Feruloylated Arabinoxylans from Nixtamalized Maize Bran Byproduct: A Functional Ingredient in Frankfurter Sausages.

Feruloylated arabinoxylans obtained from nixtamalized maize bran were evaluated in terms of physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant capacity when incorporated in frankfurter sausages. Concentrations of 0.15% and 0.30% of feruloylated arabinoxylans were incorporated in frankfurter sausages formulations and a control without feruloylated arabinoxylans was also prepared. Shear force, hardness, color measurement, proximate analysis, pH, titratable acidity, water-holding capacity, total phenols, and antioxidant capacity were evaluated. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in all treatments, sausages containing feruloylated arabinoxylans compared to the control. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity with all feruloylated arabinoxylans sausages treatments higher than control. Additionally, significant differences (P < 0.0001) were obtained in the physicochemical parameters.

Partial replacement of animal fat by oleogels structured with monoglycerides and phytosterols in frankfurter sausages.

Sunflower oil was structured with monoglycerides and phytosterols. The properties of the oleogels were studied by optical microscopy, large deformation mechanical measurements, dynamic rheometry and differential scanning calorimetry. The interaction between monoglycerides and phytosterols resulted in stronger oleogel networks with a differentiated crystalline structure, increased hardness and gel strength, increased storage modulus (G') values and decreased melting temperatures compared to monoglycerides oleogels. The oleogel structured with 15:5 monoglycerides to phytosterols weight ratio was selected to replace 50% of the pork backfat in frankfurter sausages. The control treatment (FSS1) presented higher values of hardness, brittleness, gumminess and chewiness than the oleogel-substituted samples (FSS2), whereas cohesiveness and elasticity did not present any differences. Instrumental color measurements indicated that FSS1 samples had higher a*, lower L* and similar b* values compared to FSS2. No differences were detected in the oxidation levels and sensory evaluation revealed similar overall liking for the two treatments.