RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) has evolved in the past decade, as reflected in an increased use of various therapeutic agents that could potentially impact patient outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the pattern of therapy and its possible impact on the survival of patients with MF at their institution. Patients (n = 802) with newly diagnosed, chronic, overt MF (MF fibrosis grade ≥2, <10% blasts) seen at their cancer center between 2000 and 2020 were included. RESULTS: Overall, 492 of the included patients (61%) initiated MF-directed therapy during follow-up. The most frequent initial therapy was the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (44% of treated patients), investigational agents excluding JAK inhibitors (21%), immunomodulatory agents (18%), other investigational JAK inhibitors (10%), and others (7%). Overall survival was superior for patients who received initial ruxolitinib therapy, with a median survival of 72 months versus approximately 50 months for the remaining approaches, excluding the last group. Thirty-two percent of patients required subsequent therapy (n = 159). The longest survival since the start of second-line therapy was observed in patients who initiated salvage ruxolitinib (median, 35 months; 95% CI, 25-45 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated improved outcomes of patients with MF who received treatment with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Janus Quinases , Mielofibrose Primária , Humanos , Mielofibrose Primária/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, substantial differences in the epidemiology of, antiretroviral therapy (ART) for, cascade of care in and support to people with HIV in vulnerable populations have been observed between countries in Western Europe, Central Europe (CE) and Eastern Europe (EE). The aim of this study was to use a survey to explore whether ART availability and therapies have evolved in CE and EE according to European guidelines. METHODS: The Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE) Network Group conducted two identical multicentre cross-sectional online surveys in 2019 and 2021 concerning the availability and use of antiretroviral drugs (boosted protease inhibitors [bPIs], integrase inhibitors [INSTIs] and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs]), the introduction of a rapid ART start strategy and the use of two-drug regimens (2DRs) for starting or switching ART. We also investigated barriers to the implementation of these strategies in each region. RESULTS: In total, 18 centres participated in the study: four from CE, six from EE and eight from Southeastern Europe (SEE). Between those 2 years, older PIs were less frequently used and darunavir-based regimens were the main PIs (83%); bictegravir-based and tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens were introduced in CE and SEE but not in EE. The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly interrupt delivery of ART in most centres. Two-thirds of centres adopted a rapid ART start strategy, mainly in pregnant women and to improve linkage of care in vulnerable populations. The main obstacle to rapid ART start was that national guidelines in several countries from all three regions did not support such as strategy or required laboratory tests first; an INSTI/NRTI combination was the most commonly prescribed regimen (75%) and was exclusively prescribed in SEE. 2DRs are increasingly used for starting or switching ART (58%), and an INSTI/NRTI was the preferred regimen (75%) in all regions and exclusively prescribed in SEE, whereas the use of bPIs declined. Metabolic disorders and adverse drug reactions were the main reasons for starting a 2DR; in the second survey, HIV RNA <500 000 c/ml and high cluster of differentiation (CD)-4 count emerged as additional important reasons. CONCLUSIONS: In just 2 years and in spite of the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, significant achievements concerning ART availability and strategies have occurred in CE, EE and SEE that facilitate the harmonization of those strategies with the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines. Few exceptions exist, especially in EE. Continuous effort is needed to overcome various obstacles (administrative, financial, national guideline restrictions) in some countries.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Data on first-line ablation treatment for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as initial therapy for symptomatic AF. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBA or RFA with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as first-line treatment for AF from the time of database establishment up to December 2021. The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of the treatment effect. RESULTS: Six RCTs (3 CBA, 3 RFA) that enrolled a total of 1,215 patients were included in this analysis. There were no significant differences in atrial arrhythmia (AA) (OR 0.993, 95% CI: 0.602-1.638), symptomatic AA (OR 0.638, 95% CI: 0.344-1.182), or serious adverse events (OR 1.474, 95% CI: 0.404-5.376) between the two ablation techniques. The incidences of additional CBA therapy (OR 2.693, 95% CI: 1.277-5.681) and patients who crossed over to AAD therapy (OR 0.345, 95% CI: 0.179-0.664) in the CBA group were significantly lower than those in the RFA group. CONCLUSION: Among patients with paroxysmal AF receiving initial therapy, CBA and RFA share a similar efficacy and safety profile. When pulmonary vein isolation is performed by CBA, study crossover and the need for additional ablation are substantially lower.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Criocirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Humanos , Criocirurgia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Metanálise em Rede , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , RecidivaRESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the effects of periodontal initial therapy combined with orthodontic treatment on anterior tooth function and inflammatory factors in gingival crevicular fluid in patients with periodontal disease induced anterior tooth displacement. Methods: This was a clinical comparative study. A total of 140 patients with anterior teeth displacement caused by periodontal disease in Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to May 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the control group received periodontal initial therapy, and those in the study group were provided with orthodontic treatment on the basis of initial therapy. Further comparative analysis was performed focusing on the clinical effects of the two groups, the changes of probing depth, anterior overjet degree, oral function and inflammatory factors in gingival crevicular fluid before and after treatment. Results: The efficacy of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group(p=0.00). After treatment, the probing depth, the anterior overjet degree and the rate of bleeding on probing in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P=0.00). Furthermore, the proportion of tooth mobility degrees I, II and III in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group after treatment(P<0.05). The levels of post-treatment inflammatory factors in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(p=0.00). Conclusion: Periodontal initial therapy combined with orthodontic treatment has a significant effect on anterior teeth displacement caused by periodontal disease, which deserves promotion clinically.
RESUMO
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma featuring overexpression of MYC and B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (double expressor lymphoma, DEL) is associated with poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggesting improved outcomes for DEL with the use of more intensive regimens than R-CHOP is restricted to younger patients and based on limited evidence from low patient numbers. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of intensive frontline regimens versus R-CHOP in a multicenter analysis across 7 academic medical centers in the United States. We collected 90 cases of DEL, 46 out of 90 patients (51%) received R-CHOP and 44/90 (49%) received an intensive regimen, which was predominantly DA-EPOCH-R. Treatment cohorts were evenly balanced for demographics and disease characteristics, though the intensive group had a higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 326 vs. 230 U/L p = 0.06) and presence of B-symptoms (50% vs. 22%, p = 0.01) compared to the R-CHOP cohort. There was no difference in PFS (median 53 vs. 38 months, p = 0.49) or overall survival (67 vs. not reached months, p = 0.14) between the R-CHOP and intensive therapy cohorts, respectively. On multivariate analysis, intensive therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.35 (95% CI 0.74-7.41), though this was not statistically significant. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of intermediate high-risk lymphoma defined by IPI ≥3 did not identify a difference in survival outcomes between regimens. We conclude that in our multi-center cohort there is no evidence supporting the use of intensive regimens over R-CHOP, suggesting that R-CHOP remains the standard of care for treating DEL.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: Catheter ablation (CA) is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after failure of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The role of CA as 'initial therapy' for AF is to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following PRISMA guideline an up-to-date pooled analysis of randomized data comparing ablation vs. AADs as first-line therapy for symptomatic AF was performed. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. The secondary outcomes were improvement in quality-of-life (QoL) and major adverse events. A total of 997 patients from five randomized trials were enrolled (mean age 57.4 years, 68.6% male patients, 98% paroxysmal AF, mean follow-up 1.4 years). The baseline characteristics were similar between the ablation and AADs group. Overall pooled analysis showed that, as compared with AADs, CA as first-line therapy was associated with significantly higher freedom from arrhythmia recurrence (69% vs. 48%, odds ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.48, P < 0.001). This significance was maintained in subgroup analyses of 1- and 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Catheter ablation was associated with significantly greater improvement in QoL regarding AFEQT score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score. The incidence of serious adverse events between ablation and AADs group (5.6% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.62) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation as 'initial therapy' was superior to AADs in maintenance of sinus rhythm and improving QoL for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, without increasing risk of serious adverse events.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Taquicardia/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial therapy in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system stage B-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients received a single dose of TACE followed by SBRT 4 weeks later. All patients had tumor sizes ≥5â¯cm, at least 700â¯ml of disease-free liver, Child-Pugh (CP) score ≤ B7 and tumor nodules ≤5. SBRT dose, ranging from 6â¯× 5-8â¯Gy or 5-10â¯× 4â¯Gy, was individualized according to normal tissue constraints. No subsequent scheduled treatment was delivered unless disease progression was observed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: The patients' characteristics were: median age 60 years (range 28-87 years); CP score A/B (nâ¯= 68/4); BCLC stage B/C (nâ¯= 51/21); solitary/multifocal (nâ¯= 37/35); portal vein invasion (nâ¯= 18). The median tumor size and GTV were 11.2â¯cm (range 5.0-23.6â¯cm) and 751â¯cm3 (range 41-4009â¯cm3), respectively. The median equivalent dose in 2â¯Gy per fraction (EQD2, α/ßâ¯= 10) was 37.3â¯Gy2 (range, 28-72â¯Gy2). The median follow-up time was 16.8 months (range, 3-96 months). The objective RR was 68% and the 1year LC rate was 93.6% (95% CI, 87.6-100%). The median OS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-30.6 months). SBRT-related grade 3 or higher adverse gastrointestinal events and treatment-related death occurred in three (2.8%) and one patient (1.4%) respectively. No patient developed classical radiation-induced liver injury. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that combined TACE and SBRT can be a safe and effective initial therapy for BCLC stage B-C HCC with appropriate patient selection. Further prospective trials are warranted.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of operators experience and skill on treatment results of initial non-surgical periodontal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial periodontal treatment was carried out by either second-year periodontal residents (PR) or last year dental students (DS). From the treatment records of patients in each group, plaque and bleeding indices, and pocket depth (PD) at baseline and at re-evaluation were collected retrospectively on each tooth at six locations. Data were separated according to tooth type, area, and probing depth categories, sub-grouped to 1-3, 4-5, and ≥ 6 mm. RESULTS: Fifty and 49 records of DS and PR patients, accordingly, were analyzed. Initial periodontal treatment improved patient compliance in both groups and reduced signs of inflammation with significantly superior results in the PR group. Significant change in percentage of pockets was recorded in each category. The increase in percentage of sites with PD 1-3 mm and decrease in percentage of PD ≥ 6 mm pockets was significantly (p ≤ 0.001) superior in patients treated by PR. Percentage of 4-5 mm pockets was significantly reduced in both groups (p ≤ 0.01), with a significantly greater reduction in the mandibular molar and anterior teeth in the PR group. CONCLUSIONS: Experience and skill significantly affect the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy, with more positive improvement in patient compliance and clinical parameters when performed by a more qualified operator. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improvement of operator skills may decrease the number of residual pockets and increase patient compliance following non-surgical periodontal treatment.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Periodontite/terapia , Estudantes de Odontologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice Periodontal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility and safety of a strategy for refractory Kawasaki disease, defined by Egami score ≥3. STUDY DESIGN: First-line treatment was with intravenous methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg, 2 hours, 1 dose) plus intravenous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg, 24 hours) treatment. Patients resistant to first-line treatment received additional intravenous immunoglobulin as a second-line treatment. Patients resistant to second-line treatment who had received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination 6 months earlier were treated with infliximab; otherwise, plasma exchange was performed. A total of 71 refractory patients with Kawasaki disease (median age: 2.4 years) of 365 patients with Kawasaki disease were treated according to our strategy from April 2007 to April 2016. Treatment resistance was defined as a persistent fever at 36 hours after treatment. We evaluated coronary artery lesions at the time of the diagnosis, at 1 month, and at 1 year after the diagnosis in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines and the criteria of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. RESULTS: First-line therapy was effective for 58 of 71 patients (81.6%), and second-line therapy was effective for 9 of 13 patients (69.2%). At third line, 3 patients were treated by infliximab, and 1 was treated with plasma exchange. Of the 18 patients with coronary artery abnormalities at diagnosis, 13 patients at 1 month and 6 patients at 1 year had coronary artery dilatation (median z score 3.0, 2.6, and 1.4, respectively). There were no patients with coronary artery aneurysm (CAA). CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy for refractory Kawasaki disease was safe and effective in preventing CAA.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/terapia , Troca Plasmática , Doença Aguda , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Aneurisma Coronário/etiologia , Aneurisma Coronário/prevenção & controle , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study finds out drug usage trends in Stage I Hypertensive Patients without any compelling indications in Karachi, deviations of current practices from evidence based antihypertensive therapeutic guidelines and looks for cost minimization opportunities. METHODS: In the present study conducted during June 2012 to August 2012, two sets were used. Randomized stratified independent surveys were conducted in doctors and general population - including patients, using pretested questionnaires. Sample sizes for doctors and general population were 100 and 400 respectively. Statistical analysis was conducted on Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Financial impact was also analyzed. RESULTS: On the basis of patients' doctors' feedback, Beta Blockers, and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors were used more frequently than other drugs. Thiazides and low-priced generics were hardly prescribed. Beta blockers were prescribed widely and considered cost effective. This trend increases cost by two to ten times. CONCLUSION: Feedbacks showed that therapeutic guidelines were not followed by the doctors practicing in the community and hospitals in Karachi. Thiazide diuretics were hardly used. Beta blockers were widely prescribed. High priced market leaders or expensive branded generics were commonly prescribed. Therefore, there are great opportunities for cost minimization by using evidence-based clinically effective and safe medicines.
RESUMO
AIM: To compare the outcomes of surgical periodontal therapy with and without initial scaling and root planing. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with severe chronic periodontitis were enrolled in this pilot, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were equally allocated into two treatment groups: Control group was treated with scaling and root planing, re-evaluation, followed by Modified Widman Flap surgery and test group received similar surgery without scaling and root planing. Clinical attachment level, probing depth and bleeding on probing were recorded. Standardized radiographs were analysed for linear bone change from baseline to 6 months. Wound fluid inflammatory biomarkers were also assessed. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited statistically significant improvement in clinical attachment level and probing depth at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline. A statistically significant difference in probing depth reduction was found between the two groups at 3 and 6 months in favour of the control group. No statistically significant differences in biomarkers were detected between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combined scaling and root planing and surgery yielded greater probing depth reduction as compared to periodontal surgery without initial scaling and root planing.
Assuntos
Periodontite Crônica/cirurgia , Raspagem Dentária/métodos , Aplainamento Radicular/métodos , Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Biomarcadores/análise , Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Líquido do Sulco Gengival/química , Humanos , Interleucina-1beta/análise , Interleucina-6/análise , Masculino , Metaloproteinase 8 da Matriz/análise , Metaloproteinase 9 da Matriz/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/cirurgia , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/terapia , Índice Periodontal , Bolsa Periodontal/cirurgia , Bolsa Periodontal/terapia , Projetos Piloto , Radiografia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/análiseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A minority of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergo surgery before the initiation of systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of patients undergoing surgery prior to systemic therapy (surgfirst), the predictors for surgfirst, and the survival outcomes. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and we performed a subgroup analysis of patients that received surgfirst. Time-to-initial therapy (TTI) was defined as the time in days (d) from diagnosis to systemic therapy. Overall survival was measured from the day of diagnosis in terms of months (m). RESULTS: Factors associated with lower likelihood of surgfirst were non-Hispanic Black race (p-value<0.005), rural location (p-value<0.005), treatment at academic center (p-value<0.005), Medicaid insurance (p-value=0.01), comorbidity score >=3 (p-value 0.007), year of diagnosis, advanced stages of disease, and presence of B-symptoms. The TTI of systemic therapy was delayed in the surgfirst group - 34 (IQR 22-52) days vs. 23 (IQR 13-38) days, p-value<0.005. The five-year overall survival was 62.7% (95% CI 62.1-63.2%) vs. 58.3% (95% CI 57.7-60.0%) - HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), p-value<0.005. The factors associated with higher mortality were advanced comorbidities, lower educational status, disease primarily located in the bone, brain, and spinal cord, advanced clinical stage, presence of B-symptoms, and advanced age. CONCLUSION: Despite the delay in systemic therapy, we could not identify a detrimental impact of surgfirst on survival. This needs to be confirmed in large-scale multicenter studies. We identified clinical and socioeconomic factors that affect treatment selection and survival.
RESUMO
Background: The Platinum-based combination has been proven to have an outstanding effect on patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), but the best scientific combination has not been established yet. The present study is aimed to seek the best treatment plan for PSROC. Methods: We did a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, during which lite before March 2022 were retrieved on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled databases. We included randomized controlled clinical trials comparing chemotherapy combinations with other treatments for patients with PSROC. The important outcomes concerned were progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary outcome), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and AEs-related discontinuation. All outcomes were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Results: 26 trials involving 10441 patients were retrieved in this study. For the initial treatment of PSROC, carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus bevacizumab had the best PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% credible interval (CI) 0.51-0.68]; Carboplatin plus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab resulted in the best OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.35) and ORR [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.35]. For the maintenance therapy in PSROC, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) following platinum-based chemotherapy provided the best PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61-0.68), the highest frequency of adverse events of grade three or higher (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.44) but the treatment discontinuation was generally low. Subgroup analysis suggested that trabectedin plus PLD was comparable to single platinum in prolonging PFS in the platinum-free interval (6-12 months). Conclusion: Both platinum-based chemotherapy plus PARPi and platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had higher survival benefits than other treatments in PSROC. Trabectedin plus PLD might be a potential alternative treatment strategy for the partially platinum-sensitive subpopulation with intolerance to platinum. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?], identifier [CRD42022326573].
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line approach for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the initial management of symptomatic AF. HYPOTHESIS: CBA is superior to AAD as initial therapy for symptomatic AF. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBA with AAD as first-line treatment for AF from the date of database establishment until March 18, 2021. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of treatment effect. RESULTS: Three RCTs that enrolled 724 patients in total were included in this meta-analysis. Majority of the patients were relatively young and had paroxysmal AF. CBA was associated with a significant reduction in the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia compared with AAD therapy, with low heterogeneity (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.71; p < .00001; I2 = 0%). There was a significant difference in the rate of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.65; p < .0001; I2 = 0%); however, the rate of serious adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.71-1.97, p = .53; I2 = 0%). Transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred in four patients after the CBA procedure. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis suggests that CBA is more effective than AAD as initial therapy in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Serious iatrogenic adverse events are uncommon in CBAs.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Criocirurgia , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Humanos , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In contrast to the glucocorticoid maintenance therapy employed in patients with 21 hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD), the initial therapy remains to be optimized. The Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology recommends a hydrocortisone (HC) dose of 25-100 mg/m2, which is higher than that employed in Western countries. Herein, we aimed to retrospectively verify the impact of initial HC treatment during infancy and early childhood. Between 2010 and 2018, 15 classical patients with 21OHD were enrolled and divided into the following groups based on initial HC therapy: high dose group (HDG, n = 6), medium dose group (MDG, n = 5), and low dose group (LDG, n = 4). In the HDG and MDG, HC was initiated at 100 mg/m2 and reduced to maintenance doses over 4-6 mo and 2-3 wk, respectively. In the LDG, HC was initiated with a maintenance dose of 7 mg/d, accompanied by fludrocortisone and oral NaCl. During the second year, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone was sufficiently suppressed in all three groups. At two years of age, no significant differences in anthropometric data were observed. Our retrospective study did not reveal any apparent advantages or disadvantages of high-dose initial HC therapy for 21OHD, and a lower dose would be preferable for the initial 21OHD treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Applications of machine learning for the early detection of diseases for which a clear-cut diagnostic gold standard exists have been evaluated. However, little is known about the usefulness of machine learning approaches in the decision-making process for decisions such as insulin initiation by diabetes specialists for which no absolute standards exist in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine the ability of machine learning models to predict insulin initiation by specialists and whether the machine learning approach could support decision making by general physicians for insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Data from patients prescribed hypoglycemic agents from December 2009 to March 2015 were extracted from diabetes specialists' registries, resulting in a sample size of 4860 patients who had received initial monotherapy with either insulin (n=293) or noninsulin (n=4567). Neural network output was insulin initiation ranging from 0 to 1 with a cutoff of >0.5 for the dichotomous classification. Accuracy, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to compare the ability of machine learning models to make decisions regarding insulin initiation to the decision-making ability of logistic regression and general physicians. By comparing the decision-making ability of machine learning and logistic regression to that of general physicians, 7 cases were chosen based on patient information as the gold standard based on the agreement of 8 of the 9 specialists. RESULTS: The AUCs, accuracy, and recall of logistic regression were higher than those of machine learning (AUCs of 0.89-0.90 for logistic regression versus 0.67-0.74 for machine learning). When the examination was limited to cases receiving insulin, discrimination by machine learning was similar to that of logistic regression analysis (recall of 0.05-0.68 for logistic regression versus 0.11-0.52 for machine learning). Accuracies of logistic regression, a machine learning model (downsampling ratio of 1:8), and general physicians were 0.80, 0.70, and 0.66, respectively, for 43 randomly selected cases. For the 7 gold standard cases, the accuracies of logistic regression and the machine learning model were 1.00 and 0.86, respectively, with a downsampling ratio of 1:8, which were higher than the accuracy of general physicians (ie, 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no superior performance of machine learning over logistic regression, machine learning had higher accuracy in prediction of insulin initiation than general physicians, defined by diabetes specialists' choice of the gold standard. Further study is needed before the use of machine learning-based decision support systems for insulin initiation can be incorporated into clinical practice.
RESUMO
Positive results from recent clinical trials have significantly expanded current therapeutic options for patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, new insights into the associations between clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD, pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease, and the clinical and biological effects of novel therapeutic agents are required to allow for a more individualized approach to treatment. The current report is focused on setting research priorities and direction in the treatment of chronic GVHD. Detailed correlative scientific studies should be conducted in the context of clinical trials to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and the biological effect of systemic therapeutics. For patients who require systemic therapy but not urgent initiation of glucocorticoids, clinical trials for initial systemic treatment of chronic GVHD should investigate novel agents as monotherapy without concurrently starting glucocorticoids, to avoid confounding biological, pathological, and clinical assessments. Clinical trials for treatment-refractory disease should specifically target patients with incomplete or suboptimal responses to most recent therapy who are early in their disease course. Close collaboration between academic medical centers, medical societies, and industry is needed to support an individualized, biology-based strategic approach to chronic GVHD therapy.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença Crônica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Consenso , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: . Most patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are initially treated with moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapies (meDMTs), and only a smaller group of highly active patients are initiated on a high efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT). Real-world data have shown that choosing a heDMT as the initial therapy in highly active RRMS patients is more effective than using a meDMT, and that in patients with breakthrough disease on a meDMT escalation of treatment to a heDMT is more effective than staying on the same or switching to another meDMT. The role of age and sex as determinants for selection of the initial treatment intensity, and for using escalation of treatment intensity in patients with relapse activity on treatment with meDMTs, is only partially known. METHODS: . We included all Danish patients with RRMS registered in The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry who began a DMT since 2014 and stratified the cohort according to sex and age < 40 and ≥ 40 years at first DMT treatment. We studied determinants, with emphasis on age and sex, for the primary choice of therapy, for adherence to the initial therapy and for treatment escalation. Based on existing literature and clinical relevance, we included the following potential confounders in the analyses: DMT efficacy, pre-treatment relapse activity, disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and, in a subgroup, MRI activity. RESULTS: . With all covariates mutually adjusted, patient age was a strong decisive factor for choosing a heDMT with odds ratio 1.69 for starting a heDMT in patients < 40 years compared with patients ≥ 40 years. Men had odds ratio 1.53 for starting with a heDMT compared with women. The odds ratio of heDMT in patients with EDSS > 3 vs ≤ 3 was 3.49, and every additional relapse was associated with increased odds ratio 2.33 for heDMT. Patients were more adherent to the initial heDMTs than to the initial meDMTs. Patients above 40 years were more prone to stay on the initial treatment compared to patients below 40, regardless of whether the initial treatment was meDMT (p<0.001) or heDMT (p=0.008) (covariates mutually adjusted). Relapse activity resulted in escalation of therapy to a heDMT in 67% of patients aged < 40 years (N=273) and in 56% patients aged 40 years or above (N=159) (p=0.008), and younger patients had odds ratio 1.46 of escalating therapy compared to older patients. Male patients were more likely to have treatment escalation to heDMTs than female patients (odds ratio 2.03). CONCLUSION: . Age and sex appear to be independent determinants for the choice of the initial DMT and for the decision of treatment escalation in patients with breakthrough disease on a meDMT. It is unfortunate, if older age is a factor that make choice of a heDMT more unlikely, as many DMTs seems to be less efficacious in older patients.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , RecidivaRESUMO
Over the course of the past decade-plus, the therapy of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has seen incredible advances in the domains of diagnostic evaluation, active medical therapy, and response evaluation. This manuscript reviews the evaluation and management of newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma, with a focus on major clinical trials and IMWG recommendations. The paper describes a current approach for the initial evaluation and workup for patients with putative active myeloma, with consideration towards potential MRD-directed therapeutic approaches and future clinical trials, and then discusses management with a focus on induction regimens with attention primarily to modern three and four-drug combinations for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients, and those with organ dysfunction. Finally, this article briefly reviews minimal residual disease directed therapy approaches, primarily in the context of whether eligible patients should be referred for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. Maintenance therapy for both transplant eligible and ineligible patients is discussed elsewhere in this issue.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Medula Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Medula Óssea/imunologia , Medula Óssea/patologia , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Neoplasia Residual , Plasmócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Plasmócitos/imunologia , Plasmócitos/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) is a critical form of acute pancreatitis that is related with high morbidity and mortality. Severe Clostridium difficile infection (sCDI) is a serious and rare nosocomial diarrheal complication, especially in MSAP patients. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment for refractory and recurrent CDI (rCDI). However, knowledge regarding the initial use of FMT in patients suffering from sCDI is limited. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we report an MSAP patient complicated with sCDI who was treated by FMT as a first-line therapy. The patient was a 51-year-old man who suffered from diarrhea in his course of acute pancreatitis. An enzyme immunoassay was performed to detect toxins, and the result was positive for toxin-producing C. difficile and toxin B and negative for C. difficile ribotype 027. The colonoscopy revealed pseudomembranous colitis. Due to these findings, sCDI was our primary consideration. Because the patient provided informed consent for FMT treatment, we initially treated the patient by FMT rather than metronidazole. Diarrhea resolved within 5 d after FMT. The patient remained asymptomatic, and the follow-up colonoscopy performed 40 d after discharge showed a complete recovery. Our case is the first reported in China. CONCLUSION: This case explores the possibilities of initially using FMT to treat severe CDI. Moreover, FMT may become a critical component of the treatment for severe CDI in MSAP patients.