Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)-a randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group.

BACKGROUND: Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria). PATIENTS AND METHODS: NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

Clinical impact of multimodal treatment including chemoradiotherapy, conversion surgery and postoperative chemotherapy for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without disease progression after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using S-1 with or without conversion surgery after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic cancer. METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, patients without disease progression after GnP for BR or UR-LA pancreatic cancer underwent CRT with S-1. If distant metastasis was not detected after CRT, conversion surgery and oral administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for at least 6 months was performed. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the present study. The median number of cycles of GnP was 6. Surgery was performed after CRT in 25 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods from the start of radiotherapy were 24.6 and 27.4 months, respectively. The OS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent conversion surgery and those who did not undergo conversion surgery were 41.3 and 16.8 months, respectively. The PFS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent surgery and those who did not undergo surgery were 28.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Patients who were able to receive S-1 after conversion surgery for more than 6 months had better OS than those who were not (p = 0.039), although there was no significant difference of PFS (p = 0.365). CONCLUSIONS: In BR/UR-LA pancreatic cancer without disease progression after GnP, multimodal treatment including CRT, conversion surgery and the scheduled postoperative chemotherapy may be effective.

Early skeletal muscle mass decline is a prognostic factor in patients receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable pancreatic cancer: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Patients with pancreatic cancer often have cancer cachexia at diagnosis. Recent studies suggested that loss of skeletal muscle mass was related to cancer cachexia, which hindered continuance of chemotherapy and could be one of prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer, however the association remains unclear in patients receiving gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 138 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer receiving first-line GnP at the University of Tokyo from January 2015 to September 2020. We calculated body composition in CT images before chemotherapy and at initial evaluation, and evaluated the association of both body composition before chemotherapy and its changes at initial evaluation. RESULTS: Compared by skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) change rate between pre-chemotherapy and initial evaluation, there were statistically significantly differences in the median OS: 16.3 months (95%CI 12.3-22.7) and 10.3 months (95%CI 8.3-18.1) between SMI change rate ≥ -3.5% and < -3.5% groups (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis for OS, CA19-9 (HR 3.34, 95%CI 2.00-5.57, P < 0.01), PLR (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.01-2.78, P = 0.04), mGPS (HR 2.32, 95%CI 1.47-3.65, P < 0.01) and relative dose intensity (HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.42-3.46, P < 0.01) were significantly poor prognostic factors. SMI change rate (HR 1.47, 95%CI 0.95-2.28, P = 0.08) showed a trend to poor prognosis. Sarcopenia before chemotherapy was not significantly associated with PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Early skeletal muscle mass decline was associated with poor OS. Further investigation is warranted whether the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass by nutritional support would improve prognosis.

Effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in patients aged ≥ 75 years with advanced pancreatic cancer and compare it with monotherapy (GEM or S-1). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer aged ≥ 75 years who received either GnP or monotherapy (GEM or S-1) between January 2014 and May 2020. The primary efficacy outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in this study; 51 were treated with GnP and 45 with monotherapy (31 with GEM and 14 with S-1). The median OS and progression-free survival were 10.8 and 6.7 months in the GnP group and 10.7 and 4.3 months in the monotherapy group, respectively. The treatment effect on OS was consistently favorable in the GnP group across most subgroups, particularly in patients with locally advanced cancer, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0 or 1, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio < 3.1. The disease control rates were 76% and 48% in the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 23 (45%) and 11 (24%) patients of the GnP and monotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that GnP was not superior to monotherapy with regard to OS. However, multivariate analysis showed that GnP treatment positively affected the OS and could be considered as a treatment option, even for elderly patients.

Impact of Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer receiving multi-agent chemotherapy: A single center, retrospective cohort study.

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) calculated using the serum albumin concentration, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol, was developed as a screening tool for the early detection of undernutrition. In addition, CONUT has been reported to be a prognostic predictor of various malignancies. AIM: To investigate the impact of CONUT in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). METHODS: Between June 2014 and October 2020, 110 consecutive patients with APC who received multi-agent chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into four categories (normal, 1; light, 2; moderate, 3; severe, 4) based on CONUT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (35.4%), 63 (57.2%), and 8 (7.2%) patients had CONUT 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but no patients for CONUT 4. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between CONUT classifications. In the multivariate analyses, the presence of metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-3.52), CONUT 2 (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.32-3.54), and CONUT 3 (HR, 9.18; 95% CI, 2.67-23.50) were independent risk factors for PFS. The presence of metastasis (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-3.07), CONUT 2 (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.16-3.24), and CONUT 3 (HR, 10.71; 95% CI, 3.87-27.63) were also independent risk factors for OS. A median OS in CONUT 1, 2, and 3 were 20, 14.5, and 3.5 months (CONUT 1 vs. CONUT 2, p = 0.02; CONUT 1 vs. CONUT 3, p < 0.01; CONUT 2 vs. CONUT 3, p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: CONUT could be a predictor of prognosis for survival in patients with APC.

The prognostic impact of tumour location and first-line chemotherapy regimen in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of tumour location (pancreatic head vs. pancreatic body/tail) and first-line chemotherapy regimen (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. modified FOLFIRINOX) has not been fully elucidated in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the prognostic impact of tumour location and first-line chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients who initiated first-line chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel or modified FOLFIRINOX) between March 2014 and December 2019. We compared clinical characteristics and survival outcomes according to chemotherapy regimen and tumour location. Furthermore, we examined the prognostic factors associated with overall survival using cox proportional hazards model. Distant metastasis pattern was also compared according to tumour location. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included (GnP 95, mFFX 33; Ph 66, Pbt 62). Distribution of chemotherapy regimen was balanced between pancreatic head and pancreatic body/tail cancers. Eight patients underwent conversion surgery and 81 patients (63%) developed distant metastasis. Although patients receiving modified FOLFIRINOX were significantly younger and tended to have better performance status compared to patients receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, radiological tumour response, progression-free survival, overall survival and chemotherapy-related adverse events were similar between the two groups except for grades 3-4 anorexia (9% vs. 1%, P = 0.05). Furthermore, overall survival was similar between pancreatic head and pancreatic body/tail cancers. Conversion surgery and radiation therapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The most common site of distant metastasis was liver metastasis in both groups and pattern of distant metastasis was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, tumour location and first-line chemotherapy regimen were not a prognostic factor for overall survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Risk factors for gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel-induced interstitial lung disease in pancreatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious adverse events with a high mortality rate and represents a serious clinical problem. However, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)-induced ILD in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the clinical characteristics of GnP-induced ILD and identify risk factors for developing ILD. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients with PC who received GnP between January 2015 and April 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) according to ILD occurrence and explored risk factors including ABO blood type for developing ILD. RESULTS: Of the 910 patients included in this study, ILD occurred in 20 patients (2.2%). PC patients who developed ILD had a significantly higher frequency of blood type B compared to those without ILD (42% vs. 22%, p ˂ 0.05). Other baseline characteristics including smoking history and current/previous lung disease were not different between the two groups. Median time from initiation of GnP to onset of ILD was 80 days. All patients recovered from ILD and OS was not significantly different according to ILD occurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that blood type B was an independent risk factor for developing ILD. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that GnP-induced ILD occurred in 2.2% of PC patients with no mortality and OS did not differ according to ILD occurrence. Furthermore, we clarified that ABO blood type B was an independent risk factor for developing ILD in PC patients receiving GnP.

Protocol digest of randomized phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study (JCOG1407).

Gemcitabine is one of the standard treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent studies on metastatic pancreatic cancer have shown that combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) prolonged the overall survival compared with gemcitabine alone. To select the most promising chemotherapy, a randomized phase II selection design trial was started in July 2016 to compare between modified FOLFIRINOX and GnP for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. A total of 124 patients will be enrolled from 36 Japanese institutions within 2.5 years. The primary endpoint is the proportion of 1-year overall survival, and secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, response rate in patients with target lesions, CA19-9 response, adverse events, treatment-related death, early death, grade 4 non-hematological toxicity, and dose intensity. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry [http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm], and the registration number is UMIN000023143.

Successful Multimodal Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer With Extensive Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis Utilizing Chemotherapy Combined With Direct Oral Anticoagulant.

It is well known that portal vein thrombosis (PVT) sometimes occurs in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, no effective treatment plan for PVT in PC patients has yet been proposed. We experienced a successfully treated case of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PC-BR) with extensive superior mesenteric vein thrombosis utilizing intensive chemotherapy combined with direct oral anticoagulant. The thrombus disappeared and the tumor shrank, enabling curative surgery, and long-term survival for more than five years has been achieved. We report this successful case that we experienced as an option for the treatment of PC-BR with PVT in the future era when multimodal treatment is important.

A Unique Case of a Patient With Pancreatic Cancer Developing Leptomeningeal Metastases While on Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel.

Brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease are rare with pancreatic cancer. Leptomeningeal disease is a catastrophic complication to have as patients deteriorate rapidly. Patients can present with symptoms of cranial nerve neuropathies, headache, nausea, and focal neurological deficits. We present a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer who was treated initially with FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) which resulted in marked clinical and radiologic improvement. However, he started to develop severe peripheral neuropathy and was switched to maintenance gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. On this regimen, his systemic disease was well controlled but he developed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. To our knowledge, this is the first case of leptomeningeal metastases developing in a patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma while on treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel after cessation of FOLFIRINOX. We should maintain high clinical suspicion for leptomeningeal disease in pancreatic cancer, especially when systemic disease is well controlled, as the chemotherapeutic agents may not be crossing the blood-brain barrier effectively contributing to high morbidity and mortality.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy after Modified FOLFIRINOX in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of second-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) after modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) for unresectable pancreatic cancer were unclear. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with GnP after first-line mFFX treatment between March 2015 and March 2022 at our hospital. A total of 103 patients were included. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line and second-line treatments was 14.9 months and 7.2 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. Performance status, modified Glasgow prognostic score, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independently associated with OS. Our prognostic model using these parameters classifies patients into good (n = 70) and poor (n = 33) prognosis groups. Median OS and PFS were longer in the good prognosis group than in the poor prognosis group (OS: 9.3 vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.01; PFS: 4.1 vs. 2.3 months, p < 0.01). Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 70.9% of patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent. While GnP as second-line treatment was well-tolerated, efficacy of second-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was notably limited, particularly in the poor prognosis group.

Real­world treatment outcomes among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan: The Tokushukai real­world data project.

The present study aimed to investigate temporal trends in treatment patterns and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. From the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, 1,093 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1), gemcitabine plus S-1, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, or fluorouracil, folic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) between April 2010 and March 2020 were identified. Stratified/conventional Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between patient- and tumor-related factors, study period, hospital volume, hospital type and first-line chemotherapy regimens. Overall, 846 patients were selected (503 male patients; median age, 70 years) after excluding ineligible patients. Over a median follow-up of 5.4 months, the median OS was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.3-7.4). The median OS for gemcitabine, S-1, gemcitabine plus S-1, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX regimens was 5.9, 5.3, 7.7, 9.0 and 9.5 months, respectively. The median OS for 2010-2013, 2014-2017 and 2017-2020 was 6.2, 7.1 and 7.8 months, respectively. Performance status, body mass index and first-line chemotherapy regimens were identified to be significant prognostic factors. In summary, the real-world data indicated that standard care, including chemotherapy, for metastatic pancreatic cancer was widely used in hospitals throughout Japan and verified the survival benefits of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX observed in prior clinical trials. This trial has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000050590 on April 1, 2023.

A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407).

AIM: We compared the efficacy of modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) with that of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Patients with untreated LAPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mFOLFIRINOX or GnP. One-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The major secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response, and adverse events. The sample size was 124 patients to select a more effective regimen with a minimum probability of 0.85 and to examine the null hypothesis of the 1-year OS <53%. RESULTS: Of the 126 patients enrolled from 29 institutions, 125 were deemed eligible. The 1-year OS was 77.4% (95% CI, 64.9-86.0) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7-89.9) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The median PFS was 11.2 (95% CI, 9.9-15.9) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The RR and CA19-9 response rate were 30.9% (95% CI, 19.1-44.8) and 57.1% (95% CI, 41.0-72.3) and 42.1% (95% CI 29.1-55.9) and 85.0% (95% CI, 70.2-94.3) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea and anorexia were predominant in the mFOLFIRINOX arm. CONCLUSION: GnP was considered the candidate for a subsequent phase III trial because of its better RR, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities. Both regimens displayed higher efficacy in the 1-year survival than in the historical data of gemcitabine monotherapy.

The effect of the low stromal ratio induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence patterns in borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The optimal regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its biological and physiological modification of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR PDAC) remain unknown. A deeper understanding of the complex stromal biology of the TME will identify new avenues to establish treatment strategies for PDAC patients. Herein, we sought to clarify whether stromal remodeling by NAC affects recurrence patterns and prognosis in BR PDAC patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 104 BR PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy with or without NAC (upfront surgery [UpS], n = 44; gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [GnP], n = 28; and gemcitabine + S-1 [GS], n = 32) to assess the correlations of treatment with early recurrence, the stromal ratio, and Ki-67 levels. Eighty-six patients experienced recurrence, and those with liver metastasis had significantly shorter recurrence-free survival than those with other recurrence patterns. The frequency of liver metastasis was significantly higher in patients with a low stromal ratio than in those with a high stromal ratio in the NAC group but not in the UpS group. Patients in the GnP group had significantly higher Ki-67 than those in the GS and UpS groups. A low stromal ratio was positively correlated with high Ki-67 in the NAC group but not in the UpS group. The low stromal ratio induced by NAC promoted early liver metastasis in patients with BR PDAC. Our findings provide new insights into the complexity of stromal biology, leading to consideration of the optimal NAC regimen.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A post-hoc analysis of the real-world data of a multicenter study (the NAPOLEON study).

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), especially those ≥75 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled 153 patients with MPC who received GnP as first-line chemotherapy. Patients ≥75 years old were allocated to the older group, and those <75 years old were assigned to the non-older group. We compared safety, antitumor efficacy, and survival between the two groups. In the older group, prognostic indicators of survival were also assessed. RESULTS: The pretreatment characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different excluding age, history of malignancy, and C-reactive protein levels. The initial dose and relative dose intensities of GnP were significantly lower in the older group. There were no significant differences in the adverse event and antitumor response rates between the two groups. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 12.0 months, respectively, in the older group, versus 6.0 and 11.1 months, respectively, in the non-older group. In the older group, a Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) of less than 86 was associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: GnP exhibited acceptable efficacy and safety in patients ≥75 years old with MPC. GNRI might be helpful for identifying older individuals at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.

Risk factors for interstitial lung disease induced by gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy is used for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, but may cause interstitial lung disease (ILD) as a serious side effect. However, the risk factors for ILD in patients receiving GnP therapy are not well established. Here, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of GnP-induced ILD in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, and the risk factors. METHODS: We investigated the patients' background, laboratory data, previous treatment history, concomitant medications, number of doses of GnP, cumulative dosage and administration period, and occurrence of side effects. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients included in this study, ILD occurred in 10 (9.5%). Patients with ILD had a significantly higher frequency of concomitant treatment with Kampo medicines, especially goshajinkigan, which is considered to help prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (odds ratio: 11.5, 95% confidence interval: 2.67-49.38). No significant differences were observed in other clinical characteristics. Notably, the severity of CIPN in patients who used goshajinkigan for prevention was not significantly different from that in patients who did not use goshajinkigan in this study. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that administration of goshajinkigan to patients receiving GnP therapy for prevention of CIPN may need to be reconsidered.

Clinical Outcomes of S-1 Monotherapy and Modified FOLFIRINOX Therapy after Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel Therapy in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective S-1 and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) were often used as the second-line chemotherapies after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) until nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy was approved as an alternative in Japan in 2020. However, the clinical outcomes of S-1 and mFFX after GnP have scarcely been reported. Therefore, we retrospectively studied them. Methods We extracted the clinical data of 86 patients with UPC who received second-line chemotherapy after GnP between 2015 and 2020. Among the patients who had a good organ functions and no massive ascites, 41 patients treated with S-1 and 21 treated with mFFX were enrolled. Results Compared to S-1, mFFX tended to be used for younger patients with a good general condition (median age, 63 vs. 71 years, p<0.01; and performance status 0, 67% vs. 37%, p<0.05). The median progression-free and overall survival were similar between the S-1 (3.7 and 7.2 months, respectively) and mFFX (3.3 and 7.4 months, respectively) groups. The response rate in patients with measurable lesions was 4% (n=1/23) in the S-1 group and 17% (n=2/12) in the mFFX group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 20% in the S-1 group and 57% (neutrophil count decreased in 43%) in the mFFX group (p<0.01). Conclusion S-1 and mFFX were both acceptable second-line chemotherapies after GnP therapy for UPC, although attention should be paid to myelosuppression during mFFX treatment. Further studies involving nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy are necessary to facilitate the selection of the optimal regimen for each patient.

Usefulness of the G8 Geriatric Assessment Tool as a Prognostic Factor in Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel Combination Therapy for Elderly Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Introduction: The usefulness of various prognostic factors for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) has been reported, but the number of elderly patients in these studies is disproportionately fewer than those in general practice. This study aimed to examine the prognostic factors for elderly patients with APC receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) considering the G8 geriatric assessment tool. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 77 elderly (≥65 years old) patients with APC who received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our hospital. We used the receiver operating characteristic curve to set the optimal cutoff value for G8. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to study independent prognostic factors. Results: The progression-free survival was 5.5 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 12.0 months in all patients. The most optimal cutoff of G8 was 10.5. OS of G8 ≥10.5 patients was superior to that of G8 <10.5 patients (18.5 versus 8.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, p = 0.02), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.9 (HR 2.73, p = 0.03), and G8 geriatric assessment <10.5 (HR 5.38, p < 0.001) were independent negative prognostic factors. Conclusions: G8 is useful for predicting prognoses in elderly patients with APC receiving GnP.

A locally advanced pancreatic body cancer presenting common bile duct invasion resected via distal pancreatectomy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: The locally advanced pancreatic cancer has been steadily recognized as a potentially curable disease by a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. The remarkable effect of advanced chemotherapy would help surgeons do a function-preserving operation for advanced pancreatic cancer. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 73-year-old woman presenting with obstructive jaundice was diagnosed to have a 3-cm pancreatic body cancer invading the celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), portal/splenic vein confluence, and the common bile duct (CBD). A plastic internal stent tube was placed endoscopically. After 11 cycles (231 days) of a weekly doublet chemotherapy with 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 of albumin-bound paclitaxel, the tumor shrunk based on imaging done every four months during chemotherapy, with residual periarterial high-density area around CA and proximal SMA and the patient was referred for surgery. During the operation, the absence of cancer cells was confirmed at (1) the origin of the proper hepatic artery, gastroduodenal artery and the left gastric artery, and (2) pancreatic cut stump along the right border of the portal vein; thus, distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection was done. The patient had postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 100 mg/day of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil for half a year and is currently alive and well, without signs of recurrence and diabetes mellitus a year after surgery. DISCUSSION: Although surgical techniques aimed at local radicality are important, especially for conversion surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, surgeons should consider the balance between radicality, safety, and functional preservation of surgery.

Outcomes of Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Combination Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer are at high risk of incomplete resection with upfront surgery. Currently, no standard induction chemotherapy regimen exists for these patients. Both FOLFIRINOX (5-FU, irinotecan, & oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have shown better efficacy than gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. The current study aims to assess outcomes of real-world patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received induction FOLFIRINOX or GnP. METHODS: In this population-based multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable pancreatic cancer diagnosed from 2011 to 2017, in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada, who received FOLFIRINOX or GnP were assessed. Kaplan Meier methods and log rank tests were performed for survival analyses. RESULTS: Of 161 patients with pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX or GnP during the study period, 20 eligible patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were identified. Ten patients each received FOLFIRINOX or GnP. Eleven patients had partial response (5, FOLFIRINOX; 6, GnP); 3 progressed during treatment. Five patients (4, FOLFIRINOX; 1, GnP; p = NS) underwent curative surgery. The median progression-free survival was 17 months in FOLFIRINOX (95% CI, 5.3-28.6) vs. 9 months (95% CI, 3.0-15) in GnP groups (p = 0.27). Overall, 80% patients in GnP vs. 40% in FOLFIRINOX died from progressive disease. The median overall survival has not been reached in FOLFIRINOX group versus 16 months (95% CI, 9.3-22.7) in GnP group (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX tend to have better outcomes. Future studies are warranted to establish a preferred systemic therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.