Association of C1q-fixing DSA with late graft failure in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the prognostic value of overall and complement-binding donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in pediatric patients undergoing clinically indicated graft biopsies and their association with graft outcome and specific histological lesions. METHODS: Sera of 62 patients at time of indication biopsy ≥1 year posttransplant were assessed for DSA and C1q-fixing DSA by single-antigen bead (SAB) technology. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (42 %) were DSA-positive at time of indication biopsy and nine (15 %) were C1q-positive. At 4 years postbiopsy, patients with C1q-positivity had a low graft survival (11 %) compared to DSA-positive, C1q-negative patients (82 %, p = 0.001) and to DSA-negative patients (88 %, p < 0.001). The majority (89 %) of C1q-positive patients were diagnosed with active chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). C1q DSA-positivity [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 6.35], presence of transplant glomerulopathy (HR 9.54), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of indication biopsy (HR 0.91) were risk factors for subsequent graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of C1q-positive DSA in the context of an indication biopsy identifies a subgroup of pediatric renal transplant recipients with a markedly increased risk of subsequent graft loss. Because a fraction of DSA-positive patients escape rejection or graft dysfunction, the C1q assay increases the specificity of a positive DSA result regarding unfavorable transplant outcome.

Impact of nonspecific allograft biopsy findings in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients.

A for-cause biopsy is performed to diagnose the cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplantation. We occasionally encounter ambiguous biopsy results in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients. Yet, the allograft survival outcome in symptomatic recipients with nonspecific allograft biopsy findings remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of nonspecific for-cause biopsy findings in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients. We retrospectively collected records from 773 kidney transplant recipients between January 2008 and October 2021. The characteristics of transplant recipients with nonspecific findings in the first for-cause biopsy were analyzed. Nonspecific allograft biopsy findings were defined as other biopsy findings excluding rejection, borderline rejection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, infection, glomerulonephritis, and diabetic nephropathy. The graft outcome was compared between recipients who had never undergone a for-cause biopsy and those who had a first for-cause biopsy with nonspecific findings. The graft survival in recipients with nonspecific for-cause biopsy findings was comparable to that in recipients who did not require the for-cause biopsy before and after propensity score matching. Even in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients, nonspecific allograft biopsy findings might not be a poor prognostic factor for allograft survival compared to recipients who did not require the for-cause biopsy.

Borderline rejection: To treat or not to treat?

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether kidney transplant recipients with a biopsy diagnosis as a "borderline" acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) requires the treatment with intravenous (iv) steroids pulse plus/minus intensification of the maintenance therapy (TRT) in comparison with the simple clinical follow-up (F-UP). METHODS: We retrospectively followed a consecutive series of kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with a borderline acute TCMR at biopsy by surveillance or clinical indication for 12 months and compared TRT and F-UP groups. We evaluated trends in renal function by measuring estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using multiple regression models. Repeated eGFR measures (REML) were adjusted for potential confounding factors for 12 months. The difference in 12-month eGFR values were observed in the TRT vs F-UP groups, type of biopsy, as well as the surveillance vs. clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 59 included patients, 37% of them were in the TRT group and remaining 63% in the F-UP group. As expected, the TRT group had, at the time of biopsy, lower eGFR value of 39.0 ml/min/m2 [16.5] in comparison to 49.6 [19.6] ml/min/m2 in the F-UP group (P = 0.043), Similarly, the TRT group required more frequent clinical biopsies vs. F-UP group (68% vs. 32%; P = 0.014). However, the TRT group recovered kidney function reaching the eGFR values of the F-UP group at 12 months; the increase being significant only in patients who received indication biopsies (P < 0.001). The estimated adjusted TRT effect on 12-month eGFR change after indication biopsy was improved by +15.8 ml/min/1.73m2 (95%CI: +0.1 to +31.4 ml/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.048 by three-way interaction term) compared to the F-UP group. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study supports the indication for the treatment of acute borderline TCMR only in cases with biopsies performed by clinical indication.