RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compared with the conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, embedding PD catheter implantation is one of the procedures for planned PD initiation. However, facilities where embedded PD catheter implantation is available are limited, and the impact of embedded PD catheter implantation on hospitalization cost and length of hospitalization is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 132 patients with PD initiation between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 64 patients in the embedding group and 68 patients in the conventional insertion group. We created a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with the gamma family and log-link function to evaluate the association among catheter embedding, the duration and medical costs of hospitalization for PD initiation. We also evaluated the effect modification between age and catheter embedding. RESULTS: Catheter embedding (ß coefficient - 0.13 [95% confidence interval - 0.21, - 0.05]) and age (per 10 years 0.08 [0.03, 0.14]) were significantly associated with hospitalization costs. Catheter embedding (- 0.21 [- 0.32, - 0.10]) and age (0.11 [0.03, 0.19]) were also identified as factors significantly associated with length of hospitalization. The difference between the embedding group and the conventional insertion group in hospitalization costs for PD initiation (P for interaction = 0.060) and the length of hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.027) was larger in young-to-middle-aged patients than in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter embedding was associated with lower hospitalization cost and shorter length of hospitalization for PD initiation than conventional PD catheter insertion, especially in young-to-middle-aged patients.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica , Diálise Peritoneal , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Humanos , Criança , Cateteres de Demora , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The concept of eosinophilic bronchiectasis has received clinical attention recently, but the association between blood eosinophil count (BEC) and hospital characteristics has rarely been reported yet. We aim to investigate the clinical impact of BEC on patients with acute bronchiectasis exacerbation. METHODS: A total of 1332 adult patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis from January 2012 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. A propensity-matched analysis was performed by matching age, sex and comorbidities in patients with high eosinophil count (≥ 300 cell/µL) and low eosinophil count (< 300 cell/µL). Clinical characteristics, length of hospital stay (LOS), hospitalization cost and inflammatory markers were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eosinophilic bronchiectasis occurred in approximately 11.7% of all patients. 156 propensity score-matched pairs were identified with and without high eosinophil count. Eosinophilic bronchiectasis presented with a longer LOS [9.0 (6.0-12.5) vs. 5.0 (4.0-6.0) days, p < 0.0001] and more hospitalization cost [15,011(9,753-27,404) vs. 9,109(6,402-12,287) RMB, p < 0.0001] compared to those in non-eosinophilic bronchiectasis. The median white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte, platelet (PLT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in eosinophilic bronchiectasis were significantly increased. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that the high levels of eosinophil count (OR = 13.95, p < 0.0001), worse FEV1% predicted (OR = 7.80, p = 0.0003) and PLT (OR = 1.01, p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for length of hospital (LOS) greater than 7 days. CONCLUSION: Eosinophilic bronchiectasis patients had longer length of hospital stay and more hospitalization cost compared to those in non-eosinophilic bronchiectasis group, which might be associated with the stronger inflammatory reaction.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia , Eosinofilia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Progressão da Doença , Hospitalização , Contagem de Leucócitos , Eosinófilos , Bronquiectasia/epidemiologia , Bronquiectasia/complicações , Eosinofilia/epidemiologia , Eosinofilia/complicações , HospitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) have become a public health problem for all countries, bringing a heavier economic burden of disease globally, with China's disease economic burden being even more acute due to the trend of an aging population. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs in traditional Chinese medicine (TCMa) hospitals to provide a scientific basis for controlling hospitalization cost. METHODS: With 1306 cases of DRFs patients hospitalized in 15 public TCMa hospitals in two cities of Gansu Province in China from January 2017 to 2022 as the study object, the influencing factors of hospitalization cost were studied in depth gradually through univariate analysis, multiple linear regression, and path model. RESULTS: Hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs is mainly affected by the length of stay, surgery and operation, hospital levels, payment methods of medical insurance, use of TCMa preparations, complications and comorbidities, and clinical pathways. The length of stay is the most critical factor influencing the hospitalization cost, and the longer the length of stay, the higher the hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: TCMa hospitals should actively take advantage of TCMb diagnostic modalities and therapeutic methods to ensure the efficacy of treatment and effectively reduce the length of stay at the same time, to lower hospitalization cost. It is also necessary to further deepen the reform of the medical insurance payment methods and strengthen the construction of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, to make the patients receive reasonable reimbursement for medical expenses, thus effectively alleviating the economic burden of the disease in the patients with DRFs.
Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Fraturas do Punho , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , China , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/economia , Fraturas do Punho/economia , Fraturas do Punho/terapiaRESUMO
Foodborne disease burden estimates inform public health priorities and can help the public understand disease impact. This article provides new estimates of the cost of U.S. foodborne illness. Our research updated disease modeling underlying these cost estimates with a focus on enhancing chronic sequelae modeling and enhancing uncertainty modeling. Our cost estimates were based on U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates of the numbers of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths caused by 31 known foodborne pathogens and unspecified foodborne agents. We augmented these estimates of illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths with more detailed modeling of health outcomes, including chronic sequelae. For health outcomes, we relied on U.S. data and research where possible, supplemented by the use of non-U.S. research where necessary and scientifically appropriate. Cost estimates were developed from large insurance or hospital charge databases, public data sources, and existing literature and were adjusted to 2023 dollars. We estimated the cost of foodborne illness in the United States circa 2023 to be $75 billion. Deaths accounted for 56% and chronic outcomes for 31% of the mean cost. The costliest pathogen was nontyphoidal Salmonella at $17.1 billion followed by Campylobacter at $11.3 billion. Toxoplasma ($5.7 billion) and Listeria ($4 billion) followed due primarily to deaths and chronic outcomes from pregnancy-associated cases. Per-case cost ranged from $196 for Bacillus cereus to $4.6 million for Vibrio vulnificus. Unspecified agents accounted for 38% of the total cost of foodborne illness, but these illnesses were generally mild (per-case cost $781). These cost estimates can help inform food safety priorities. Our pathogen-specific per-case cost estimates can also help inform benefit-cost analysis required for new federal food safety regulations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early in-patient MR Imaging may assist in identifying stroke etiology, facilitating prompt secondary prevention for ischemic strokes (IS), and potentially enhancing patient outcomes. This study explores the impact of early in patient MRI on IS patient outcomes and healthcare resource use beyond the hyper-acute stage. METHODS: In this retrospective registry-based study, 771 admitted transient ischemic attack (TIA) and IS patients at Halifax's QEII Health Centre from 2015 to 2019 underwent in-patient MRI. Cohort was categorized into two groups based on MRI timing: early (within 48 h) and late. Logistic regression and Poisson log-linear models, adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, acute stroke protocol (ASP) activation, thrombolytic, and thrombectomy, were employed to examine in-hospital, discharge, post-discharge, and healthcare resource utilization outcomes. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 39.6 % received early in-patient MRI. ASP activation and TIA were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving early MRI. Early MRI was independently associated with a lower rate of symptomatic changes in neurological status during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.88), higher odds of good functional outcomes at discharge (1.55; 1.11-2.16), lower rate of non-home discharge (0.65; 0.46-0.91), shorter length of stay (regression coefficient, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.89-0.97), and reduced direct cost of hospitalization (0.77; 0.75-0.79). CONCLUSION: Early in-patient MRI utilization in IS patients post-hyper-acute stage was independently associated with improved patient outcomes and decreased healthcare resource utilization, underscoring the potential benefits of early MRI during in-patient management of IS. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is warranted to validate these findings.
Assuntos
Ataque Isquêmico Transitório , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico por imagem , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/terapia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/complicações , AVC Isquêmico/complicações , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Redução de Custos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Background and Objectives: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, is used as an adjunct to anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. One of its advantages is the opioid-sparing effect which can facilitate early extubation and recovery. When the ERAS cardiac society was set in 2017, our facility was already using the ERAS program, in which the "fast-track Anesthesia" was facilitated by the intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine. Our objective is to share our experience and investigate the potential impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine use as a part of the ERAS program on patient outcomes in elective cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Switzerland. The patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2018 were included in this analysis (n = 327). Regardless of the surgery type, all the patients received a standardized fast-track anesthesia protocol inclusive of dexmedetomidine infusion, reduced opioid dose, and parasternal nerve block. The primary outcome was the postoperative time when the criteria for extubation were met. Three groups were identified: group 0-(extubated in the operating room), group < 6 (extubated in less than 6 h), and group > 6 (extubated in >6 h). The secondary outcomes were adverse events, length of stay in ICU and in hospital, and total hospitalization costs. Results: Dexmedetomidine was well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events reported. Early extubation was performed in 187 patients (57%). Group 3 had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median: 70 h vs. 25 h) and in hospital (17 vs. 12 days), and consequently higher total hospitalization costs (CHF 62,551 vs. 38,433) compared to the net data from the other two groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine can be safely used as part of the opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass with the potential to facilitate early extubation, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and reduced hospitalization costs.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Dexmedetomidina , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Suíça , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodosRESUMO
The cost of influenza and other respiratory virus infections should be determined to analyze the real burden of these diseases. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and cost of illness due to respiratory virus infections in hospitalized adult patients. Hospitalized patients who had nasal swab sampling for a suspected viral infection between August 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019 were included. Outcome variables were oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation need, intensive care unit admission, and cost. At least one viral pathogen was detected in 125 (47.7%) of 262 patients who were included in the study. Fifty-five (20.9%) of the patients were infected with influenza. Influenza-positive patients had higher rates for respiratory support, intensive care unit admission, and mortality compared to all other patients. The average cost of hospitalization per person was 2879.76 USD in the influenza-negative group, while the same cost was 3274.03 USD in the influenza-positive group. Although all of the vaccinated influenza-positive patients needed oxygen support, neither of them required invasive mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit admission. The average hospitalization cost per person was 779.70 USD in the vaccinated group compared to 3762.01 USD in the unvaccinated group. Disease-related direct cost of influenza in the community was estimated as 22 776 075.61 USD in the 18-65 years of age group and 15 756 120.02 USD in the 65 years of age and over group per year. Influenza, compared to other respiratory virus infections, can lead to untoward clinical outcomes and mortality as well as higher direct medical costs in adults.
Assuntos
Influenza Humana , Humanos , Adulto , Idoso , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estresse Financeiro , Estações do Ano , Hospitalização , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , OxigênioRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: With the initial utilization of endovascular treatment options in 1970s, the number of procedures performed for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) both with open surgical (OS) and endovascular (EV) treatment increased, but this did not result in a decrease in the number of amputations. The burden of LEAD still constitutes a huge proportion among the health care costs over the world. METHODS: The patients who admitted to our clinic between October 2014 and December 2019 with LEAD and required revascularization were enrolled. The total hospitalization costs related to LEAD were registered and divided into two groups as care costs and medical supplies costs. RESULTS: 181 procedures were performed to 133 patients. Mean age was 63.98 ± 11.65 and 115 (86.5%) patients were male. Mean follow-up period was 31.19 ± 17.99 months (95% CI). The most frequent comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 86, 66.2%) and active smoking (n = 59, 44.4%). Total costs and medical supplies costs were increased in EV group when compared with OS group ($4347.26 ± 3352.96, $3339.28 ± 3459.53 p = .005 v.s. $3318.67 ± 2874.55,$904.42 ± 1209.97 p < .001, respectively). Care costs were increased in OS group when compared with EV group ($2434.85 ± 2641.89 v.s. $1028.56 ± 1397.77 p < .001). The highest total, medical supplies, and care costs were determined in EV + OS group ($13071.32 ± 13717; $6784.91 ± 8332.04; $6286.41 ± 7652.12, respectively).Graft/wound infection related and amputation related costs were 21% of all costs. Amputation-free survival was 71.42% (95% CI) with 21 total amputations. There were linear correlations between mortality and amputation (p = .002); also between mortality and cost (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In mid-long-term period, the care costs are increased with OS; however, EV treatment significantly increases the medical supplies and total costs. The increase in cost is correlated with poor outcome. Although the comorbidities and risk factors of these patients lead the clinicians to perform more challenging endovascular approaches, in mid-long-term period, particularly failed endovascular procedures are not promising in terms of outcomes and costs. We consider that the best-fit therapy on time is cost-effective, life and extremity-saving either, by avoiding deleterious effects of severe ischemia, such as severe pain, tissue loss, and related major adverse cardiaovascular events.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The removal of spinal implants is needed in revision surgery or in some cases whose fracture had healed or fusion had occurred. The slip of polyaxial screw or mismatch of instruments would make this simple procedure intractable. Here we introduce a simple and practical method to address this clinical dilemma. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. The patients underwent new technique for retrieving the implants from July 2019 to July 2022 were labeled as group A, while the patients underwent traditional implants retrieval technique from January 2017 to January 2020 were labeled as group B. Patients in each group were subdivided into revision surgery group (r group) and simple implants removal group (s group) according to the surgery fashion. For the new technique, the retrieved rod was cut off to a proper length which was matched with the size of tulip head, and was replaced into the tulip head. After tightened with nut, a monoaxial screw-rod "construct" was formed. Then the "construct" can be retrieved by a counter torque. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative bacteria culture, hospital stay and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 116 polyaxial screws with difficult retrieval (43 screws in group A, 73 screws in group B) in 78 patients were recorded, in which 115 screws were successfully retrieved. Significant differences were found in the mean operation duration, intraoperative blood loss when comparing the r group in group A and B, as well as the s group in group A and B (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in hospital stay and costs between group A and B. Three patients were found positive bacteria culture of drainage tube/tape in group A (3/30), while 7 patients in group B (7/48). The most prevalent bacteria was Propionibacterium acnes. CONCLUSION: This technique is practical and safe in retrieving tulip head poly-axial screw. Reduced operation duration and intraoperative bloods loss may potentially alleviate the hospitalization burden of patients. Positive bacterial cultivation results are common after implants removal surgery, but they rarely represent an organized infection. A positive culture with P. acnes or S. epidermidis should be interpreted with caution.
Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Tulipa , Humanos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sepsis causes a major health burden in the United States. To better understand the role of sepsis as a driver of the burden and cost of foodborne illness in the United States, we estimated the frequency and treatment cost of sepsis among US patients hospitalized with 31 pathogens commonly transmitted through food or with unspecified acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI). METHODS: Using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2015, we identified sepsis hospitalizations using 2 approaches-explicit ICD-9-CM codes for sepsis and a coding scheme developed by Angus that identifies sepsis using specific ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes indicating an infection plus organ failure. We examined differences in the frequency and the per-case cost of sepsis across pathogens and AGI and estimated total hospitalization costs using prior estimates of foodborne hospitalizations. RESULTS: Using Explicit Sepsis Codes, sepsis hospitalizations accounted for 4.6% of hospitalizations with a pathogen commonly transmitted through food or unspecified AGI listed as a diagnosis; this was 33.2% using Angus Sepsis Codes. The average per-case cost was $35â 891 and $20â 018, respectively. Applying the proportions of hospitalizations with sepsis from this study to prior estimates of the number foodborne hospitalizations, the total annual cost was $248 million annually using Explicit Sepsis Codes and $889 million using Angus Sepsis Codes. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis is a serious complication among patients hospitalized with a foodborne pathogen infection or AGI resulting in a large burden of illness. Hospitalizations that are diagnosed using explicit sepsis codes are more severe and costly, but likely underestimate the burden of foodborne sepsis.
Assuntos
Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos , Sepse , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to global health and the world economy. The economic burden of carbapenem-resistant infections has not previously been evaluated. We aimed to compare the potential economic burden and clinical outcomes between carbapenem-resistant infections and carbapenem-susceptible infections in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records. Patients aged 15 years or older and with the diagnosis of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, biliary infection, and sepsis were included. Multivariable regression models with random effects were used to estimate the impact of carbapenem resistance on cost, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among the 9,517 patients, 86 (0.9%) had carbapenem-resistant (CR) infections. Compared to carbapenem-susceptible (CS) infections, the patients with the CR infections were significantly more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (37.2 vs. 21.2%, P-value = 0.003), antibiotics (88.4 vs. 63.0%, P-value < 0.001), and especially carbapenem (31.4 vs. 8.3%, P-value < 0.001), before the bacterial culture test positive. Significantly higher median costs were found for the CR infections than the CS infections in the categories of medications (3477 US dollars vs. 1609 US dollars), laboratory tests (2498 US dollars, vs. 1845 US dollars), and hospital stay (14,307 US dollars vs. 10,560 US dollars). In the multivariable regression analysis, the length of stay was 42.1% longer and the cost was 50.4% higher in the CR infections than in the CS infections. The risk of in-hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups (odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 0.72-2.11), due to the small sample size. The result was robust with a similar trend in the analysis using the inverse probability treatment weighting method. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to carbapenem-susceptible infections, carbapenem-resistant infections were associated with a higher cost and a longer length of stay. Detailed cost analysis showed significant differences in the categories of medication, laboratory tests, and hospital stay. To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the potential economic burden of carbapenem-resistant infections using a large hospital-based database.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Drug non-adherence is assumed to play an important role in development of hypertensive urgency, which is a common health problem resulting in frequent emergency department admissions and thus increased healthcare spending wastage. The objective of this study is to assess the rate of non-adherence to antihypertensives and to evaluate influencing factors predicting this behavior in Lebanese hypertensive adults. In addition, this study aim to estimate the cost of hospitalization for hypertensive urgency covered by the Ministry of Public Health in patients' non-adherent to their antihypertensives. METHODS: A multi-methods approach is used comprising a cross-sectional study, additionally to an observational, retrospective, cost of illness study. A cross-sectional questionnaire based study is conducted from May to Dec, 2019 to address the study objective. Using the Ministry of Public Health hospitalization data during 2019, the cost of hospitalization for hypertensive urgency is assessed. Multivariable analysis is performed to calculate the adjusted odd ratios by fitting a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The cross-sectional study includes 494 participants and shows that 43.0% of patients hospitalized and covered by the Ministry of Public Health are non-adherent. The univariate regression model shows that adherence to antihypertensive medications is significantly associated with age (p-value = 0.005) and follow-up visits (p-value = 0.046). The odds of adherence for participants earning more than USD 2000 was 3.27 times that for those who earn less than USD 1000 (p = 0.026). The estimated cost of hospitalization for non-adherent patients is USD 452,353 in 2019. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence associated hospitalization costs represents a financial burden to Lebanese health system.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos , Hipertensão , Adulto , Humanos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adesão à Medicação , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the United States, sepsis accounts for 13% of the total hospital expenses and > 50% of hospital deaths. Moreover, people with sepsis are more likely to be readmitted. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and outcomes of different hospital readmissions (DHRs) in patients with sepsis, and the factors associated with DHR. METHODS: We used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database of the United States in 2017 to identify patients admitted for sepsis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with DHR; five models were constructed to elucidate the relationship between DHR and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: In 2017, 85,120 (21.97%) of all patients with sepsis readmitted within 30 days in the United States were readmitted to a different hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection irrespective of hospital status. Compared with the patients with sepsis who were readmitted to the same hospital, DHR was associated with higher hospitalization costs ($2264; 95% CI $1755-$2772; p < 0.001), longer length of stay (0.58 days; 95% CI 0.44-0.71 days; p < 0.001), and higher risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.63; 95% CI 1.55-1.72; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DHR occurred in one-fifth of patients with sepsis in the United States. Our findings suggest that patients readmitted to a different hospital within 30 days may experience higher in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, and higher hospitalization costs. Future studies need to examine whether continuity of care can improve the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente , Sepse , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Sepse/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Stroke is the main cause of death in Chinese residents, bringing a heavy economic burden to patients. This study aims to explore the characteristics and the factors influencing the hospitalization cost for stroke, and to provide scientific evidence for reducing the economic burden on stroke patients. METHODS: The data were mainly obtained from the Shanghai Statistics Center for Health. Using the coding system of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10, we retrospectively collected the stroke-related first hospitalization records of stroke patients in J district, Shanghai during January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 whose main diagnostic disease codes were I61-I63. After cleaning and arranging the data, we counted the first hospitalization cost and length of hospital stay (LOS) of the patients. Univariate analysis was performed using non-parametric tests, and the factors influencing stroke hospitalization cost were further analyzed by multiple linear regression fitting path model. RESULTS: A total of 3 901 stroke patients were included. Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients accounted for 92.59% and 7.41%, respectively, of which the mean hospitalization cost per patient were 12 397.35 yuan and 28 814.72 yuan, respectively, and the mean LOS per patient were 13 days and 19 days, respectively. Hospitalization cost for ischemic stroke mainly consisted of medicine fees, diagnosis fees, and service fees, accounting for 44.70%, 29.92%, and 15.42%, respectively, and hospitalization cost for hemorrhagic stroke mainly consisted of medicine fees, diagnosis fees, consumables fees, and service fees, accounting for 38.76%, 18.33%, 17.59%, and 15.38%, respectively. From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of medicine fees for ischemic stroke was decreased by 19.38 percentage points, and the diagnosis fees and service fees were increased by 8.43 percentage points and 9.04 percentage points, respectively; the proportions of medicine fees and consumables fees for hemorrhagic stroke were decreased by 7.54 percentage points and 13.43 percentage points, respectively, and the proportions of diagnostic fees and service fees were increased by 6.87 percentage points and 10.15 percentage points, respectively. Path analysis results showed that the main direct factors influencing hospitalization cost were the LOS, hospital level, operation, and year, and the main indirect factors were age and hospital level (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cost burden of stroke patients in Shanghai is relatively heavy, and we should continue to promote the medical reform policy and consolidate the achievements of medical reform. Hospitals should strengthen clinical pathway management and patient health education to improve medical efficiency and reduce invalid hospitalization days. Government departments should continue to improve the medical insurance system, enhance the supervision to medical insurance, and promote health equity.
Assuntos
Acidente Vascular Cerebral Hemorrágico , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , China/epidemiologia , Promoção da Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of increased cost and postoperative length-of-stay (LOS) following intrathecal baclofen pump (ITBP) placement. METHODS: Patients were derived from the 2009/2012 kids' inpatient database. Inclusion criteria were selected for patients with ICD-9 codes 343.X (infantile cerebral palsy), 86.06 (infusion pump insertion), 03.90 (spinal catheter insertion), and elective hospitalizations. Nonparametric univariate analysis and subsequent gamma log-link general linear modeling were used to identify significant predictors of cost/LOS (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 529 unweighted patients (787 with survey weights applied) met criteria. Median LOS was 3.00 days, and median cost was USD 23,284. Following multivariate modeling, predictors of increased LOS (in days) included increased hospital ITBP volume (p = 0.027), small hospital size (+0.55, p = 0.004), device complications (+0.95, p < 0.001), procedural complications (+1.40, p < 0.001), additional procedures (+0.86, p < 0.001), electrolyte abnormalities (+3.74, p < 0.001), and neurological comorbidities (+1.60, p < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased LOS were paralysis (-0.53, p < 0.001), Northeastern hospital region (-0.55, p = 0.018), and investor-owned hospital status (-0.75, p = 0.001). Similarly, predictors of increased cost included race of Hispanic (+USD 1,156, p = 0.033) or "other" (+USD 2,158, p = 0.001), Northeast hospital region (+USD 4,120, p < 0.001), small (+USD 4,139, p < 0.001) or medium (+USD 3,368, p < 0.001) hospital sizes, additional procedures (+USD 1,649, p < 0.001), neurological comorbidities (+USD 3,222, p = 0.003), and increased LOS (p < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased cost included Western hospital region (-USD 1,594, p = 0.001), government hospitals (-USD 1,391, p = 0.019), and investor-owned hospitals (-USD 2,057, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study found multiple variables associated with increased cost/LOS following ITBP placement. Broadly, this analysis demonstrates national trends associated with increased cost following ITBP placement.
Assuntos
Baclofeno , Paralisia Cerebral , Paralisia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Paralisia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Criança , Comorbidade , Hospitais , Humanos , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
Foodborne illness is a continuing public health problem in the United States. Seven pathogens-Campylobacter, Clostridium perfringens, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, nontyphoidal Salmonella, norovirus, and Toxoplasma gondii-are estimated to cause >90% of the foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths attributed to 31 known pathogens. The purpose of this article was to inform estimates of the cost of hospitalizations associated with these pathogens using National Inpatient Survey data from January 2012 through September 2015. The article explored two methodological issues. First, is it more appropriate to use hospitalizations identified using principal or all diagnosis codes when estimating cost? Second, should pathogen-specific or overall mean cost estimates be used? After excluding C. perfringens because of low sample size, the remaining six pathogens included in the analysis were associated with 17,102 hospital discharge records. Of these 55% have the pathogen listed as a principal diagnosis (FBP-PD), ranging from 6% for T. gondii to 68% for nontyphoidal Salmonella. The mean per-case cost of records with the pathogen listed as a secondary diagnosis (FBP-SD) was 2.7 times higher than FBP-PD. FBP-SD were also more severe than FBP-PD with longer lengths of stay, increasing loss of function, and increasing risk of mortality. Severity was the main driver of cost. We also found severity of illness and cost of hospitalizations vary by pathogen. Based on identifying cases with a pathogen in either FBP-PD or FBP-SD, we found mean per-case hospitalization cost across the six pathogens included in this study was $17,515, ranging from $11,552 for Campylobacter to $34,206 for norovirus. In summary, if only FBP-PD cases were used to estimate cost, estimates would likely underestimate hospitalization costs among those cases with a pathogen-specific diagnosis. Because these foodborne pathogens varied in severity of illness, the mean cost of hospitalizations also varied significantly by pathogen.
Assuntos
Microbiologia de Alimentos , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Vigilância da População , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Both the opioid and gun violence epidemics are recurrent public health issues in the United States. We sought to determine the effect of opioid dependence on gunshot injury treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2016 National Readmission Database, patients were included if they had a principal diagnosis of firearm injury. Opioid dependence was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality, resource utilization, and most common reasons for admission and readmission. Confounders were adjusted for using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31,303 patients were included, 695 of whom were opioid dependent. Opioid-dependent patients were more likely to be young (35.1 y, range: 33.4-36.7 y) and male (89.9%) compared with patients without opioid dependence. Opioid dependence was associated with higher 30-day readmission rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.50, P = 0.01). However, opioid dependence was associated with lower in-hospital (aOR: 0.16, CI: 0.07-0.38, P < 0.01) and 1-year (aOR: 0.15, CI: 0.06-0.38, P < 0.01) mortality, longer mean length of stay (adjusted mean difference [aMD]: 2.09 d, CI: 0.43-3.76, P = 0.03), and total hospitalization costs (aMD: $6,318, CI: $ 257-$12,380, P = 0.04). Both groups had similar total hospitalization charges (aMD: $$10,491, CI: -$12,618-$33,600, P-value = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid dependence leads to higher rates of 30-day readmission and resource utilization among patients with firearm injuries. However, the in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates are lower among patients with opioid dependence secondary to lower injury acuity.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Gravidade do Paciente , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Epidemia de Opioides/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/economia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidadeRESUMO
Purpose: The most recent published guidelines on Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were released in 2017 and outline its treatment based on severity of the disease and recurrence; however, a clear first-line agent has not been recommended specifically for severe CDAD. Methods: This retrospective chart review was approved by the institutional review board and consisted of three community hospitals and one academic medical center. To be included, patients need to meet criteria for severe CDAD and receive at least 72 hours of therapy. Patients received either oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin, in addition to other therapies for CDAD, and differences in outcomes such as cost obtained from a common charge center, rates of recurrence, time to recurrence as measured at time of positive to negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and mortality were assessed. Results: Of the 147 patients, 74 patients received fidaxomicin and 73 patients received oral vancomycin. The average hospitalization cost for patients receiving fidaxomicin was $129,338.69 and for patients receiving vancomycin was $153,563.81 (P = .26). Recurrence rates were lower with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin (6.8% vs 17.6%; P = .047), and time to recurrence was longer with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but not statistically significant (96.8 ± 45.9 days vs 63.2 ± 66.9 days; P = .321). Mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall length of stay were similar between the two therapies. Conclusions: In the treatment of severe CDAD, recurrence rates were lower and time to recurrence was higher with fidaxomicin compared with oral vancomycin. A clear financial benefit has yet to translate from these known findings.
RESUMO
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used for end-stage heart failure not amenable to medical therapy. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in this setting is common due to heart failure decompensation, surgical stress, and other factors. Little is known about national trends in AKI diagnosis and AKI requiring dialysis (AKI-D) and associated outcomes with VAD implantation. We investigated national estimates and trends for diagnosed AKI, AKI-D, and associated patient and resource utilization outcomes in hospitalizations in which implantable VADs were placed. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of 20% stratified sample of US hospitalizations. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent implantable VAD placement in 2006 to 2015. EXPOSURE: No AKI diagnosis, AKI without dialysis, AKI-D. OUTCOMES: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, estimated hospitalization costs. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariate logistic and linear regression using survey design methods to account for stratification, clustering, and weighting. RESULTS: An estimated 24,140 implantable VADs were placed, increasing from 853 in 2006 to 3,945 in 2015. AKI was diagnosed in 56.1% of hospitalizations and AKI-D occurred in 6.5%. AKI diagnosis increased from 44.0% in 2006 to 2007 to 61.7% in 2014 to 2015; AKI-D declined from 9.3% in 2006 to 2007 to 5.2% in 2014 to 2015. Mortality declined in all AKI categories but this varied by category: those with AKI-D had the smallest decline. Adjusted hospitalization costs were 19.1% higher in those with diagnosed AKI and 39.6% higher in those with AKI-D, compared to no AKI. LIMITATIONS: Administrative data; timing of AKI with respect to VAD implantation cannot be determined; limited pre-existing chronic kidney disease ascertainment; discharge weights not derived for subpopulation of interest. CONCLUSIONS: A decreasing proportion of patients undergoing VAD implantation experience AKI-D, but mortality among these patients remains high. AKI diagnosis with VAD implantation is increasing, possibly reflecting changes in AKI surveillance, awareness, and coding.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar , Hospitalização/tendências , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the costing methodological approaches adopted by published cost-of-illness (COI) studies. A systematic review was performed to identify cost-of-illness studies of heart failure published between January 2003 and September 2015 via computerized databases such as Pubmed, Wiley Online, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Costs reported in the original studies were converted to 2014 international dollars (Int$). Thirty five out of 4972 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen out of the 35 studies reported the costs as annual cost per patient, ranging from Int$ 908.00 to Int$ 84,434.00, while nine studies reported costs as per hospitalization, ranging from Int$ 3780.00 to Int$ 34,233.00. Cost of heart failure increased as condition of heart failure worsened from New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I to NYHA class IV. Hospitalization cost was found to be the main cost driver to the total health care cost. The annual cost of heart failure ranges from Int$ 908 to Int$ 40,971 per patient. The reported cost estimates were inconsistent across the COI studies, mainly due to the variation in term of methodological approaches such as disease definition, epidemiological approach of study, study perspective, cost disaggregation, estimation of resource utilization, valuation of unit cost components, and data sources used. Such variation will affect the reliability, consistency, validity, and relevance of the cost estimates across studies.