Influence of further decompensation on survival across clinical stages of decompensated cirrhosis: The role of portal hypertension and HVPG changes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Decompensated-cirrhosis encompasses several stages with different prognosis, such as bleeding, ascites and bleeding-plus-ascites. Development of further-decompensation worsens survival, while non-selective ß-blockers (NSBBs) can modify the risk. However, how this applies to each stage is uncertain. We aimed to investigate, in each stage of decompensated-cirrhosis, the influence of further-decompensation on mortality and whether changes in portal-pressure (HVPG) under NSBBs influence these outcomes. METHODS: Patients with variceal bleeding were consecutively included differentiating those with bleeding-alone from those who also had ascites. Patients with ascites and high-risk varices referred for primary-prophylaxis were also investigated. A baseline haemodynamic study was performed and was repeated after 1-3-months under NSBBs. Outcomes were investigated by competing-risk. RESULTS: Totally 103 patients had bleeding-alone, 186 bleeding-plus-ascites and 187 ascites-alone. Mean follow-up was 32-months (IQR, 12-60). Patients with bleeding-plus-ascites had higher HVPG and were more hyperdynamic than patients with ascites-alone and these than those with bleeding-alone. At each stage, the mortality risk was more than twice in patients developing further-decompensation vs. those without (p < .001). In each stage, HVPG-decrease under NSBBs showed better discrimination to predict further-decompensation than the baseline MELD, Child-Pugh or HVPG, by time-dependent ROC-curves (c-statistic >70%). At each stage, patients without HVPG-decreases, either ≥10% or ≥20% from the baseline, had higher risk of further-decompensation (sHR from 2.43 to 6.73, p < .01) and worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In each stage of decompensated cirrhosis, mortality risk significantly and very markedly increase with further-decompensation. HVPG-non-response to NSBBs may adequately stratify the risk of further decompensation and death, in each stage. This suggests potential benefit with pre-emptive therapies in HVPG-non-responders at each-stage.

Severity of Acute Portal Hypertension Determines the Clinical Outcomes in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) presenting as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has high mortality. Severe hepatic inflammation and ongoing hepatocellular cell death lead to rapid rise in portal pressure, a hyperdynamic circulation that might precipitate infections and organ failures. METHODS: Consecutive SAH patients were classified based on baseline HVPG measurement as 6to < 12 mmHg, 12to < 20 mmHg, and ≥ 20 mmHg. We analyzed portal hypertension severity in relation to fibrosis stage, ACLF at presentation, response to prednisolone, severity scores(MELD and Maddrey's Discriminant Function, mDF), and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 819 SAH patients (94.6% ACLF, 85.4% histological cirrhosis, median MELD and mDF scores 25 and 66, respectively), 250(30.5%) had HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg. Patients with HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg more often had large esophageal varices (25.2%vs.13.2%; p-0.001), higher baseline MELD (27.1 ± 5.6vs.25.3 ± 5.2; p-0.001), and mDF(76.1 ± 16vs.68.4 ± 15.1; p-0.01) scores. No patient without ACLF had HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg. Moreover, during hospital course these patients had higher incidence of variceal bleed (17.2%vs.8.8%; p-0.001), acute kidney injury (36.4%vs.25.3%; p-0.001), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (6.4%vs.3.5%; p-0.05). Of 412(50.3%) eligible patients treated with prednisolone, 69.2% showed response at day 7(Lille's score < 0.45). 90-day mortality was 27.6%; and baseline MELD > 25.5[HR 1.78], HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg [HR 1.86], the presence of HE[HR 1.63], and prednisolone ineligibility due to sepsis[HR 1.27] were independent predictors. Mortality was unrelated to varices grade, variceal bleed, and histological cirrhosis. Repeat HVPG performed in 114(19.2%) patients after a median of 5.2 months showed significant decrease (3.6 mmHg; p-0.001) which correlated with improvement in MELD score(13points; p-0.05). CONCLUSION: Development of ACLF and complications in SAH are likely a result of acute rise in HVPG. "High-risk" SAH are SAH patients with HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg in the presence of ascites. Understanding the drivers for acute rise in portal pressure in SAH ACLF might help introduction of newer therapies.

Non-invasive tests for clinically significant portal hypertension after HCV cure.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥10 mmHg) have predominantly been studied in patients with active HCV infection. Investigations after HCV cure are limited and have yielded conflicting results. We conducted a pooled analysis to determine the diagnostic/prognostic utility of liver stiffness measurement (LSM)/platelet count (PLT) in this setting. METHODS: A total of 418 patients with pre-treatment HVPG ≥6 mmHg who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) and underwent post-treatment HVPG measurement were assessed, of whom 324 (HVPG/NIT-cohort) also had paired data on pre-/post-treatment LSM/PLT. The derived LSM/PLT criteria were then validated against the direct endpoint decompensation in 755 patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with SVR (cACLD-validation-cohort). RESULTS: HVPG/NIT-cohort: Among patients with cACLD, the pre-/post-treatment prevalence of CSPH was 80%/54%. The correlation between LSM/HVPG increased from pre- to post-treatment (r = 0.45 vs. 0.60), while that of PLT/HVPG remained unchanged. For given LSM/PLT values, HVPG tended to be lower post- vs. pre-treatment, indicating the need for dedicated algorithms. Combining post-treatment LSM/PLT yielded a high diagnostic accuracy for post-treatment CSPH in cACLD (AUC 0.884; 95% CI 0.843-0.926). Post-treatment LSM <12 kPa & PLT >150 G/L excluded CSPH (sensitivity: 99.2%), while LSM ≥25 kPa was highly specific for CSPH (93.6%). cACLD-validation-cohort: the 3-year decompensation risk was 0% in the 42.5% of patients who met the LSM <12 kPa & PLT >150 G/L criteria. In patients with post-treatment LSM ≥25 kPa (prevalence: 16.8%), the 3-year decompensation risk was 9.6%, while it was 1.3% in those meeting none of the above criteria (prevalence: 40.7%). CONCLUSIONS: NITs can estimate the probability of CSPH after HCV cure and predict clinical outcomes. Patients with cACLD but LSM <12 kPa & PLT>150 G/L may be discharged from portal hypertension surveillance if no co-factors are present, while patients with LSM ≥25 kPa require surveillance/treatment. LAY SUMMARY: Measurement of liver stiffness by a specific ultrasound device and platelet count (a simple blood test) are broadly used for the non-invasive diagnosis of increased blood pressure in the veins leading to the liver, which drives the development of complications in patients with advanced liver disease. The results of our pooled analysis refute previous concerns that these tests are less accurate after the cure of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We have developed diagnostic criteria that facilitate personalized management after HCV cure and allow for a de-escalation of care in a high proportion of patients, thereby decreasing disease burden.

Decompensation in Advanced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease May Occur at Lower Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Levels Than in Patients With Viral Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Portal hypertension is the strongest predictor of hepatic decompensation and death in patients with cirrhosis. However, its discriminatory accuracy in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been challenged because hepatic vein catheterization may not reflect the real portal vein pressure as accurately as in patients with other etiologies. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and presence of portal hypertension-related decompensation in patients with advanced NAFLD (aNAFLD). METHODS: Multicenter cross-sectional study included 548 patients with aNAFLD and 444 with advanced RNA-positive hepatitis C (aHCV) who had detailed portal hypertension evaluation (HVPG measurement, gastroscopy, and abdominal imaging). We examined the relationship between etiology, HVPG, and decompensation by logistic regression models. We also compared the proportions of compensated/decompensated patients at different HVPG levels. RESULTS: Both cohorts, aNAFLD and aHVC, had similar baseline age, gender, Child-Pugh score, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Median HVPG was lower in the aNAFLD cohort (13 vs 15 mmHg) despite similar liver function and higher rates of decompensation in aNAFLD group (32% vs 25%; P = .019) than in the aHCV group. For any of the HVPG cutoff analyzed (<10, 10-12, or 12 mmHg) the prevalence of decompensation was higher in the aNAFLD group than in the aHCV group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aNAFLD have higher prevalence of portal hypertension-related decompensation at any value of HVPG as compared with aHCV patients. Longitudinal studies aiming to identify HVPG thresholds able to predict decompensation and long-term outcomes in aNAFLD population are strongly needed.

Clinical parameters associated with gastric portal hypertensive polyps.

OBJECTIVES: Portal hypertensive polyps (PHPs) are incompletely characterized lesions that can be found in the distal stomach of patients with portal hypertension. We aimed to delineate clinical factors associated with the appearance of these rare polyps. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a cohort with 513 cirrhotic patients comparing patients with and without PHP using descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression. To address the problem of missing values, in particular for HVPG and liver stiffness, we used multiple imputation of missing values. RESULTS: The prevalence of macroscopically diagnosed PHP was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.0 - 5.4%). In 53% of cases, the correct classification was missed on index gastroscopy. Patients with PHP were older at gastroscopy (65 years vs. 59), had higher hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG, 28 mmHg vs. 19 mmHg), higher transient elastography (TE) measurements (50.7 kPa vs. 21.8 kPa) and more often had previous rubber band ligations (RBL, 64.7% vs. 25.8%). The multivariable logistic regression on the outcome macroscopically diagnosed PHP estimated an odds ratio (OR) for HPVG of 1.13 (CI 0.95-1.34), increased liver stiffness of 1.03 (1.00 - 1.07) and previous RBL of 3.84 (1.24 - 11.88), respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PHPs in the stomach was higher than assumed in previous studies and misclassification was commonly observed. The appearance of these rare polyps is associated with previous RBL and may correlate with severity of PH. Thus, PHPs may be regarded as marker for relevant PH, but clinical significance of these polyps is still uncertain.

Indications and methods for measuring portal hypertension in cirrhosis.

Background and objectives: Over the last decade our understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has increased. Novel diagnostic technologies have facilitated and improved the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. With this review we aim to provide an overview of contemporary diagnostic principles of portal hypertension and indications for measuring portal pressure in cirrhosis.Methods: By review of current literature, we assessed new and old principles of measuring portal hypertension and the diagnostic values of the methods.Results: Invasive measurement of the portal pressure is still the gold standard to quantitate portal hypertension and to assess response to vasoactive treatment. The size of the portal pressure is important to assess since it contains information on the course of the disease and risk of developing hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality. Reliable non-invasive Elastography techniques are emerging that adequately assess portal pressure, but the available methods are not yet sufficiently accurate.Conclusion: Although elastography techniques provide valuable information and are good monitoring tools, liver vein catheterization remains valuable in diagnosing and monitoring portal hypertension, especially in combination with a trans-jugular liver biopsy.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration and liver stiffness measurement predict the prognosis of patients with gastric varices.

BACKGROUND: Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is a treatment option for patients with gastric varices (GVs). This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of portal hypertension estimated by the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), subsequent exacerbation of esophageal varices (EVs), and prognosis of patients who underwent BRTO for GVs. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with GVs treated with BRTO were enrolled in this study, and their HVPG was measured before (pre-HVPG) and on the day after BRTO (post-HVPG). After BRTO, patients were followed-up for a median interval of 24.5 (3-140) months. Clinical factors related to EVs exacerbation and prognosis after BRTO were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Post-HVPG increased compared to pre-HVPG in 21 out of 36 patients (58%), and post-HVPG was overall significantly higher compared to pre-HVPG (P = 0.009). During the observation period, 19 patients (53%) developed EVs exacerbation, and the cumulative EVs exacerbation rates at 1, 3 and 5 years after BRTO were 27%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. Pre-HVPG was not related to EVs exacerbation, although elevation of post-HVPG to ≥ 13 mmHg (P < 0.01) and high level of serum aspartate aminotransferase (P < 0.05) were significant independent risk factors for EVs exacerbation after BRTO. Fourteen patients (38.9%) died during the observation period. An elevated value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) of ≥ 21 kPa was a significant independent risk factor for poor prognosis after BRTO (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HVPG increases after BRTO. HVPG after BRTO has greater predictive ability for subsequent EVs exacerbation than HVPG before BRTO. LSM is a potential prognostic parameter in patients who undergo BRTO.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient ≤ 10 mm Hg.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), defined as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mmHg predicts clinical decompensation (CD) in cirrhosis. A proportion of cirrhosis patients have HVPG 6-10 mmHg. Their natural history is largely unknown. DESIGN: Consecutive patients with advanced chronic liver disease (aCLD) [histological cirrhosis(n = 196) or liver stiffness measurement (LSM) > 15 kPa(n = 65)] and HVPG 6-10 mmHg were included. Primary objective was to study their natural course and patterns of CD. We also analyzed the predictors of CD at presentation and on follow-up and response to carvedilol. RESULTS: Of 261 patients with HVPG 6-10 mmHg, 129(49.4%) had CD at first presentation; 78(29.9%) had single and 51(19.5%) had ≥ 2 CD. The most common CDs were ascites(n = 77) and jaundice(n = 65). A baseline HVPG ≥ 8 mmHg was independently associated with greater risk of CD [HR:1.7; p-0.002, AUROC:0.85(95%CI-0.81-0.91)]. New CD developed in 14.4% patients with compensated aCLD (median duration-23.1 months). Despite comparable baseline HVPG, patients developing new CD had higher HVPG on follow-up(15.3 ± 3.7 vs. 8 ± 2.1 mmHg; p < 0.001). Baseline LSM > 26.6 kPa, portosystemic shunt and serum albumin independently predicted new CD. Overall HVPG response to carvedilol(n = 60) was 23.3%, independent of baseline CD and HVPG. Five-year mortality was higher with ≥ 2 CD compared to single or no CD (23.5, 10 and 3%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nearly one-half of aCLD patients with HVPG 6-10 mmHg had CD, justifying the need to redefine CSPH. Interventions to reduce portal pressure in patients with HVPG ≥ 8 mmHg might improve long-term outcomes.

Bacterial infections adversely influence the risk of decompensation and survival in compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prognosis of compensated cirrhosis is good until decompensation. In decompensated cirrhosis, bacterial infections (BIs) are common and increase the risk of death. The incidence and prognostic implications of BIs in compensated cirrhosis are less-well characterized. This study aimed to assess whether BIs influence the risk of decompensation and survival in patients with compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: This is a cohort study nested to the PREDESCI study, a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether ß-blockers could prevent decompensation of cirrhosis. Patients with compensated cirrhosis and hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg were included. Development of BIs during follow-up was prospectively registered. Using a competing-risk time-dependent regression analysis, we investigated whether BIs affect the risk of decompensation and survival. Decompensation was defined as development of ascites, bleeding or overt encephalopathy. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized and followed for a median of 36 months (IQR 24-47 months); 34 patients (17%) developed BIs, which occurred before decompensation in 33 cases, and 29 (14%) developed ascites. Respiratory and urinary tract infections were the most frequent BIs. Decompensation occurred in 26% patients with BIs vs. 16% without BIs. Patients with BIs were at higher risk of decompensation (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 2.93; 95% CI 1.02-8.42; p = 0.047) and of developing ascites (SHR 3.55; 95% CI 1.21-10.47; p = 0.022) than those without BIs. Risk of death was also higher in patients with BIs (subdistribution HR 6.93; 95% CI 2.64-18.18; p <0.001), although decompensation occurred before death in 71% of such cases. CONCLUSIONS: BIs have a marked impact on the natural history of compensated cirrhosis, significantly increasing the risk of decompensation, mainly that of ascites, and increasing the risk of death, which usually occurs after decompensation. Our results suggest that BIs may constitute a target to prevent decompensation. LAY SUMMARY: It is widely known that bacterial infections are common and increase the mortality risk in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, the relevance of bacterial infections in compensated cirrhosis has not been well studied. This study shows that in patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension, bacterial infections occur as frequently as the development of ascites, which is the most frequent decompensating event. Bacterial infections increase the risk of progression to decompensation, mainly by increasing the risk of ascites, and also increase the risk of death, which usually occurs after decompensation. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01059396.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of emricasan for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Emricasan, an oral pan-caspase inhibitor, decreased portal pressure in experimental cirrhosis and in an open-label study in patients with cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, defined as a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥12 mmHg. We aimed to confirm these results in a placebo-controlled study in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a multicenter double-blinded study, randomizing 263 patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and baseline HVPG ≥12 mmHg to twice daily oral emricasan 5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg or placebo in a 1:1:1:1 ratio for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HVPG (ΔHVPG) at week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in biomarkers (aminotransferases, caspases, cytokeratins) and development of liver-related outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ΔHVPG for any emricasan dose vs. placebo (-0.21, -0.45, -0.58 mmHg, respectively) adjusted for baseline HVPG, compensation status, and non-selective beta-blocker use. Compensated patients (n = 201 [76%]) tended to have a greater decrease in HVPG (emricasan all vs. placebo, p = 0.06), the decrease being greater in those with higher baseline HVPG (p = 0.018), with a significant interaction between baseline HVPG (continuous, p = 0.024; dichotomous at 16 mmHg [median], p = 0.013) and treatment. Biomarkers decreased significantly with emricasan at week 24 but returned to baseline levels by week 48. New or worsening decompensating events (∼10% over median exposure of 337 days), progression in model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh scores, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a reduction in biomarkers indicating target engagement, emricasan was not associated with improvement in HVPG or clinical outcomes in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Compensated patients with higher baseline HVPG had evidence of a small treatment effect. Emricasan treatment appeared safe and well-tolerated. LAY SUMMARY: Cirrhosis (scarring of the liver) is the main consequence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cirrhosis leads to high pressure in the portal vein which accounts for most of the complications of cirrhosis. Reducing portal pressure is beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. We studied the possibility that emricasan, a drug that improves inflammation and scarring in the liver, would reduce portal pressure in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Our results in a large, prospective, double-blind study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of emricasan in these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov #NCT02960204.

Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Aided Detection of Portal Hypertension in Patients With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Noninvasive and accurate methods are needed to identify patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). We investigated the ability of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) to identify patients with CSPH. METHODS: We collected liver and spleen images from patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MR analysis within 14 days of transjugular catheterization for hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. The CT cohort comprised participants with cirrhosis in the CHESS1701 study, performed at 4 university hospitals in China from August 2016 through September 2017. The MR cohort comprised participants with cirrhosis in the CHESS1802 study, performed at 8 university hospitals in China and 1 in Turkey from December 2018 through April 2019. Patients with CSPH were identified as those with a hepatic venous pressure gradient of 10 mm Hg or higher. In total, we analyzed 10,014 liver images and 899 spleen images collected from 679 participants who underwent CT analysis, and 45,554 liver and spleen images from 271 participants who underwent MR analysis. For each cohort, participants were shuffled and then sampled randomly and equiprobably for 6 times into training, validation, and test data sets (ratio, 3:1:1). Therefore, a total of 6 deep CNN models for each cohort were developed for identification of CSPH. RESULTS: The CT-based CNN analysis identified patients with CSPH with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.998 in the training set (95% CI, 0.996-1.000), an AUC of 0.912 in the validation set (95% CI, 0.854-0.971), and an AUC of 0.933 (95% CI, 0.883-0.984) in the test data sets. The MR-based CNN analysis identified patients with CSPH with an AUC of 1.000 in the training set (95% CI, 0.999-1.000), an AUC of 0.924 in the validation set (95% CI, 0.833-1.000), and an AUC of 0.940 in the test data set (95% CI, 0.880-0.999). When the model development procedures were repeated 6 times, AUC values for all CNN analyses were 0.888 or greater, with no significant differences between rounds (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a deep CNN to analyze CT or MR images of liver and spleen from patients with cirrhosis that identifies patients with CSPH with an AUC value of 0.9. This provides a noninvasive and rapid method for detection of CSPH (ClincialTrials.gov numbers: NCT03138915 and NCT03766880).

What's new in portal hypertension?

Portal hypertension is defined as increased pressure in the portal venous system. The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. In this setting, there is an increase in intrahepatic resistance leading to an increase in portal pressure. By increasing portal blood flow, splanchnic vasodilation further aggravates portal hypertension. New pathogenic pathways are being established which might result in new therapeutic strategies. The presence of varices at endoscopy and/or other abdominal portosystemic collaterals confirms the diagnosis of portal hypertension. The role of non-invasive and imaging tests in the diagnosis and prognosis of portal hypertension has been clarified. Non-selective beta-blockers decrease both the risk of variceal haemorrhage and hepatic decompensation. Terlipressin, somatostatin or octreotide, in combination with early endoscopic therapy, are recommended for the treatment of acute variceal haemorrhage. Early Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is effective as salvage therapy in acute variceal bleeding in selected patients and prevents rebleeding more effectively than endoscopic and medical therapy resulting in an increased survival.

The stratification of cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis is traditionally seen as an irreversible stage of chronic liver disease although its clinical course may last several years. Overall, the clinical management of patients with cirrhosis is based on the observation of clinical events mostly related to complications of portal hypertension. Each event of cirrhosis decompensation has clear prognostic implications although it is not precisely predictable. In practice, the advancement in the knowledge of the mechanisms responsible for disease progression is not yet translated in clinical tools allowing the stratification of the cirrhotic stage according to pathophysiological mechanisms. This article provides a review of the main clinical and histopathological features of liver cirrhosis that are relevant for its clinical stratification together with the advancements provided by the introduction of non-invasive measures of portal hypertension. Other clinical aspects that have a major impact on the quality of life and the possibility of liver transplantation are also discussed.

The prognostic role of hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhotic patients undergoing elective extrahepatic surgery.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surgery in cirrhosis is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Retrospectively reported prognostic factors include emergency procedures, liver function (MELD/Child-Pugh scores) and portal hypertension (assessed by indirect markers). This study assessed the prognostic role of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and other variables in elective extrahepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A/B/C: 59/37/4%), who were due to have elective extrahepatic surgery (121 abdominal; 9 cardiovascular/thoracic; 10 orthopedic and others), were prospectively included in 4 centers (2002-2011). Hepatic and systemic hemodynamics (HVPG, indocyanine green clearance, pulmonary artery catheterization) were assessed prior to surgery, and clinical and laboratory data were collected. Patients were followed-up for 1 year and mortality, transplantation, morbidity and post-surgical decompensation were studied. RESULTS: Ninety-day and 1-year mortality rates were 8% and 17%, respectively. Variables independently associated with 1-year mortality were ASA class (American Society of Anesthesiologists), high-risk surgery (defined as open abdominal and cardiovascular/thoracic) and HVPG. These variables closely predicted 90-, 180- and 365-day mortality (C-statistic >0.8). HVPG values >16 mmHg were independently associated with mortality and values ≥20 mmHg identified a subgroup at very high risk of death (44%). Twenty-four patients presented persistent or de novo decompensation at 3 months. Low body mass index, Child-Pugh class and high-risk surgery were associated with death or decompensation. No patient with HVPG <10 mmHg or indocyanine green clearance >0.63 developed decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: ASA class, HVPG and high-risk surgery were prognostic factors of 1-year mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing elective extrahepatic surgery. HVPG values >16 mmHg, especially ≥20 mmHg, were associated with a high risk of post-surgical mortality. LAY SUMMARY: The hepatic venous pressure gradient is associated with outcomes in patients with cirrhosis undergoing elective extrahepatic surgery. It enables a better stratification of risk in these patients and provides the foundations for potential interventions to improve post-surgical outcomes.

Addition of Carvedilol to Gastric Variceal Obturation Does Not Decrease Recurrence of Gastric Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) frequently recurs after hemostasis by gastric variceal obturation (GVO). We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of carvedilol plus GVO in secondary prophylaxis of GVB. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 121 patients with cirrhosis (ages 20-80 years) with GVB proven by endoscopy within 24 hours of bleeding and stable hemodynamics for at least 3 days after initial GVO. Patients were randomly assigned into a group that underwent repeated GVO (n = 61) or a group received repeated GVO plus carvedilol (n = 60). Recurrent GVB, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), adverse events, and survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS: GVB recurred in 21 patients (34%) in the group that received repeated GVO and 14 patients (23%) in the group that received repeated GVO plus carvedilol (P = .18). Ascites (relative risk [RR], 2.69; 95% CI, 1.33-5.48; P = .006) and hepatoma (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.03-4.28; P = .04) were associated with recurrent GVB. Twenty-nine patients (48%) in the group that received repeated GVO and 17 patients (28%) in the group that received repeated GVO plus carvedilol had recurrent UGIB (P = .03). Carvedilol (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.80; P = .007) was associated with reduced risk of UGIB recurrence. Ascites (RR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.59-5.73; P = .001) and hepatoma (RR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.10-3.88; P = .02) were associated with recurrent UGIB. A higher proportion of patients in the group that received repeated GVO plus carvedilol (53%) had adverse events than the group that received repeated GVO (15%) (P < .001). Mean survival times were 21 ± 18 months in the group that received repeated GVO vs 25 ± 20 months in the group that received repeated GVO plus carvedilol (P = .30). CONCLUSION: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that addition of carvedilol to GVO did not decrease recurrence of GVB in patients with cirrhosis but was associated with decreased recurrence of UGIB. However, carvedilol plus GVO produced significantly more adverse events. Mean survival times did not differ significantly between groups. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02504723.

Patients With Signs of Advanced Liver Disease and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension Do Not Necessarily Have Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPGs) of 10 mm Hg or greater and chronic liver disease often are assumed to have cirrhosis. We investigated the association between HVPGs and cirrhosis, using histologic findings as the reference standard. We also assessed the prevalence and characteristics of patients with HVPGs of 10 mm Hg or greater without cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 157 consecutive patients, 89 with suspected cirrhosis and hepatic hemodynamic data collected from 2015 through 2017. Biopsy specimens collected had 10 or more portal tracts from each patient and were analyzed for features of cirrhosis. Biopsy specimens with histologic features of cirrhosis were excluded and the remaining biopsy specimens were re-reviewed by an expert pathologist. The fibrosis area was calculated digitally by image analysis. RESULTS: HVPG identified patients with cirrhosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.879: 14 of 89 patients with HVPG of 10 mm Hg or greater (16%) had no histologic features of cirrhosis (METAVIR scores <4 and Ishak scores <6). The median HVPG was 11 mm Hg (range, 10-22 mm Hg). Based on METAVIR scores, 7 patients had fibrosis stage F3, 4 patients had fibrosis stage F2, and 3 patients had fibrosis stages F0 or F1. The mean area of fibrosis in livers was 16.2% ± 6.5%. All 14 patients had perisinusoidal fibrosis and 8 patients had hepatocyte ballooning. The most common diagnoses were nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (n = 5) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia (n = 4). An HVPG cut-off value of 12 mm Hg identified patients with cirrhosis with 92% specificity, misclassifying 5 patients with different etiologies of liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of 89 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease and an HVPG of 10 mm Hg or greater, 16% were not found to have cirrhosis upon biopsy analysis. Most of these patients had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Perisinusoidal fibrosis and hepatocyte ballooning might increase sinusoidal pressure. An HVPG cut-off value of 12 mm Hg or greater identified patients with cirrhosis with 92% specificity.

Cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and C-reactive protein as prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The main stages of cirrhosis (compensated and decompensated) have been sub-staged based on clinical, endoscopic, and portal pressure (determined by the hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG]) features. Vasodilation leading to a hyperdynamic circulatory state is central in the development of a late decompensated stage, with inflammation currently considered a key driver. We aimed to assess hepatic/systemic hemodynamics and inflammation (by C-reactive protein [CRP]) among the different sub-stages of cirrhosis and to investigate their interrelationship and prognostic relevance. METHODS: A single center, prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis undergoing per protocol hepatic and right-heart catheterization and CRP measurement, were classified into recently defined prognostic stages (PS) of compensated (PS1: HVPG ≥6 mmHg but <10 mmHg; PS2: HVPG ≥10 mmHg without gastroesophageal varices; PS3: patients with gastroesophageal varices) and decompensated (PS4: diuretic-responsive ascites; PS5: refractory ascites) disease. Cardiodynamic states based on cardiac index (L/min/m2) were created: relatively hypodynamic (<3.2), normodynamic (3.2-4.2) and hyperdynamic (>4.2). RESULTS: Of 238 patients, 151 were compensated (PS1 = 25; PS2 = 36; PS3 = 90) and 87 were decompensated (PS4 = 48; PS5 = 39). Mean arterial pressure decreased progressively from PS1 to PS5, cardiac index increased progressively from PS1-to-PS4 but decreased in PS5. HVPG, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and CRP increased progressively from PS1-to-PS5. Among compensated patients, age, HVPG, relatively hypodynamic/hyperdynamic state and CRP were predictive of decompensation. Among patients with ascites, MELD, relatively hypodynamic/hyperdynamic state, post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, and CRP were independent predictors of death/liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that, in addition to known parameters, cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and CRP are predictive of relevant outcomes, both in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. LAY SUMMARY: There are two main stages in cirrhosis, compensated and decompensated, each with a main relevant outcome. In compensated cirrhosis the main relevant outcome is the development of ascites, while in decompensated cirrhosis it is death. Major roles of cardiac dysfunction and systemic inflammation have been hypothesized in the evolution of the disease in decompensated patients. In this study, we have shown that these factors were also involved in the progression from compensated to decompensated stage.

Prevention of Rebleeding From Esophageal Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis Receiving Small-Diameter Stents Versus Hemodynamically Controlled Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage have a high risk of rebleeding. We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the prevention of rebleeding in patients given a small-diameter covered stent vs those given hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)-based medical therapy prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed an open-label study of patients with cirrhosis (92% Child class A or B, 70% alcoholic) treated at 10 medical centers in Germany. Patients were assigned randomly more than 5 days after variceal hemorrhage to groups given a small covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) (8 mm; n = 90), or medical reduction of portal pressure (propranolol and isosorbide-5-mononitrate; n = 95). HVPG was determined at the time patients were assigned to groups (baseline) and 2 weeks later. In the medical group, patients with an adequate reduction in HVPG (responders) remained on the drugs whereas nonresponders underwent only variceal band ligation. The study was closed 10 months after the last patient was assigned to a group. The primary end point was variceal rebleeding. Survival, safety (adverse events), and quality of life (based on the Short Form-36 health survey) were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: A significantly smaller proportion of patients in the TIPS group had rebleeding within 2 years (7%) than in the medical group (26%) (P = .002). A slightly higher proportion of patients in the TIPS group experienced adverse events, including encephalopathy (18% vs 8% for medical treatment; P = .05). Rebleeding occurred in 6 of 23 patients (26%) receiving medical treatment before hemodynamic control was possible. Per-protocol analysis showed that rebleeding occurred in a smaller proportion of the 32 responders (18%) than in nonresponders who received variceal band ligation (31%) (P = .06). Fifteen patients from the medical group (16%) underwent TIPS placement during follow-up evaluation, mainly for refractory ascites. Survival time and quality of life did not differ between both randomized groups. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a small-diameter, covered TIPS was straightforward and prevented variceal rebleeding in patients with Child A or B cirrhosis more effectively than drugs, which often required step-by-step therapy. However, TIPS did not increase survival time or quality of life and produced slightly more adverse events. Clinical Trial no: ISRCTN 16334693.