Dose-dense chemotherapy for untreated poor-prognosis and relapsed germ-cell tumours: an 18-year experience with GAMEC chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a single-centre experience of the regimen GAMEC (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, actinomycin-D, methotrexate with folinic acid rescue, etoposide and cisplatin) over 18 years in both untreated disease and relapse settings. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on 162 patients who received GAMEC dose-dense chemotherapy incorporating actinomycin and high dose methotrexate. Survival outcomes were compared. Risk categorization based on (1) the International Prognostic Factor Study Group (IPFSG) criteria and (2) two factors, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels greater than the upper limit of normal and age ≥35 years, were also compared in terms of survival outcomes using Cox proportional hazard regression modelling. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with poor-prognosis disease, according to International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification, received GAMEC as initial therapy. With a median follow-up of 63 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was >14 months. The 2-year PFS rate was 61.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.1-71.6), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 71.9%. Seventy-six patients received GAMEC as second-line therapy (following failure of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin or etoposide cisplatin). The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI 5.2-not evaluable), the 2-year PFS rate was 43.5% (95% CI 32.1-54.4) and the 3-year OS rate was 53.7% (95% CI 41.6-64.3). In the third-line setting (n = 11), the 2-year PFS was 18.2% (95% CI 2.8-44.2). Overall, the treatment-related death rate declined from 10.5% in the first 15 years to 2.6% in the last 5 years. CONCLUSION: GAMEC was an effective regimen in untreated poor-prognosis disease and on relapse following conventional cisplatin and etoposide-based chemotherapy. Risk categorization based on LDH/age is more sensitive than that based on the updated IPFSG criteria. It is possible to identify patients who are particularly likely to benefit from this treatment, which has the important advantages of short duration and absence of bleomycin, particularly in patients with central nervous system and mediastinal disease. Low-dose induction treatment is associated with safer delivery of treatment without compromising survival.

Metronomic therapy has low toxicity and is as effective as current standard treatment for recurrent high-risk neuroblastoma.

The metronomic therapy concept uses low doses of continuously applied chemotherapeutic, anti-angiogenetic, and immunomodulating drugs. Twenty patients with recurrent and 3 with refractory high-risk neuroblastoma were treated by the metronomic concept using celecoxib, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, and etoposide for up to 24 months. The outcome was compared to 274 matched patients with a first recurrence from stage 4 neuroblastoma using the variables time from diagnosis to first recurrence, number of organs involved, and MYCN amplification. All were treated with dose-intensive conventional chemotherapy. The study patients experienced 1-3 recurrences and had 1-3 sites involved (osteomedullary, primary tumor, central nervous system, lymph nodes, liver, lungs) before the metronomic therapy started. Two patients in complete remission and three with active refractory disease following recurrence treatment were excluded from the outcome analysis. The curves for secondary event-free and overall survival demonstrated no significant differences. The toxicity was minimal except for ≥3 grade thrombocytopenia and leukopenia (all heavily pretreated). The treatment was realized in an outpatient setting. The metronomic approach is similarly effective as standard treatment in recurrent high-risk neuroblastoma, has low toxicity, and is applicable in an outpatient setting. A prospective study including propranolol as a fifth drug is underway.

UNICANCER-PEGASE 07 study: a randomized phase III trial evaluating postoperative docetaxel-5FU regimen after neoadjuvant dose-intense chemotherapy for treatment of inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive disease requiring a multimodal treatment. We evaluated the benefit of adding docetaxel-5-fluorouracil (D-5FU) regimen after preoperative dose-intense (DI) epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) and locoregional treatment in IBC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PEGASE 07 was a national randomized phase III open-label study involving 14 hospitals in France. Women with nonmetastatic IBC were eligible and randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of DI EC (E 150 mg/m(2) and C 4000 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with repeated hematopoietic stem cell support), then mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection, and radiotherapy (arm A) or the same treatment followed by four cycles of D-5FU (D 85 mg/m(2), day 1 and 5FU 750 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion, days 1-5 every 3 weeks) administered postradiotherapy (arm B). Patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors received hormonal therapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point. Secondary end points included tolerance, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between January 2001 and May 2005, 174 patients were enrolled and treated (87 in each arm). Median follow-up was similar in both arms: 59.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.4-60.3] in arm A and 60.5 months (95% CI 58.3-61.4) in arm B. The estimated 5-year DFS rates were not different: 55% (95% CI 43.9-64.7) in arm A and 55.5% (95% CI 44.3-65.3) in arm B [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94 (0.61-1.48); P = 0.81]. Identical results were observed for 5-year OS: 70.2% (95% CI 59.1-78.8) in arm A and 70% (95% CI 58.8-78.7) in arm B [HR = 0.93 (0.55-1.60); P = 0.814]. Following DI EC induction, in-breast and global (breast plus nodes) pCR were 28.9% and 20.1%, respectively. Estrogen receptor and pCR status were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSION: The addition of D-5FU after preoperative DI EC and standard local therapy did not improve DFS in IBC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02324088.

Retrospective Analysis of Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with FLAG at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: FLAG ± Ida (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin), is a salvage chemotherapy regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with complete remission (CR) rates historically ranging from 52% to 63%. We review the outcomes for patients with R/R AML treated with FLAG ± Ida at the University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with R/R AML who received FLAG or FLAG + Ida from January 1, 2012 to October 31, 2016 were identified via chart review. Outcomes evaluated were CR, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall response rate, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included. The median age was 52 years (range, 23-73 years), and 57% were male. Sixteen (38.1%) patients had relapsed disease, and 26 (61.9%) had refractory disease. Most (n = 35; 83.3%) patients had European LeukemiaNet intermediate-risk AML. Responses were CR in 20 (47.6%) and CRi in 6 (14.3%). The median OS was 10 months (range, 0.8-51 months), and the median relapse-free survival was 12 months (range, 1-51 months) for responders. The median OS for patients who achieved CR was not reached, and the estimated 48-month survival rate was 56%. The median OS after CRi or no response was 3.47 and 2.17 months, respectively. The median OS was not significantly different when censored for stem cell transplant following chemotherapy, nor with use/deferral of idarubicin. The most common adverse effects were pancytopenia and infection. CONCLUSION: Patient outcomes after treatment with FLAG ± Ida for R/R AML remain similar to prior reports, confirming its role as a salvage regimen for these patients.

Emergence of an unrelated highly aberrant clone in an AML patient at relapse four months after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

We report a case of AML-M1 with 5q aberration at diagnosis. The patient was treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). After remission induction, he received allogenic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from an HLA-match donor brother. The successive follow-up conventional cytogenetics investigations in remission after HDCT and PBSCT revealed cytogenetic remission. The most interesting observation in this case is that relapsed marrow revealed the emergence of an entirely new, highly aberrant, unrelated clone with unusual translocations t(6;17)(p23;p11.2),+8,der(8)dup inv(8)(q23qter), t(10;19)(q26;q13.3) 4½ months after PBSCT. Our findings suggest the possibility of a mutagenic effect of HDCT and myeloablative intense chemotherapy before PBSCT that could have induced a genetic lesion in the recipient's genetically unstable stem cells in an environment of immunosuppression. The highly complex nature of the clone and the rapid clonal evolution indicates the possibility of selective pressure with proliferative advantage.