Radiological characteristics and injury mechanism of Logsplitter injury: a descriptive and retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Logsplitter Injury is a type of high-energy ankle fracture dislocation. The mechanism of injury has not been described in detail. A detailed understanding of the radiological features and pathological changes can further guide treatment. METHODS: Between April 2009 and December 2018, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with Logsplitter injury. The study analysed the characteristics of fibular injury, tibial injury, syndesmosis injury, medial injury and lateral ligament injury on preoperative X-ray and CT scans. The incidence of the different injury types was summarised. The correlation between Logsplitter injuries and the mechanisms causing them were analysed using the Lauge-Hansen classification of ankle fractures. RESULTS: The study provides data on the types of fractures observed. Of the total fractures, 98.4% were open fractures. The fibula injuries were classified as no fracture (1.6%), transverse or short oblique fractures (61.3%), butterfly fragments (25.8%), and comminuted fractures (11.3%). The tibial injuries included compression of lateral articular surfaces (38.7%) and posterior compressions (6.5%). Medial injuries, including medial malleolar fractures, accounted for 87.1%, and deltoid ligament rupture accounted for 12.9%. The study found that injuries to the syndesmosis consisted of simple ligament ruptures (11.3%), Tillaux fractures (8.1%), Volkmann fractures (43.5%), and Tillaux and Volkmann fractures (37.1%). In 12.9% of cases, there was a complete rupture of the lateral collateral ligament. Based on the Lauge-Hansen classification, 87.1% of injuries were pronation-abduction injuries, while 8.1% were pronation and external rotation injuries, and 1.6% were supination external rotation injuries. Furthermore, 3.2% of cases could not be classified. CONCLUSION: The pathoanatomic characteristics of Logsplitter injury are diverse, with some cases accompanied by collateral ligament injury. It is important to note that these evaluations are objective and based on current results. The most common injury mechanism is vertical violence combined with abduction, although in some cases, it may be a vertical combined external-rotation injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (4) case series. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been approved by the ethical research committee of the Honghui Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, under the code: 202,003,002.

Case report: A complete lower cervical fracture dislocation without permanent neurological impairment.

BACKGROUND: Complete fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine are usually associated with severe spinal cord injury. However, a very small number of patients do not have severe spinal cord injury symptoms, patients with normal muscle strength or only partial nerve root symptoms, known as "lucky fracture dislocation". The diagnosis and treatment of such patients is very difficult. Recently, we successfully treated one such patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old male patient had multiple neck and body aches after trauma, but there was sensory movement in his limbs. However, preoperative cervical radiographs showed no significant abnormalities, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed complete fracture and dislocation of C7. Before operation, the halo frame was fixed traction, but the reduction was not successful. Finally, the fracture reduction and internal fixation were successfully performed by surgery. The postoperative pain of the patient was significantly relieved, and the sensory movement of the limbs was the same as before. Two years after surgery, the patient's left little finger and ulnar forearm shallow sensation recovered, and the right flexion muscle strength basically returned to normal. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that when patients with trauma are encountered in the clinic, they should be carefully examined, and the presence of cervical fracture and dislocation should not be ignored because of the absence of neurological symptoms or mild symptoms. In addition, positioning during handling and surgery should be particularly avoided to increase the risk of paralysis.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Study and Functional Outcome Analysis of Coronoid Fracture in Different Elbow Injury Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Coronoid fractures are often part of a complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow. For an optimum prognosis, it is important to understand the characteristics of coronoid fractures in different elbow injury patterns. Significant differences in these characteristics have been observed in various studies, but these previous studies have suffered from limitations, such as insufficient quantification and unknown prognostic differences among different injury patterns. Therefore, we aimed to quantitatively analyze coronoid fracture characteristics and functional outcomes in different elbow injury patterns using 3D-CT. METHODS: All patients with coronoid fractures surgically treated at our hospital between January and December 2017 were categorized into three groups according to elbow injury pattern: PLRI, VPMRI and OFD. 3D models were reconstructed using Mimics 17.0, and the total volume (TV) and number of coronoid fragments (NCF) were measured. The coronoid process edge was classified into different anatomical regions, and each region was assigned a number to quantify the distribution of fracture lines. At the last follow-up, the ROM, VAS, MEPS, complications and reoperations were recorded. RESULTS: The ninety-two patients enrolled had an average age of 42±15 years and a male-to-female ratio of 66:26. The median TV in PLRI patients was less than that in VPMRI patients [431 (132, 818)mm3 vs. 1125 (746,1421)mm3,adjusted P<0.001] and OFD patients [431 (132, 818) mm3 vs. 2565 (381, 4076)mm3, adjusted P =0.001]. The median NCF in PLRI patients was also less than that in VPMRI patients [1 (1, 2) vs. 2 (1, 3), adjusted P=0.043]. Most of the PCFL-Rs (79%) were located around the volar edge of the lesser sigmoid notch. Compared with that of PLRI, the PCFL-Us of the VPMRI and OFD tended to be located on the more ulnodorsal side of the coronoid process edge. The median ROM [110 (90, 133), P=0.001] and the median MEPS [85 (68, 95), P=0.038] of patients with OFD were significantly less than those of patients with the other two patterns. The incidence of elbow stiffness (56%, 5/9, P=0.001) and implant-related irritation (44%, 4/9, P<0.001) in the OFD group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Coronoid fractures differ significantly in fragment volume, comminution severity and fracture line distribution among different elbow injury patterns. OFD has the worst functional outcomes among complex elbow injury patterns.

Reported outcome measures in complex fracture elbow dislocations: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Complex elbow fracture dislocations, dislocation with fracture of one or several surrounding bony stabilizers, are difficult to manage and associated with poor outcomes. While many studies have explored treatment strategies but a lack of standardization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) makes cross-study comparison difficult. In this systematic review, we aim to describe what injury patterns, measured outcomes, and associated complications are reported in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature to provide outcome reporting recommendations that will facilitate improved future cross-study comparison. METHODS: A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles published between 2010 and 2022 reporting on adult patients who had a complex elbow fracture dislocation. Pathologic fractures were excluded. A bias assessment using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies criteria was conducted. For each article, patient demographics, injury pattern, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-one studies reporting on 3664 elbows (3654 patients) with an elbow fracture and dislocation (weighted mean age 44 years, follow-up of 30 months, 41% female) were evaluated. Of these, the injury pattern was described in 3378 elbows and included 2951 (87%) terrible triad injuries and 72 (2%) transolecranon fracture-dislocations. The three most commonly reported classification systems were: Mason classification for radial head fractures, Regan and Morrey coronoid classification for coronoid fractures, and O'Driscoll classification for coronoid fractures. Range of motion was reported in 87 (96%) studies with most reporting flexion (n = 70), extension (n = 62), pronation (n = 68), or supination (n = 67). Strength was reported in 11 (12%) studies. PROMs were reported in 83 (91%) studies with an average of 2.6 outcomes per study. There were 14 outcome scores including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (n = 69 [83%]), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (n = 28 [34%]), the visual analog scale for pain (n = 27 [33%]), QuickDASH score (n = 13 [15.7%]), and Oxford Elbow score (n = 5 [6.0%]). No significance was found between the number of PROMs used per article and the year of publication (P = .313), study type (P = .689), complex fracture pattern (P = .211), or number of elbows included (P = .152). CONCLUSION: There is great heterogeneity in reported PROMs in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature. Although there is no gold standard PROM for assessing complex elbow fracture dislocations, we recommend the use of at least the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and DASH outcomes measures as well as visual analog scale pain rating scale in future studies to facilitate cross-study comparisons.

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Trans-Ulnar Basal Coronoid Fracture-Dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations of the elbow are complex injuries that can be difficult to classify and treat. Trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries, in which the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the metaphysis, present substantial challenges to achieve anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between 2002 and 2019, 32 consecutive trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) at our institution. Four elbows were lost to follow-up within the first 6 months after surgery and were excluded. Among the 28 elbows remaining, there were 13 females and 15 males with a mean age of 56 (range 28-78) years at the time of injury. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up times were 37 months and 29 months, respectively. Radiographs were reviewed to determine rates of union, Hastings and Graham heterotopic ossification (HO) grade, and Broberg and Morrey arthritis grade. RESULTS: Union occurred in 25 elbows. Union could not be determined for 1 elbow at most recent follow-up and the remaining 2 elbows developed nonunion of the coronoid. Complications occurred in 10 elbows (36%): deep infection (4), ulnar neuropathy (2), elbow contracture (2), and nonunion (2). There were reoperations in 11 elbows (39%): irrigation and débridement with hardware removal (4), hardware removal (2), ulnar nerve transposition (2), contracture release with HO removal (2), and revision ORIF with iliac crest autograft (1). At most recent follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 106° (range 10-150°), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 137° (range 0-170°). The mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range 0-39) points with a mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation-Elbow score of 81 (range 55-100) points. At final radiographic follow-up, 16 elbows (57%) had HO (8 class I and 8 class II), and 20 elbows (71%) had arthritis (8 grade 1, 6 grade 2, and 6 grade 3). DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are severe injuries associated with high rates of reoperation, heterotopic ossification, and post-traumatic arthritis. However, the majority of elbows achieve union, a functional range of motion, and reasonable patient reported outcome measures. Over the study period, surgeons were more likely to utilize multiple deep approaches and separate fixation of the coronoid (either with lag screws or anteromedial plates) to ensure anatomic reduction.

Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems.

BACKGROUND: Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II. RESULTS: The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13. DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

Open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocation: anterior or posterior approach?

INTRODUCTION: To date, the approach that prevails in the open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocations (CFD) remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CFD treated via the anterior or posterior approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 64 cases of CFDs openly reduced through an anterior (group A, n = 31) or a posterior (group B, n = 33) approach were retrospectively analyzed. Functional results, reduction quality, residual displacements in the axial and coronal planes, pelvic asymmetry deformity, and correlations between Day's classification were compared. Complications and fracture union were also recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. RESULTS: The functional scores were similar between the two groups, and all fractures achieved good or excellent reduction postoperatively. In the coronal plane, the excellent/good ratio in group B was higher than in group A. The mean residual displacement in the coronal plane was significantly higher in group A than in group B, with group A showing greater displacement in both planes for Day I fractures and in the coronal plane for Day II fractures. The residual displacement in both planes for Day III fractures was comparable between the groups. The pelvic asymmetry deformity was equal between the two groups and among the different Day's fracture types. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of CFDs obtained satisfactory outcomes through an anterior or posterior approach. The posterior approach achieved a better sacroiliac joint reduction. The optimal indication for the posterior approach was a Day I fracture, followed by a Day II fracture. No correlation was found between the surgical approach and reduction quality in Day III fractures.

Chopart dislocations: a review of diagnosis, treatment and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Chopart injuries can be allocated into 4 broad groups, ligamentous injury with or without dislocation and fracture with or without dislocation, which must occur at the talonavicular joint (TNJ) and/or calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ). Chopart dislocations are comprised of pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations. We aim to review the literature, to enable evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles from the electronic databases, PubMed, Medline and Scopus. The PRISMA flow chart was used to scrutinise the search results. Articles were screened by title, abstract and full text to confirm relevance. RESULTS: We identified 58 papers for analysis, 36 case reports, 4 cohort studies, 4 case series and 14 other articles related to the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of Chopart dislocations. Diagnostic recommendations included routine imaging to contain computed tomography (CT) and routine examination for compartment syndrome. Treatment recommendations included early anatomical reduction, with restoration and maintenance of column length and joint congruency. For both pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations urgent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) provided the most favourable long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Chopart dislocations are a complex heterogenous midfoot injury with historically poor outcomes. There is a relative paucity of research discussing these injuries. We have offered evidence-based recommendations related to the clinical and surgical management of these rare pathologies.

The long-term results of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in irreducible four-part fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus without rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

PURPOSE: Although there are concerns about nonunion of the greater tuberosity or shoulder weakness, hemishoulder arthroplasty (HSA) is a viable treatment option for irreducible four-part proximal humerus fractures-dislocation without rotator cuff tear arthropathy. This study aims to analyze the long-term radiological and functional outcomes of HSA. METHODS: This study enrolled 36 patients who underwent HSA due to irreducible four-part proximal humerus fracture-dislocation without rotator cuff tear arthropathy between March 2005 and May 2020. The exclusion group included 10 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 68.6 years old and 48.6 months, respectively. Radiological assessments, such as vertical and horizontal greater tuberosity position, greater tuberosity healing, and implant position, were evaluated. Clinically, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and range of motion were evaluated. RESULTS: The greater tuberosity union rate was 55.6% (n = 20), with 44.4% (n = 16) experiencing nonunion, malunion, and bone resorption. The mean vertical and horizontal greater tuberosity positions showed significant difference at last follow-up compared to immediate postoperation. The retroversion of the implant was 23.8 ± 4.61°, and the acromio-humeral interval was 7.6 ± 1.34 mm. The mean last follow-up ASES and CMS were 39.5 ± 4.03 and 55.4 ± 10.41, respectively. The mean active forward flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation were 100.9 ± 15.04°, 92.5 ± 14.47°, 44.2 ± 12.83°, and 42.5 ± 15.32°, respectively. CONCLUSION: In long-term follow-up, the greater tuberosity was superiorly migrated and externally rotated. Active forward flexion and abduction in the last follow-up were significantly limited. However, in terms of pain relief, a satisfactory result was seen.

Temporary immobilization methods for closed low-energy ankle fracture-dislocations: comparative analysis of a retrospective cohort.

PURPOSE: Ankle fracture-dislocations (AFD) often necessitate staged management involving temporary external fixation (EF) due to mechanical instability or blistering. However, limited literature exists on the optimal temporary immobilization method for low-energy closed AFD. This study compared baseline patient and fracture characteristics, along with clinical and radiological outcomes between AFD initially immobilized with EF versus splinting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients with AFD temporarily immobilized using EF or splinting, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Quality of reduction (QOR) was assessed for each patient post-initial immobilization and after the definitive surgery. RESULTS: The study encompassed 194 patients: 138 treated with a splint (71.1%) and 56 (28.9%) with EF. Secondary loss of reduction had occurred in three patients who were splinted (2.2%). The mean ages in the EF and splint groups were 63.2 and 56.1 years, respectively (p = 0.01). Posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) and blisters were more prevalent in EF patients (69.6% vs. 43.5% for PMF and 76.8% vs. 20.3% for blisters, respectively; p = 0.05 and p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were 8.9% for EF versus 10.9% for splinting (p = 0.69). Satisfactory final QOR was attained in 79.8% of patients treated with a splint versus 64.3% with EF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients immobilized by EF presented with poorer baseline characteristics and had more unstable injuries. Nevertheless, postoperative complication rates were comparable. Thus, EF appears to be a valuable tool for standardizing outcomes in AFD patients with a less favorable prognosis.

Multiligament knee injuries. Ten years' experience at a public university, level I Trauma Center.

PURPOSE: To describe our institutional experience and results in the surgical management of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective series of MLKI consecutively operated on at a single, level I Trauma Center. Data on patients' baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes were recorded up to one-year follow-up. Recorded outcomes included the Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), return to work, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: MLKI incidence was 0.03% among 9897 orthopedic trauma admissions. Twenty-four patients of mean age 43.6 years were included in analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score was 12.6. Five patients presented with knee dislocations and six had fracture-dislocations, two of them open fractures. There was one popliteal artery injury requiring a bypass and four common peroneal nerve palsies. Staged ligamental reconstruction was performed in all cases. There were seven postoperative complications. The median TLKSS was 80 and, though patient satisfaction was high, and dissatisfaction was largely restricted to recreational activities (only 58.3% satisfied). Seventeen patients returned to their previous employment. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high aggregation of fracture-dislocations secondary to road traffic accidents. One in four patients experienced complications, particularly stiffness. Complications were more common in cases involving knee dislocation. Most patients had good functional results, but 25% were unable to return to their previous work, which demonstrates the long-lasting sequelae of this injury.

Surgical management and functional outcomes of perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations through the dorsal approach.

BACKGROUND: Perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture dislocations (PLD/PLFDs) are rare injuries of the wrist, with surgical management leading to acceptable functional results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcomes of the patients of our department who were treated with surgical management of PLDs/PLFDs through dorsal approach, as well as to report any complications on their follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 52 patients with PLD/PLFD, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, underwent surgical management of their injury. All patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively with radiographic imaging as well as functional scores measured with the modified mayo wrist score and the QuickDASH questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean postoperative modified Mayo score was 76.8 ± 8.8 and the mean QuickDASH score was 1.52 ± 2.18. Of the 52 cases, 20% had excellent results, 42% had good results, 29% had fair results and 9% had poor results as per the modified Mayo wrist score. No patient signed any symptoms of median nerve neuropathy. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, open reduction and internal fixation through dorsal approach is a reliable technique to manage perilunate injuries in spite of radiological evidence of wrist arthritis, as it also provides consistently good results in terms of functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Retrospective case series study.

Bennett fracture combined with hamate fracture: carpometacarpal joint 'diagonal' fracture and dislocation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Multiple carpometacarpal fractures and dislocations are rare. This case report describes a novel multiple carpometacarpal injury, namely, 'diagonal' carpometacarpal joint fracture and dislocation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old male general worker sustained a compression injury to his right hand in the dorsiflexion position. Radiography indicated a Bennett fracture, hamate fracture, and fracture at the base of the second metacarpal. Subsequent computed tomography and intraoperative examination confirmed an injury to the first to fourth carpometacarpal joint along a diagonal line. The normal anatomy of the patient's hand was successfully restored via open reduction combined with Kirschner wire and steel plate fixation. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of taking the injury mechanism into account to avoid a missed diagnosis and to choose the best treatment approach. This is the first case of 'diagonal' carpometacarpal joint fracture and dislocation to be reported in the literature.

Retrospective interobserver agreement on diagnoses of 4th and 5th carpometacarpal fracture-dislocation and hamate fracture in plain X-ray - Is CT essential after ulnar carpometacarpal pain?

OBJECTIVE: To determine interobserver agreement and reliability of different radiological parameters in the assessment of fracture-dislocation of the 4th and 5th carpometacarpal joints (FD CMC 4-5) and associated hamate fracture on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series of 53 patients diagnosed with FD CMC 4-5. Emergency room diagnostic radiology images were reviewed by four independent observers. The reviews included assessment of radiological patterns and parameters in relation to CMC fracture-dislocations and associated injuries previously described in the literature, to analyze their diagnostic power (specificity and sensitivity) and reproducibility (interobserver reliability). RESULTS: Among 53 patients, mean age 35.3 years, dislocation of the 5th CMC joint was present in 32/53 (60%) of patients, mostly (11/32 [34%]) associated with 4th CMC dislocation and base of 4th and 5th metacarpal fracture. The most common presentation of hamate fracture, in 4/18 (22%), was associated with combined 4th and 5th CMC dislocation and base of metacarpal fracture. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 23 patients. Performing CT scan was significantly associated with hamate fracture diagnosis (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was slight (0-0.641) for most of the parameters and diagnoses. Sensitivity ranged from 0 to 0.61. Overall, the described parameters had low sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Radiological parameters described for assessment of fracture-dislocation of the 4th and 5th CMC joints and associated hamate fracture have a slight interobserver agreement index in plain X-ray and low sensitivity for diagnostic assessment. These results suggest the need for emergency medicine diagnostic protocols that include CT scan for such injuries. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04668794.

The Results of Hook Plate Fixation for Palmar Fracture Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to present the clinical outcomes of the dorsal plating technique for palmar fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. This plating technique minimizes dissection and interference with the finger extensor mechanism. METHODS: We treated seven patients (with a mean age of 39.1 years) with dorsal hook plates for palmar fracture dislocations of the PIP joint between April 2018 and August 2022. The little finger was affected in five patients, and ring finger was affected in two. The mean time to surgery was 5.6 days, and the postoperative follow-up period was seven months. On the second postoperative day, all patients were allowed active motion of both the PIP and the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints. Simultaneously, DIP blocking exercises were started to prevent adhesion of the extensor mechanism. RESULTS: The mean active flexion and extension of the PIP joint was 105° and -4°, respectively, whereas those of the DIP joint were 65° and 4°. No patient experienced extension lag in the DIP joint. The mean total active motion (TAM) was 273°, and the %TAM was 96%. The grip strength of the affected hand averaged 90% of that of the unaffected hand. The mean numerical rating scale for pain was 0.3 points, and the mean Hand20 score was 5.1 points. No complications were observed; two patients underwent implant removal at their request. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that this hook plate technique, which minimizes interference with the finger extension mechanism, is an effective surgical procedure that allows patients to tolerate early range of motion exercises and obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes in both the PIP and DIP joints. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Bilateral Fracture-Dislocation of the Shoulder After Defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple reported injuries associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, most of them caused by the force of compressions, like sternal and rib fractures, abdominal organ injuries like splenic rupture, liver lacerations, and injuries to the upper airway and skin. Injuries related to defibrillation and cardioversion are rare, mostly related to skin and muscle injuries on where the defibrillation paddles were placed. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department with crushing chest pain. The patient was suffering from a myocardial infarction, and during percutaneous coronary intervention, had to be defibrillated on the angioplasty table. This resulted in fracture-dislocations on both shoulders. The patient was transferred to our orthopedics clinic and was operated on within 5 days of angioplasty. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Early diagnosis and treatment are important, and can prevent long-term morbidity. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation are acts that are most commonly performed in the emergency department. Injury prevention by controlling the patient's position, in this case, positions of the shoulders, is an important factor that emergency physicians can control and effect.

Posterolateral stabilization of the elbow by autologous ligament reconstruction to limit long-term development of osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral instability is the most frequent form of both acute and chronic elbow instability. Joint incongruity due to posterolateral unlocking leads to shear and compression stress of the internal aspect of the humeroulnar joint. We carried out long-term analysis of patients with posterolateral elbow instability in order to determine whether, in addition to improving their symptoms, reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex may play a protective role against the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll stabilizes the elbow and also limits the development of osteoarthritis in the long term. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic posterolateral instability of the elbow and who underwent ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll from January 1995 to December 2010 were identified and retrospectively included for 2 follow-up evaluations at a mean of 5 and 14 years. RESULTS: Fourteen elbows in 14 patients were included. All had a negative lateral pivot shift test and none reported a new episode of instability. Two patients (14%) had osteoarthritis. The 2 radiographic evaluations showed no progression of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis developed in 33% of patients with intra-articular fracture. In simple dislocations, pre-existing osteoarthritic lesions were stabilized and there were no new cases of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Elbow ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll gives effective posterolateral stabilization and appears to protect against progression to osteoarthritic degeneration in the long term. In the absence of associated lesions, it prevents the development of osteoarthritis or the worsening of pre-existing osteoarthritis.

Subacute ascending myelopathy in adolescent athlete after spinal cord injury: a case report on dynamic complication of spine trauma.

BACKGROUND: Subacute post-traumatic ascending myelopathy (SPAM) is a rare complication after spinal cord injury (SCI). SPAM onsets within few days or weeks after initial SCI. Here, we present an adolescent male athlete who developed SPAM after SCI and brief review of literature. Previous reports almost all were about adult patients. Here, we present second adolescent case in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 15 years old adolescent athlete presented to A&E with a T10-T11 fracture dislocation of the spine and a SCI. He underwent T9-L1 posterior instrumentation and decompression. On the 11th post injury, he complained numbness of the T4 dermatome and by the 14th day, he had become tetraplegia with paralysis of the arms and required ventilation. MRI revealed C3-T10 cord changes on T2 weighed images. He received high dose methylprednisolone for 3 weeks. At one-year follow up he had fully recovered arm motor power and improved light touch and pin prick sensation. CONCLUSIONS: SPAM may occur in adolescents with a good prognosis. Our case is well example against for proposal of arterial hypothesis.

Traumatic divergent dislocation of the elbow in the adults.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of DDE in adults. METHODS: From September 2010 to March 2020, adult patients with traumatic DDEs admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Jishuitan Hospital were included in this study. Each patient underwent operative or conservative treatment during hospitalization. The clinical and radiological examinations were followed up. The primary outcomes included the Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Broberg and Morrey functional index, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score that were performed. Post-operative complications and secondary surgery details were also collected. RESULTS: Of the fourteen patients, clinical and radiographic results were reviewed at a mean of 53.2 months (18 to 110 months) postoperatively. There were 11 men and three women with an average age of 31.5 years (17 to 51 years). At the final follow-up, the average MMWS, MEPS, Broberg and Morrey functional index, and DASH scores were 91.4 points, 93.4 points, 92.6 points, and 10.7 points. The mean VAS at rest and during activities was 0.4 and 1.7 points. Two patients required a secondary procedure due to radial malalignment and elbow contracture, respectively. In addition, two patients were found degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of high-energy DDE combined with simultaneous upper limb injuries, our study recommended obtaining the mechanical benefit of the forearm ring with concentric elbow stability. Despite the various and complicated traumatic patterns of DDE, great clinical results could be acquired based on adequate surgical treatments and early rehabilitation training.