A novel in vitro 3D model of the human bone marrow to bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity testing.

The regulatory 2D in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay is part of a battery of tests, used to test for genotoxicity of new and existing compounds before they are assessed in vivo (ICH S2). The 2D MN assay consists of a monolayer of cells, whereas the in vivo bone marrow (BM) setting comprises a multicellular environment within a three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Although the in vitro MN assay follows a robust protocol set out by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to comply with regulatory bodies, some compounds have been identified as negative genotoxicants within the in vitro MN assay but marginally positive when assessed in vivo. The glucocorticoids, which are weakly positive in vivo, have generally been suggested to pose no long-term carcinogenic risk; however, for novel compounds of unknown activity, improved prediction of genotoxicity is imperative. To help address this observation, we describe a novel 3D in vitro assay which aims to replicate the results seen within the in vivo BM microenvironment. AlgiMatrix scaffolds were optimized for seeding with HS-5 human BM stromal cells as a BM microenvironment, to which the human lymphoblast cell line TK6 was added. An MN assay was performed aligning with the 2D regulatory assay protocol. Utilizing this novel 3D in vitro model of the BM, known genotoxicants (mitomycin C, etoposide, and paclitaxel), a negative control (caffeine), and in vivo positive glucocorticoids (dexamethasone and prednisolone) were investigated for the induction of MN. It was found, in agreement with historical in vivo data, that the model could accurately predict the in vivo outcome of the glucocorticoids, unlike the regulatory 2D in vitro MN assay. These preliminary results suggest our 3D MN assay may better predict the outcome of in vivo MN tests, compared with the standard 2D assay.

Development of a rapid electrophoretic assay for genomic DNA damage quantification.

Accuracy, sensitivity, simplicity, reproducibility, and low-cost are desirable requirements for genotoxicity assessment techniques. Here we describe a simple electrophoretic assay for genomic DNA lesions quantification (EAsy-GeL) based on subjecting DNA samples to rapid unwinding/renaturation treatments and neutral agarose gel electrophoresis. The experiments performed in this work involved different biological samples exposed to increasing environmental-simulated doses of ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation, such as Escherichia coli, human leukocytes, and isolated human genomic DNA. DNA extraction was carried out using a universal and low-cost protocol, which takes about 4 h. Before electrophoresis migration, DNA samples were kept into a neutral buffer to detect double-strand breaks (DSBs) or subjected to a 5-min step of alkaline unwinding and neutral renaturation to detect single-strand breaks (SSBs) or incubated with the DNA repair enzyme T4-endonuclease V for the detection of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) before the 5-min step of DNA unwinding/renaturation. Then, all DNA samples were separated by neutral agarose gel electrophoresis, the DNA average length of each lane was calculated through the use of free software, and the frequency of DNA breaks per kbp was determined by a simple rule of three. Dose-response experiments allowed the quantification of different levels of DNA damage per electrophoretic run, varying from a constant and low amount of DSBs/SSBs to high and dose-dependent levels of CPDs. Compared with other assays based on alkaline unwinding and gel electrophoresis, EAsy-GeL has important advantages for both environmental monitoring and laboratory testing purposes. The simplicity and applicability of this protocol to other types of DNA lesions, biological models, and agents make it ideal for genotoxicity, DNA repair studies, as well as for assessing exposure risks to ecosystems and human health.

Human Hazard Assessment Using Drosophila Wing Spot Test as an Alternative In Vivo Model for Genotoxicity Testing-A Review.

Genomic instability, one of cancer's hallmarks, is induced by genotoxins from endogenous and exogenous sources, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), diet, and environmental pollutants. A sensitive in vivo genotoxicity test is required for the identification of human hazards to reduce the potential health risk. The somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) or wing spot test is a genotoxicity assay involving Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) as a classical, alternative human model. This review describes the principle of the SMART assay in conjunction with its advantages and disadvantages and discusses applications of the assay covering all segments of health-related industries, including food, dietary supplements, drug industries, pesticides, and herbicides, as well as nanoparticles. Chemopreventive strategies are outlined as a global health trend for the anti-genotoxicity of interesting herbal extract compounds determined by SMART assay. The successful application of Drosophila for high-throughput screening of mutagens is also discussed as a future perspective.

Adipose tissue stem cell-derived hepatic progenies as an in vitro model for genotoxicity testing.

The problem of the currently used routine genotoxicity tests is relatively low predictivity of in vitro tests for in vivo genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. An important reason is considered to be inadequate expression of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in indicator cell lines. The aim of our study was to generate metabolically active differentiated hepatic progenies (hDHP) from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASC) for genotoxicity testing. hDHP, generated using a three-step hepatic differentiation procedure, expressed hepatic properties such as glycogen storage and albumin secretion. The results of the comet assay demonstrated comparable sensitivity of hASC and hDHP to detect DNA damage induced by a direct acting genotoxic agent tert-butylhydroperoxide. Exposure to model indirect acting genotoxins benzo(a)pyrene, aflatoxin B1, and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine did not induce DNA damage in hASC, while hDHP cells detected DNA damage induced by benzo(a)pyrene and aflatoxin B1, indicating their metabolic activity. The gene and protein expression analysis confirmed the presence of key enzymes involved in metabolism of the three genotoxins in hDHP cells. Moreover, the exposure of hDHP to the model pro-carcinogens altered the expression of selected metabolic genes. hDHP were further immortalized with hTERT transfection, resulting in a stable cell line that can be matured to metabolically active hDHP ready for genotoxicity testing in only 2 weeks. The advantage of these immortalized cells is their prolonged replicative life span and consequently limitless supply of hDHP cells. We conclude that hDHP cells have a great potential for the application in the routine genotoxicity testing and are therefore worth further investigations.

Evaluation of the mutagenicity of simple substituted quinoxalines in Salmonella typhimurium.

Limited information is available on the genotoxicity of simple quinoxalines, distinct from the food related carcinogenic derivatives bearing an aromatic amino group. Isolated positive results, with no apparent structure-activity relationships, were reported in earlier studies on alkyl substituted quinoxalines, raising a safety concern in some regulatory authorities in view of the potential human exposure related to their use as food flavors. In order to elucidate the genotoxic hazard posed by simple quinoxalines, in this work a random set of mono- and bi-substituted methyl, chloro- and hydroxyl- quinoxalines have been tested in an OECD-compliant bacterial reversion test (TG 471). The results obtained do not highlight any genotoxic potential in the set of quinoxalines examined, and suggest that this may be a common trait for other simple substituted quinoxalines. Earlier published positive findings were not confirmed in this work, which call for a cautious approach in the use of literature data for regulatory purpose.

Use of Lentivirus-Based Method for Establishing TK6 Human Cell Lines Expressing Cytochrome P450 and its Applications in Genotoxicity Testing.

The human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 stands out as the most widely employed human cell line in genotoxicity testing, as recommended by various testing guidelines for in vitro assessments. Nevertheless, like many testing cell lines, TK6 lacks functional phase I drug-metabolizing enzymes crucial for chemical genotoxicity evaluations. This protocol introduces a lentivirus-based methodology for establishing a panel of TK6-derived cell lines, each expressing one of 14 cytochrome P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A7). The utilization of a lentiviral expression system ensures stable transduction, offering notable advantages such as sustained transgene expression, high transduction efficiency, positive selection feasibility, and user-friendly application. Additionally, we present a detailed procedure for validating the enhanced expression of each CYP in the established cell lines through real-time PCR, western blotting, and mass spectrometry analysis. Lastly, we exemplify the application of these CYP-expressing TK6 cell lines in genotoxicity testing, employing a flow-cytometry-based in vitro micronucleus test. Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Basic Protocol 1: Lentivirus production and transduction for TK6 cells Support Protocol: Selecting a single clone of CYP-expressing TK6 cells Basic Protocol 2: Validation of CYP expression in TK6 cell lines Basic Protocol 3: Application of transduced cell lines in flow-cytometry-based micronucleus assay.

Non-clinical safety assessment of novel drug modalities: Genome safety perspectives on viral-, nuclease- and nucleotide-based gene therapies.

Gene therapies have emerged as promising treatments for various conditions including inherited diseases as well as cancer. Ensuring their safe clinical application requires the development of appropriate safety testing strategies. Several guidelines have been provided by health authorities to address these concerns. These guidelines state that non-clinical testing should be carried out on a case-by-case basis depending on the modality. This review focuses on the genome safety assessment of frequently used gene therapy modalities, namely Adeno Associated Viruses (AAVs), Lentiviruses, designer nucleases and mRNAs. Important safety considerations for these modalities, amongst others, are vector integrations into the patient genome (insertional mutagenesis) and off-target editing. Taking into account the constraints of in vivo studies, health authorities endorse the development of novel approach methodologies (NAMs), which are innovative in vitro strategies for genotoxicity testing. This review provides an overview of NAMs applied to viral and CRISPR/Cas9 safety, including next generation sequencing-based methods for integration site analysis and off-target editing. Additionally, NAMs to evaluate the oncogenicity risk arising from unwanted genomic modifications are discussed. Thus, a range of promising techniques are available to support the safe development of gene therapies. Thorough validation, comparisons and correlations with clinical outcomes are essential to identify the most reliable safety testing strategies. By providing a comprehensive overview of these NAMs, this review aims to contribute to a better understanding of the genome safety perspectives of gene therapies.

Automatic nuclear bud detection using ellipse fitting, moving sticks or top-hat transformation.

Micronucleus assays are extensively used by biologists to assess genotoxicity and to monitor human exposure to genotoxic materials. As recent studies suggested that nuclear buds can be a new source of micronuclei formed in interphase, the quantification of nuclear buds, which are micronucleus like objects that are attached to the nuclei in interphase, in normal and control group is needed. Three automatic nuclear bud detection algorithms fit for different situations are proposed in this paper. One is based on ellipse fitting, one is based on a stick model and the other is based on the top-hat transform. Comparison of the three methods is also given in this paper. Experimental results showed that the proposed algorithms are all effective and efficient for nuclear bud detection.

International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT): Origins, achievements and ambitions.

Over the past thirty years, the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) became one of the leading groups in the field of regulatory genotoxicology, not only due to the diversity of participants with respect to geography and professional affiliation, but also due to the unique setup of recurring IWGT meetings every four years. The hallmarks of the IWGT process have been diligent initial planning approaches of the working groups, collection of data so as to stimulate data-driven discussions and debate, and striving to reach consensus recommendations. The scientific quality of the Working Groups (WGs) has been exceptional due to the selection of highly regarded experts on each topic. As a result, the IWGT working group reports have become important documents. The deliberations and publications have provided guidance on test systems and testing protocols that have influenced the development or revision of test guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), guidance by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), and strategic testing or data analysis approaches in general. This article summarizes the history of the IWGT, identifies some of its major achievements, and provides an outlook for the future.

In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: Report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).

The in vivo working group (WG) considered three topics: acceptable maximum doses for negative erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) tests, validation status of MN assays in non-hematopoietic tissues, and nuisance factors in the comet assay. The WG reached agreement on many issues, including: negative erythrocyte MN studies should be acceptable if dosing is conducted to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 474 recommendations and if sufficient bone marrow exposure is demonstrated; consensus on the evidence required to demonstrate "sufficient" exposure was not reached. The liver MN test using six-week-old rats is sufficiently validated to develop an OECD TG, but the impact of animal age warrants additional study. Ki-67 is a reliable marker for cellular proliferation in hepatocytes. The gastrointestinal tract MN test is useful for detecting poorly absorbed or rapidly degraded aneugens, and for genotoxic metabolites formed in the colon. Although current validation data are insufficient to support the development of an OECD TG, the methodologies are sufficient to consider as an appendix to OECD TG474. Comparison of comet assay results to laboratory historical control data (HCD) should not be used in data evaluation, unless the HCD distribution is demonstrated to be stable and the predominant source of HCD variation is due to animal, not study, factors. No universally acceptable negative control limit for any tissue was identified. Methodological differences in comet studies can result in variable data interpretations; more data are required before best practice recommendations can be made. Hedgehogs alone are unreliable indicators of cytotoxicity and additional investigations into cytotoxicity markers are required.

TubulinTracker, a Novel In Vitro Reporter Assay to Study Intracellular Microtubule Dynamics, Cell Cycle Progression, and Aneugenicity.

Aneuploidy is characterized by the presence of an abnormal number of chromosomes and is a common hallmark of cancer. However, exposure to aneugenic compounds does not necessarily lead to cancer. Aneugenic compounds are mainly identified using the in vitro micronucleus assay but this assay cannot standardly discriminate between aneugens and clastogens and cannot be used to identify the exact mode-of-action (MOA) of aneugens; tubulin stabilization, tubulin destabilization, or inhibition of mitotic kinases. To improve the classification of aneugenic substances and determine their MOA, we developed and validated the TubulinTracker assay that uses a green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin reporter cell line to study microtubule stability using flow cytometry. Combining the assay with a DNA stain also enables cell cycle analysis. Substances whose exposure resulted in an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, combined with increased or decreased tubulin levels, were classified as tubulin poisons. All known tubulin poisons included were classified correctly. Moreover, we correctly classified compounds, including aneugens that did not affect microtubule levels. However, the MOA of aneugens not affecting tubulin stability, such as Aurora kinase inhibitors, could not be identified. Here, we show that the TubulinTracker assay can be used to classify microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing compounds in living cells. This insight into the MOA of aneugenic agents is important, eg, to support a weight-of-evidence approach for risk assessment, and the classification as an aneugen as opposed to a clastogen or mutagen, has a big impact on the assessment.

Healthy Volunteer Studies in the Development of Anticancer Drugs with Genotoxic Findings.

BACKGROUND: Recent scientific advances in cancer research have led to the development of immunomodulatory and molecularly targeted drugs with better safety profiles than chemotherapeutics, which makes it possible to include healthy volunteers (HVs) in clinical trials. In this study, we aimed to identify the number of marketing authorization applications (MAAs) that enrolled HVs in a clinical trial and to identify the number of anticancer drugs that were given to HVs despite a positive genotoxic finding. In addition, we evaluated the dose of anticancer drugs administered to HVs and the justification for proceeding with HV studies despite a positive genotoxic finding. METHODS: Publicly available information from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website was used for this study. Anticancer drugs were identified using the human medicines highlights published by EMA between January 2010 and December 2019. EPARs were used to collect general information of the anticancer drugs, details on genotoxicity studies, and the enrollment of HVs in clinical trials. RESULTS: We identified 71 MAAs for small molecule anticancer drugs with a positive or negative CHMP opinion in the EU. Forty-eight anticancer drugs were studied in HVs, of which 12 anticancer drugs were administered to HVs despite positive genotoxic findings in the standard battery. Systematic and extensive genetic toxicology screening demonstrated the absence of genotoxic risks to the cell system. CONCLUSION: We showed that despite a positive genotoxic finding, comprehensive genetic toxicology testing demonstrated the absence of risks to the cell system at the human exposure dose. Therefore, these anticancer drugs posed no harm to HVs.

The expression of Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes in human B-lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

In vitro genotoxicity testing plays an important role in chemical risk assessment. The human B-lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 is widely used as a standard cell line for regulatory safety evaluations. Like many other mammalian cell lines, TK6 cells have limited metabolic capacity; therefore, usually require a source of exogenous metabolic activation for use in genotoxicity testing. Previously, we developed a set of TK6-derived cell lines that individually express one of fourteen cytochrome P450s (CYPs). In the present study, we surveyed a panel of major Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes to characterize their baseline expression in TK6 cells. These results may serve as a reference enzymatic profile of this commonly used cell line.

Use of in vitro 3D tissue models in genotoxicity testing: Strategic fit, validation status and way forward. Report of the working group from the 7th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).

Use of three-dimensional (3D) tissue equivalents in toxicology has been increasing over the last decade as novel preclinical test systems and as alternatives to animal testing. In the area of genetic toxicology, progress has been made with establishing robust protocols for skin, airway (lung) and liver tissue equivalents. In light of these advancements, a "Use of 3D Tissues in Genotoxicity Testing" working group (WG) met at the 7th IWGT meeting in Tokyo in November 2017 to discuss progress with these models and how they may fit into a genotoxicity testing strategy. The workshop demonstrated that skin models have reached an advanced state of validation following over 10 years of development, while liver and airway model-based genotoxicity assays show promise but are at an early stage of development. Further effort in liver and airway model-based assays is needed to address the lack of coverage of the three main endpoints of genotoxicity (mutagenicity, clastogenicity and aneugenicity), and information on metabolic competence. The IWGT WG believes that the 3D skin comet and micronucleus assays are now sufficiently validated to undergo an independent peer review of the validation study, followed by development of individual OECD Test Guidelines.

Flash-comet: Significantly improved speed and sensitivity of the comet assay through the introduction of lithium-based solutions and a more gentle lysis.

Evaluation of primary DNA-damage is one way to identify potential genotoxic agents and for this purpose the Comet assay has, for the last decades, been used to monitor DNA single strand and double strand breaks in individual cells. Various attempts have been made to modify the different steps in the in vitro protocol for the Comet assay in order to improve its sensitivity. However, to the best of our knowledge, nobody has tried to replace the traditionally used NaOH-based electrophoresis solution (pH > 13), with another type of solution. In the present paper, using TK-6 cells exposed to different concentrations of H2O2 or ionizing radiation, we present evidence clearly showing that a low-conductive LiOH-based electrophoresis solution at pH 12.5, and a more gentle lysis procedure, significantly improved both the speed and sensitivity of the assay. The new approach, which we call the Flash-comet, is based on a lysis buffer at pH 8.5, an unwinding time of 2.5 min in a LiOH solution without EDTA at pH 12.5, and an electrophoresis time of 1 min at 150 V (5 V/cm) using the same solution.

Flash-comet assay.

In the present paper, we present a substantially revised protocol of the widely used SCGE assay performed under alkaline conditions. In our updated version of the comet assay, which we call the Flash-comet, LiOH is used instead of NaOH during the unwinding and electrophoresis. This allows a higher voltage during the electrophoresis (5 V/cm instead of 0.7 V/cm), making it possible to reduce the unwinding time from 20 to 40 to 2.5 min, and the electrophoresis time from 10 to 20 to 1 min. Still, the Flash-comet was found to detect DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites with a higher degree of sensitivity than the conventional protocol in cells that had been exposed to H2O2 or ionizing radiation. In order to prevent alkaline hydrolysis of DNA, the wash and lysis solutions have been modified in the Flash-comet protocol.•By using an alkaline LiOH-based medium, the Flash-comet allows for much shorter times for both unwinding and electrophoresis than the conventional comet assay without compromising the sensitivity.•The reduced run-times of the unwinding and electrophoresis steps in the Flash-comet should also reduce the risk of laboratory-induced alkaline hydrolysis of DNA when evaluating the potential DNA-damaging effects of different types of xenobiotics.

Genetic instability of in vitro cell lines: Implications for genetic toxicity testing.

Cell line-based in vitro testing has been widely used as an important component of the genotoxicity testing battery; however, the use of cell lines is constrained by several limitations, including the genetic drift and variability. A study recently reported in the literature comprehensively examined genomic changes in a large number of cell lines and reported extensive genetic variations within the same cell lines across passage numbers and laboratories, even for single-cell derived subclones. The primary objective of this communication is to raise awareness and stimulate discussion within the genotoxicity testing community of the extent of genetic variability of cell lines in general and how these variables could potentially influence the results and reproducibility of genotoxicity testing. Meanwhile, some recommendations for good cell culture practices are highlighted to mitigate, at least to some extent, the concern about genetic variation. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:559-562, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

In vitro mammalian cell mutation assays based on transgenic reporters: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).

Chemical safety evaluations require assessment of genetic toxicity. Transgenic rodent (TGR) assays permit enumeration of mutations in chromosomally-integrated targets contained in shuttle vectors. In order to improve in vitro mutagenicity assessment, and to substantially reduce animal use, in vitro assays using transgenic reporters have been developed. These assays are based on cells derived from TGRs, or cells transfected with transgenic shuttle vectors containing a mutation target. As part of the 7th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing, an In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay working group reviewed all published information pertaining to in vitro transgene mutagenicity assays; the utility, advantages and disadvantages of the assays were evaluated and discussed. The review revealed that over 20 TGR-based in vitro assays have been used to assess the mutagenic activity of over 150 agents. Overall, the Working Group considered in vitro transgene mutagenicity assays pragmatic tools for the safety evaluation of new and existing substances. A formal SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis revealed advantages including the use of established scoring protocols, avoidance of laborious clone isolation and enumeration, ability to use metabolically competent primary cells, ability to detect different types of genetic damage, large dynamic range, and complementarity to in vivo TGR endpoints. Disadvantages include lack of validation and little consistency in protocols, the use of specialised reagents, the time and effort required for mutant enumeration, the use of some cell lines that lack metabolic capacity, and the need for multiple assays to cover all mutational mechanisms. Several assays have been partially validated, indicating promising reliability, reproducibility and applicability domain. Once in vitro transgene mutagenicity assays have been more thoroughly validated, they are well placed to augment or replace existing in vitro mammalian cell mutagenicity assays, particularly in cases where the in vivo TGR mutation assay is intended for follow-up.

[Occupational hazards, DNA damage, and oxidative stress on exposure to waste anesthetic gases]. / Riscos ocupacionais, danos no material genético e estresse oxidativo frente à exposição aos resíduos de gases anestésicos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) present in the ambient air of operating rooms (OR), are associated with various occupational hazards. This paper intends to discuss occupational exposure to WAGs and its impact on exposed professionals, with emphasis on genetic damage and oxidative stress. CONTENT: Despite the emergence of safer inhaled anesthetics, occupational exposure to WAGs remains a current concern. Factors related to anesthetic techniques and anesthesia workstations, in addition to the absence of a scavenging system in the OR, contribute to anesthetic pollution. In order to minimize the health risks of exposed professionals, several countries have recommended legislation with maximum exposure limits. However, developing countries still require measurement of WAGs and regulation for occupational exposure to WAGs. WAGs are capable of inducing damage to the genetic material, such as DNA damage assessed using the comet assay and increased frequency of micronucleus in professionals with long-term exposure. Oxidative stress is also associated with WAGs exposure, as it induces lipid peroxidation, oxidative damage in DNA, and impairment of the antioxidant defense system in exposed professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The occupational hazards related to WAGs including genotoxicity, mutagenicity and oxidative stress, stand as a public health issue and must be acknowledged by exposed personnel and responsible authorities, especially in developing countries. Thus, it is urgent to stablish maximum safe limits of concentration of WAGs in ORs and educational practices and protocols for exposed professionals.

Current methods in risk assessment of genotoxic chemicals.

Chemical contaminants and residues are undesired chemicals occurring in consumer products such as food and drugs, at the workplace and in the environment, i.e. in air, soil and water. These compounds can be detected even at very low concentrations and lead frequently to considerable concerns among consumers and in the media. Thus it is a major challenge for modern toxicology to provide transparent and versatile tools for the risk assessment of such compounds in particular with respect to human health. Well-known examples of toxic contaminants are dioxins or mercury (in the environment), mycotoxins (from infections by molds) or acrylamide (from thermal treatment of food). The process of toxicological risk assessment of such chemicals is based on i) the knowledge of their contents in food, air, water etc., ii) the routes and extent of exposure of humans, iii) the toxicological properties of the compound, and, iv) its mode(s) of action. In this process quantitative dose-response relationships, usually in experimental animals, are of outstanding importance. For a successful risk assessment, in particular of genotoxic chemicals, several conditions and models such as the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach or the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) concept exist, which will be discussed.