Comparison of hemodialysis urea clearance using spent dialysate and Kt/Vurea equations.

INTRODUCTION: Dialysis adequacy is traditionally calculated from pre- and post-hemodialysis session serum urea concentrations and expressed as the urea reduction ratio, or Kt/Vurea. However, with increasing hemodiafiltration usage, we wished to determine whether there were any differences between standard Kt/Vurea equations and directly measured spent dialysate urea clearance. METHODS: Urea clearance was measured from collected effluent dialysate and compared with various other methods of Kt/Vurea calculation, including change in total body urea from measuring pre- and post-total body water with bioimpedance and the Watson equation, by standard Kt/V equations, and online clearance measurements using effective ionic dialysance (OLC). RESULTS: We compared urea clearance in 41 patients, 56.1% male, mean age 69.3 ± 12.6 years with 87.8% treated by hemodiafiltration. Reduction in total body urea was greater when estimating changes in total body urea, compared to measured dialysate losses of 58.4% (48.5-67.6) vs 71.6% (62.1-78), p < 0.01. Sessional urea clearance (Kt/Vurea) was greater using the online Solute-Solver program compared to OLC, median 1.45(1.13-1.75) vs 1.2 (0.93-1.4), and 2nd generation Kt/V equations 1.3 (1.02-1.66), p < 0.01, but not different from estimated total body urea clearance 1.36 (1.15-1.73) and dialysate clearance 1.36 (1.07-1.76). The mean bias compared to the Solute-Solver program was greatest with OLC (-0.25), compared to second-generation equations (-0.02), estimated total body clearance (-0.02) and measured dialysate clearance (-0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the result from equations estimating urea clearance indirectly from pre- and postblood samples from hemo- and hemodiafiltration treatments was highly correlated with direct measurements of dialysate urea clearance.

Comparison of the Watson formula and bioimpedance spectroscopy for measuring body volume and calculating kt/V in patients with peritoneal dialysis.

CONCLUSION: There were significant differences between Vwat and Vbis and between Kt/Vwat and Kt/Vbis. Kt/Vwat may underestimate small-solute dialysis adequacy in most cases. Kt/Vbis instead of Kt/Vwat could be accounted for in creating individualized dialysis prescriptions if the patient has no obvious clinical symptoms.

The effect of changing dialysate bicarbonate concentration on serum bicarbonate, body weight and normalized nitrogen appearance rate.

INTRODUCTION: Most hemodialysis machines deliver a fixed bicarbonate concentration. Higher concentrations may improve acidosis, but risk post-hemodialysis alkalosis, whereas lower concentrations potentially increase acidosis but reduce alkalosis. We reviewed the effects of lowering dialysate bicarbonate. METHODS: We reviewed peri-dialysis chemistries in patients switching to a lower bicarbonate dialysate at 4 time points over 19 months. RESULTS: We studied 126 patients, mean age 63.7 ± 16.3 years, 57.9% males. Post-hemodialysis alkalosis fell from 1.6 to 0.3% sessions, but pre-hemodialysis acidosis increased from 11.9 to 23.8% sessions (p = 0.005) reducing dialysate bicarbonate from 32 to 28 mmol/L. After 3 months, pre-hemodialysis serum bicarbonate fell (21.1 ± 2.3 to 19.8 ± 2.2 mmol/L), and post-hemodialysis (24.9 ± 2.1 to 22.5 ± 2.0 mmol/L, p < 0.001) with a fall in pre-hemodialysis weight from 74.6 ± 20.7 to 71.7 ± 18.2 kg, normalized protein nitrogen accumulation rate 0.8 ± 0.28 to 0.77 ± 0.2 g/kg/day, p < 0.05, and serum albumin 39.7 ± 4.2 to 37.7 ± 4.9 g/L, p < 0.001. Thereafter, apart from pre- and post-hemodialysis serum bicarbonate, weight and normalized protein nitrogen accumulation stabilized, although albumin remained lower (37.6 ± 4.0 g/L, p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic analysis, serum bicarbonate increased more with lower pre-hemodialysis bicarbonate standardized coefficient ß 0.5 (95% confidence interval -0.6 to -0.42), increased normalized protein nitrogen accumulation ß 0.2 (0.96 to 2.38), p < 0.001, and session time ß 0.09, (0.47 to 5.98), p < 0.022, and less with lower dialysate bicarbonate 0.0-0.23 (-1.54 to -0.74), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Increases in SE-Bic with hemodialysis, depend on the bicarbonate gradient, session time and nPNA. Lower D-Bic reduces post-hemodialysis alkalosis but increases pre-hemodialysis acidosis and may initially have adverse effects on weight and normalized protein nitrogen accumulation.

Kt/V or Bicarbonate: What Is More Important for Growth in Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

INTRODUCTION: Growth retardation is a common problem in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. It is unknown if the growth of children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be augmented by more dialysis. METHODS: We studied the effect of various peritoneal adequacy parameters on delta height standard deviation scores (SDSs) and growth velocity z-scores in 53 children (27 males) on PD, who underwent 2 longitudinal adequacy tests at 9-month intervals. None of the patients were on growth hormone. Intraperitoneal pressure and standard KDOQI guidelines were compared to the outcome measures delta height SDS and height velocity z-scores, using univariate and multivariate tests. RESULTS: At the time of the second PD adequacy test, their mean age was 9.2 ± 5.3 years; mean fill volume was 961 ± 254 mL/m2; and median total infused dialysate volume was 5.26 L/m2/day (range 2.03-15.32 L). The median total weekly Kt/V was 3.79 (range 0.9-9.5), and the median total creatinine clearance was 56.6 (range 7.6-133.48) L/week, higher than previous pediatric studies. The delta height SDS was a median of -0.12 (range -2 to +3.95)/year. The mean height velocity z-score was -1.6 ± 4.0. The only relationships discovered were between the delta height SDS and age, bicarbonate, and intraperitoneal pressure, but not for Kt/V or creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of normalization of bicarbonate concentrations to improve height z-score.

Individualized hemodialysis: Is similar hemodialysis adequacy possible using less water?

Background and aim: There are over 60,000 hemodialysis (HD) patients in Türkiye, and the number of patients is increasing yearly. Dialysate flow rate (Qd) is a factor in HD adequacy. Approximately 150 L of water are consumed per session to prepare the dialysate. We aimed to investigate whether HD effectiveness can be achieved at a low Qd in different patient groups for the purpose of saving water. Materials and methods: This prospective study included 81 HD patients from 2 centers. The patients underwent an aggregate total of 486 HD sessions, including 3 sessions at a Qd of 500 mL/min and 3 sessions at a Qd of 300 mL/min for each patient. We used online Kt/V readings recorded at the end of each dialysis session to compare the effectiveness of these 2 types of HD session performed at a different Qd. Results: The online Kt/V readings were similar between the standard (500) and low (300) Qd HD (1.51 ± 0.41 and 1.49 ± 0.44, respectively, p = 0.069). In the subgroup analyses, men had higher online Kt/V values at the standard Qd compared to the low Qd (1.35 ± 0.30 and 1.30 ± 0.32, respectively, p = 0.019), but the Kt/V values were not different for women. While the low Qd did not reduce online Kt/V in patients using small surface area dialysis membranes (1.75 ± 0.35 for 300 Qd and 1.75 ± 0.32 for 500 Qd, p = 0.931), it was associated with reduced online Kt/V in patients using large surface area dialysis membranes (1.12 ± 0.25 for 300 Qd and 1.17 ± 0.24 for 500 Qd, p = 0.006). The low Qd did not result in differences in online Kt/V among low-weight patients. However, online Kt/V values were better with the standard Qd in patients weighing 65 kg and above. Conclusion: In our study, dialysis adequacy at a reduced dialysate flow was not inferior for women, patients with low body weight, or patients using small surface area membranes. Individualized HD at a reduced Qd of 300 mL/min in eligible patients can save 48 L of water per HD session and an average of 7500 L of water per year.

Impact of First Wave COVID-19 Crisis on Dialysis Parameters of COVID-Free Hemodialysis Patients: A NephoCare France Longitudinal Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients are at high risk of severe COVID-19 with a high risk of death. The organization of dialysis units to treat chronic HD patients with COVID-19 is demanding to prevent virus transmission both in COVID-free patients and the staff. These constraints may have an impact on the dialysis delivery to COVID-free HD patients. We report our experience in French NephroCare (NC) centers. METHODS: We report retrospectively dialysis and nutritional indicators among COVID-free prevalent chronic HD patients' cohort treated in French NC units from February 2020 to April 2020. The COVID-free HD patients were split into 2 subgroups for the analysis, Paris region and other regions because the incidence of COVID-19 was different according to the French regions. RESULTS: The Paris region was the most impacted by COVID-19 with 73% of all the contaminations that occurred in French NC units (n = 118). The dialysis frequency was not reduced all over the NC regions. 2,110 COVID-free HD patients were split into 2 subgroups including Paris region (748 patients) and other regions (1,362 patients). The weekly treatment time decreased significantly in Paris region from February to April (723-696 min [p < 0.00001]) but remained stable in the other regions. The processed blood volume, KT/V, and convective volume declined significantly in the Paris region subgroup but not in other regions. The 3-month weight loss significantly increased in the whole group of patients whatever the region from 0.0 to 0.2% between February 2020 and April 2020 (p < 0.00001). Ultrafiltration rate (UFR) and the normalized proteic catabolic rate remained stable all along the period. The stepwise regression analysis identified February serum albumin level and April UFR as negatively associated with 3-month weight loss. CONCLUSION: HD delivery to COVID-free HD patients was negatively impacted in the Paris region because of the strong constraints on units' organization related to the treatment of COVID-19+ HD patients and with a higher proportion of limited care/self-care units with less staff resources. The 3-month weight loss increase may be related to the suppression of intradialytic snack that impacted mostly the more malnourished patients or patients with lower interdialytic weight gain. These consequences of the COVID-19 crisis on COVID-free HD patients must be recognized and corrected to prevent further deleterious effects on patients' outcomes.

What Total Body Water Measurement Should Be Used for Prescribing the Dialysis Dose in Low-Flow Home Daily Dialysis?

INTRODUCTION: In low-flow home daily dialysis (HDD), the dialysis dose is evaluated from the total body water (TBW). TBW can be estimated by anthropometric methods or bioimpedance spectroscopy. METHODS: A multicentric cross-sectional study of patients in HDD for >3 months was conducted to assess the correlation and the difference between the anthropometric estimate of TBW (Watson-TBW) and the bioimpedance estimate (BIS-TBW) and to analyse the impact on the dialysate volume prescribed. RESULTS: Forty patients from 10 centres were included. The median BIS-TBW and Watson-TBW were 35.1 (29.1-41.4 L) and 36.9 (32-42.4 L), respectively. The 2 methods had a good correlation (r = 0.87, p < 0.05). However, Bland-Altman analysis showed an overestimation of TBW with Watson's formula, with a bias of 2.77 L. For 4, 5, or 6 sessions per week, the use of Watson-TBW increases the dialysate prescription per week by 100 L, 45 L, or 10 L, respectively, over our entire cohort. There is no increase in the volume of dialysate prescribed with the 7 sessions per week schedule. CONCLUSION: BIS-TBW and Watson-TBW estimation have a good correlation; however, Watson's equation overestimates TBW. This overestimation is negligible for a prescription frequency of >5 sessions per week.

Kt/V reach rate is associated with clinical outcome in incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The urea clearance index (Kt/V) is an important index for predicting the clinical outcome of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, but it changes with time depending on the clinical condition. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Kt/V reach rate (defined as the percentage of Kt/V measurements that reached ≥ 1.70) and clinical outcome in incident PD patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 210 patients were enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 1 January 2013 to 31 October 2019. The target Kt/V reach rate in the first year was applied as the predictor variable. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn to evaluate differences in prognosis. The association between Kt/V reach rate and the composite clinical outcome (death or transfer to hemodialysis) was tested by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The dialysis adequacy group (Kt/V reach rate 3/3 times) and the dialysis intermittent adequacy group (1/3 or 2/3 times) had significantly better clinical outcomes than the dialysis inadequacy group (0/3 times). There was no difference in clinical outcome between the lower-rate group (reach rate 1/3 times) and the higher-rate group (2/3 times). Compared with the dialysis inadequacy group, the dialysis intermittent adequacy group and dialysis adequacy group had significantly lower risks of the composite outcome (HR 0.487, 95% CI 0.244-0.971, p = 0.041; HR 0.150, 95% CI 0.043-0.520, p = 0.003) in the fully adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: Higher Kt/V reach rates are associated with a better prognosis in incident PD patients.

Comparison between different methods of calculating Kt/V as the marker of adequacy of dialysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare different methods of calculating adequacy of hemodialysis in terms of Kt/V. METHODS: This was an observational, quantitative study undertaken after the approval of Internal Review Board at the Hemodialysis Unit of Nephrology department, Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1st December 2018 to 30th June 2019. Sixty hemodynamically stable patients of end stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis for more than three months with age 18 to 70 years were included in the study by convenience non probability sampling. Critically ill patients with multiple co-morbidities like sepsis (i.e. total leukocyte count >11000 or <4000 x 109/L), ischemic heart disease, pace- makers, malignancies, cirrhosis etc. were excluded. Patients who were not adherent to dialysis prescription or hemodynamically unstable were also excluded. One way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation were used to find correlation between three methods of measuring Kt/V. RESULTS: Mean ultrafiltration was 2.1+ 0.76 liter/session. Pre dialysis weight was 64.7 +14.7 kgs, mean post dialysis weight was 62.5 + 14.7 kgs. For every patient blood flow rate was 300 ml/m and dialysis flow rate was 500 ml/min. The mean values of Kt/V measured by Daugirdas formula was 1.35 ± 0.33, mean online clearance monitoring (OCM) value was 1.17 ± 0.29 and by normogram was 1.36 ± 0.33. There was positive significant correlation between values of Daugirdas formula, Normogram and online clearance monitoring (OCM) i.e. r = 0.897 (p-value < 0.001) measured by Pearson's correlation and one way-ANOVA. CONCLUSION: Online clearance monitoring can be used for measuring adequacy of hemodialysis, but OCM slightly underestimates Kt/V as compared to Daugirdas formula and Normogram.

Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?

For three-weekly hemodialysis, a single-pool Kt/V target of at least 1.4 together with a minimal dialysis dose Kt at 45 L for men and 40 L for women per each session is currently recommended. Fully automatic online calculation of Kt and Kt/V from conductivity or UV-absorbance measurements in the dialysate is standardly implemented on some hemodialysis monitors and makes it possible to estimate the dialysis dose without the need for blood or dialysate samples. Monitoring the UV-absorbance of the spent dialysate is the most direct method for estimating Kt/V as it does not require an estimate of V. Calculation of ionic dialysance from conductivity measurements is the most direct method for estimating Kt and BSA-scaled dialysis dose. Both ionic dialysance monitoring and UV-absorbance monitoring may help detect a change in urea clearance occurring during the session, but this change must be interpreted differently depending on the monitoring being considered. An abrupt decrease in urea clearance results in a decrease in ionic dialysance but, paradoxically, a sudden increase in estimated urea clearance provided by dialysate UV-absorbance monitoring. Healthcare teams who monitor both ionic dialysance and UV-absorbance in their hemodialysis units must be clearly informed of this difficulty.

Hemodialysis (HD) dose and ultrafiltration rate are associated with survival in pediatric and adolescent patients on chronic HD-a large observational study with follow-up to young adult age.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) dose targets and ultrafiltration rate (UFR) limits for pediatric patients on chronic HD are not known and are derived from adults (spKt/V>1.4 and <13 ml/kg/h). We aimed to characterize how delivered HD dose and UFR are associated with survival in a large cohort of patients who started HD in childhood. METHODS: Retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients <30 years, on chronic HD since childhood (<19 years), having received thrice-weekly HD 2004-2016 in outpatient DaVita centers. OUTCOME: Survival while remaining on HD. PREDICTORS: (I) primary analysis: mean delivered dialysis dose stratified as spKt/V ≤1.4/1.4-1.6/>1.6 (Kaplan-Meier analysis), (II) secondary analyses: UFR and alternative dialysis adequacy measures [eKt/V, body-surface normalized Kt/BSA] on continuous scale (Weibull regression model). RESULTS: A total of 1780 patients were included (age at the start of HD: 0-12y: n=321, >12-18y: n=1459; median spKt/V=1.55, eKt/V=1.31, Kt/BSA=31.2 L/m2, UFR=10.6 mL/kg/h). (I) spKt/V<1.4 was associated with lower survival compared to spKt/V>1.4-1.6 (P<0.001, log-rank test), and spKt/V>1.6 (P<0.001), with 10-year survival of 69.3% (59.4-80.9%) versus 83.0% (76.8-89.8%) and 84.0% (79.6-88.5%), respectively. (II) Kt/BSA was a better predictor of survival than spKt/V or eKt/V. UFR was additionally associated with survival (P<0.001), with increased mortality <10/>18 mL/kg/h. Associations did not alter significantly following adjustment for demographic characteristics (age, etiology of kidney disease, and ethnicity). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest usefulness of targeting Kt/BSA>30 L/m2 for best long-term outcomes, corresponding to spKt/V>1.4 (>12 years) and >1.6 (<12 years). In contrast to adults, higher UFR of 10-18 ml/kg/h was not associated with greater mortality in this population.

Changes in practice patterns in Japan from before to after JSDT 2013 guidelines on hemodialysis prescriptions: results from the JDOPPS.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) published in 2013 inaugural hemodialysis (HD) guidelines. Specific targets include 1.4 for single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V) with a minimum dose of 1.2, minimum dialysis session length of 4 hours, minimum blood flow rate (BFR) of 200 mL/min, fluid removal rate no more than 15 mL/kg/hr, and hemodiafiltration (HDF) therapy for certain identified symptoms. We evaluated the effect of these guidelines on actual practice in the years spanning 2005 - 2018. METHODS: Analyses were carried out to describe trends in the above HD prescription practices from December 2005 to April 2013 (before guideline publication) to August 2018 based on prevalent patient cross-sections from approximately 60 randomly selected HD facilities participating in the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. RESULTS: From April 2006 to August 2017 continual rises occurred in mean spKt/V (from 1.35 to 1.49), and percent of patients having spKt/V>1.2 (71% to 85%). Mean BFR increased with time from 198.3 mL/min (April 2006) to 218.4 mL/min (August 2017) , along with percent of patients with BFR >200 ml/min (65% to 85%). HDF use increased slightly from 6% (April 2006 and August 2009) to 8% by April 2013, but increased greatly thereafter to 23% by August 2017. In contrast, mean HD treatment time showed little change from 2006-2017, whereas mean UFR declined from 11.3 in 2006 to 8.4 mL/Kg/hour in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: From 2006 - 2018 Japanese HD patients experienced marked improvement in reaching the spKt/V target specified by the 2013 JSDT guidelines. This may have been due to moderate increase in mean BFR even though mean HD session length did not change much. In addition, HDF use increased dramatically in this time period. Other HD delivery changes during this time, such as increased use of super high flux dialyzers, also merit study. While we cannot definitively conclude a causal relationship between the publication of the guidelines and the subsequent practice changes in Japan, those changes moved practice closer to the recommendations of the guidelines.

Routine Kt/V and Normalized Protein Nitrogen Appearance Rate Determined From Conductivity Access Clearance With Infrequent Postdialysis Serum Urea Nitrogen Measurements.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Conventional monitoring of hemodialysis dose is implemented using urea kinetic modeling based on single-pool Kt/V, which requires both pre- and postdialysis serum urea nitrogen (SUN) measurements. We compared this conventional approach to one in which Kt/V is calculated using conductivity clearance, thereby reducing the need for regular postdialysis SUN measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative study of 2 diagnostic tests. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 2 years for whom both urea reduction ratio (URR) and average conductivity clearance (Kecn) were measured. TESTS COMPARED: During the initial 8 months (baseline interval), average Kecn and URR were used to calculate a median patient-specific, modeled, calibration solute distribution volume (Vcal). During months 9 to 16 (period 1) and 17 to 24 (period 2), Kt/V was conventionally computed using URR and also by a new method using Vcal and Kecn without postdialysis SUN values. We examined the percentage error between these 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. OUTCOMES: Concordance between the 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. RESULTS: Among 1,093 patients, mean individual-level median single-pool Kt/V values derived using the conventional method during the baseline interval, period 1, and period 2 were 1.62±0.24 (SD), 1.66±0.24, and 1.67±0.24, respectively. During periods 1 and 2, patient-level median Kt/V values derived using Kecn were 1.64±0.24 and 1.65±0.24, respectively. Percent differences between patient-level median values of Kt/V (conductivity minus conventional URR methods) were-0.63%±7.7% and-0.75%±8.4% for periods 1 and 2. Normalized protein nitrogen appearance were comparable between the 2 methods. LIMITATIONS: Data were collected over 2 years. Study was limited to in-center hemodialysis patients dialyzed 3 times per week. Dialysis session length was not adjusted for treatment interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: A new method of calculating Kt/V based on Kecn that requires fewer postdialysis SUN measurements provided diagnostic data comparable to those from conventional use of URR and has the potential to avoid errors related to postdialysis blood sampling and measurement.

Online hemodiafilteration use in children: a single center experience with a twist.

BACKGROUND: Haemodiafilteration (HDF) is a promising new modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT). It is an improvement in the quality of hemodialysis (HD) and thus in the quality of patients'lives. The main obstacle to using HDF is the cost, especially in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of incorporating HDF with different regimens in the treatment of children with end stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: Thirty-four children with ESRD on regular HD in Pediatric Dialysis Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University were followed up in 2 phases: initial phase (all patients: HD thrice weekly for 3 months) and second phase, patients were randomized into 2 groups, HDF group and HD group, the former was subdivided into once and twice weekly HDF subgroups. Evaluation using history, clinical and laboratory parameters at 0, 3, 9 and 18 months was carried out. RESULTS: On short term, we found that the HDF group was significantly superior to HD group regarding all clinical and laboratory parameters. Also, twice HDF subgroup was significantly superior to once HDF subgroup. This was confirmed on long term follow up, but the once HDF proved comparable to twice subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating online hemodiafilteration (OL-HDF) in the RRT of children was beneficial in most of the clinical and laboratory parameters measured. It's not all or non; OL-HDF, even once a week, can improve outcomes of HD without significantly affecting the cost.

High dose haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration parameters and the relationship with advanced vascular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification (VC) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis (MHD). However, evidence is still insufficient about the association between dialysis parameters and VC. Thus, this study was to evaluate association of dialysis parameters with VC. METHODS: We enrolled 297 ESRD patients undergoing MHD at six distinct centers in Korea. Study participants were categorized into 3 groups by the scoring system of abdominal aortic calcification based on lateral lumbar radiography (no VC group: 0, mild VC group: 1-7 and advanced VC group: 8-24). We compared the features of dialysis parameters according to the severity of VC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for mild and advanced VC in each haemodialysis parameter (adjusted OR [95% CI]). RESULTS: Pooled Kt/V (spKt/V), equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), standard Kt/V (stdKt/V) and the proportion of haemodiafiltration were increased along with the severity of VC. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that advanced VC was positively associated with spKt/V (5.27 [1.51-18.41]), eKt/V (6.16 [1.45-26.10]), stdKt/V (10.67 [1.74-65.52]) and haemodiafiltration (3.27 [1.74 to 6.16]). CONCLUSION: High dose dialysis and haemodiafiltration were significantly associated with advanced VC.

Rationale and Strategies for Preserving Residual Kidney Function in Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Residual kidney function (RKF) conveys a survival benefit among dialysis patients, but the mechanism remains unclear. Improved volume control, clearance of protein-bound and middle molecules, reduced inflammation and preserved erythropoietin and vitamin D production are among the proposed mechanisms. Preservation of RKF requires techniques to measure it accurately to be able to uncover factors that accelerate its loss and interventions that preserve it and ultimately to individualize therapy. The average of renal creatinine and urea clearance provides a superior estimate of RKF in dialysis patients, when compared with daily urine volume. However, both involve the difficult task of obtaining an accurate 24-h urine sample. SUMMARY: In this article, we first review the definition and measurement of RKF, including newly proposed markers such as serum levels of beta2-microglobulin, cystatin C and beta-trace protein. We then discuss the predictors of RKF loss in new dialysis patients. We review several strategies to preserve RKF such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, incremental dialysis, use of biocompatible membranes and ultrapure dialysate in hemodialysis (HD) patients, and use of biocompatible solutions in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Despite their generally adverse effects on renal function, aminoglycoside antibiotics have not been shown to have adverse effects on RKF in well-hydrated patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Presently, the roles of better blood pressure control, diuretic usage, diet, and dialysis modality on RKF remain to be clearly established. Key Messages: RKF is an important and favorable prognostic indicator of reduced morbidity, mortality, and higher quality of life in both PD an HD patients. Further investigation is warranted to uncover factors that protect or impair RKF. This should lead to improved quality of life and prolonged lifespan in patients with ESRD and cost-reduction through patient centeredness, individualized therapy, and precision medicine approaches.

A Fast Decline of Residual Renal Function in the First Year is a Predictor for Early Withdrawal from Peritoneal Dialysis in Non-Diabetic Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little is known about the relationship between residual renal function (RRF) decline in early period and survival in non-diabetic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: A total of 567 non-diabetic patients who began PD from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2013 was investigated. The rate of RRF decline was determined by the "slope of the trend equation" of serial RRFs. A composite end-point of all-cause mortality and conversion to hemodialysis (HD) was used, survival status was censored on June 30, 2016. RESULTS: The median of "the slope of RRF decline equation" was 0.308 (0.001-2.111) ml/min/1.73 m2/ month. In the median follow-up period of 43 months (range 12 to 120 months), 65 (11.5%) patients died, 90 (15.9%) patients converted to HD and 171 (30.2%) patients received kidney transplantation. Multivariate linear regression showed male, high baseline RRF, high baseline peritoneal Kt/V urea, low serum albumin and low uric acid were independently associated with the rate of RRF decline in the first year of PD. Multivariate Cox models revealed that RRF decline in the first year remained a predictor for composite end-point (HR, 2.74, 95% CI, 1.53 to 4.90, P=0.001). The patients were divided into high RRF decline group (> 0.308ml/ min/1.73m2/month) and low RRF decline group (≤0.308 ml/min/1.73m2/month). In the first three years of PD, the rate of end-point events was higher in high RRF decline group (23.2%) than that in low RRF decline group (11.0%) (P< 0.001). There were 189 patients in low RRF decline group and 171 patients in high RRF decline group maintaining PD for more than 3 years, in a median follow-up of 54 months (range 37 to 120 months), the survival rate was 30.9% in high RRF decline group and 46.4% in low RRF decline group (P=0.883). In high RRF decline group, there were 92 patients reaching composited end-point and 112 patients maintaining PD; multivariate Cox model showed high peritoneal Kt/V urea after 1 year of PD and high albumin level were protective factors (HR, 0.29, 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.61, P= 0.001; HR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.90-0.99, P=0.022, respectively), while fast RRF decline remained risk factor for composite end-point (HR, 3.28, 95% CI,1.48-7.31, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: A faster RRF decline in the first year was a predictor for all-cause mortality and conversion to HD in non-diabetic PD patients, mainly in the first three year. For patients with faster RRF decline, increasing PD dose was effective to improve survival.

Calculating Standard Kt/V during Hemodialysis Based on Urea Mass Removed.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We derived a novel equation for calculating weekly urea standard Kt/V (stdKt/V) during hemodialysis (HD) based on urea mass removed, comparable to the approach during peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: Theoretical consideration of urea mass balance during HD led to the following equation for stdKt/V, namely, stdKt/V = N × (URR + UFV/V), where N is the number of treatments per week, URR is urea reduction ratio per treatment, UFV is ultrafiltration volume per treatment, and V is postdialysis urea distribution volume. URR required corrections for postdialysis rebound and intradialytic urea generation. We compared the accuracy of this approach with previous equations for stdKt/V by numerical simulations using a 2-compartment model of urea kinetics for thrice-weekly and more frequent HD prescriptions. RESULTS: The proposed equation based on urea mass removed predicted values of stdKt/V that are equivalent to those calculated by previous equations for stdKt/V. CONCLUSION: This work provides a novel approach for calculating stdKt/V during HD and strengthens the theoretical understanding of stdKt/V.

End-Stage Kidney Patients Require Hemodialysis Therapy Full Start.

Recently the concept that prescription of chronic hemodialysis (HD) start should be tailored based on residual renal function (RRF) and urine output (UO) has been revived from the past and called infrequent or incremental dialysis. It mainly consists in prescribing 1 or 2 HD sessions per week instead of what has become the standard thrice-weekly HD. It is both surprising and fascinating that almost 60 years after the first end-stage kidney disease patient was treated by Scribner et al. [Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1960; 6: 114-122], the nephrology community still questions the best way to start HD therapy. This comforting process is the result of pieces of evidence accumulated with time such as that RRF is associated with better outcomes that starting HD therapy favors the loss of RRF and/or UO and also results in a high rate of deaths in the first weeks of HD therapy. Through this review, we support the idea that when the decision to start HD therapy is made, ideally with the full collaboration of the patient, it is necessary to be efficient to alleviate uremic symptoms, to correct the fluid overload and to allow a full recovery from the uremic state associated with the late stages of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease.

Urea reduction ratio may be a simpler approach for measurement of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is conventionally based upon urea kinetic models for calculation of single pool Kt/Vurea (Kt/V), with 1.2 accepted as minimum adequate clearance for thrice weekly IHD. In the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study, adequacy of IHD in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) was assessed using Kt/V. However, equations for Kt/V require volume of distribution of urea, which is highly variable in AKI. Therefore, simpler methods are needed to assess adequacy of IHD in AKI. We assessed correlation of urea reduction ratio (URR) with Kt/V and determined URR thresholds corresponding to Kt/V values to determine if URR could be a simpler means to assess the delivered dose of IHD. METHODS: Using patients who received IHD for 2.5-6 h and with pre-dialysis BUN ≥20 mg/dL, we plotted URR against Kt/V. We determined URR thresholds (0.60 to 0.75) corresponding to Kt/V ≥ 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for increasing URR values for each level of Kt/V to identify the corresponding thresholds of URR. RESULTS: There was strong correlation between URR and Kt/V. ROC curves comparing URR with Kt/V ≥ 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 had area under the curves (AUC) of 0.99. Sensitivity and specificity of URR ≥0.67 for corresponding values of Kt/V ≥ 1.2 were 0.769 (95% CI: 0.745 to 0.793) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997 to 1.000), respectively and the sensitivity and specificity of URR ≥0.67 for corresponding values of Kt/V ≥ 1.4 were 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 1.000) and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.771 to 0.811), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting a URR ≥0.67 provides a simplified means of assessing adequacy of IHD in patients with AKI. Use of URR will enhance ability to assess delivery of small solute clearance and improve adherence with clinical practice guidelines in AKI.