[Medical termination of pregnancy for maternal psychosocial distress]. / L'interruption médicale de grossesse pour détresse maternelle psychosociale.

Medical termination of pregnancy when decided for maternal psychosocial distress is a new issue facing maternity field teams. Multidisciplinary work is required, as well as respect for the patients' temporality. The decision is collegial, estimating the least traumatic impact possible for them over the long term. The ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence guide the work of the team and the evaluation of the psychiatrist in this context.

[Specificities of antenatal grief]. / Spécificités du deuil anténatal.

Taking into account the pain of antenatal bereavement is relatively recent. If the stages of elaboration of this mourning are identical compared to those of other close persons, nevertheless it has some particularities. The status of the fetus is singular, an integral part of the mother's body, but without legal existence. The psychological context in which the mourning takes place is marked by a profound psychic transformation. Finally, the impact on parental narcissism must be taken into account.

[The caregiver faced with perinatal bereavement]. / Le soignant face au deuil périnatal.

Being a caregiver in perinatal care means working with others' intimate feelings as well as one's own. Issues surrounding life and death coexist in delivery rooms, causing all those involved to consider the meaning of life and origins. When perinatal bereavement becomes part of the idealised picture of birth, the caregiver becomes the buoy to whom the parents hold on in order not to founder.

[The psychological challenges of MAR]. / Les enjeux psychologiques d'un parcours d'AMP.

The difficulties in becoming parents and the medical process undertaken to achieve it can cause major suffering in the people confronted with these situations. Psychological support may then be necessary to comfort the couple and support it through the different stages of the MAR process. It also enables the pair as a whole, and as individuals, to understand what is at stake, in relation to their own history, in the inability to fulfil this desire for a child.

[The specificities of perinatal bereavement]. / Les spécificités du deuil périnatal.

Parents can be faced with a situation of bereavement during pregnancy or birth. It is often during a later pregnancy, an ultrasound scan or a subsequent birth, that some will talk about the loss of a child. These situations resulting in bereavement during pregnancy or perinatal bereavement are specific and all perinatal caregivers must be aware of them.

[Trisomy 21, the ethics between the right to life and a possible termination of pregnancy for medical reasons]. / Trisomie 21, quelle éthique entre le droit à la vie et une possible interruption médicale de grossesse ?

The antenatal diagnosis tools now available feed the fantasy of the 'perfect baby'. In this context and in parallel to a whole range of other foetal pathologies, trisomy 21 represents an emblematic situation which acts as a reminder that it is ethically essential to keep open the question of terminating or continuing with a pregnancy. Multidisciplinary team work remains the best safeguard against possible abuses.

[Embryo reduction in twin pregnancy on maternal request: A French practice study]. / Réduction embryonnaire pour demande maternelle en cas de grossesse gémellaire : enquête nationale française.

INTRODUCTION: In France, embryo reduction is controversial in twin pregnancy, especially when there is no underlying pathology. The objective of this study was to establish the status of this practice in France and to depict the ethical issues around this problematic. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire drafted by Maternal and Fetal Medicine physicians and family planning teams of the University Hospital from Strasbourg was distributed to the 48 French Multidisciplinary Prenatal Diagnosis Centers, among which 28 answered (58,3%). RESULTS: Embryo reduction in twin pregnancy on maternal request has already challenged 71% of the centers; 29% have performed such a reduction. The overall position of the centers to these requests is negative (3.1/10), with very mixed levels of in-team agreement. The main arguments against this practice are that twin pregnancy is not a pathology, that embryo reduction exposes to the risk of loosing the entire pregnancy, the feeling of being held hostage with the alternative of abortion of the whole pregnancy, and the lack of legal framing. On the contrary, the arguments in favor of the reduction are: that the reduction can avoid an abortion, that this type of reduction can be related to a partial abortion, that it responds to women's rights and that mental health is an integral part of women's health. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus about how to respond to patients requesting for embryo reduction in twin pregnancy. However, the majority of Centers have been confronted with it and it would be necessary to open the debate on this problem and the ethical questions it raises.

[Medical termination of pregnancy for isolated intrauterine growth retardation beyond 24 weeks and more than 450g]. / Interruption médicale de grossesse pour retard de croissance intra-utérin isolé au-delà de 24 SA et de 450g.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is an obstetric complication responsible for increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. In some severe and early FGR situations, termination of pregnancy (TOP) may be considered. The main objective of our study was to describe the population of fetuses for whom a TOP was performed for isolated FGR beyond 24 days' gestation and for a birth weight>450g and to analyze the immediate outcome, at 2 and 5 years, of term- and weight-matched neonates born in a context of severe FGR after 24 weeks' gestation and over 450g. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, descriptive, retrospective, uni-centric study between 2008 and 2018. The primary endpoint was survival at maternity discharge, 2 years and 5 years in these children. Secondary endpoints were assessment of immediate and longer-term postnatal morbidity. Twenty-five patients (36%) were selected for the study with a fetus weight>450g and term>24 weeks. Each fetus with an TOP was matched (on gestational age and weight) with two live-born children from the perinatal network cohort to assess immediate discharge outcome, and then at 2 and 5 years. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 24%. In neonatal management, for 67% (n=17) of the newborns the evolution was complicated by death or at least two sequelae (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hyaline membrane disease stage≥2, intraventricular of grade 3 and 4, ulcerative colitis requiring surgery, retinopathy of prematurity stage 2 and more) at discharge. In 32% (n=8) of cases, there was at least one sequela at discharge. Regardless of gestational age at birth, development at 2 years was normal for 48% (n=11/23) of them and abnormal for 22% (n=5) and development at 5 years was normal for 56% (n=9/16) of them and abnormal for 19% (n=5). CONCLUSION: An ultrasound evaluation in a reference center as well as additional information by the obstetrician and neonatologist ensures the most appropriate informed involvement of the couple in the medical decisions before and after birth.

[Uterine rupture during medical termination of pregnancy or intrauterine death: A risk management study]. / Rupture utérine sur interruption médicale de grossesse ou mort fœtale in utero : une étude de gestion du risque.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze a series of uterine ruptures (UR) that occurred in the context of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) or intrauterine death (IUD) from a risk management perspective. METHODS: French retrospective descriptive observational study of all cases of UR occurring during induction for IUD or MTP, reported between 2011 and 2021 by Gynerisq. Cases were recorded on a basis of voluntary reports using targeted questionnaires. RESULTS: Between November 27, 2011, and August 22, 2021, 12 cases of UR occurring during an induction for IUD or MTP were recorded. 50 % of the patients had never given birth by cesarean section. The term of delivery varied from 17+3 days to 41+2 days. The clinical signs found were pain (n=6), ascending fetal presentation (n=5) and bleeding (n=4). All patients were managed by laparotomy, 5 were transfused. One vascular ligation and one hysterectomy were required. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of surgical history is involved in the prevention of UR. The signs of detection are pain, ascending presentation and bleeding. The speed of management and good teamwork allow a reduction of maternal complications. The findings of the morbidity and mortality reviews show that prevention and mitigation barriers can be established.

[Induced abortions for maternal indications: Retrospective study in Western Normandy between 2010 and 2019]. / Interruptions médicales de grossesse pour indications maternelles : analyse rétrospective en Normandie Occidentale (2010­2019).

INTRODUCTION: Termination of pregnancy for maternal reasons (MTOP) are authorized in France without limit of term when "the continuation of the pregnancy puts in serious danger the health of the woman". The literature on the subject is rare and we wanted to make an inventory in our region. METHODS: Retrospective observational study between 2010 and 2019 at the multidisciplinary center for prenatal diagnosis in Western Normandy. RESULTS: Thirty-one cases of MTOP were included (2.5% of all TOP). At the CHU de Caen, they represented one in 1200 births. Twenty-three percent of MTOP had a psychosocial or psychiatric indication (average term=22 SA) and 29% an obstetric indication due to severe preeclampsia (23 SA). Finally, 48% were linked to a non-obstetric somatic disorder including 46% pre-existing pathologies (average term=11 SA), most often cardiological or nephrological and 54% diagnosed during pregnancy (17 SA) dominated by neoplasias. They were more often (68%) performed in the second trimester. Vaginal births were more frequent (74% against 26% of endouterine aspirations). CONCLUSION: Strict medical contraindications to pregnancy are exceptional. Recourse to the medical termination of pregnancy within the framework of a preexisting pathology must remain rare, by systematizing of the preconception consultation.

[Feticide procedures in second and third trimesters terminations of pregnancy]. / Geste d'arrêt de vie fœtale : techniques pour les interruptions médicales de grossesse des deuxième et troisième trimestres.

Performing a feticide as part of termination of late pregnancy is recommended in many countries. Feticide avoids a live birth of a severely affected premature newborn and prevents fetal pain. There are limited data on feticide procedures since only a few countries in the world authorize late termination of pregnancy. The objective of this review was to assess the most appropriate feticide procedure based on published data during the last thirty years. Administration of an initial fetal analgesia followed by a lethal lidocaine injection through the umbilical cord, under ultrasound guidance, appears to be the most effective, safe and ethical way to perform feticide. According to the current knowledge regarding the risk of fetal pain and survival of extremely preterm infants, a feticide should be discussed as early as 20-22 weeks of gestation.

[Antenatal diagnosis and shared medical decision-making]. / Diagnostic anténatal et décision médicale partagée.

The antenatal diagnosis can sometimes result in a decision to terminate the pregnancy. It is a shared decision taken by the medical body and the couple with regard to their future child, legally recognised as a foetus throughout the pregnancy. Terminations for foetal abnormalities can only be decided on at the end of a care pathway along which the pregnant woman, the couple and caregivers must draw up a 'dignified and acceptable' future project for the unborn infant.

[Methods of induction of labor in termination of pregnancy after 22weeks: About 3procedures]. / Modalités d'induction du travail des interruptions médicales de grossesse après 22SA : à propos de 3protocoles.

OBJECTIVES: To propose a protocol for induction of labor to terminate pregnancy after 22weeks of amenorrhea allowing to decrease the duration of labor and of hospitalization but also, allowing to reduce the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death, to improve the experience of the patients and to limit the cost. METHODS: We realized a retrospective single-center study including 269patients and comparing three protocols, with and without laminaria and with various intervals mifepristone-misoprostol (14 and 38hours). The outcome measures were the misoprostol-delivery interval, the delivery time and the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death. RESULTS: We showed that the misoprostol-delivery interval and the delivery time were comparable for the three periods of our study, even after decrease of 24hours of the mifepristone-misoprostol interval and in the absence of laminaria. The misoprostol-delivery interval was between 7h30 and 8h35 between protocols (P=0.055). The delivery time was between 5:18pm and 6:48pm between protocols (P=0.252). The early administration of misoprostol allowed the patients to give birth earlier (P=0.001). Finally, we showed that the increase of the size and the number of laminarias were risk factors of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death (respectively P=0.013 and P=0.002). CONCLUSION: The absence of laminaria and the reduction of the interval mifepristone-misoprostol of 24hours do not change the time to delivery and allow to reduce the duration of hospitalization, the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death and the cost of the TOP.

[Use of misoprostol for induction of labor in case of fetal death or termination of pregnancy during second or third trimester of pregnancy: Efficiency, dosage, route of administration, side effects, use in case of uterine scar]. / Utilisation du misoprostol pour l'induction du travail en cas de MIU ou d'IMG au deuxième ou au troisième trimestre de la grossesse : efficacité, posologie, voie d'administration, effets secondaires, utilisation en cas d'utérus cicatriciel.

OBJECTIVE: Study, based on the literature, of the use of misoprostol for induction of labor in cases of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy and define the different mode of administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliographic review using the Medline and Pubmed databases and the guidelines of the international professional societies. Selection of papers in French and English. Keywords used: misoprostol, termination of pregnancy, mid and third trimester, scarred uterus, previous cesarean section, uterine rupture. RESULTS: Misoprostol is effective for induction of labor in case of second or third fetal death or termination of pregnancy. Comparing to oral route, vaginal route reduces the induction-expulsion time and the rate of patients remaining undelivered in the first 24 hours without increasing side effects. Oral route is a possible alternative if preferred by the patient. Sublingual route seems interesting but data are limited. The use of moderate doses (800-2400 µg/day) every 3 to 6 hours seems to be the best compromise between efficiency and tolerance. It is not possible to recommend a specific dosing schedule. The risk of uterine rupture in case of previous cesarean section justifies the use of minimum effective dose for these patients. In this case, it is recommended not to exceed a dose of 100 µg for each dose. The induction-birth period and doses of misoprostol required to induce labor are reduced when combined with mifepristone administered 36 to 48 hours before. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is effective and safe for induction of labor in case of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy.

[Misoprostol: off-label use in the first trimester of pregnancy (spontaneous abortion, and voluntary medical termination of pregnancy)]. / Misoprostol: utilisation hors AMM au premier trimestre de la grossesse (fausses couches spontanées, interruptions médicales et volontaires de grossesse).

OBJECTIVE: State of knowledge about misoprostol's use out of its marketing authorization during the first trimester of pregnancy, in early miscarriage or to induce abortion or medical termination of pregnancy. METHODS: French and English publications were searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library and international learned societies recommendations. RESULTS: Cervical ripening prior to surgical uterine evacuation during the first trimester of pregnancy facilitates cervical dilatation and reduces operative time and uterine retention risk. Misoprostol, mifepristone and osmotic cervical dilators are equally efficient. Concerning first trimester miscarriage, surgical uterine evacuation remains the most effective and the quickest method of treatment (EL 1). Depending on the clinical situation, medical treatment using misoprostol (missed miscarriage) or expectative attitude (incomplete miscarriage) does not increase the risk of complications, neither haemorrhagic nor infectious (EL 1). However, these alternatives generally require longer outpatient follow-up, which leads to more consultations, prolonged bleeding and not planned surgical procedures (EL 1). Concerning missed miscarriage, a vaginal dose of 800 µg of misoprostol, possibly repeated 24 to 48 hours later, seems to offer the best efficiency/tolerance ratio (EL 2). Concerning early abortion, medical method is a safe and efficient alternative to surgery (EL 2). Success rates are inversely proportional to gestational age (EL 2). According to the modalities of its marketing authorization, 400 µg of misoprostol can only be given by oral route, for less than 7 weeks of amenorrhea (WA) pregnancies and after 36 to 48 hours following 600 mg of mifepristone (EL 1). However, 200mg of mifepristone is as efficient as 600 mg (EL 1). Beyond 7WA, misoprostol buccal dissolution (sublingual or prejugal) or vaginal administration are more efficient and better tolerated than oral ingestion (EL 1). Between 7 and 9WA, the best protocol in terms of efficiency and tolerance is the association of 200mg of mifepristone followed 24 to 48 hours later by 800 µg of vaginal, sublingual or buccal misoprostol (EL 1). An additional dose of 400 µg can be given 3 hours later if necessary (EL 3). In case of buccal administration, the dose of 400 µg seems to offer the same efficiency with a better tolerance but further evaluation is needed (EL 2). Between 9 and 12WA, medical treatment is less efficient than surgery and its tolerance is lower (EL 2). However, a protocol of 200mg of mifepristone followed 36 to 48 hours later by 800 µg of vaginal or sublingual misoprostol, plus an additional 400 µg dose every 3-4 hours (until 4-5 doses maximum) seems safe and efficient (EL 5). CONCLUSION: Misoprostol use during the first trimester of pregnancy is a safe and efficient alternative to surgery as long as detailed protocols adjusted to each clinical situation are respected.

[Termination of pregnancy and palliative care in case of vascular intra-uterine growth retardation]. / Place de l'interruption médicale de grossesse et des soins palliatifs en cas de retard de croissance intra-utérin vasculaire.

OBJECTIVE: Discuss the place of medical termination of pregnancy and palliative care in case of vascular intra uterine growth retardation. METHODS: Bibliographic review using the Medline and PubMed databases and the guidelines of the international professional societies. RESULTS: The prognostic evaluation in case of IUGR is essential. It is based on several criteria, including gestational age and ultrasound (estimated fetal weight and Doppler). In some situations, postnatal prognosis may seem so pejorative that absence of active care can be decided with the parents. The choice can then be focused on a decision not to proceed with fetal extraction while Doppler or fetal heart rate abnormalities could justify it and "wait" for spontaneous fetal death or have a more active attitude of medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) with or without feticide or palliative care after birth. In some cases, IUGR is accompanied by maternal complications such as preeclampsia. The severity of the maternal disease may sometimes justify a termination of pregnancy for maternal rescue. That either maternal or fetal indication, these situations are often difficult to manage because of the difficulty in establishing fetal prognosis, particularly when the maternal condition requires urgent decision. CONCLUSION: In these difficult situations, ultrasound assessment must be conducted by a senior and the discussion should always be multidisciplinary. If TOP is requested by the parents, it must be discussed in a multidisciplinary center for prenatal diagnosis in accordance with French law. Maternal emergency is the only derogatory status.