Safety, efficacy, and timing of transplantation(s) in propionic and methylmalonic aciduria.

Propionic (PA) and methylmalonic aciduria (MMA) share many clinical similarities, which include the risk of acute metabolic encephalopathies, and some long-term complications, such as optic neuropathy, pancreatic involvement, developmental disability, and similar management approaches, but they also represent distinct clinical and biochemical entities. In the severe forms of PA and MMA, most long-term complications cannot be prevented with conventional clinical management. Organ transplantation represents a form of partial enzyme replacement to improve the long-term outlook for these disorders. There is evidence that early liver transplant in both disorders greatly improves metabolic stability and reduces the risk of long-term complications. For MMA, early liver transplant reduces methylmalonic acid levels which in turns reduces its effects on kidneys, and therefore slows progression of chronic kidney disease. However, established organ damage cannot be reversed. For patients with MMA who present with chronic kidney disease, consideration should be given for combined liver and kidney transplants. Transplantation in PA and MMA carries a high risk of complications and requires highly specialised pre-operative and peri-operative management. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team is essential and should include metabolic team, nephrologist, hepatologist, hepatobiliary and renal transplant surgeons, anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, intensive care team, dieticians and specialist nurses. These patients require life-long multidisciplinary follow-up. There is increasing evidence in the literature on excellent short to medium-term patient and allograft survival following transplantation when patients are managed by a multidisciplinary team in a specialist centre. Improved early diagnosis and reductions in transplant-related mortality and morbidity have allowed early transplantation to be used electively to further improve the outcome.

Liver and kidney transplantation in polycystic liver and kidney disease. / Trasplante hepático y renal en la enfermedad poliquística hepatorrenal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of isolated liver and combined liver and kidney transplantation in a retrospective series of 32 patients with hepatorenal liver and kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study that enrolled patients with polycystic liver disease (PLD) and polycystic liver and kidney disease (PLKD) who were evaluated for transplantation between January 1999 and December 2019 at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona [Clinical Hospital of Barcelona]. RESULTS: We included a total of 53 patients enrolled, 32 (60.3%) had indication for transplantation, of which 12 received a single liver transplant and 20 received a double liver and kidney transplant. The mean age was 52 years and 83.9% of the recipients were women. The main indication for liver transplantation was disabling symptomatic hepatomegaly (93.5%). Among the postoperative complications, in the combined liver and kidney transplant group, hepatic artery thrombosis in one case and renal artery thrombosis in other were detected. In both groups there was one case of inferior vena cava lesion. Three patients presented acute cellular rejection responding to corticosteroids and one presented humoral rejection which was treated with plasmapheresis. During the follow-up period of 80 (27-121) months, the liver transplant survival rate was 100% and the kidney transplant survival rate was 90%. Two patients in the combined liver and kidney transplant group died (one due to cardiovascular causes and the other due to intestinal adenocarcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated liver transplantation or combined liver and kidney transplantation in selected patients with polycystic disease yields excellent results, with few complications, very good transplant survival and excellent patient survival (93.8%).

Outcomes of liver-kidney transplantation in patients with primary hyperoxaluria: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is an inherited disease lacking of hepatic oxalic acid metabolic enzymes which could lead to irreverisible renal damage. Currently, liver-kidney transplantation is a curative but highly invasive therapy used to treat patients with PH. However, limited studies have focused on combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) and sequential liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) in patients with PH. METHODS: The present study included 201 patients with PH who received both liver and kidney transplants and who were listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1987 to 2018. According to the liver-kidney transplant procedure, patients were separated into a CLKT group and a SLKT group. Patient demographics and transplant outcomes were assessed in each group. RESULTS: Compared with the SLKT group, The CLKT group got a worse pretransplant dialysis condition in both the proportion of patients under pretransplant dialysis (p = 0.048) and the duration of the pretransplant dialysis (p < 0.001). The SLKT group got higher human leukocyte antigen mismatch score of kidney donor (p < 0.001) and liver donor (p = 0.003). The CLKT group utilized higher proportion (98.9%) of organs from a single deceased donor, while the SLKT group utilized 75.0% of organs from deceased liver donors and only 35.0% of organs from deceased kidney donors (p < 0.001). Kidney function measured by serum creatinine concentration before liver transplantation (LT) or CLKT was similar (p = 0.305) between groups. Patient survival was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.717) and liver (p = 0.685) and kidney (p = 0.464) graft outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SLKT seems to be an alternative option with strict condition for CLKT, further exploration about the SLKT is still required.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation in children: analysis of renal graft outcome.

BACKGROUND: Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is the accepted treatment for patients with both liver failure and progressive renal insufficiency. Long-term outcome data for CLKT in children is sparse and controversy exists as to whether simultaneous CLKT with organs from the same donor confers immunologic and survival benefit to the kidney allograft. We report the long-term renal graft outcomes of 40 patients who had simultaneous CLKT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of kidney graft survival (time from transplantation to death, return to dialysis or last follow-up event) in all pediatric patients (age < 18 years old) who underwent CLKT from March 1994 to January 2015. A 1:1 ratio of controls (deceased donor kidney recipients from our centre matched for age (±2 years) at transplant, time from transplant (±1 year) and treated with the same immunosuppressive regime) to cases was used to compare outcome. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was calculated using the Schwartz formula. Survival curves were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The kidney graft survival for CLKT patients was 87.4, 82, and 82 % at 1, 5, and 10 years; kidney graft survival for isolated KT patients were 97.2, 93, and 93 % at 1, 5, and 10 years (p = NS). There were two acute rejection episodes (5 %) in the CLKT group compared to five (12.5 %) episodes in the isolated KT group. There was no statistically significant difference in e-GFR at 1, 5, and 10 years in the two groups but there was a statistically significantly greater decline in e-GFR in the KT group compared to CLKT group from 5-10 years following transplant. CONCLUSIONS: There are fewer acute rejection episodes following CLKT compared to isolated KT, and we noted a higher mean e-GFR at 1, 5, and 10 years with significantly lesser decline in e-GFR from 5 to 10 years in the CLKT group.

Review of combined liver and kidney transplantation in children.

In this review, we focused on CLKT with regard to indication, results, outcome, and future developments. PH1 is one of the most common diagnoses for adult and pediatric patients qualifying for CLKT. The other major indication for combined transplantation is ARPKD. CLKT appears to be superior to sequential liver and kidney transplantation in the majority of patients and overall results following CLKT are now good, even in small children. Clinical observations suggest that there is an immunological advantage of CLKT in comparison with isolated liver or kidney transplantation. More clinical studies are necessary to identify the best candidates for CLKT while the availability of donor organs is low.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation and kidney after liver transplantation in children: Indication, postoperative outcome, and long-term results.

CLKT and sequential KALT are decided on a case-by-case basis in children for special indications such as ARPKD or PH1. We report on 21 children who underwent CLKT or KALT at our hospital between 1998 and 2013. Eleven children were diagnosed with PH1 and six with ARPKD. Other diagnosis were Joubert syndrome (n = 1), nephronophthisis (n = 1), CF (n = 1), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1). Children (12 males, nine females) were aged 7.8 ± 6.2 yr (range, 10 months to 18 yr) at time of transplantation. Average wait time was 1.9 ± 0.9 yr (range, four months to 2.3 yr). Fifteen patients received dialysis prior to transplantation. In PH1 patients, four children received CLKT, five received KALT, and two infants have received only an LTx, whereas all six patients with ARPKD received CLKT. In patients with other indications, CLKT was performed in three cases and KALT in one girl. Cumulative 10-yr survival of all 21 patients was 78.4%. At the time of transfer into adult care, 13 patients retained stable liver and kidney function. Regardless the underlying diagnosis, CLKT and KALT can be performed in children with good surgical outcomes and long-term survival.

Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation in a Primary Type 2 Hyperoxaluria With Corrected TOF and Severe Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.

Background: Primary type 2 hyperoxaluria is a very rare genetic disorder,1,2 where in the progression to renal failure was assumed to be insidious and not very common.3 PH2 is due to deficient glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR),1,2 which was thought to have extra-hepatic production also.4 The progression to renal failure in these patient subgroups is well documented in the Literature and the role of SLK (simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation) has not been clearly established.8. Method: We present a case report of a young girl with PH2, who successfully underwent SLK, with evidence of reduction in the urine oxalate levels post SLK. Results: PH2, though a rare genetic disease, has a proven potential to progress to chronic renal failure requiring transplantation, renal transplantation alone has not shown any benefit, these patients can be offered SLK as a primary treatment option, to improve the outcomes, this needs further validation with consensus and studies.

Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in a Patient With Telomere Biology Disorder: A Case Study.

Organ transplantation is the primary therapy for organ failure caused by telomere biology disorder (TBD). We describe the first documented case of simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKTx) for TBD, although the diagnosis of TBD was reached only three months following SLKTx. The patient was born prematurely, displayed growth retardation, and developed chronic kidney and liver diseases. His pre-SLKTx autoimmune, metabolic, and viral assessments were negative, and persistent pancytopenia (bone marrow cellularity 70-80%) was attributed to renal disease-associated bone marrow changes. Following SLKTx, he was discharged with stable graft function on tacrolimus and prednisolone. Although mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued on the second postoperative day, his pancytopenia persisted. Despite extensive evaluations, including drug, immune, nutritional, and viral assessments, all results were negative. A bone marrow biopsy conducted three months post-transplant revealed significant hypocellularity (40-50%). Whole genome sequencing revealed a likely pathogenic variant of the TINF2 gene. The patient was subsequently treated with danazol. At the nine-month follow-up post-SLKTx, he exhibited stable graft function and improved cell counts while maintaining triple-drug immunosuppression. Given the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria for TBD, healthcare providers must be vigilant with patients presenting with multi-organ failure and persistent cytopenias. Effective pre-transplant screening for TBD can lead to timely diagnoses, better management, and improved post-transplant outcomes.

A novel oxygenated machine perfusion system for preservation of the liver.

Machine perfusion (MP) is a potential method to increase the donor pool for organ transplantation. However, MP systems for liver grafts remain difficult to use because of organ-specific demands. Our aim was to test a novel, portable MP system for hypothermic preservation of the liver. A portable, pressure-regulated, oxygenated MP system designed for kidney preservation was adapted to perfuse liver grafts via the portal vein (PV). Three porcine livers underwent 20 h of hypothermic perfusion using Belzer MP solution. The MP system was assessed for perfusate flow, temperature, venous pressure, and pO2 /pCO2 during the preservation period. Biochemical and histological parameters were analyzed to determine postpreservation organ damage. Perfusate flow through the PV increased over time from 157 ± 25 mL/min at start to 177 ± 25 mL/min after 20 h. PV pressure remained stable at 13 ± 1 mm Hg. Perfusate temperature increased from 9.7 ± 0.6°C at the start to 11.0 ± 0.0°C after 20 h. Aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase increased from 281 ± 158 and 308 ± 171 U/L after 1 h to 524 ± 163 and 537 ± 168 U/L after 20 h, respectively. Blood gas analysis showed a stable pO2 of 338 ± 20 mm Hg before perfusion of the liver and 125 ± 14 mm Hg after 1 h perfusion. The pCO2 increased from 15 ± 5 mm Hg after 1 h to 53 ± 4 mm Hg after 20 h. No histological changes were found after 20 h of MP. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a portable MP system for preservation of the liver and showed that continuous perfusion via the PV can be maintained with an oxygen-driven pump system without notable preservation damage of the organ.

Effect of liver transplantation with primary hyperoxaluria type 1: Five case reports and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare autosomal recessive disease stemming from a deficiency in liver-specific alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase, resulting in increased endogenous oxalate deposition and end-stage renal disease. Organ transplantation is the only effective treatment. However, its approach and timing remain controversial. CASE SUMMARY: We retrospectively analyzed 5 patients diagnosed with PH1 from the Liver Transplant Center of the Beijing Friendship Hospital from March 2017 to December 2020. Our cohort included 4 males and 1 female. The median age at onset was 4.0 years (range: 1.0-5.0), age at diagnosis was 12.2 years (range: 6.7-23.5), age at liver transplantation (LT) was 12.2 years (range: 7.0-25.1), and the follow-up time was 26.3 mo (range: 12.8-40.1). All patients had delayed diagnosis, and 3 patients had progressed to end-stage renal disease by the time they were diagnosed. Two patients received preemptive LT; their estimated glomerular filtration rate was maintained at > 120 mL/min/1.73 m2, indicating a better prognosis. Three patients received sequential liver and kidney transplantation. After transplantation, serum and urinary oxalate decreased, and liver function recovered. At the last follow-up, the estimated glomerular filtration rates of the latter 3 patients were 179, 52 and 21 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSION: Different transplantation strategies should be adopted for patients based on their renal function stage. Preemptive-LT offers a good therapeutic approach for PH1.

A case report of invasive infantile primary hyperoxaluria type 1 and literature review.

Infantile primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is the most devastating primary hyperoxaluria (PH) subtype as it leads to early end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) associated with high mortality. We report a case of a three-month-old female Chinese infant who was diagnosed with PH1 by renal biopsy and genetic studies. She carried two heterozygous mutations in the alanine-glyoxylate and serine pyruvate aminotransferase (AGXT) gene, one of which has never been previously reported. The patient had multiple organ failures caused by kidney failure, which was improved by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy. However, her primary disease responded poorly to conservative treatment. Fortunately, after waiting for four months, the patient underwent a successful combined liver-kidney transplantation and has progressed well so far. This case highlights the importance of suspecting PH in infant patients with ESKD of uncertain etiology, as early initiation of therapy prevents poor outcomes.

Predictors of Kidney Delayed Graft Function and Its Prognostic Impact following Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation: A Recent Single-Center Experience.

Combined liver−kidney transplantation (CLKT) improves patient survival among liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction. However, kidney delayed graft function (kDGF) still represents a common and challenging complication that can negatively impact clinical outcomes. This retrospective study analyzed the incidence, potential risk factors, and prognostic impact of kDGF development following CLKT in a recently transplanted cohort. Specifically, 115 consecutive CLKT recipients who were transplanted at our center between January 2015 and February 2021 were studied. All transplanted kidneys received hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (HPMP) prior to transplant. The primary outcome was kDGF development. Secondary outcomes included the combined incidence and severity of developing postoperative complications; development of postoperative infections; biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR); renal function at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplant; and death-censored graft and patient survival. kDGF was observed in 37.4% (43/115) of patients. Multivariable analysis of kDGF revealed the following independent predictors: preoperative dialysis (p = 0.0003), lower recipient BMI (p = 0.006), older donor age (p = 0.003), utilization of DCD donors (p = 0.007), and longer delay of kidney transplantation after liver transplantation (p = 0.0003). With a median follow-up of 36.7 months post-transplant, kDGF was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing more severe postoperative complication(s) (p < 0.000001), poorer renal function (particularly at 1 month post-transplant, p < 0.000001), and worse death-censored graft (p = 0.00004) and patient survival (p = 0.0002). kDGF may be responsible for remarkable negative effects on immediate and potentially longer-term clinical outcomes after CLKT. Understanding the important risk factors for kDGF development in CLKT may better guide recipient and donor selection(s) and improve clinical decisions in this increasing group of transplant recipients.

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in developing countries: novel challenges in a new therapeutic era.

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is an autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism characterized by marked hepatic overproduction of oxalate due to deficiency of hepatic peroxisomal alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase caused by AGXT gene mutation. One major hallmark of PH1 in developed as well as developing countries (DC) is the diagnostic delay. Notably in DC, where the disease is most prevalent and probably underdiagnosed, there are many challenges in PH1 diagnosis and management, with economic constrains and ethical concerns. This has led to the existing gap in the management of PH1 between developed and DC, which is expected to further deepen with the advent of novel therapeutic agents unless appropriate actions are taken. Until recently, treatment possibilities were limited to supportive measures. Thanks to a better understanding of the molecular basis of the disease a number of new therapies are developed, or being developed, leading to profound changes in management strategies. In this review we discuss the current situation of PH1 in DC as well as the accessibility challenges and the advantages of using promising novel therapeutics to bridge the currently existing gap. We also provide an overview of an integrated approach to ensure equitable access of sustainable therapeutics to PH1 patients in DC. This is expected to reduce global PH1 healthcare disparities, improve its standard of care and reduce disability linked to extrarenal complications of PH1 by implementing personalized medicine.

Safety and efficacy of liver transplantation for methylmalonic acidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background-objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) and combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) have been proposed as enzyme replacement therapies for methylmalonic aciduria (MMA). We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on their safety and efficacy. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library were searched to identify studies that reported post-LT/CLKT clinical outcomes of MMA from their inception to February 1, 2020. The pooled rate was calculated using random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies involving 109 patients were included. The pooled estimate rates were 99.9% (95% CI 95.3-100.0) for patient survival, 98.5% (95% CI 91.5-100.0) for graft survival after LT/CLKT. The combined incidence of biliary, vascular complications and rejection were 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-6.6), 7.7% (95% CI 0.1-22.1) and 18.4% (95% CI 4.6-36.3), respectively. The pooled estimate rates were 100.0% (95% CI 99.4-100.0) for metabolic eradication, 61.5% (95% CI: 33.4-87.0) for normalization of kidney function. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remission is more promising after CLKT (70.3% VS 37.6% in LT group). The pooled estimate rates for neurodevelopmental status improvement and protein intake liberalization were 52.0% (95% CI 2.8-98.8) and 36.3% (95% CI 6.3-71.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This first quantitative systematic review confirms favorable survival outcomes and partially improved disease-related complications in transplanted MMA patients, although some results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with detailed description of long-term outcomes and consensus on neurodevelopmental evaluation method can help provide a more accurate picture.

No Benefit of Prophylactic Surgical Drainage in Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation: Our Experience and Review of the Literature.

Background: Contrasting results have emerged from limited studies investigating the role of prophylactic surgical drainage in preventing wound morbidity after liver and kidney transplantation. This retrospective study analyzes the use of surgical drain and the incidence of wound complications in combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKTx). Methods: A total of 55 patients aged ≥18 years were divided into two groups: the drain group (D) (n = 35) and the drain-free group (DF) (n = 20). Discretion to place a drain was based exclusively on surgeon preference. All deceased donor kidneys were connected to the LifePort Renal Preservation Machine® prior to transplantation, in both simultaneous and delayed technique of implantation of the renal allograft. The primary outcome was the development of superficial/deep wound complications during the study follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the development of delayed graft function (DGF) of the transplanted kidney, primary non-function (PNF) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) of the transplanted liver, graft failure, graft and patient survival, overall post-operative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay. Results: With a median follow-up of 14.4 months after transplant, no difference in the incidence of superficial/deep wound complications, except for hematomas, in collections size, intervention rate, PNF, EAD, graft failure and patient survival, was observed between the 2 groups. Significantly lower level of platelets, higher INR values, DGF, morbidity rates and length of hospital stay were reported post-operatively in the D group. Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia and longer CIT were included in the propensity score for receiving a drain and were associated with a significantly higher rate of developing a hematoma post-transplant. Conclusions: Absence of the surgical drain did not appear to adversely affect wound morbidity compared to the prophylactic use of drains in renal transplant patients during CLKTx.

Masked acute rejection of the graft kidney under the recovery of native kidneys in a patient who underwent simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with liver failure and irreversible renal dysfunction. However, some studies have reported the recovery of native renal function after simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old woman initially underwent living-donor liver transplantation for liver failure. When graft liver failure developed, she also sustained acute renal failure and required continuous hemodiafiltration for 6 weeks. Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation from a brain-dead donor recovered her liver and renal function. A 1-year protocol graft kidney biopsy revealed acute cellular rejection despite stable serum creatinine levels. Renal scintigraphy showed functional native kidneys masking acute rejection of the graft kidney. The rejection was improved by pulse steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: Acute rejection of the graft kidney may silently progress due to recovery of the native kidney function after simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. Renal scintigraphy and graft kidney biopsy should be considered even if blood tests indicate stable total renal function.

Current status of combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease and underlying chronic kidney disease, or prolonged acute kidney injury. Due to physiologic changes secondary to portal hypertension in patients with end-stage liver disease, kidney injury is common, and combined liver-kidney transplantation accounts for 10% of all the liver transplants performed in the United States. Recently implemented policy in the United States standardizes the medical criteria for eligibility, and introduces a 'safety net' for those who are transplanted with a liver graft alone, in order to be able to receive a kidney graft later. Increasing number of combined liver-kidney transplants provides a large cohort of patients to be studied in detail for identification of factors (both donor and recipient-related) associated with better outcomes. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of delaying the kidney transplant part of the combined liver-kidney transplantation, and the immunologic benefits of the multi-organ transplantations including the liver are emerging. Here, we review the most recent analyses, and provide our opinion regarding the best practices in combined liver-kidney transplantation based on the evidence.

Guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of combined liver and kidney transplantation / 器官移植

Combined liver and kidney transplantation has been steadily applied in major transplantation centers, saving the lives of many patients with end-stage liver and renal failure. However, there are still multiple unresolved problems in the clinical diagnosis, treatment and long-term prognosis of combined liver and kidney transplantation. By referring to "Technical Operating Standards for Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation (2019 Edition)" and the latest published literature and guidelines at home and abroad, "Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation" was formulated. Recommendations and suggestions were delivered regarding the surgical indications and contraindications, preoperative preparation and evaluation, the timing of transplantation for end-stage liver and kidney diseases, the selection of surgical approaches and postoperative follow-up, specific pathophysiology, surgical techniques, complication management and immunosuppressive treatment of combined live and kidney transplantation, aiming to enhance the utilization rate of grafts and improve the survival and prognosis of combined liver and kidney transplant recipients.

Primary hyperoxaluria type II and organ transplantation / 器官移植

Primary hyperoxaluria type Ⅱ (PH2) is an inherited disorder of the glyoxylate metabolism caused by the gene mutation of glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR). PH2 is characterized by recurrent nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis, which may even progress into end-stage renal disease. Currently, organ transplantation is the only treatment option for PH2, which mainly includes two strategies: kidney transplantation and combined liver and kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation yields a high risk of recurrence of oxalate nephropathy, which may cause early graft dysfunction. Combined liver and kidney transplantation could mitigate the deficiency of oxalate metabolism, whereas it yields a high risk of graft complications. PH2 is an extremely rare disorder. No consensus has been reached on the indications, surgical selection and perioperative management of organ transplantation for PH2 patients. In this article, the pathogenesis, diagnosis, monitoring and organ transplantation experience of PH2 were reviewed, aiming to divert clinicians' attention to PH2 and provide reference for determining diagnosis and treatment regimens, especially transplantation strategy for PH2 patients.

Differential Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplant Benefit Based on Severity of Liver Damage at the Time of Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the concept of whether liver failure patients with a superimposed kidney injury receiving a simultaneous liver and kidney transplant (SLKT) have similar outcomes compared to patients with liver failure without a kidney injury receiving a liver transplantation (LT) alone. METHODS: Using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, patients were divided into five groups based on pre-transplant model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and categorized as not having (serum creatinine (sCr) ≤ 1.5 mg/dL) or having (sCr > 1.5 mg/dL) renal dysfunction. Of 30,958 patients undergoing LT, 14,679 (47.5%) had renal dysfunction, and of those, 5,084 (16.4%) had dialysis. RESULTS: Survival in those (liver failure with renal dysfunction) receiving SLKT was significantly worse (P < 0.001) as compared to those with sCr < 1.5 mg/dL (liver failure only). The highest mortality rate observed was 21% in the 36+ MELD group with renal dysfunction with or without SLKT. In high MELD recipients (MELD > 30) with renal dysfunction, presence of renal dysfunction affects the outcome and SLKT does not improve survival. In low MELD recipients (16 - 20), presence of renal dysfunction at the time of transplantation does affect post-transplant survival, but survival is improved with SLKT. CONCLUSIONS: SLKT improved 1-year survival only in low MELD (16 - 20) recipients but not in other groups. Performance of SLKT should be limited to patients where a benefit in survival and post-transplant outcomes can be demonstrated.