Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5: no association with antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of polymorphism of CYP3A subfamily isoenzymes (allelic variants of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) on the efficacy clopidogrel in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet activity was determined on a VerifyNow P2Y12 test system in 81 patients with ACS aged 37-91 who had PCI. The activity of CYP3A4/5 was expressed as the ratio of the concentrations of cortisol and 6ß-hydroxycortisol was performed by using high performance liquid chromatography. Genotyping was performed by using real-time polymerase real-time chain reaction. The frequencies for the CYP3A5 gene, rs 776746, were identified as follows: 77 (95.1%)-CC, 4 (4.9%)-CT; the allele frequencies by loci for the CYP3A4, rs rs35599367, were as follows: 78 (96.3%)-GG, 3 (3.7%)-AG. There was no statistically significant genotype-dependent difference between the presence of a minor T and G alleles and the presence of clopidogrel resistance (OR 3.53; 95% CI 0.46-26.94; p = 0.233 and p = 0.443, respectively). The average level of the metabolic relationship (6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol) between the clopidogrel-resistant group and the normal platelet reactivity group was not statistically significantly different: 3.3 ± 2.8 versus 3.2 ± 3.2; p = 0.947. So, the activity of CYP3A4/5 was not related to platelet aggregation rates in this model. Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5 does not predict the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. More extensive research is required to establish their clinical relevance.

Individual long-term variation of platelet reactivity in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction.

There is a large inter-individual variation in response to clopidogrel treatment, and previous studies have indicated higher risk of thrombotic events in those with high residual platelet reactivity (HPR). Less is known about individual variation over time. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate intra-individual variation in platelet reactivity. Platelet aggregation in whole blood was assessed in 77 patients, at 3 days, 8 days and 6 months after admission for acute myocardial infarction and loading dose of clopidogrel. All patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel through 6-month follow-up. We found a significant increase in median ADP-stimulated aggregation from third to eighth day (195 vs. 250 AU*min, p-value = 0.001) but not from day 8 to 6 months (250 vs. 223 AU*min, p-value = 0.666). There was no significant change in the overall rate of HPR (15.6% vs 20.8%, p-value 0.503) or low platelet reactivity (LPR) (37.7% vs 33.8%, p-value = 0.609) from day 8 to 6-month follow-up. In contrast, more than one in four changed HPR status, 15.6% from non-HPR to HPR and 10.4% HPR to non-HPR. A shift in LPR status appeared even more frequent, occurring in about one of three patients. In spite of similar median aggregation and rate of HPR during 6-month follow-up, about one in four of the patients changed HPR status and one in three changed LPR status. This may be important information for a concept of risk stratification based on a single aggregation value early after an acute coronary syndromes.

Clopidogrel-Related High Residual Platelet Reactivity Associated with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: There are few studies on the relationship between the occurrence of clopidogrel-related high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between the two. METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were recruited from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital. Renal function was measured within 24 h of enrollment and eGFR was calculated. Patients were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow system after 7 days of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel 75 mg/d alone, and patients with P2Y12 reaction unit values ≥230 were diagnosed with HRPR. The association between HRPR and eGFR was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 91 (33.21%) had HRPR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that an increased risk of HRPR was independently associated with female sex and reduced eGFR (female sex: OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.26-3.99, p = 0.006; mild chronic kidney disease [CKD]: OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.93, p = 0.002; moderate CKD: OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.08-8.75, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Decreased eGFR is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of HRPR in patients with ischemic stroke.

Impact of renal function on residual platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbidity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may potentially influence platelet function. HYPOTHESIS: We explored the influence of renal function on platelet reactivity to investigate whether high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with cardiovascular events. METHODS: ACS patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were prospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): non-CKD (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Platelet function was measured by thromboelastography ≥5 days after maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy. Major adverse clinical events (MACEs) were collected at 1 year after discharge. RESULTS: There were 282 non-CKD patients and 212 CKD patients. A significant difference in median MAADP value was observed between the two groups (15.0 mm vs. 31.3 mm, p < .001). HRPR was more prevalent in the CKD group than the non-CKD group (27.4% vs 9.6%, p < .001). At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of MACEs was significantly higher for those with both CKD and HRPR compared with those with either CKD or HRPR (37.9% vs. 18.5%, p < .001). The relationship between HRPR and MACEs was consistent across CKD strata without evidence of interaction. Adding platelet reactivity to eGFR improved the model with area under the curve increasing from 0.703 to 0.734. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, the risk of HRPR increased with declining eGFR. Both CKD and HRPR were associated with MACEs at 1-year follow-up.

Disaggregation Following Agonist-Induced Platelet Activation in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Disaggregation as the difference between maximal and final platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry indicates the stability of platelet aggregates. We evaluated the extent of disaggregation after platelet stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-6 in 323 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with daily aspirin and clopidogrel (group 1), prasugrel (group 2), or ticagrelor (group 3) therapy. All patients in group 1 underwent elective angioplasty and stenting, whereas all patients included in groups 2 and 3 suffered from acute coronary syndromes (STEMI or NSTEMI) and underwent urgent PCI. Significant differences between maximal and final platelet aggregation were observed with all agonists throughout the groups (all p<0.001). Disaggregation was highest using AA (clopidogrel 36.5%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%) and ADP (clopidogrel 21.7%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%). In contrast, low disaggregation was observed after platelet stimulation with collagen and TRAP-6 in clopidogrel-treated patients, and after platelet stimulation with collagen and epinephrine in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, pathways of platelet activation that are not inhibited by standard antiplatelet therapy allow persisting platelet aggregation and may at least in part be responsible for adverse ischemic events.

Parathyroid Hormone Levels and High-Residual Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: High-residual-on-treatment platelet reactivity still represents a challenging issue, potentially vanishing the benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. However, very few is known on the determinants of suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents. Recent interests have emerged on the potential prothrombotic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30- to 90-days postdischarge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists). RESULTS: We included 362 patients on DAPT, 125 (34.5%) receiving clopidogrel, and 237 (65.5%) on ticagrelor. Patients were divided according to PTH quartiles values (<45.8; 45.8-60.3; 60.4-88; ≥88.1 pg/mL). Higher PTH was associated with older age (P = 0.001); renal failure (P < 0.001), higher HDL cholesterol (P = 0.006) and creatinine (P < 0.001) and lower 25-OH cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Suboptimal response to ASA was infrequent (2.8%), and not influenced by the levels of PTH (P = 0.57). ADP-mediated platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with higher PTH (P = 0.03), with an absolute increase in the prevalence of HRPR to ADP antagonists for higher PTH (24.7% vs. 40%, P = 0.007 for 4th vs. 1-3rd quartiles, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.04[1.14-3.64], P = 0.02). By the use of the ROC curve, we identified PTH levels above 96.7 pg/mL as the best predictor of HRPR with ADP antagonists (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.52[1.31-4.87], P = 0.006). Higher rate of HRPR was confirmed for PTH >96.7 pg/mL among the subgroup of patients on clopidogrel (51.5 vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 12.5[2.6-60.9], P = 0.002), but not among ticagrelor-treated patients (11.3 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.31; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.55[0.56-4.6], P = 0.42). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease, higher PTH levels are associated with an increased ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to clopidogrel, especially for values above 96.7 pg/mL, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA and ticagrelor.

Selection of P2Y12 antagonist, treatment initiation, and predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in a "Real World" registry.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare characteristics related to selection of a P2Y12 antagonist, investigate initiation of therapy with new-generation drugs, and identify predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with stent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 589 patients in the LAPCOR (Laboratory AntiPlatelet efficacy and Clinical Outcome Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02264912) registry was analyzed. P2Y12 receptor antagonist efficacy was measured by VASP phosphorylation 24 ± 4 hours after a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg, N=407), prasugrel (60 mg, N=106), or ticagrelor (180 mg, N=76) and expressed by platelet reactivity index (PRI). HTPR was defined as PRI ≥50%. Patients treated with prasugrel were significantly younger and had significantly higher hemoglobin levels than those who received clopidogrel or ticagrelor, while chronic kidney disease was significantly more prevalent in the ticagrelor group. Almost all invasively managed patients given new-generation drugs received a loading dose after coronary angiography. Mean residual PRI and HTPR were significantly higher after clopidogrel (44.2 ± 23.1% and 42.2%, respectively) vs. prasugrel (17.7 ± 18.0% and 9.4%, respectively) or ticagrelor (18.8 ± 17.0% and 7.9%, respectively; all p<0.001). Among multiple variables tested, HTPR in patients treated with the new agents significantly related only to platelet count (p=0.014) and mean platelet volume (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Safety is the most important aspect under consideration in choosing new agents for an individual patient. Other than platelet count and mean platelet volume, factors known as predictors of higher platelet reactivity, did not influence the efficacy of new-generation P2Y12 receptor antagonists.

Mean platelet volume and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

OBJECTIVE: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with a two- to ninefold increased risk of recurrent ischemic events among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease. However, its determinants are still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of mean platelet volume (MPV) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30 - 90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test > 862 aggregation units (AU)*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥ 417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). RESULTS: Our population is represented by a total of 487 patients on DAPT, divided according to MPV tertiles (< 10.4 fl; 10.4 - 11.29 fl; ≥ 11.3 fl). Larger-sized platelets were associated with use of statins (p < 0.001) and beta-blockers (p = 0.03), higher hemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower platelets count (p < 0.001). Higher platelet reactivity was observed at ASPI test in patients with higher MPV (r = 0.12, p = 0.008), but not for ADP-mediated aggregation (r = -0.007, p = 0.88). However, a low prevalence of HRPR was observed with ASA, with no impact of MPV tertiles (1.2 vs 1.1 vs 1.6%, p = 0.70, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.51 - 1.77], p = 0.87). MPV did not influence the prevalence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (25.9 vs 1 vs 26.5%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.1 [0.84 - 1.45], p = 0.50) with similar results among the 259 patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.82 - 1.62], p = 0.43) and the 228 patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [0.84 - 2.55], p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving DAPT, MPV does not affect the response to major antiplatelet therapies. In fact, MPV elevation does not influence the risk of HRPR with clopidogrel, ticagrelor or ASA.

High residual platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor and its influence on prognosis / 中国介入心脏病学杂志

Objective To observe high residual platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor and its influence on prognosis. Methods A total of 175 patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital were included in this retrospective study, and all patients were divided into two groups : ticagrelor group ( n = 22 ) and clopidogrel group ( n = 153 ) . The platelet aggregation function was tested by light transmission platelet aggregation (LTA). The high residual platelet reactivity was defined as maximum platelet aggregation rate ﹥46. 0%. The differences of high residual platelet reactivity and the effect of high residual platelet reactivity on cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups. Results The number of patients with high residual platelet reactivity in the clopidogrel group were 99 patients (64. 7%), and 8 patients(36. 4%) in the ticagrelor group (P=0. 011) . For stent thrombosis developed in three months, 3 patients were from the high residual platelet reaction group ( n=107 ) , none from the normal residual platelet reaction group ( n =68 ) ( P =0. 016 ) . For bleeding events at 3 months, there were 2 patients (1. 9%, 2/107) from the high residual platelet reaction group and 2 patients (2. 9%, 2/68) were from the normal residual platelet reaction group (P=0. 631). Conclusions Ticagrelor significantly decreases high residual platelet reactivity than clopidogrel. High residual platelet reactivity increases stent thrombosis risk for ACS and type 2 diabetes mellitus.