Prognostic Impact of Multiple Drug Use at Discharge in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure.

The association between polypharmacy/multiple drug use (MDU) and prognosis in patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) is unclear. It is also unknown whether the prognostic values of MDU vary depending on the presence/absence of a previous history of HF and preserved/reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analyzed consecutive 1,034 patients hospitalized with HF (age, 74.9 ± 11.5 years; 58.7% male). MDU was defined as ≥5 drugs at discharge. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and HF readmission. MDU was observed in 695 patients (67.2%). Patients with MDU use had higher prevalences of a previous history of HF, reduced LVEF, and comorbidities than those without MDU. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that MDU was significantly associated with the primary endpoint after adjustment for possible confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.79; P = 0.030). There was significant interaction between the presence/absence of a history of HF and the prognostic impact of MDU (HF history [-]: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.553; HF history [+]: HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; P = 0.007; P for interaction = 0.005). However, there was no significant interaction between preserved/reduced LVEF and the prognostic impact of MDU (P for interaction = 0.274). In conclusion, MDU at discharge is an independent risk factor for the composite of death or HF readmission in patients hospitalized with HF. We observed a significant interaction between the presence of de novo versus recurrent HF and the prognostic value of MDU.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mortality and Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The ARIC Study.

Background Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). The contribution of individual and neighborhood SES to the prognosis and quality of care for HF with reduced ejection fraction is not clear yet has important implications. Methods and Results We examined 728 participants of the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study (mean age, 78.2 years; 34% Black participants; 46% women) hospitalized with HF with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction <50%) between 2005 and 2018. We assessed associations between education, income, and area deprivation index with mortality and HF readmission using multivariable Cox models. We also evaluated the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (optimal: ≥3 of ß-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers; acceptable: at least 2) at discharge. During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 58.7% were readmitted with HF, and 74.0% died. Low income was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.14-2.04]) and readmission (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.03]). Similarly, low education was associated with mortality (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.01-1.59]) and readmission (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.24-2.12]). The highest versus lowest area deprivation index quartile was associated with readmission (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.11-2.58]) but not necessarily with mortality. The prevalence of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and acceptable guideline-directed medical therapy was 5.5% and 54.4%, respectively, but did not significantly differ by SES. Conclusions Among patients hospitalized with HF with reduced ejection fraction, low SES was independently associated with mortality and HF readmission. A targeted secondary prevention approach that focuses intensive efforts on patients with low SES will be necessary to improve outcomes of those with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Assessing Guideline-Directed Medication Therapy for Heart Failure in End-Stage Renal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) requires guideline-directed medication therapy (GDMT) consisting of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker in combination with an indicated beta-blocker. There is concern that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are not being prescribed GDMT. The study aim was to determine whether outcomes differ for patients with HFrEF and ESRD receiving GDMT compared to those not receiving GDMT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with ESRD and HFrEF admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital over a 2-year period were included. Patients were categorized into GDMT or non-GDMT groups based on their home medications. The length of stay (LOS), mortality, and 30-day hospital readmissions were compared between groups. The incidence of hyperkalemia, hypotension and bradycardia were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included: 88% African-American, 61% males, median age 63 (28-93) years with 25 in the GDMT group and 84 in the non-GDMT group. The LOS did not differ between the GDMT (5 days; 3-14) compared to the non-GDMT group (7 days; 3-28), P = 0.14. Thirty-day hospital readmission and in-hospital mortality were also similar. Hypotension occurred less frequently in the GDMT group compared to the non-GDMT group, 4% versus 27% (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in the primary outcomes, the shorter LOS in the GDMT group may be clinically significant. The fact that most patients with ESRD and HFrEF were not receiving GDMT is a finding that requires further evaluation.