RESUMO
PURPOSE: In combined anterior-posterior adult spinal deformity surgery, the optimal combination of anterior and posterior procedures remains unclear. We aimed to demonstrate the radiological outcomes and relevant factors in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for lumbosacral fractional curve (FC) correction combined with open posterior surgery in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). METHODS: This study involved 42 consecutive patients with DLS who had a major curve (MC) ≥ 20° and an FC (L4 to S1) ≥ 10°, and underwent a combined anterior-posterior surgery Changes in the MC, FC, coronal balance distance, type of coronal imbalance, coronal/sagittal disc angle at L4-5 and L5-S1, L4 and L5 tilt, and sagittal parameters were examined. The associations between FC correction and demographic, surgical, and radiological factors were analysed. RESULTS: The FC decreased from 16.9 ± 7.3° preoperatively to 6.6 ± 4.4° at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). The coronal disc angle at L4-5 and L5-S1 were, respectively, 6.8 ± 2.2° and 6.0 ± 4.1° preoperatively and decreased to 2.2 ± 2.1 and 1.2 ± 1.3° at the last follow-up (both P < 0.001). The changes in FC were greater in uppermost instrumented level > T10 (P < 0.001), and associated with the preoperative FC (r = 0.820, P < 0.001), L4 tilt (r = 0.434, P = 0.007), and L5 tilt (r = 0.462, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: OLIF at the FC combined with open posterior surgery is an effective combined anterior-posterior correction strategy in DLS.
Assuntos
Escoliose , Adulto , Humanos , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Região LombossacralRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and evaluate the relationship between postoperative outcomes and LSTV when the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is fixed at L3. METHODS: The study included 61 patients with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent fusion surgery of L3 as the LIV who were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: LSTV + and LSTV-. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data, including L4 tilt and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angle, were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS: LSTV was observed in 15 patients (24.5%). The L4 tilt was not significantly different between the two groups preoperatively (P = 0.54); however, it was significantly greater in the LSTV group postoperatively (2 weeks: LSTV + = 11.7 ± 3.1, LSTV - = 8.8 ± 3.2, P = 0.013; 2 years: LSTV + = 11.5 ± 3.5, LSTV - = 7.9 ± 4.1, P = 0.006; 5 years: LSTV + = 9.8 ± 3.1, LSTV - = 7.3 ± 4.5, P= 0.042). The postoperative TL/L curve was greater in the LSTV + group, with significant differences at 2 weeks and 2 years postoperatively (preoperative: LSTV + = 53.5 ± 11.2, LSTV - = 51.7 ± 10.3,P = 0.675; 2 weeks: LSTV + = 16.1 ± 5.0, LSTV- = 12.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.027; 2 years: LSTV + = 21.7 ± 5.9, LSTV - = 17.6 ± 5.9, P = 0.035; 5 years: LSTV + = 18.7 ± 5.8, LSTV - = 17.0 ± 6.1, P = 0.205). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LSTV in Lenke 5C AIS patients was 24.5%. Lenke 5C AIS patients with LSTV with the LIV at L3 had a significantly greater postoperative L4 tilt than those without LSTV and retained the TL/L curve.
Assuntos
Cifose , Anormalidades Musculoesqueléticas , Escoliose , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Adolescente , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis is a serious clinical condition that affects activities of daily living. This study aimed to investigate the age-related progression of nonoperative degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis, to clarify its final state in elderly people, and to identify factors associated with its progression. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study included 115 nonoperative cases (mean age at first consultation, 70.9 years; range, 50-89 years). All were followed up for >6 years. The analysis included changes between initial and latest measurements in the coronal parameters (Cobb angle, L4 tilt angle, intervertebral angle, lateral spondylolisthesis, and C7-central sacral vertical line) and sagittal parameters (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis, and vertebral wedging rate). Factors in scoliosis progression were investigated by analyzing the correlations between the initial parameter values and the increase in Cobb angle. RESULTS: Changes in the coronal parameters increased with age from 50s to 70s but decreased significantly in those aged 80s. Sagittal parameters increased by the age group, accelerating in those aged 80s, with the progression of vertebral wedging. In patients aged 50s-70s, the increase in Cobb angle correlated significantly with the initial Cobb angle, L4 tilt angle, and L4/L5 intervertebral angle. However, in the cases without initial scoliosis, the increase in Cobb angle correlated significantly only with the L4 tilt angle. There were no significant differences in any parameter according to the use of a trunk brace or medication for osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: L4 tilt angle is an important factor in the progression of degenerative scoliosis. The progression of scoliosis gradually ends after the age of 80 years with the decreasing variation of L4 tilt angle, whereas kyphosis accelerates with aging, especially in those aged >80 years, with the progression of vertebral wedging.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the effects of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt and rotation on uninstrumented lumbar segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Because the intraoperative LIV tilt from the inferior endplate of the LIV to the superior sacral endplate is not stable after surgery, the authors measured the LIV angle of the instrumented thoracic spine as the LIV angle of the construct. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the LIV angle of the construct and the effects of LIV rotation on the postoperative uninstrumented lumbar curve and L4 tilt in patients with thoracic AIS. METHODS: A retrospective correlation and multivariate analysis of a prospectively collected, consecutive, nonrandomized series of patients at a single institution was undertaken. Eighty consecutive patients with Lenke type 1 or type 2 AIS treated with posterior correction and fusion were included. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographic measurements were the outcome measures for this study. Outcome variables were postoperative uninstrumented lumbar segments (LIV tilt, LIV translation, uninstrumented lumbar curve, thoracolumbar/lumbar [TL/L] apical vertebral translation [AVT], and L4 tilt). The LIV angle of the construct was measured from the orthogonal line drawn from the upper instrumented vertebra to the LIV. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was conducted between outcome variables and patient demographics/radiographic measurements. There were no study-specific biases related to conflicts of interest. RESULTS: Predictor variables for postoperative uninstrumented lumbar curve were the postoperative LIV angle of the construct, number of uninstrumented lumbar segments, and flexibility of TL/L curve. Specifically, a lower postoperative uninstrumented lumbar curve was predicted by a lower absolute value of the postoperative LIV angle of the construct (p < 0.0001). Predictor variables for postoperative L4 tilt were postoperative LIV rotation, preoperative L4 tilt, and preoperative uninstrumented lumbar curve. Specifically, a lower postoperative L4 tilt was predicted by a lower absolute value of postoperative LIV rotation (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The LIV angle of the construct significantly affected the LIV tilt, uninstrumented lumbar curve, and TL/L AVT. LIV rotation significantly affected the LIV translation and L4 tilt.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To determine factors influencing the ability to achieve coronal balance following spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Following institutional ethics approval, the radiographs of 47 patients treated for spinal deformity surgery with long fusions to the pelvis, were retrospectively reviewed. The postoperative measurements included coronal balance, L4 tilt, and L5 tilt, levels fused, apical vertebral translation and maximum Cobb angle. L4 and L5 tilt angles were measured between the superior endplate and the horizontal. Sagittal parameters including thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and sagittal vertical axis were recorded. Coronal balance was defined as the distance between the central sacral line and the mid body of C7 being ≤40 mm. Surgical factors, including levels fused, use of iliac fixation with and without connectors, use of S2A1 screws, interbody devices, and osteotomies. Statistical tests were performed to determine factors that contribute to postoperative coronal imbalance. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients reviewed, 32 were balanced after surgery and 14 were imbalanced. Coronal balance was 1.30 cm from center in the balanced group compared to 4.83 cm in the imbalanced group (P < .01). Both L4 and L5 tilt were statistically different between the groups. Gender and the use of transverse connectors differed between the groups but not statistically. CONCLUSIONS: In adult spinal deformity patients undergoing primary fusions to the pelvis, the ability to level the coronal tilt of L4 and L5 had the greatest impact on the ability to achieve coronal balance in this small series. A larger prospective series can help validate this important finding.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: This study focused on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who were followed up for more than 10 years, and assessed the influence of spinal balance on lumbar degenerative changes at distal unfused segments (DUS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies suggested that longer fusion segments may result in higher rates of occurrence of disc degeneration (DD) at unfused segments adjacent to the distal fused area. However, there are no existing studies that correlate the degree of DD to the location of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and the amount of the residual lumbar curve during the follow-up period. METHODS: Radiologic measurements were recorded at the time of surgery, immediately after surgery, and 10 years after surgery. The Pfirrmann grading scale was used to rate the MR images of these patients. The presence of vertebral DD was also used to classify patients into DD+ and DD- groups. RESULTS: 93 patients with AIS participated in this study. The average age at the time of surgery was 15.2 years; the average follow-up time was 154 months. DD was found in 45 patients (48%) and L5/S1 was the most common (40%) location in those patients. The L1 group experienced DD at a frequency of 34%, whereas the frequency increased with lower LIV placement. There was a significant difference between DD+ and DD- in age at the time of operation, the L4 tilt (pre Op. and post. 10 years), and the number of mobile segments. CONCLUSIONS: Disc degeneration occurred in 48% of the patients at the time of postop. 10 years. Disc degeneration had a tendency to occur in patients with greater preoperative and postoperative 10 years L4 tilt angle and fewer mobile segments in the lower lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.