Patent ductus arteriosus and the association between lung ultrasound score and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a secondary analysis of a prospective study.

Moderate-to-large patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has been linked to increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), while lung ultrasound score (LUS) has been demonstrated to accurately predict BPD. We aimed to investigate the correlation of LUS as a marker of interstitial pulmonary edema and the severity of the ductal shunt in predicting future BPD development in very preterm infants. This secondary analysis of a prospective study recruited preterm infants with gestational age < 30 weeks. LUS on postnatal days 7 and 14, and echocardiographic data [PDA diameter and left atrium-to-aortic root ratio (LA/Ao)] near LUS acquisition were collected. Correlation coefficient, logistics regression analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) procedure were used. A statistically significant and positive correlation existed between LUS and PDA diameter (ρ = 0.415, ρ = 0.581, and p < 0.001) and LA/Ao (ρ = 0.502, ρ = 0.743, and p < 0.001) at postnatal days 7 and 14, respectively, and the correlations of LUS and echocardiographic data were generally stronger in the non-BPD group. In the prediction of BPD, LUS incorporating echocardiographic data at postnatal days 7 obtained significantly higher predictive performance compared to LUS alone (AUROC 0.878 [95% CI 0.801-0.932] vs. AUROC 0.793 [95% CI 0.706-0.865]; Delong test, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant correlation between LUS and echocardiographic data, suggesting their potential role as early predictors for respiratory outcomes in very preterm infants. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound score (LUS) has shown good reliability in predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) development. • Some echocardiographic data that characterized ventricular function was reported to be used to predict severe BPD. WHAT IS NEW: • There is a positive and statistically significant correlation between LUS and echocardiographic data at postnatal days 7 and 14. • The integrated use of LUS and echocardiographic data may have potential value in predicting BPD.

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in determining invasive ventilation needs in neonates on non-invasive ventilation: An observational study from a tertiary NICU in India.

Effective management of neonatal respiratory distress requires timely recognition of when to transition from non-invasive to invasive ventilation. Although the lung ultrasound score (LUS) is useful in evaluating disease severity and predicting the need for surfactants, its efficacy in identifying neonates requiring invasive ventilation has only been explored in a few studies. This study aims to assess the accuracy of LUS in determining the need for invasive ventilation in neonates on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) support. From July 2021 to June 2023, we conducted a prospective study on 192 consecutively admitted neonates with respiratory distress needing NIV within 24 h of birth at our NICU in Hyderabad, India. The primary objective was the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in determining the need for invasive ventilation within 72 h of initiating NIV. We calculated LUS using the scoring system of Brat et al. (JAMA Pediatr 169:e151797, [10]). Treating physicians' assessments of the need for invasive ventilation served as the reference standard for evaluating LUS effectiveness. Out of 192 studied neonates, 31 (16.1%) required invasive ventilation. The median LUS was 5 (IQR: 2-8) for those on NIV and 10 (IQR: 7-12) for those needing invasive ventilation. The LUS had a strong discriminative ability for invasive ventilation with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.825 (CI: 0.75-0.86, p = 0.0001). An LUS > 7 had 77.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 58.9-90.8%), 75.1% specificity (95% CI: 67.8-81.7%), 37.5% positive predictive value (PPV) (95% CI: 30.15-45.5%), 94.5% negative predictive value (NPV) (95% CI: 89.9-97.1%), 3.1 positive likelihood ratio (PLR) (95% CI: 2.2-4.3), 0.3 negative likelihood ratio (NLR) (95% CI: 0.15-0.58), and 75.5% overall accuracy (95% CI: 68.8-81.4%) for identifying invasive ventilation needs. In contrast, SAS, with a cutoff point greater than 5, has an AUC of 0.67. It demonstrates 62.5% sensitivity, 61.9% specificity, 24.7% PPV, 89.2% NPV, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 61.9%. The DeLong test confirms the significance of this difference (AUC difference: 0.142, p = 0.04), underscoring LUS's greater reliability for NIV failure.  Conclusion: This study underscores the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS cutoff of > 7 in determining invasive ventilation needs during the initial 72 h of NIV. Importantly, while lower LUS values typically rule out the need for ventilation, higher values, though indicative, are not definitive. What is known? • The effectiveness of lung ultrasound in evaluating disease severity and the need for surfactants in neonates with respiratory distress is well established. However, traditional indicators for transitioning from non-invasive to invasive ventilation, like respiratory distress and oxygen levels, have limitations, underscoring the need for reliable, non-invasive assessment tools. What is new? • This study reveals that a LUS over 7 accurately discriminates between neonates requiring invasive ventilation and those who do not. Furthermore, the lung ultrasound score outperformed the Silverman Andersen score for NIV failure in our population.

Lung ultrasound score and in-hospital mortality of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) score could quantitatively reflect the lung aeration, which has been well applied in critically ill patients. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between LUS score at admission and the risk of in-hospital mortality of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Toachieve the objective of this meta-analysis, we conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify relevant observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. We employed random-effects models to combine the outcomes, considering the potential influence of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirteen cohort studies with 1,022 hospitalized patients with ARDS were included. Among them, 343 patients (33.6%) died during hospitalization. The pooled results suggested that the LUS score at admission was higher in non-survivors as compared to survivors (standardized mean difference = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 0.91, p < 0.001; I2 = 25%). Moreover, a high LUS score at admission was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality of patients with ARDS (risk ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.81, p = 0.002; I2 = 46%). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results in studies with LUS score analyzed with 12 or 16 lung regions, and in studies reporting mortality during ICU or within 1-month hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a high LUS score at admission may be associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality of patients with ARDS.

Lung ultrasound score in the decision of patent ductus arteriosus closure in neonates.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) score in the closure of hemodynamically insignificant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and the clinical findings of the patients before and after closure. METHODS: The study groups (107 preterm neonates under 34 gestational weeks) were classified as hemodynamically significant PDA (group 1), hemodynamically insignificant PDA with closure therapy (group 2), hemodynamically insignificant PDA without closure therapy (group 3), and no PDA group (group 4) based on the echocardiography. 6- and 10-region LUS scores were compared for each group. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between groups 1 and 3 on first, third, and seventh days. In contrast, groups 1 and 2 had similar LUS scores on the first, third, and seventh days. There was a negative correlation between LUS scores on the first and third days and gestational age, birth weight, the first- and fifth-minute APGAR scores, and there was a positive correlation between aortic root to left atrium ratio, and PDA diameter/weight ratio. CONCLUSION: We observed that LUS scores in patients with hemodynamically insignificant PDA treated with closure therapy were similar to in patients with hemodynamically significant PDA. Thus, LUS score can have role in PDA closure in preterm neonates. However, more comprehensive studies are needed.

Visual lung ultrasound protocol (VLUP) in acute respiratory failure: description and application in clinical cases.

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is widely used as a diagnostic and monitoring tool in critically ill patients. Lung ultrasound score (LUSS) based on the examination of twelve thoracic regions has been extensively validated for pulmonary assessment. However, it has revealed significant limitations: when applied to heterogeneous lung diseases with intermediate LUSS pattern (LUSS 1 and 2), for instance, intra-observer consistency is relatively low. In addition, LUSS is time-consuming and a more rapid overview of the extent of lung pathology and residual lung aeration is often required, especially in emergency setting. We propose a Visual Lung Ultrasound Protocol (VLUP) as a rapid monitoring tool for patients with acute respiratory failure. It consists of a probe sliding along the mid-clavicular, mid-axillary and scapular lines in transversal scan. VLUP allows a visualization of a large portion of the antero-lateral and/or posterior pleural surface. Serial assessments of two clinical cases are recorded and visually compared, enabling rapid understanding of lung damage and its evolution over time. VLUP allows a semi-quantitative and qualitative point-of-care assessment of lung injury. Through this standardized approach it is possible to accurately compare subsequent scans and to monitor the evolution of regional parenchymal damage. VLUP enables a quick estimation of the quantitative-LUSS (qLUSS) as the percentage of pleura occupied by artifacts, more suitable than LUSS in inhomogeneous diseases. VLUP is designed as a standardized, point-of-care lung aeration assessment and monitoring tool. The purpose of the paper is to illustrate this new technique and to describe its applications.

Comparison among three lung ultrasound scores used to predict the need for surfactant replacement therapy: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study in a cohort of preterm infants.

Lung ultrasound (LU) has emerged as the imaging technique of choice for the assessment of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) at the bedside. Scoring systems were developed to quantify RDS severity and to predict the need for surfactant administration. There is no data on the comparison of the three main LU scores (LUS) proposed by Brat, Raimondi and Rodriguez-Fanjul. Moreover, there is not enough evidence to recommend which score and which cut-off has the best ability to predict surfactant need. The three LUS were compared in terms of ability to predict the need for surfactant and reproducibility in a cohort of very preterm infants. This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. Neonates below 32 weeks of gestational age with RDS, on non-invasive ventilation with a LU performed prior to surfactant administration (1-3 h of life) were included. Brat, Raimondi, and Rodriguez-Fanjul's scores were calculated for each patient. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the ability to predict surfactant administration. K-Cohen test, Bland-Altman, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the intra and interobserver variability. Fifty-four preterm infants were enrolled. Brat, Raimondi, and Rodriguez-Fanjul scores showed a strong ability to predict the need for surfactant: the AUCs were 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96), 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.96), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), respectively. No significant differences have been found between the AUCs using the DeLong test. Brat and Raimondi's scores had an optimal cut-off value > 8, while the Rodriguez-Fanjul's score > 10. The k-Cohen values of intraobserver agreement for Brat, Raimondi, and Rodriguez-Fanjul's scores were 0.896 (0.698-1.000), 1.000 (1.000-1.000), and 0.922 (0.767-1.000), respectively. The k-Cohen values of interobserver agreement were 0.896 (0.698-1.000), 0.911 (0.741-1.000), and 0.833 (0.612-1.000), respectively.Conclusions: The three LUS had an excellent ability to predict the need for surfactant and an optimal intra and interobserver agreement. The differences found between the three scores are minimal with negligible clinical implications. Since the optimal cut-off value differed, the same score should be used consistently within the same center. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound is a useful bedside imaging tool that should be used in the assessment of neonates with RDS • Scoring systems or lung ultrasound scores allow to quantify the severity of the pulmonary disease and to predict the need for surfactant replacement therapy What is New: • The three lung ultrasound scores by Brat, Raimondi and Rodriguez-Fanjul have an excellent ability to predict the need for surfactant replacement therapy, although with different cut-off values • All three lung ultrasound scores had an excellent intra and interobserver reproducibility.

Comparison of lung ultrasound scores with clinical models for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) have been demonstrated to accurately predict moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD). This study attempted to explore the additional value of LUSs for predicting msBPD compared to clinical multivariate models in different gestational age (GA) groups. The study prospectively recruited preterm infants with GA < 32 weeks. Lung ultrasound was performed on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 after birth. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to evaluate LUS evolution in infants born before and after 28 weeks. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure was used to analyze the reliability of LUS and clinical multivariable models for predicting msBPD. The optimal time to predict msBPD in all infants was 7 days with a cut-off point of 5 (area under the ROC (AUROC) curve: 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.84). In infants with GA ≥ 28 weeks, LUSs provided a moderate diagnostic accuracy for all four time points (AUROC curve: 0.74-0.78), and the AUROC curve for the clinical multivariable model on day 14 was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), which was significantly higher than that of LUSs (AUROC curve: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85, P < 0.05). In infants born at 23-27 weeks, LUSs showed a low diagnostic accuracy with higher cut-off points to predict msBPD, and the AUROC curve for GA to predict msBPD was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85), providing diagnostic accuracy similar to that of LUSs.  Conclusion: The contribution of LUSs to predict msBPD in infants with different GAs remains controversial and requires further investigation. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) have been demonstrated to accurately predict moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with gestational age (GA)＜32 weeks. What is New: • The LUSs evolution differed between extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks and preterm infants born at 28-32 weeks of gestation. • LUSs provided similar moderate predictive performance as GA-adjusted LUS and clinical multivariate models in infants born after 28 weeks, while LUSs seem to be less helpful in infants born before 28 weeks.

Impact of patent ductus arteriosus on non-invasive assessments of lung fluids in very preterm infants during the transitional period.

This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether lung fluids, assessed by lung ultrasonography and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB), may be influenced by the presence of a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) in very preterm infants during the transitional period. Infants < 32 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of IRCCS AOU Bologna and Niguarda Metropolitan Hospital of Milan (Italy) underwent a daily assessment of a lung ultrasound score (LUS) and of a TEB-derived index of thoracic fluid contents (TFC) during the first 72 h after birth. Echocardiographic scans were simultaneously performed to evaluate the concomitant ductal status (hsPDA vs. restrictive or closed duct). The correlation between LUS, TFC, and the ductal status was tested using generalized estimating equations. Forty-six infants (median GA: 29 [interquartile range, IQR: 27-31] weeks; median birth weight: 1099 [IQR: 880-1406] g) were included. At each daily evaluation, the presence of a hsPDA was associated with significantly higher LUS and TFC compared with a restrictive or closed ductus (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). These results were confirmed significant even after adjustment for GA and for the ongoing modality of respiratory support. Conclusion: Even during the first 72 h of life, the presence of a hsPDA determines a significant increase in pulmonary fluids which can be non-invasively detected and monitored over time using lung ultrasonography and TEB. What is Known: • Lung ultrasonography provides a non-invasive assessment of lung fluids and is widely used in neonatal settings. • In preterm infants, the persistence of a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) over the first weeks can negatively affect pulmonary outcomes. What is New: • The presence of aan hsPDA is associated with increased lung fluids since early postnatal phases. • Lung ultrasonography and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance can effectively monitor lung fluid clearance in preterm infants with a hsPDA during the transitional period, with potential clinical implications.

Prediction of respiratory distress severity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia by lung ultrasounds and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance.

This study aims to evaluate whether the assessment of a lung ultrasound score (LUS) by lung ultrasonography and of thoracic fluid contents (TFC) by electrical cardiometry may predict RDS severity and the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants with respiratory distress (RDS). Infants ≤ 34 weeks' gestation admitted with RDS to two neonatal intensive care units were prospectively enrolled in this observational study. A simultaneous evaluation of LUS and TFC was performed during the first 72 h. The predictivity of LUS and TFC towards mechanical ventilation (MV) need after 24 h and BPD development was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sixty-four infants were included. The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MV need was 0.851 (95%CI, 0.776-0.925, p < 0.001) for LUS and 0.793 (95%CI, 0.724-0.862, p < 0.001) for TFC, while an AUC of 0.876 (95%CI, 0.807-0.946, p < 0.001) was obtained for combined LUS and TFC evaluation. LUS and TFC AUC for BPD prediction were 0.769 (95%CI, 0.697-0.842, p < 0.001) and 0.836 (95%CI, 0.778-0.894, p < 0.001), respectively, whereas their combined assessment yielded an AUC of 0.867 (95%CI, 0.814-0.919, p < 0.001). LUS ≥ 11 and TFC ≥ 40 were identified as cut-off values for MV need prediction, whereas LUS ≥ 9 and TFC ≥ 41.4 best predicted BPD development.   Conclusion: A combined evaluation of LUS and TFC by lung ultrasonography and EC during the first 72 h may represent a useful predictive tool towards short- and medium-term pulmonary outcomes in preterm infants with RDS. What is Known: • Lung ultrasonography is largely used in neonatal intensive care and can contribute to RDS diagnosis in preterm infants. • Little is known on the diagnostic and predictive role of TFC, measured by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance, in neonatal RDS. What is New: • Combining lung ultrasonography and TFC evaluation during the first 72 h can improve the prediction of RDS severity and BPD development in preterm infants with RDS and may aid to establish tailored respiratory approaches to improve these outcomes.

Thoracic Ultrasound in COVID-19: Use of Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in Evaluating Dyspnea in Survivors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome from COVID-19 Pneumonia in a Post-ICU Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Dyspnea is a common symptom in survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. While frequently employed in hospital settings, the use of point-of-care ultrasound in ambulatory clinics for dyspnea evaluation has rarely been explored. We aimed to determine how lung ultrasound score (LUS) and inspiratory diaphragm excursion (DE) correlate with patient-reported dyspnea during a 6-min walk test (6MWT) in survivors of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesize higher LUS and lower DE will correlate with dyspnea severity. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-center cross-sectional study of survivors of critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia (requiring high-flow nasal cannula, invasive, or non-invasive mechanical ventilation) seen in our Post-ICU clinic. All patients underwent standardized scanning protocols to compute LUS and DE. Pearson correlations were performed to detect an association between LUS and DE with dyspnea at rest and exertion during 6MWT. RESULTS: We enrolled 45 patients. Average age was 61.5 years (57.7% male), with average BMI of 32.3 Higher LUS correlated significantly with dyspnea, at rest (r = + 0.41, p = < 0.01) and at exertion (r = + 0.40, p = < 0.01). Higher LUS correlated significantly with lower oxygen saturation during 6MWT (r = -0.55, p = < 0.01) and lower 6MWT distance (r = -0.44, p = < 0.01). DE correlated significantly with 6MWT distance but did not correlate with dyspnea at rest or exertion. CONCLUSION: Higher LUS correlated significantly with patient-reported dyspnea at rest and exertion. Higher LUS significantly correlated with more exertional oxygen desaturation during 6MWT and lower 6MWT distance. DE did not correlate with dyspnea.

Point-of-care lung ultrasound score for predicting escalated care in children with respiratory distress.

PURPOSE: Respiratory distress due to lower respiratory illnesses is a leading cause of death in children. Early recognition of high-risk populations is critical for the allocation of adequate resources. Our goal was to assess whether the lung ultrasound (US) score obtained at admission in children with respiratory distress predicts the need for escalated care. METHODS: This prospective study included 0-18-year-old patients with respiratory distress admitted to three emergency departments in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil, between July 2019 and September 2021. The enrolled patients underwent lung US performed by a pediatric emergency physician within two hours of arrival. Lung ultrasound scores ranging from 0 to 36 were computed. The primary outcome was the need for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or mechanical ventilation within 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included. The diagnoses included wheezing (33%), bronchiolitis (27%), pneumonia (16%), asthma (9%), and miscellaneous (16%). Thirty-five patients (34%) required escalated care and had a higher lung ultrasound score: median 13 (0-34) vs 2 (0-21), p < 0.0001; area under the curve (AUC): 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.90). The best cut-off score derived from Youden's index was seven (sensitivity: 71.4%; specificity: 79.4%; odds ratio (OR): 9.6 [95% CI: 3.8-24.7]). A lung US score above 12 was highly specific and had a positive likelihood ratio of 8.74 (95% CI:3.21-23.86). CONCLUSION: An elevated lung US score measured in the first assessment of children with any type of respiratory distress was predictive of severity as defined by the need for escalated care with HFNC, NIV, or mechanical ventilation.

Lung ultrasound to evaluate pulmonary changes in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) in patients with cardiogenic shock treated by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in Xuzhou Central Hospital from September 2015 to April 2022. Patients with cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO treatment were enrolled in this study. The LUS score was obtained at the different time points of ECMO. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were divided into a survival group (n = 16) and a nonsurvival group (n = 6). The intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 27.3% (6/22). The LUS scores in the nonsurvival group were significantly higher than those in the survival group after 72 h (P < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between LUS scores and PaO2/FiO2 and LUS scores and pulmonary dynamic compliance(Cdyn) after 72 h of ECMO treatment (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of T72-LUS was 0.964 (95% CI 0.887 ~ 1.000, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: LUS is a promising tool for evaluating pulmonary changes in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(NO.ChiCTR2200062130 and 24/07/2022).

Lung ultrasound score follows the chronic pulmonary insufficiency of prematurity trajectory in early infancy.

Extremely preterm birth is associated with a high risk of chronic pulmonary insufficiency of prematurity (CPIP). Lung ultrasound score (LUS) proved capable to characterise CPIP progression beyond the acute setting, but still, post-discharge data remain lacking. We hypothesised a priori that LUS in both BPD and no-BPD infants declines with postnatal age from birth through early infancy. This observational retrospective cohort study included preterm infants < 32 gestational weeks, who underwent the follow-up for CPIP. LUS was assessed from birth to 8 months postnatal age, over antero-lateral (LUS) and posterior (pLUS) pulmonary areas, placing the transducer longitudinally over the midclavicular and midaxillary lines and medial to the scapular line respectively. Extended LUS (eLUS) including LUS and pLUS was calculated. The primary outcome was LUS time course. Secondary outcomes included the correlation between LUS and pLUS. Sixty-two infants were included: 22 (35.5%) in the BPD group and 40 (64.5%) in the no-BPD group. BPD group infants were smaller (weight 841 g (± 228) vs 1226 (± 328), p < 0.001) and younger (26.8 weeks (± 2.0) vs 28.9 (± 1.9), p < 0.001). LUS declined over time in the entire population (ß = - 1.75, p < 0.001) and in both no-BPD and BPD groups (ß = - 1.64, p < 0.001 and ß = - 1.93, p < 0.001, respectively). eLUS declined correspondingly (p < 0.001). LUS and likewise eLUS were significantly different between BPD and no-BPD groups over time (p < 0.001).  Conclusion: LUS trajectory progressively decreased from birth to early infancy. BPD cohort tracked higher, implying a worse respiratory status. pLUS had a similar timepoint course, adding no further information to LUS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that describes preterm LUS time course after discharge. LUS may help track the CPIP progression. What is Known: • Extremely preterm birth is associated with high risk of chronic pulmonary insufficiency of prematurity (CPIP). • Several studies investigated the ability of lung ultrasound score (LUS) to characterize CPIP progression beyond the acute setting, still post-discharge data remain lacking. What is New: • LUS trajectory progressively decreases from birth to early infancy; BPD cohort tracks higher, implying a worse respiratory status. pLUS has similar timepoint course, adding no further information to LUS. • The use of LUS may contribute to better characterising and monitoring CPIP in BPD and no-BPD infants.

Prognostic Significance of Chest Imaging by LUS and CT in COVID-19 Inpatients: The ECOVID Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) score is a semiquantitative score of lung damage severity. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard method to evaluate the severity of lung involvement from the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Few studies have investigated the clinical significance of LUS and HRCT scores in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic yield of LUS and of HRCT in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We carried out a multicenter, retrospective study aimed at evaluating the prognostic yield of LUS and HRCT by exploring the survival curve of COVID-19 inpatients. LUS and chest CT scores were calculated retrospectively by 2 radiologists with >10 years of experience in chest imaging, and the decisions were reached in consensus. LUS score was calculated on the basis of the presence or not of pleural line abnormalities, B-lines, and lung consolidations. The total score (range 0-36) was obtained from the sum of the highest scores obtained in each region. CT score was calculated for each of the 5 lobes considering the anatomical extension according to the percentage parenchymal involvement. The resulting overall global semiquantitative CT score was the sum of each single lobar score and ranged from 0 (no involvement) to 25 (maximum involvement). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three COVID-19 inpatients (mean age 65 ± 15 years; 65% M), including 23 (15%) in-hospital deaths for any cause over a mean follow-up of 14 days were included. Mean LUS and CT scores were 19 ± 12 and 10 ± 7, respectively. A strong positive linear correlation between LUS and CT scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.754; R2 = 0.568; p < 0.001) was observed. By ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-point for mortality prediction was 20 for LUS score and 4.5 for chest CT score. According to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, in-hospital mortality significantly increased among COVID-19 patients presenting with an LUS score ≥20 (log-rank 0.003; HR 9.87, 95% CI: 2.22-43.83) or a chest CT score ≥4.5 (HR 4.34, 95% CI: 0.97-19.41). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, LUS score was the sole independent predictor of in-hospital mortality yielding an adjusted HR of 7.42 (95% CI: 1.59-34.5). CONCLUSION: LUS score is useful to stratify the risk in COVID-19 patients, predicting those that are at high risk of mortality.

Pilot study on the value of echocardiography combined with lung ultrasound to evaluate COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between echocardiography results and lung ultrasound score (LUS) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia patients and evaluate the impact of the combined application of these techniques in the evaluation of COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients who underwent daily lung ultrasound and echocardiography were included in this study. Patients with tricuspid regurgitation within three days of admission were enrolled. Moreover, the correlation and differences between their pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and LUS on days 3, 8, and 13 were analyzed. The inner diameter of the pulmonary artery root as well as the size of the atria and ventricles were also considered. RESULTS: The PAP on days 3, 8, and 13 of hospitalization was positively correlated with the LUS (r = 0.448, p = 0.003; r = 0.738, p < 0.001; r = 0.325, p = 0.036, respectively). On day 8, the values of both PAP and LUS were higher than on days 3 and 13 (p < 0.01). Similarly, PAP and LUS were significantly increased in 92.9% (39/42) and 90.5% (38/42) of patients, respectively, and at least one of these two values was positive in 97.6% (41/42) of cases. The inner diameters of the right atrium, right ventricle, and pulmonary artery also differed significantly from their corresponding values on days 3 and 13 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PAP is positively correlated with LUS in COVID-19 pneumonia. The two values could be combined for a more precise assessment of disease progression and recovery status.

The Associations Between Lung Ultrasonography Scores in the First Day of Life and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of lung ultrasonography (LU) in predicting noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure and the relationship between lung ultrasonography scores (LUS) with clinical outcomes in neonatal respiratory failure (NRF). METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in newborns with NRF who needed NIV and were evaluated by LU. The first LUS (LUS1) was calculated at 2-6 hours and the second (LUS2) at 12-24 hours of life. The patients were divided into NIV failure and NIV non-failure groups. The relationship between LUS and clinical outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 157 neonates, the median (interquartile range) of gestational week and birth weight were 37 weeks (34-39), and 2890 grams (2045-3435), respectively. The reasons for NRF were transient tachypnea of the newborn (n = 92, 58.6%), congenital pneumonia (n = 58, 36.9%), and respiratory distress syndrome (n = 7, 4.5%). The rate of NIV failure was 17.8% (n = 28). Both LUS1 and LUS2 were significantly higher in neonates with NIV failure compared to neonates with NIV non-failure (P = .001). A cutoff value of LUS1 ≥ 4 predicted NIV failure with 96% sensitivity and 63% specificity. There were positive correlations between LUS and PEEP values, IMV and total MV days, carbon dioxide values, length of hospital stay, and antibiotic days (ρLUS1 , P = .843, <.001; .474, <.001; .444, <.001; .258, .001; .212, .008; .270, <.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound scores were higher in neonates with NIV failure than with NIV non-failure group, and strongly correlated with end-expiratory pressure values. Lung ultrasound scores were found to be related with some of the clinical outcomes of the NRF, and this suggested that LUS could provide information about the prognosis of NRF.

Seeing is Believing: The Import of Lung Ultrasound!

How to cite this article: Govil D, Pachisia AV. Seeing is Believing: The Import of Lung Ultrasound! Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(8):894-895.

Author's Response to Diaphragm Evaluation and Lung Ultrasound Score during Weaning.

How to cite this article: Amara V, Chaudhuri S. Author's Response to Diaphragm Evaluation and Lung Ultrasound Score during Weaning. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(9):1056-1057.

Lung Ultrasound for Prediction of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extreme Preterm Neonates: A Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive ability of lung ultrasound at 3 time points in the first 2 weeks after birth for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) among infants <29 weeks of gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, diagnostic cohort study. Lung ultrasound was performed on days 3, 7, and 14 after birth and lung ultrasound scores (LUS) were calculated in blinded fashion. Diagnostic test characteristics and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 152 infants were enrolled with mean (SD) gestational age of 25.8 (1.5) weeks gestation. Of them, 87 (57%) infants were diagnosed with BPD. The LUS were significantly higher in infants diagnosed with BPD compared with those without BPD at all scan time points (P < .01). The score of >10 at all 3 time points had higher sensitivity (0.89, 0.89, and 0.77), specificity (0.87, 0.90, and 0.92), and corresponding clinically important positive and negative likelihood ratios. The AUROC for LUS at the 3 time points were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.95 on day 3, 7, and 14, respectively. Compared with the model using clinical characteristics, LUS alone had higher AUROC (P < .05 for all 3 time points). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, LUS in the first 2 weeks after birth had a very high predictive value for the diagnosis of BPD among infants of <29 weeks of gestation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04756297.

Lung ultrasound predicts the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of lung ultrasound (LU) in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. A total of 130 VLBW infants with gestational age < 32 weeks were included; LU was performed at days 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 postnatally. We calculated the LU score by 12-region, 10-region, and 6-region protocols. The incidence of BPD according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2001 definition and 2019 criteria was 38.5% and 64.6%, respectively. By 12-region and 10-region protocols, LU predicted BPD from the 9th to 15th days of life (DOLs) regardless of the criteria used, with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.826 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.750-0.887) to 0.877 (95% CI: 0.807-0.928). According to the 2019 BPD definition, the LU score incorporated gestational age, and invasive mechanical ventilation >6 days predicted BPD on the 6th DOL with an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.790-0.916). The 6-region protocol had significantly smaller AUC values on the 6th and 9th DOLs than the other two protocols.Conclusion: The 12-region and 10-region LU scoring protocols are superior to the 6-region protocol in the prediction of BPD. LU can predict the development of BPD from the 9th to 15th DOLs. With the addition of clinical variables, the earliest prediction time was the 6th DOL. What is Known: • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is the most common and adverse complication of prematurity. Recent four studies found that lung ultrasound score or findings predicted the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. What is New: • We present analysis by classical 6-region and the other two lung ultrasound score (10-region and 12-region) which include an assessment of the posterior lung to allow to understand what is the best score to be used. In addition, we explore whether LU-incorporated clinical variables could improve the predictive value for BPD.