Defining tumor growth in vestibular schwannomas: a volumetric inter-observer variability study in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.

PURPOSE: For patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS), a conservative observational approach is increasingly used. Therefore, the need for accurate and reliable volumetric tumor monitoring is important. Currently, a volumetric cutoff of 20% increase in tumor volume is widely used to define tumor growth in VS. The study investigates the tumor volume dependency on the limits of agreement (LoA) for volumetric measurements of VS by means of an inter-observer study. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 VS patients who underwent contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Five observers volumetrically annotated the images. Observer agreement and reliability was measured using the LoA, estimated using the limits of agreement with the mean (LOAM) method, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The 100 patients had a median average tumor volume of 903 mm3 (IQR: 193-3101). Patients were divided into four volumetric size categories based on tumor volume quartile. The smallest tumor volume quartile showed a LOAM relative to the mean of 26.8% (95% CI: 23.7-33.6), whereas for the largest tumor volume quartile this figure was found to be 7.3% (95% CI: 6.5-9.7) and when excluding peritumoral cysts: 4.8% (95% CI: 4.2-6.2). CONCLUSION: Agreement limits within volumetric annotation of VS are affected by tumor volume, since the LoA improves with increasing tumor volume. As a result, for tumors larger than 200 mm3, growth can reliably be detected at an earlier stage, compared to the currently widely used cutoff of 20%. However, for very small tumors, growth should be assessed with higher agreement limits than previously thought.

Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an innovative imaging tool for breast cancer detection, involving intravenous injection of a contrast medium and the assessment of lesion enhancement in two phases: early and delayed. The aim of the study was to analyze the topographic concordance of lesions detected in the early- versus delayed phase acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approved by the Ethics Committee (No. 118/20), this prospective study included 100 women with histopathological confirmed breast neoplasia (B6) at the Radiodiagnostics Department of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara, Italy from May 1, 2021, to October 17, 2022. Participants underwent CEM examinations using a complete protocol, encompassing both early- and delayed image acquisitions. Three experienced radiologists blindly analyzed the CEM images for contrast enhancement to determine the topographic concordance of the identified lesions. Two readers assessed the complete study (protocol A), while one reader assessed the protocol without the delayed phase (protocol B). The average glandular dose (AGD) of the entire procedure was also evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated high concordance among the three readers in the topographical identification of lesions within individual quadrants of both breasts, with a Cohen's κ > 0.75, except for the lower inner quadrant of the right breast and the retro-areolar region of the left breast. The mean whole AGD was 29.2 mGy. The mean AGD due to CEM amounted to 73% of the whole AGD (21.2 mGy). The AGD attributable to the delayed phase of CEM contributed to 36% of the whole AGD (10.5 mGy). CONCLUSIONS: As we found no significant discrepancy between the readings of the two protocols, we conclude that delayed-phase image acquisition in CEM does not provide essential diagnostic benefits for effective disease management. Instead, it contributes to unnecessary radiation exposure.

Validation of the updated Bosniak classification (2019) in pathologically confirmed CT-categorised cysts.

INTRODUCTION: The updated Bosniak classification in 2019 (v2019) addresses vague imaging terms and revises the criteria with the intent to categorise a higher proportion of cysts in lower-risk groups and reduce benign cyst resections. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement rate of the original (v2005) and updated classifications (v2019). METHOD: Resected/biopsied cysts were categorised according to Bosniak classifications (v2005 and v2019) and the diagnostic accuracy was assessed with reference to histopathological analysis. The inter-observer agreement of v2005 and v2019 was determined. RESULTS: The malignancy rate of the cohort was 83.6% (51/61). Using v2019, a higher proportion of malignant cysts were categorised as Bosniak ≥ III (88.2% vs 84.3%) and a significantly higher percentage were categorised as Bosniak IV (68.9% vs 47.1%; p = 0.049) in comparison to v2005. v2019 would have resulted in less benign cyst resections (13.5% vs 15.7%). Calcified versus non-calcified cysts had lower rates of malignancy (57.1% vs 91.5%; RR,0.62; p = 0.002). The inter-observer agreement of v2005 was higher than that of v2019 (kappa, 0.70 vs kappa, 0.43). DISCUSSION: The updated classification improves the categorisation of malignant cysts and reduces benign cyst resection. The low inter-observer agreement remains a challenge to the updated classification system.

A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer variation in contouring vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the organs-at-risk (OAR), and its dosimetric impact in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Three VS typical cases were contoured by four clinicians. The Agreement Volume Index (AVI) appeared to be notably higher in VS than in OARs, such that the dose coverage of VS is fairly robust. In OARs, the largest variation was +1.02Gy in dmax for the brainstem, +0.78Gy in dmean for the cochlea and +1.05Gy in dmax of the trigeminal nerve. Accordingly, it was decided that all VS delineations for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and all frame-based SRS contouring in general, should always be reviewed by a second physician. In addition, the retrospective presentation of VS cases at daily peer review meetings has also been adopted to ensure that the consensus is constantly updated, as well as for training purposes.

Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Visual assessment of mammographic breast composition remains the most common worldwide, although subjective variability limits its reproducibility. This study aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-observer variability in qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition through a multi-institutional observer performance study for the first time in Japan. METHODS: This study enrolled 10 Japanese physicians from five different institutions. They used the new Japanese breast-composition classification system 4th edition to subjectively evaluate the breast composition in 200 pairs of right and left normal mediolateral oblique mammograms (number determined using precise sample size calculations) twice, with a 1-month interval (median patient age: 59 years [range 40-69 years]). The primary endpoint of this study was the inter-observer variability using kappa (κ) value. RESULTS: Inter-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment revealed moderate agreement (Fleiss' κ: first and second reading = 0.553 and 0.587, respectively) and substantial agreement (Fleiss' κ: first and second reading = 0.689 and 0.70, respectively). Intra-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment demonstrated substantial agreement (Cohen's κ, median = 0.758) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen's κ, median = 0.813). Assessments of consensus between the 10 physicians and the automated software Volpara® revealed slight agreement (Cohen's κ; first and second reading: 0.104 and 0.075, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition using the new Japanese classification revealed excellent intra-observer reproducibility. However, persistent inter-observer variability, presenting a challenge in establishing it as the gold standard in Japan.

Non-calcified plaque-based coronary stenosis grading in contrast enhanced CT.

BACKGROUND: The high mortality rate associated with coronary heart disease has led to state-of-the-art non-invasive methods for cardiac diagnosis including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, stenosis computation and clinical assessment of non-calcified plaques has been very challenging due to their ambiguous intensity response in CT i.e. a significant overlap with surrounding muscle tissues and blood. Accordingly, this research presents an approach for computation of coronary stenosis by investigating cross-sectional lumen behaviour along the length of 3D coronary segments. METHODS: Non-calcified plaques are characterized by comparatively lower-intensity values with respect to the surrounding. Accordingly, segment-wise orthogonal volume was reconstructed in 3D space using the segmented coronary tree. Subsequently, the cross sectional volumetric data was investigated using proposed CNN-based plaque quantification model and subsequent stenosis grading in clinical context was performed. In the last step, plaque-affected orthogonal volume was further investigated by comparing vessel-wall thickness and lumen area obstruction w.r.t. expert-based annotations to validate the stenosis grading performance of model. RESULTS: The experimental data consists of clinical CT images obtained from the Rotterdam CT repository leading to 600 coronary segments and subsequent 15786 cross-sectional images. According to the results, the proposed method quantified coronary vessel stenosis i.e. severity of the non-calcified plaque with an overall accuracy of 83%. Moreover, for individual grading, the proposed model show promising results with accuracy equal to 86%, 90% and 79% respectively for severe, moderate and mild stenosis. The stenosis grading performance of the proposed model was further validated by performing lumen-area versus wall-thickness analysis as per annotations of manual experts. The statistical results for lumen area analysis precisely correlates with the quantification performance of the model with a mean deviation of 5% only. CONCLUSION: The overall results demonstrates capability of the proposed model to grade the vessel stenosis with reasonable accuracy and precision equivalent to human experts.

A comparison of target volumes drawn on arterial and venous phase scans during radiation therapy planning for patients with pancreatic cancer: the PANCRINJ study.

BACKGROUND: The planification of radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) requires a dosimetric computed tomography (CT) scan to define the gross tumor volume (GTV). The main objective of this study was to compare the inter-observer variability in RT planning between the arterial and the venous phases following intravenous contrast. METHODS: PANCRINJ was a prospective monocentric study that included twenty patients with non-metastatic PC. Patients underwent a pre-therapeutic CT scan at the arterial and venous phases. The delineation of the GTV was performed by one radiologist (gold standard) and two senior radiation oncologists (operators). The primary objective was to compare the Jaccard conformity index (JCI) for the GTVs computed between the GS (gold standard) and the operators between the arterial and the venous phases with a Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples. The secondary endpoints were the geographical miss index (GMI), the kappa index, the intra-operator variability, and the dose-volume histograms between the arterial and venous phases. RESULTS: The median JCI for the arterial and venous phases were 0.50 (range, 0.17-0.64) and 0.41 (range, 0.23-0.61) (p = 0.10) respectively. The median GS-GTV was statistically significantly smaller compared to the operators at the arterial (p < 0.0001) and venous phases (p < 0.001), respectively. The GMI were low with few tumors missed for all patients with a median GMI of 0.07 (range, 0-0.79) and 0.05 (range, 0-0.39) at the arterial and venous phases, respectively (p = 0.15). There was a moderate agreement between the radiation oncologists with a median kappa index of 0.52 (range 0.38-0.57) on the arterial phase, and 0.52 (range 0.36-0.57) on the venous phase (p = 0.08). The intra-observer variability for GTV delineation was lower at the venous phase than at the arterial phase for the two operators. There was no significant difference between the arterial and the venous phases regarding the dose-volume histogram for the operators. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating GTV for PC without significant differences between the arterial and the venous phases. The use of both phases should be encouraged. Our findings suggest the need to provide training for radiation oncologists in pancreatic imaging and to collaborate within a multidisciplinary team.

A validation study to analyze the reliability of center of pressure data in static posturography in dogs.

Introduction: Center of pressure (COP) parameters are frequently assessed to analyze movement disorders in humans and animals. Methodological discrepancies are a major concern when evaluating conflicting study results. This study aimed to assess the inter-observer reliability and test-retest reliability of body COP parameters including mediolateral and craniocaudal sway, total length, average speed and support surface in healthy dogs during quiet standing on a pressure plate. Additionally, it sought to determine the minimum number of trials and the shortest duration necessary for accurate COP assessment. Materials and methods: Twelve clinically healthy dogs underwent three repeated trials, which were analyzed by three independent observers to evaluate inter-observer reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed across the three trials per dog, each lasting 20 seconds (s). Selected 20 s measurements were analyzed in six different ways: 1 × 20 s, 1 × 15 s, 2 × 10 s, 4 × 5 s, 10 × 2 s, and 20 × 1 s. Results: Results demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC ≥ 0.93) for all COP parameters. However, only 5 s, 10 s, and 15 s measurements achieved the reliability threshold (ICC ≥ 0.60) for all evaluated parameters. Discussion: The shortest repeatable durations were obtained from either two 5 s measurements or a single 10 s measurement. Most importantly, statistically significant differences were observed between the different measurement durations, which underlines the need to standardize measurement times in COP analysis. The results of this study aid scientists in implementing standardized methods, thereby easing comparisons across studies and enhancing the reliability and validity of research findings in veterinary medicine.

The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning.

Background: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established surgery for many pathologies of the shoulder and the demand continues to rise with an aging population. Preoperative planning is mandatory to support the surgeon's understanding of the patient's individual anatomy and, therefore, is crucial for the patient's outcome. Methods: In this observational study, we identified 30 patients who underwent RTSA with two- and three-dimensional preoperative planning. Each patient underwent new two-dimensional planning from a medical student and an orthopedic resident as well as through a mid-volume and high-volume shoulder surgeon, which was repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was then analyzed and compared to the 3D planning and the implanted prosthesis. The evaluated parameters were the size of the pegged glenoid baseplate, glenosphere, and humeral short stem. Results: The inter-rater reliability showed higher deviations in all four raters compared to the 3D planning of the base plate, glenosphere, and shaft. The intra-rater reliability showed a better correlation in more experienced raters, especially in the planning of the shaft. Conclusions: Our study shows that 3D planning is more accurate than traditional planning on plain X-rays, despite experienced shoulder surgeons showing better results in 2D planning than inexperienced ones.

Assessment of bias in scoring of AI-based radiotherapy segmentation and planning studies using modified TRIPOD and PROBAST guidelines as an example.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies investigating the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the field of radiotherapy exhibit substantial variations in terms of quality. The goal of this study was to assess the amount of transparency and bias in scoring articles with a specific focus on AI based segmentation and treatment planning, using modified PROBAST and TRIPOD checklists, in order to provide recommendations for future guideline developers and reviewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TRIPOD and PROBAST checklist items were discussed and modified using a Delphi process. After consensus was reached, 2 groups of 3 co-authors scored 2 articles to evaluate usability and further optimize the adapted checklists. Finally, 10 articles were scored by all co-authors. Fleiss' kappa was calculated to assess the reliability of agreement between observers. RESULTS: Three of the 37 TRIPOD items and 5 of the 32 PROBAST items were deemed irrelevant. General terminology in the items (e.g., multivariable prediction model, predictors) was modified to align with AI-specific terms. After the first scoring round, further improvements of the items were formulated, e.g., by preventing the use of sub-questions or subjective words and adding clarifications on how to score an item. Using the final consensus list to score the 10 articles, only 2 out of the 61 items resulted in a statistically significant kappa of 0.4 or more demonstrating substantial agreement. For 41 items no statistically significant kappa was obtained indicating that the level of agreement among multiple observers is due to chance alone. CONCLUSION: Our study showed low reliability scores with the adapted TRIPOD and PROBAST checklists. Although such checklists have shown great value during development and reporting, this raises concerns about the applicability of such checklists to objectively score scientific articles for AI applications. When developing or revising guidelines, it is essential to consider their applicability to score articles without introducing bias.

Inter-observer effects in needle reconstruction for temporary prostate brachytherapy: Dosimetric implications and adaptive CBCT-TRUS registration solutions.

PURPOSE: To investigate geometric and dosimetric inter-observer variability in needle reconstruction for temporary prostate brachytherapy. To assess the potential of registrations between transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to support implant reconstructions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The needles implanted in 28 patients were reconstructed on TRUS by three physicists. Corresponding geometric deviations and associated dosimetric variations to prostate and organs at risk (urethra, bladder, rectum) were analyzed. To account for the found inter-observer variability, various approaches (template-based, probe-based, marker-based) for registrations of CBCT to TRUS were investigated regarding the respective needle transfer accuracy in a phantom study. Three patient cases were examined to assess registration accuracy in-vivo. RESULTS: Geometric inter-observer deviations >1 mm and >3 mm were found for 34.9% and 3.5% of all needles, respectively. Prostate dose coverage (changes up to 7.2%) and urethra dose (partly exceeding given dose constraints) were most affected by associated dosimetric changes. Marker-based and probe-based registrations resulted in the phantom study in high mean needle transfer accuracies of 0.73 mm and 0.12 mm, respectively. In the patient cases, the marker-based approach was the superior technique for CBCT-TRUS fusions. CONCLUSION: Inter-observer variability in needle reconstruction can substantially affect dosimetry for individual patients. Especially marker-based CBCT-TRUS registrations can help to ensure accurate reconstructions for improved treatment planning.

Reliability of study endpoint adjudication in a pragmatic trial on brain arteriovenous malformations.

BACKGROUND: The results of a clinical trial are given in terms of primary and secondary outcomes that are obtained for each patient. Just as an instrument should provide the same result when the same object is measured repeatedly, the agreement of the adjudication of a clinical outcome between various raters is fundamental to interpret study results. The reliability of the adjudication of study endpoints determined by examination of the electronic case report forms of a pragmatic trial has not previously been tested. METHODS: The electronic case report forms of 62/434 (14%) patients selected to be observed in a study on brain AVMs were independently examined twice (4 weeks apart) by 8 raters who judged whether each patient had reached the following study endpoints: (1) new intracranial hemorrhage related to AVM or to treatment; (2) new non-hemorrhagic neurological event; (3) increase in mRS ≥1; (4) serious adverse events (SAE). Inter and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Gwet's AC1 (κG) statistics, and correlations with mRS score using Cramer's V test. RESULTS: There was almost perfect agreement for intracranial hemorrhage (92% agreement; κG = 0.84 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93), and substantial agreement for SAEs (88% agreement; κG = 0.77 (95%CI: 0.67-0.86) and new non-hemorrhagic neurological event (80% agreement; κG = 0.61 (95%CI: 0.50-0.72). Most endpoints correlated (V = 0.21-0.57) with an increase in mRS of ≥1, an endpoint which was itself moderately reliable (76% agreement; κG = 0.54 (95%CI: 0.43-0.64). CONCLUSION: Study endpoints of a pragmatic trial were shown to be reliable. More studies on the reliability of pragmatic trial endpoints are needed.

Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability of the AMADEUS Tool for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

BACKGROUND: Managing osteochondral cartilage defects (OCDs) of the talus is a common daily challenge in orthopaedics as they predispose patients to further cartilage damage and progression to osteoarthritis. Therefore, the implementation of a reliable tool to quantify the amount of cartilage damage that is present is of the essence. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 15 adult patients diagnosed with uncontained OCDs of the talus measuring <150 mm2, which were treated arthroscopically with bone marrow stimulation. Five independent assessors evaluated the pre-operative MRI scans with the AMADEUS scoring system (i.e., MR-based pre-operative assessment system) and the intra-/inter-observer variability was then calculated by means of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa (κ) statistics, respectively. In addition, the correlation between the mean AMADEUS scores and pre-operative self-reported outcomes as measured by the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOxFQ) was assessed. RESULTS: The mean ICC and the κ statistic were 0.82 (95% CI [0.71, 0.94]) and 0.42 (95% CI [0.25, 0.59]). The Pearson correlation coefficient was found to be r = -0.618 (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The AMADEUS tool, which was originally designed to quantify knee osteochondral defect severity prior to cartilage repair surgery, demonstrated good reliability and moderate inter-observer variability for small OCDs of the talar shoulder. Given the strong negative correlation between the AMADEUS tool and pre-operative clinical scores, this tool could be implemented in clinical practise to reliably quantify the extent of the osteochondral defects of the talus.

When Two Eyes Don't Suffice-Learning Difficult Hyperfluorescence Segmentations in Retinal Fundus Autofluorescence Images via Ensemble Learning.

Hyperfluorescence (HF) and reduced autofluorescence (RA) are important biomarkers in fundus autofluorescence images (FAF) for the assessment of health of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), an important indicator of disease progression in geographic atrophy (GA) or central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Autofluorescence images have been annotated by human raters, but distinguishing biomarkers (whether signals are increased or decreased) from the normal background proves challenging, with borders being particularly open to interpretation. Consequently, significant variations emerge among different graders, and even within the same grader during repeated annotations. Tests on in-house FAF data show that even highly skilled medical experts, despite previously discussing and settling on precise annotation guidelines, reach a pair-wise agreement measured in a Dice score of no more than 63-80% for HF segmentations and only 14-52% for RA. The data further show that the agreement of our primary annotation expert with herself is a 72% Dice score for HF and 51% for RA. Given these numbers, the task of automated HF and RA segmentation cannot simply be refined to the improvement in a segmentation score. Instead, we propose the use of a segmentation ensemble. Learning from images with a single annotation, the ensemble reaches expert-like performance with an agreement of a 64-81% Dice score for HF and 21-41% for RA with all our experts. In addition, utilizing the mean predictions of the ensemble networks and their variance, we devise ternary segmentations where FAF image areas are labeled either as confident background, confident HF, or potential HF, ensuring that predictions are reliable where they are confident (97% Precision), while detecting all instances of HF (99% Recall) annotated by all experts.

Inter-observer Variability in the Analysis of CO-RADS Classification for COVID-19 Patients.

During the early stages of the pandemic, computed tomography (CT) of the chest, along with serological and clinical data, was frequently utilized in diagnosing COVID-19, particularly in regions facing challenges such as shortages of PCR kits. In these circumstances, CT scans played a crucial role in diagnosing COVID-19 and guiding patient management. The COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) was established as a standardized reporting system for cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. Its implementation necessitates a high level of agreement among observers to prevent any potential confusion. This study aimed to assess the inter-observer agreement between physicians from different specialties with variable levels of experience in their CO-RADS scoring of CT chests for confirmed COVID-19 patients, and to assess the feasibility of applying this reporting system to those having little experience with it. All chest CT images of patients with positive RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed by seven observers. The observers were divided into three groups according to their type of specialty (three radiologists, three house officers, and one pulmonologist). The observers assessed each image and categorized the patients into five CO-RADS groups. A total of 630 participants were included in this study. The inter-observer agreement was almost perfect among the radiologists, substantial among a pulmonologist and the house officers, and moderate-to-substantial among the radiologists, the pulmonologist, and the house officers. There was substantial to almost perfect inter-observer agreement when reporting using the CO-RADS among observers with different experience levels. Although the inter-observer variability among the radiologists was high, it decreased compared to the pulmonologist and house officers. Radiologists, house officers, and pulmonologists applying the CO-RADS can accurately and promptly identify typical CT imaging features of lung involvement in COVID-19.

The internal rotation traction radiograph does not improve the reliability in the AO classification system for pertrochanteric fractures. An inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The most universal method for classifying pertrochanteric fractures is the AO/OTA classification. These fractures are classified into different categories according to the features found in the anteroposterior radiograph of the hip. Anteroposterior radiograph of the hip with internal rotation traction can improve the characterization of the fracture. Inter- and intra-observer reliability in any classification is essential to achieve a homogeneous agreement for decision making. Our objective is assessing the overall reliability and by level of experience of the new AO/OTA classification of pertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital registry was used to collect patients with pertrochanteric hip fracture who had anteroposterior radiograph of the hip with and without internal rotation traction. We selected six evaluators stratified by levels of expertise in orthopedic trauma, leaving three groups: advanced, intermediate and beginner. Radiographs were sent through electronic forms and inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using the kappa (K) statistic. RESULTS: 115 (one hundred fifteen) patients were included, each with their corresponding anteroposterior radiograph of the hip with and without internal rotation traction. Overall inter- and intra-observer reliability was moderate on both anteroposterior radiographs of the hip with and without internal rotation traction. Regarding the different levels of experience, the advanced level group reached a substantial inter- and intra-observer reliability in both anteroposterior radiographs with and without traction, while the rest of the groups with lower level of experience obtained a lesser reliability. CONCLUSION: Our study found that the internal rotation traction x-ray did not improve the reliability of the new AO/OTA classification for pertrochanteric fractures, as assessed by inter- and intra-observer agreement, in either the overall group or in groups divided by experience level.

Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Short and Long [18F]FDG-PET Acquisition Times in Giant Cell Arteritis.

(1) Background: In giant cell arteritis (GCA), the assessment of cranial arteries using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with low-dose computed tomography (CT) may be challenging due to low image quality. This study aimed to investigate the effect of prolonged acquisition time on the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in GCA. (2) Methods: Patients with suspected GCA underwent [18F]FDG-PET imaging with a short acquisition time (SAT) and long acquisition time (LAT). Two nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) reported the presence or absence of GCA according to the overall image impression (gestalt) and total vascular score (TVS) of the cranial arteries. Inter-observer agreement and intra-observer agreement were assessed. (3) Results: In total, 38 patients were included, of whom 20 were diagnosed with GCA and 18 were without it. Sensitivity and specificity for GCA on SAT scans were 80% and 72%, respectively, for the first NMP, and 55% and 89% for the second NMP. On the LAT scans, these values were 65% and 83%, and 75% and 83%, respectively. When using the TVS, LAT scans showed especially increased specificity (94% for both NMPs). Observer agreement was higher on the LAT scans compared with that on the SAT scan. (4) Conclusions: LAT combined with the use of the TVS may decrease the number of false-positive assessments of [18F]FDG PET/CT. Additionally, LAT and TVS may increase both inter and intra-observer agreement.

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for detecting subscapularis tendon tears: a diagnostic test study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for making the diagnosis of subscapularis tears presents wide variation in the literature and there are few prospective studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare the findings from MRI and arthroscopy for diagnosing subscapularis tears. DESIGN AND SETTING: Diagnostic test study performed in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: We included patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and who had firstly undergone high magnetic field MRI without contrast. The images were independently evaluated by a shoulder surgeon and two musculoskeletal radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and inter and intra-observer agreement were calculated. RESULTS: MRIs on 200 shoulders were evaluated. The incidence of subscapularis tears was 69.5% (41.5% partial and 28.0% full-thickness). The inter and intra-observer agreement was moderate for detection of subscapularis tears. The shoulder surgeon presented sensitivity of 51.1% to 59.0% and specificity of 91.7% to 94.4%. The radiologists showed sensitivity of 83.5% to 87.1% and specificity of 41% to 45.9%. Accuracy ranged from 60.5% to 73.0%. CONCLUSION: The 1.5-T MRIs without contrast showed mean sensitivity of 70.2% and mean specificity of 61.9% for detection of subscapularis tears. Sensitivity was higher for the musculoskeletal radiologists, while specificity was higher for the shoulder surgeon. The mean accuracy was 67.6%, i.e. lower than that of rotator cuff tears overall.

Reliability of the measurement of glenoid bone defect in anterior shoulder instability / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

Background@#The size of the glenoid bone defect is an important index in selecting the appropriate treatment for anterior shoulder instability. However, the reliability of glenoid bone defect measurement is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the reliabilities of measurements of the glenoid bone defect on computed tomography and to explore the predisposing factors leading to inconsistency of these measurements.@*Methods@#The study population comprised 69 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation in Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine from March 2016 to January 2017. The glenoid bone defect was measured by three surgeons on 'self-confirmed’ and 'designated’ 3-D en-face views, and repeated after an interval of 3 months. Measurements included the ratio of the defect area to the best-fit circle area, and the ratio of the defect width to the diameter of the best-fit circle. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities of the measurements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The maximum absolute inter- and intra-observer differences and the cumulative percentages of cases with inter- and intraobserver differences greater than these respective levels were calculated.@*Results@#Almost all linear defect values were bigger than the areal defect values. The inter-observer ICCs for the areal defect were 0.557 and 0.513 in the 'self-confirmed’ group and 0.549 and 0.431 in the 'designated’ group. The inter-observer reliabilities for the linear defect were moderate or fair in the 'self-confirmed’ group (ICC = 0.446, 0.374) and 'designated’ group (ICC = 0.402, 0.327). The ICCs for intra-observer measurements were higher than those for inter-observer measurements. The respective maximum interand intra-observer absolute differences were 13.9% and 13.2% in the 'self-confirmed’ group, and 15.8% and 9.8% in the 'designated’ group.@*Conclusions@#The areal measurement of the glenoid bone defect is more reliable than the linear measurement. The reliability of the glenoid defect areal measurement is moderate or worse, suggesting that a more accurate and objective measurement method is needed in both en-face view and best-fit circle determination. Subjective factors affecting the glenoid bone loss measurement should be minimized.

Inter-observer variability in the histologic criteria of diagnosis of hydatidiform moles

@#Introduction: In the event of encountering hydropic villi in products of conception specimens, pathologists will have to distinguish complete and partial hydatidiform mole (CHM & PHM) from hydropic abortion (HA). The histological diagnostic criteria are subjective and demonstrate considerable inter-observer variability. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated the inter-observer variability in diagnosis of CHM, PHM and HA according to defined histologic criteria. Ninety abortus conception specimens were reviewed. Representative haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were assigned independently to two pathologists who were asked to make a diagnosis of CHM, PHM or HA, and provide a report of the identified diagnostic histological criteria. Kappa value was calculated for the inter-observer agreement. Results: There was a total of 36.7% disagreement between two pathologists (K = 0.403, Strength of Agreement = moderate), of which 24.4% and 12.2%, were differentiating PHM from CHM and PHM from HA, respectively. Among defined diagnostic histological criteria, the highest rate of agreement was observed in the identification of cistern formation and hydropic changes (K = 0.746 and 0.686 respectively, Strength of Agreement = substantial). Conclusion: There was moderate to substantial agreement rate between two pathologists in identification of two essential histologic criteria for diagnosis of molar pregnancies i.e. “hydropic change” and “trophoblastic proliferation”.