RESUMO
The immunohistochemical assessment of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins represents a pivotal screening tool for identifying Lynch syndrome (LS)-related cancers, as the loss of their expression often indicates MMR dysfunction associated with genetic or epigenetic alterations. Frequently, LS-related colorectal cancers present germline pathogenic variants in the MLH1 or MSH2 genes, which result in the simultaneous immunohistochemical loss of MLH1 and PMS2 or MSH2 and MSH6 proteins expression, respectively. Less commonly observed is the single involvement of the MSH6 or PMS2 proteins expression, indicative of the presence of germline pathogenic variants in the corresponding genes. Extremely rarely reported are the null immunohistochemistry phenotypes represented by the complete loss of expression of all MMR proteins. The molecular mechanisms contributing to the raising of this latter uncommon immunohistochemical phenotype are derived from the combination of pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes with the somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene promoter. This study focuses on elucidating the molecular cascade leading to the development of the null immunohistochemical phenotype, providing valuable insights into understanding the sequential molecular events driving the LS-associated tumorigenesis, which may have pivotal implications in the clinical management of patients with LS-related cancers.
RESUMO
Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most frequent cancer predisposition syndrome affecting the colon and rectum. A pathogenic variant (PV) disrupting one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes is responsible for the disease. The spectrum of tumors in LS is heterogeneous and includes cancer of the colon and rectum (CRC), endometrium, ovaries, stomach, small bowel, urinary tract, bladder, pancreas, and skin. Knowledge of the phenotypic variation of patients with LS, the type and frequency of PVs, and cascade testing studies in the Latin American population is limited. The present study aims to recognize the PVs in MMR genes, describe the phenotype in Mexican-Mestizo patients and their relatives, and identify the acceptance rate of cascade testing of relatives at risk. We included 40 carriers of a MMR gene PV and 142 relatives that developed a LS-related neoplasm. Patients' clinical data, number, and type of malignancies were obtained from their medical records. Amsterdam I-II, Bethesda criteria, and PREMM5® predictive model score were estimated. Available immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports were analyzed. Relatives at risk were determined from index cases pedigrees. The distribution of MMR gene mutations among 40 probands was: MLH1 (67.5 %), MSH2 (22.5 %), MSH6 (7.5 %), and PMS2 (2.5 %). Out of the 182 LS cases, 58 % exhibited the LS phenotype before age 50. The most common tumor was CRC, followed by endometrial cancer in women and gastric cancer in males. We found a 90.0 % concordance between the IHC and germline PV. The most frequent PV in our sample was MLH1 c.676C > T, occurring in 1/6 index cases. All probands disclosed their molecular test result to their family. Out of the 451 asymptomatic relatives at risk, 28.2 % underwent germline testing. Our results highlight the importance of conducting germline genetic studies in LS since it allows the establishment of appropriate cancer screening, risk-reducing measures, and genetic cascade testing among relatives at risk. Interestingly, we observed a significantly higher prevalence of the c.676C > T variant in MLH1, probably a singular characteristic of the Mexican-Mestizo population. New strategies to facilitate accurate communication between index cases and relatives should be implemented to improve the cascade testing acceptance rate.