RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ocular siderosis (OS) is a significant cause of visual loss due to retained ferrous intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB). Despite its rarity, OS can lead to severe visual impairment if not promptly diagnosed and treated. This case is notable due to the occult nature of the IOFB, which was undetected by standard imaging modalities, emphasizing the critical role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in such scenarios. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Caucasian male presented with progressive vision loss in his right eye over 20 days. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/1000 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 9 mmHg in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination revealed a small linear corneal wound and an iris defect in the right eye, along with a cataract featuring brownish deposits on the anterior capsule. The left eye was normal. Fundus examination of the right eye was hindered by media opacities. Ultrasonography showed a flat retina and choroid with no detectable IOFB. Despite a strong clinical suspicion of OS, computed tomography (CT) did not detect any IOFB. MRI subsequently identified an artifact in the inferior sectors of the right eye, indicative of a metallic IOFB. Surgical intervention involved a 23-gauge vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, IOFB removal and silicon oil (SO) tamponade resulting in a fully restored VA of 20/20 and normal IOP one month post-operation. SO was removed 2 months later. The retina remained adherent with no PVR development, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans showed a normal macula. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of considering OS in patients with unexplained vision loss and history of ocular trauma, even when initial imaging fails to detect an IOFB. MRI proved crucial in identifying the IOFB, highlighting its value in the diagnostic process. Early detection and surgical removal of IOFBs are essential to prevent irreversible visual damage. This case demonstrates that MRI should be employed when CT and ultrasonography are inconclusive, ensuring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to preserve vision.
Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Siderose , Humanos , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/cirurgia , Siderose/diagnóstico , Acuidade Visual , VitrectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We reported a rare case of indirect choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to a posterior-segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB) that was not located in the area of direct injury but in the fovea. After intravitreal injections (IVIs) of aflibercept, the choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion disappeared and vision improved. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old male patient suffered from a fast-shot metallic IOFB in his right eye. He underwent primary corneal repair, pars plana vitrectomy, IOFB removal and an IVI of antibiotics in the right eye. Two weeks later, cataract surgery was performed on the right eye for traumatic cataract after an episode of acute phacolytic glaucoma. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the right eye improved to 20/20 5 months after the first surgery. However, the vision of the right eye worsened suddenly with metamorphopsia 1 year after the first surgery. Color fundus images showed a whitish lesion with faint retinal hemorrhage and surrounding sensory elevation. Fluorescein angiography (FA) revealed a lesion with early- and late-phase severe leakage. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated a CNV lesion with surrounding subretinal fluid. The patient received an IVI of aflibercept every 8 weeks for 3 times. Finally, the BCVA of the right eye improved to 20/25. CONCLUSIONS: For rare cases of fovea-spared injury by a metallic IOFB, it is still necessary to pay close attention to the foveal microstructure to avoid possible CNV formation. Treatment with IVIs of anti-VEGF, aflibercept, as early as possible could provide good visual outcomes.
Assuntos
Corioide/patologia , Neovascularização de Coroide/etiologia , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/complicações , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Acuidade Visual , Adulto , Neovascularização de Coroide/diagnóstico , Neovascularização de Coroide/cirurgia , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/diagnóstico , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Introduction: Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) can be serious as they may result in vision-threatening ocular inflammations and even loss of the eye. Delay in presentation or treatment by more than 24 hours from the time of injury results in a poor prognosis. In penetrating wounds, microorganisms enter the eye through penetrating objects. Both bacterial and fungal organisms are responsible for causing panophthalmitis. At the ocular level, these microorganisms produce irreversible damage which includes keratitis, uveitis, hypopyon, vitreous abscesses, retinal necrosis, detachment, and, finally, panophthalmitis. Case scenarios: In this case series, we report three cases of IOFB presenting with panophthalmitis secondary to delay in seeking medical attention. In our cases, there was a delay in the presentation by more than 24 hours of trauma. All cases had panophthalmitis at the time of presentation. In two cases, the causative organism was coagulase-negative staphylococci and in one case it was staphylococcus. Initially, we planned to manage them with intravitreous, intravenous and topical antibiotics till the inflammation subsides, then IOFB removal surgeries were planned. However, in two cases, the clinical presentation worsens with scleral necrosis. Therefore, they had to undergo evisceration. In one case, the antibiotics therapy was enough without IOFB removal surgery to manage her symptoms. All cases recovered uneventfully after the interventions. Discussion/Conclusion: In developing nations, like Nepal, transportation barriers can affect a person's access to health care services. This can be clearly explained from this case series as limited transportation options in rural regions are a major factor for all patients' delayed presentation to the hospital during the time of national lockdown in the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The concerned authority must pay attention to solving such social determinants of health.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To describe the epidemiology, outcomes, and prognostic factors of intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries at a tertiary ophthalmic referral centre in Cork University Hospital, Ireland. METHODS: A retrospective review of 23 eyes with IOFB that presented to Cork University Hospital (CUH) from January 2009 to December 2019 was performed. The mechanism and characteristics of IOFB injury were all noted. This data was collated and analysed to ascertain the epidemiology of IOFB injury in CUH and to describe the prognostic factors affecting visual outcome following IOFB injury. RESULTS: There was a 100% male prevalence. The mean age was 37.4 years. The majority of IOFBs were metal in nature and were acquired by hammering, often while working and frequently in the absence of personal protective equipment (PPE). The route of entry for the IOFB was via the cornea in 70% of cases. Fifty-two percent of cases were clinically detectable and 43% of cases were only identifiable on CT (computed tomography) imaging. Eighty-seven percent of cases underwent surgery on the same day as presentation. There was no incidence (0%) of endophthalmitis. Seventeen percent of cases developed post-operative retinal detachment (RD). The mean pre-operative VA was 0.79 LogMAR (6/38 Snellen equivalent-SE) compared to a mean VA of 0.58 LogMAR (6/24 SE) following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides important epidemiological data for IOFB injuries in Ireland. It also adds some useful information to the literature in relation to prognostic factors and lens status post IOFB injury.
Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos no Olho , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes , Adulto , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/epidemiologia , Corpos Estranhos no Olho/cirurgia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/etiologia , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/cirurgia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for management of retained posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB) secondary to gunshot injury. METHODS: This is a retrospective interventional case series including consecutive patients who had PPV for retained posterior segment IOFB secondary to gunshot injury. Main outcome measures were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), long-term globe survival and detection of complications. Spearman correlation analyzed relationships between numerical data. Kruskal-Wallis test compared differences in initial BCVA and final BCVA across variables. Categorical variables were tested using Chi square or Fisher's exact test. P value is significant at 0.05. RESULTS: The study included 103 eyes of 103 patients. Mean baseline BCVA was 0.01 decimal unit (2 logMAR). Mean duration from primary repair to PPV was 3 weeks. Mean duration of post-operative follow-up was 60 months. Mean final BCVA was 0.04 decimal unit (1.3 logMAR), p 0.001. Post-operatively, BCVA improved in 58.2% of patients. Nineteen patients (18%) gained ≥2 lines of vision, and 15 patients (14.5%) achieved final BCVA of 0.4 decimal unit (logMAR 0.4). All complications were related to the original injury. These included macular scar (19%), macular pucker (6%), recurrent retinal detachment (4%), subretinal fibrosis (3%), consecutive optic atrophy (3%), and PVR (3%). Phthisis bulbi or sympathetic ophthalmia did not develop in any case. CONCLUSION: PPV for removal of IOFB caused by gunshot injury yielded long-term favorable functional outcome with excellent globe survival. Poor initial BCVA, location of IOFB in the posterior pole, associated lens injury and retinal detachment are significant adverse prognostic factors for final BCVA but not for globe survival.