal 5th metatarsal fractures.

The use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in treating delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures.

BACKGROUND: There are no studies looking at the success rate of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in fifth metatarsal fracture delayed unions to our knowledge. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of LIPUS treatment for delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who were treated with LIPUS following a delayed union of fifth metatarsal fracture was conducted over a three-year period. RESULTS: There were thirty patients (9 males, 21 females) in this cohort. The average age was 39.3 years. Type 2 fractures made up 43% of our cohort. Twenty-seven (90%) patients went on to progress to union clinically and radiologically following LIPUS treatment. Smoking (p=0.014) was predictive of non-union. Assuming that there were 10 delayed unions a year and 6 went on to non-union as previously suggested by a systematic review, the cost savings of using LIPUS (90% success rate; 10 LIPUS machine and surgery for 1 non-union) vs operative intervention (surgery for 6 non-union) equates to a cost saving of £7765 a year. CONCLUSION: There is a role for the use of LIPUS in delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures and can serve as an adjunct prior to consideration of surgery. The findings of this study also suggest the use of LIPUS to be a cost effective treatment modality compared to surgical management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Virtual fracture clinic management of fifth metatarsal, including Jones', fractures is safe and cost-effective.

Virtual clinics have been shown to be safe and cost-effective in many specialties, yet barriers exist to their implementation in orthopaedics. The aims of this study were to look at whether the management of 5th metatarsal fractures using a virtual fracture clinic model is safe, cost effective and avoids adverse outcomes whilst being acceptable to patients using the service. All patients with a fifth metatarsal fracture between September 2013 and September 2015 had a standardised management plan initiated (blackboot, full weightbearing) in the emergency department (ED). 663 patients met inclusion criteria, 251 (37.5%) Type 1, 111 (17%) Type 2 (Jones'), 281 (42%) Type 3 or distal, 20 (3%) were misdiagnosed, and 4 (0.5%) patient's images were unavailable. 499 (75%) patients were discharged immediately, 47 (7%) had further imaging, 114 (17%) had either ESP or consultant clinic review, and 3 (<1%) transferred their care privately. The average number of clinic visits per patient was 0.17. At a conservative estimate of 1.3 visits per patient in a traditional pathway this saved 779 clinic visits with a cost saving of £60,000 on clinic visits alone. There were 8 (7%) asymptomatic non-unions in Type 2 (Jones') fractures. One patient required surgical intervention. Fifth metatarsal fractures have excellent outcomes with conservative management yet traditionally have required clinic visits to confirm the diagnosis and explain the management and prognosis. Our study supports the use of a virtual fracture clinic model that is standardised, initiated in ED, that is both safe and cost-effective.

The Biology of Bone and Ligament Healing.

This review describes the normal healing process for bone, ligaments, and tendons, including primary and secondary healing as well as bone-to-bone fusion. It depicts the important mediators and cell types involved in the inflammatory, reparative, and remodeling stages of each healing process. It also describes the main challenges for clinicians when trying to repair bone, ligaments, and tendons with a specific emphasis on Charcot neuropathy, fifth metatarsal fractures, arthrodesis, and tendon sheath and adhesions. Current treatment options and research areas are also reviewed.

Contribution of Lateral Ankle Instability Evaluation with MRI to Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fracture / 대한족부족관절학회지

PURPOSE: One of the main contributors to proximal fifth metatarsal fracture is ankle inversion and the incidence of recurrence may increase in patients with ankle instability. So, the authors confirmed the patients of proximal fifth metatarsal fracture with ankle instability by checking the history and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assessed the value of MRI as therapeutic prognosis and clinical indicators for prevention of recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures visited our hospital during recent five years were reviewed. 35 patients with suspected damage by ankle inversion had been identified a history of ankle instability and checked the hindfoot malalignment through hindfoot alignment view and MRI was performed prospectively. The patients was devided to three groups on the location of fracture site and the groups were compared each other. RESULTS: The mean time from injury to checking MRI was 10.7 days. There was no structural abnormality and was no significant difference according to the location of fracture. The patients with history of ankle inversion were 31(88.6%) and the patients with history of chronic or recurrent injury were 22 patients (62.9%). The lesion of MRI related to lateral ankle instability were identified in all patients. CONCLUSION: This study noted a high incidence of lateral ankle instability that was identified by MRI in the patients of proximal fifth metatarsal fracture. Aggressive treatment for lateral ankle instability should be needed for complications as proximal fifth metatarsal fracture to reduce the recurrence and occurrence.