In situ digestion of alcohol-fixed cells for quantitative proteomics.

Currently, the bottom-up approach, in which proteins are digested by enzymes such as trypsin prior to mass spectrometry, is the mainstream approach in mass spectrometer-based proteomics. In this approach, the enzymatic digestion process strongly affects the reproducibility of protein identification and quantification. Here, we quantitatively evaluated the enzymatic digestion of proteins under various conditions by quantitative proteomics using data-independent acquisition and found that proteins precipitated with acetone after solubilization with SDS were fully digestible without re-solubilization. This result implies that organic solvent treatment makes cells amenable to trypsin digestion. Direct trypsin digestion of methanol-fixed cells achieved the same digestion efficiency and quantitative reproducibility as the conventional method. Furthermore, this method was found to be equally applicable to mouse liver samples. The establishment of this method indicates that the sample preparation process in bottom-up proteomics can be simplified while maintaining high digestion efficiency and is expected to become a general method for sample preparation in bottom-up proteomics in the future.

Characterizing monoclonal antibody structure by carboxyl group footprinting.

Structural characterization of proteins and their antigen complexes is essential to the development of new biologic-based medicines. Amino acid-specific covalent labeling (CL) is well suited to probe such structures, especially for cases that are difficult to examine by alternative means due to size, complexity, or instability. We present here a detailed account of carboxyl group labeling (with glycine ethyl ester (GEE) tagging) applied to a glycosylated monoclonal antibody therapeutic (mAb). The experiments were optimized to preserve the structural integrity of the mAb, and experimental conditions were varied and replicated to establish the reproducibility of the technique. Homology-based models were generated and used to compare the solvent accessibility of the labeled residues, which include aspartic acid (D), glutamic acid (E), and the C-terminus (i.e., the target probes), with the experimental data in order to understand the accuracy of the approach. Data from the mAb were compared to reactivity measures of several model peptides to explain observed variations in reactivity. Attenuation of reactivity in otherwise solvent accessible probes is documented as arising from the effects of positive charge or bond formation between adjacent amine and carboxyl groups, the latter accompanied by observed water loss. A comparison of results with previously published data by Deperalta et al using hydroxyl radical footprinting showed that 55% (32/58) of target residues were GEE labeled in this study whereas the previous study reported 21% of the targets were labeled. Although the number of target residues in GEE labeling is fewer, the two approaches provide complementary information. The results highlight advantages of this approach, such as the ease of use at the bench top, the linearity of the dose response plots at high levels of labeling, reproducibility of replicate experiments (<2% variation in modification extent), the similar reactivity of the three target probes, and significant correlation of reactivity and solvent accessible surface area.