Meniscal ramp lesion classification systems: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To describe the proposed classification systems for meniscal ramp lesions (RLs) in the literature and evaluate their accuracy and reliability. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines utilising PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Level I-IV studies referencing RLs along with either an arthroscopic- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system used to describe RL subtypes were included. RESULTS: In total, 21 clinical studies were included. Twenty-seven (79%) of the included studies were published in 2020 or later. There were four main classification systems proposed within the literature (two arthroscopic-, two MRI-based), describing tear patterns, mediolateral extent, associated ligament disruption and stability of the lesion. The first classification was proposed in 2015 by Thaunat et al. and is referenced in 22 (64.7%) of the included studies. The application of the Thaunat et al. criteria to MRI showed variable sensitivity (31.70%-93.8%) and interobserver agreement (k = 0.55-0.80). The Greif et al. modification to the Thaunat et al. system was referenced in 32.4% of the included studies and had a substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.8). Stability to probing and specific tear location were each used to classify RLs in 28.6% and 23.8% of the included clinical studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there has been a recent increase in the recognition and treatment of meniscal RLs, there is limited consistency in descriptive classifications used for this pathology. Current RL classification systems based on preoperative MRI have variable reliability, and arthroscopic examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis and classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Biomechanical characteristics of the meniscocapsular junction of the posterior segment of the medial meniscus.

PURPOSE: Despite extensive literature available on the mechanical properties of knee ligaments and menisci, research on the mechanical properties of the meniscus-capsular junction (MCJ) is lacking. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical behavior of the MCJ of the medial meniscus using a tensile failure test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven dissected cadaveric knees were used for biomechanical analysis. Tensile failure tests were performed using an INSTRON ElectroPuls E1000 stress system to measure stress/strain curves, maximum load at failure, elastic limit load, elongation at break, elongation at the elastic limit, and linear stiffness, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: All ruptures occurred at the MCJ. The MCJ displayed similar mechanical properties to knee ligaments. Average values were: maximum load at failure (63.9 ± 3.2 N), yield load (52.9 N ± 2.6 N), elongation at break (2.5 mm ± 0.3 mm), elongation at the elastic limit (1.25 mm ± 0.15 mm), strain at break (47.0% ± 3.5%), strain at yield (23.2% ± 2.3%), and stiffness (56.6 ± 9. N/mm-1). CONCLUSION: The meniscus-capsular junction's mechanical properties are similar to other knee ligaments and may play a role in knee stability. The findings provide insights into the the behavior of the meniscus-capsular junction could have clinical implications for diagnosing and surgical treatment of meniscocapsular lesions.

Reproducibility of MRI in the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions: an inter-observer study.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal ramp lesions have gained much prominence in recent years due to a significant increase in their diagnosis and their important biomechanical involvement in the knee. A new proposed classification of these lesions has recently been published. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the new classification of meniscal ramp lesions recently published using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 249 post-traumatic knee MRI studies were evaluated by three musculoskeletal radiologists independently. Patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear on MRI in addition to a recent history of trauma to the knee for <12 months were included in the study, for a total of 95. We carried out an inter-observer concordance study to analyze whether the new classification is reproducible to detect meniscal ramp lesions and to classify them into their different types. RESULTS: Among our study cohort of 95 patients, we found 47 (49.5%) ramp lesions. In the inter-observer study, we obtained a good concordance (k = 0.733) in the detection of these lesions and an excellent one (k = 0.843) when the type of lesion is described. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the new classification of meniscal ramp lesions has good reproducibility on MRI.

Medial meniscal posterior horn tears and ramp lesions in pediatric patients: lessons learned.

Meniscal injuries are increasingly reported in pediatric patients due to early sports participation and are commonly encountered during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Preoperative identification of meniscal tears is crucial, particularly when involving the posteromedial meniscocapsular junction (ramp lesion). MRI plays an important role in detecting this particular type of meniscal injury. Consequently, pediatric radiologists should be aware of particular MRI findings related to ramp lesions including the presence of a medial meniscal tear, peripheral meniscal irregularity, meniscocapsular junctional fluid-like signal intensity, and capsular ligament tears. Thus, we illustrate the lessons we have learned from our institutional multidisciplinary arthroscopic-MR correlation conference for retrospectively identified posterior horn medial meniscal tears and ramp lesions.

Medial meniscal ramp lesions in ACL-injured elite athletes are strongly associated with medial collateral ligament injuries and medial tibial bone bruising on MRI.

PURPOSE: Medial menisco-capsular separations (ramp lesions) are typically found in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. They are frequently missed preoperatively due to low MRI sensitivity. The purpose of this article was to describe demographic and anatomical risk factors for ramp lesions, and to identify concomitant lesions and define their characteristics to improve diagnosis of ramp lesions on MRI. METHODS: Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between September 2015 and April 2019 were included in this study. The presence/absence of ramp lesions was recorded in preoperative MRIs and at surgery. Patients' characteristics and clinical findings, concomitant injuries on MRI and the posterior tibial slope were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred patients (80 male, 20 female) with a mean age of 22.3 ± 4.9 years met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of ramp lesions diagnosed at surgery was 16%. Ramp lesions were strongly associated with injuries to the deep MCL (dMCL, p < 0.01), the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL, p < 0.01), and a small medial-lateral tibial slope asymmetry (p < 0.05). There was also good correlation between ramp lesions and bone oedema in the posterior medial tibia plateau (MTP, p < 0.05) and medial femoral condyle (MFC, p < 0.05). A dMCL injury, a smaller differential medial-lateral tibial slope than usual, and the identification of a ramp lesion on MRI increases the likelihood of finding a ramp lesion at surgery. MRI sensitivity was 62.5% and the specificity was 84.5%. CONCLUSION: The presence on MRI of sMCL and/or dMCL lesions, bone oedema in the posterior MTP and MFC, and a smaller differential medial-lateral tibial slope than usual are highly associated with ramp lesions visible on MRI. Additionally, a dMCL injury, a flatter lateral tibial slope than usual, and the identification of a ramp lesion on MRI increases the likelihood of finding a ramp lesion at surgery. Knowledge of the risk factors and secondary injury signs associated with ramp lesions facilitate the diagnosis of a ramp lesion preoperatively and should raise surgeons' suspicion of this important lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.

MRI Criteria for Meniscal Ramp Lesions of the Knee in Children With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of MRI criteria for identifying meniscal ramp lesions in children with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, with arthroscopy used as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 85 children who underwent a preoperative MRI examination and arthroscopically guided primary ACL reconstruction between June 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Blinded to arthroscopic findings, two radiologists reviewed all MRI examinations and reached consensus on the presence or absence of an effusion and various findings within the medial and lateral tibiofemoral joints. Chi-square, Fisher exact, independent t, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare MRI findings between patients with and without arthroscopically confirmed meniscal ramp lesions. RESULTS. At arthroscopy, 35 children (23 boys and 12 girls; mean [± SD] age, 15.7 ± 2.0 years) had ramp lesions and 50 children (22 boys and 28 girls; mean age, 15.1 ± 2.4 years) had intact meniscocapsular junctions. Knees in which a ramp lesion was observed were significantly more likely to have MRI findings of a medial meniscus tear (p = .005), peripheral meniscal irregularity (p = .001), junctional T2-weighted signal (p < .001), and a meniscocapsular ligament tear (p < .001). No significant difference was found between children with and without ramp lesions with regard to the presence of an effusion (p = .65) or a lateral meniscus tear (p = .08) or the extent of medial and lateral tibial plateau marrow edema (p = .67 and p = .83, respectively). CONCLUSION. MRI findings associated with an arthroscopic diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesion include medial meniscus tear, peripheral meniscal irregularity, junctional fluidlike signal, and capsular ligament tear.

Accuracy measures of 1.5-tesla MRI for the diagnosis of ACL, meniscus and articular knee cartilage damage and characteristics of false negative lesions: a level III prognostic study.

BACKGROUND: MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for diagnosing knee pathologies. However, there is uncertainty concerning factors predicting false negative MRI, such as meniscal tear patterns as well as patient factors. The aims of this study were to report 1.5-Tesla MRI accuracy of ACL, meniscus and articular cartilage damage and characterize false negative lesions. METHODS: Two hundred eighteen consecutive knee arthroscopies performed in our institution between 2013 and 2016 and their respective prospectively-collected MRI reports were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age > 15 years-old, primary arthroscopy, 1.5-Tesla MRI performed at the same institution, and time interval MRI-surgery < 6 months. Exclusion criteria were revision arthroscopy and arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation or multiligament surgery. Accuracy measures and Kappa coefficients were calculated comparing the MRI diagnosis to the arthroscopic findings. Moreover, the arthroscopic findings of false negative MRI were compared to the findings of true positive MRI using the Fisher-exact test. Pearson correlation was used for testing the correlation between MRI accuracy and patient age. RESULTS: The highest accuracy was observed in medial meniscus and in ACL findings. For the medial meniscus sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and Kappa coefficient were 77, 92, 86%, and 0.7, and for the ACL these measures were 82, 97, 87%, and 0.73. MRI accuracy was lower in the lateral meniscus and articular cartilage with Kappa coefficient 0.42 and 0.3, respectively. More specifically, short peripheral tears in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus were characteristic of false negative findings compared to true positive findings of the MRI (p <  0.01). MRI accuracy correlated negatively compared to arthroscopic findings with patient age for the medial meniscus (r = - 0.21, p = 0.002) and for articular cartilage damage (r = - 0.45, p <  0.001). CONCLUSION: 1.5-Tesla MRI will accurately diagnose ACL and medial meniscal tears and can reliably complete the diagnostic workup following physical examination, particularly in young adults. This modality however is not reliable for diagnosing short peripheral tears at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and partial thickness articular cartilage lesion of the femoral condyles. For these lesions, definitive diagnosis may require cartilage-specific MRI sequences or direct arthroscopic evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level III.

MRI appearance of the different meniscal ramp lesion types, with clinical and arthroscopic correlation.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal ramp lesions have been defined as longitudinal vertical peripheral tears of the medial meniscus involving the posterior meniscocapsular ligament, meniscotibial ligament, and/or the red-red zone of the posterior horn. They are heavily associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries, and because of their potentially important biomechanical role in knee stabilization, injuries to this region may require surgical repair. However, due to their location and lack of general knowledge regarding their different types and associated appearances on magnetic resonance imaging, ramp lesions are routinely underreported. This is compounded by the fact that ramp lesions are also often overlooked during conventional anterior portal arthroscopy when direct visualization is not achieved. PURPOSE: To demonstrate MRI appearances and arthroscopic findings of the different types of meniscal ramp lesions, in the hopes of improving their detection on pre-operative imaging.

Ramp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees and should be repaired in case of instability.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was (1) to provide an overview of common definitions and classification systems of ramp lesions (RL) and (2) to systematically review the available literature with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of RLs in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for articles (1) reporting on acute or chronic ACL injuries, (2) with concomitant medial meniscus injury, (3) located at the posterior meniscocapsular attachment site (and red-red zone). Ex vivo studies, reviews and technical notes were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included based on the criteria mentioned above. RLs are common in ACL-deficient knees with a prevalence ranging from 9 to 24%. RLs should especially be suspected in younger patients, patients with an increased meniscal slope and in patients with prolonged time from injury to surgery. The sensitivity of MRI for the detection of RLs ranges from 48 to 86% at a specificity of 79-99%. For arthroscopy, RLs are easily missed through standard anterior portals (sensitivity 0-38%). RL repair leads to a significant improvement of subjective knee scores, regardless of the specific fixation technique. For stable RLs, the literature suggests equivalent postoperative stability for trephination and abrasion compared to surgical RL repair. CONCLUSION: Ramp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees on standard arthroscopy with anterior portals only. If a RL is suspected, exploration via an additional posteromedial portal is indicated. In case of instability, RL repair should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Meniscal ramp lesions should be considered in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees, especially with larger instability or longer delay before surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of meniscal ramp lesions in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knees and to clarify whether ramp lesions are related to chronic ACL deficiency and increased knee instability. METHODS: Consecutive ACL injured patients were evaluated arthroscopically for a ramp lesion via a trans-notch view and evidence of menisco-capsular injury was recorded. Other concomitant injuries to the knee were also noted. Incidence of meniscal ramp lesions, delay before surgery, and anterior-posterior stability was analyzed. All patients underwent bilateral KT-2000 evaluation. RESULTS: One hundred and three consecutive ACL injured patients with a mean age of 24 years were included in this study. In total, a ramp lesion was found in 10 knees (9.7%) via a trans-notch view. None of these lesions could be identified by the standard view from the anterolateral portal. Other medial meniscal lesions were found in 26 knees (25.2%) by standard arthroscopic viewing. The ramp lesion group had significantly longer delay before surgery with a median of 191 days (p < 0.01) as well as a larger side-to-side difference of KT-2000 measurement (7.3 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.01), compared with the intact medial meniscus group (53 days and 5.5 ± 1.5 mm, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ramp lesions that were identified using a trans-notch view were not visualized with standard arthroscopic views. Increased anterior tibial translation and longer delay before surgery were seen in knees with ramp lesions. Careful inspection of the posteromedial menisco-capsular region is required as hidden menisco-capsular lesions may occur which may result in residual knee instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

MR evaluation of the meniscal ramp lesion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tear.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the findings on magnetic resonance imaging most strongly associated with meniscal ramp lesions in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament tear. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients (mean age, 33.7 years; 64 male, 14 female) with an arthroscopically proven anterior cruciate ligament tear were included in this retrospective study. The presence of the following six features on magnetic resonance images were recorded: complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule margin; edema affecting the posterior capsule; irregularity of the medial meniscus at the posterior margin; fluid at the periphery of the medial meniscus; the corner notch sign; and a vertical tear at the medial meniscus. Findings at arthroscopy served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Seven ramp lesions were noted on arthroscopy (9%). Findings of irregularity at the posterior margin (p = 0.001) and complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule margin (p = 0.004) on magnetic resonance imaging were significantly associated with the presence of a ramp lesion. With the irregularity at the posterior margin, sensitivity was 86% and specificity was 79%. Complete fluid filling sign showed sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 92%. Concordance of the two readers for the six magnetic resonance imaging features was fair to very good (k = 0.38-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Irregularity at posterior margin and complete fluid filling were most sensitive findings for detecting of a ramp lesion on magnetic resonance imaging.

MRI can accurately detect meniscal ramp lesions of the knee.

PURPOSE: Posterior horn meniscal tears are commonly found in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Some believe tears in the posterior meniscocapsular zone, coined ramp lesions, are important to knee stability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pre-operative MRI evaluation was able to accurately and reproducibly identify ramp lesions. METHODS: Three blinded reviewers assessed MRIs twice for the presence of ramp lesions in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for MRI were calculated based on arthroscopic diagnosis of a ramp lesion. Intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to assess intra- and interobserver reliability of the MRI assessment between the three examiners. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Ninety patients met inclusion criteria (45 males, 45 females, mean age 28.0 years). Thirteen of these patients had arthroscopy-confirmed ramp lesions, while the other 77 had other meniscal pathology. Sensitivity of detecting a ramp lesion on MRI ranged from 53.9 to 84.6%, while specificity was 92.3-98.7%. Negative predictive value was 91.1-97.4%, while positive predictive value was 50.0-90.0%. Inter-rater reliability between three reviewers was moderate at 0.56. The observers had excellent intra-rater reliability ranging from 0.75 to 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates high sensitivity and excellent specificity in detecting meniscal ramp lesions on MRI. Ramp lesions are likely more common and may have greater clinical implications than previously appreciated; the outcomes of untreated lesions must be investigated. Pre-operative identification of ramp lesions may aid clinicians in surgical planning and patient education to improve outcomes by addressing pathology which may have otherwise been missed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Meniscocapsular release technique to reduce chronic and challenging bucket-handle meniscus tear.

Several surgical procedures for the repair of bucket handle meniscus tears have been reported in the literature. However, even the most skilled surgeon can find it difficult to treat chronic and locked lesions, which typically result in meniscectomies. Therefore, a repair method for bucket-handle meniscus tears that are chronic and locked is shown, along with a case series where this procedure was used. The technique consists of a release of the joint capsule attachment to the meniscal body, which increases the mobility of the meniscus and facilitates the reduction of the injury, allowing subsequent repair through a combination of both all-inside and inside-out repair techniques. The main objective of this technique is to reduce the need for meniscectomies in difficult cases of bucket-handle meniscus tears, protect the meniscal tissue, and slow the progression of osteoarthritis in the process.

Greater Knee Rotatory Instability After Posterior Meniscocapsular Injury Versus Anterolateral Ligament Injury: A Proposed Mechanism of High-Grade Pivot Shift.

Background: For anterolateral rotatory instability as a result of secondary soft tissue injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees, there is increasing interest in secondary stabilizers to prevent internal rotation (IR) of the tibia. Purpose: To determine which secondary stabilizer is more important in anterolateral rotatory instability in ACL-deficient knees. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The lower extremities of 10 fresh-frozen cadavers (20 extremities) without anterior-posterior or rotational instability were included. Matched-pair randomization was performed, with each side per specimen assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In group 1, the ACL was sectioned, followed by the anterolateral ligament (ALL); in group 2, the ACL was sectioned, followed by sequential sectioning of the posterolateral meniscocapsular complex (PLMCC) and posteromedial meniscocapsular complex (PMMCC). The primary outcome was the change in relative tibial IR during a simulated pivot-shift test with 5 N·m of IR torque and 8.9 N of valgus force. The secondary outcomes were the International Knee Documentation Committee grade in the pivot-shift test and the incidence of the grade 3 pivot shift. Results: In group 1, compared with baseline, the change in relative tibial IR at 0° of knee flexion was 1.4° (95% CI, -0.1° to 2.9°; P = .052) after ALL release. In group 2, it was 2.5° (95% CI, 0.4° to 4.8°; P = .007) after PLMCC release and 4.1° (95% CI, 0.5° to 7.8°; P = .017) after combined PLMCC and PMMCC release. Combined PLMCC and PMMCC release resulted in greater change of tibial IR with statistical significance at 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion (P = .008, .057, and .004, respectively) compared with ALL release. The incidence of grade 3 pivot shifts was 10% in group 1 and 90% in group 2. Conclusion: Posterior meniscocapsular laxity caused an increase in relative tibial IR as much as ALL injury in ACL-deficient knees in our simulated laboratory test, and greater anterolateral rotatory instability occurred with posterior meniscocapsular injury compared with ALL injury. Clinical Relevance: Repair of the injured posterior meniscocapsular complex may be an important treatment option for reducing anterolateral rotatory instability in the ACL-deficient knee.

Permanent Subluxation of the Lateral Meniscus in a 10-year-old Boy: A Case Report with Short Literature Review.

Introduction: Locking of the knee attributed to non-discoid lateral meniscus in an atraumatic setting is a rare phenomenon. One such cause is permanent subluxation of lateral meniscus (PSLM). In the entire literature, there is only one documented case of a 37-year-old female. Case Report: We present a case of a 10-year-old boy who suffered two episodes of knee locking reported radiologically as a bucket handle tear of the lateral meniscus. No tear was found during arthroscopy. The lateral meniscus was malformed with meniscocapsular discontinuity and irreducibly subluxated into the intercondylar space. No salvage procedure was possible. We ended up performing a subtotal meniscectomy. Conclusion: This is the first case of PSLM reported in the pediatric age group and second overall. Management options are limited. Further genetic and fetal studies are needed in this area to determine the exact causality.

Meniscal ramp lesions - Skillful neglect or routine repair?

Background: Meniscal ramp lesions are injuries of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus at the meniscocapsular junction or the meniscotibial ligament and are frequently associated with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Objective: To review the current literature on meniscal ramp lesion management to better define the indications for and outcomes of repair. Methods: A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Studies of all evidence levels (I-V) pertaining to meniscal ramp lesions were reviewed and included. Results: The incidence of ramp lesions has been reported between 16% and 42%. Arthroscopy remains the diagnostic gold standard as magnetic resonance imaging has limited sensitivity. Biomechanically, ramp lesions are known to increase anterior tibial translation and rotational laxity. Clinical investigations regarding optimal management are largely limited to studies of low evidence levels. While case series have demonstrated that repair is safe and efficacious, comparative studies have failed to suggest that repair of stable lesions results in superior outcomes when compared to conservative treatment approaches. However, repair may be warranted in unstable ramp lesion injuries despite the increased risk for revision surgery. Conclusion: While there is evidence to suggest that ramp lesion repair can restore joint kinematics, the current body of clinical literature fails to suggest that outcomes following repair are superior to injuries managed conservatively. The current body of clinical literature is limited, and further robust, long-term study is warranted to better guide injury diagnosis and management protocol.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.

Meniscal ramp lesions are a special type of injury that affects the periphery of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) and/or its meniscocapsular attachments. They are strongly associated with acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. These lesions have gained much prominence in recent years, due to a significant increase in their diagnosis and their important biomechanical involvement in the knee. It is known that their presence in ACL-deficient knees is related to instability and if they are not repaired during ACL reconstruction, they can ultimately cause the failure of the graft. Since this type of injury is often underdiagnosed due to its localization at the "blind" point of arthroscopic vision, it is crucial to make an accurate preoperative diagnosis of them with MRI. The objective of this article is to review the recent literature regarding meniscal ramp lesions and to summarize the anatomical, biomechanical and fundamentally diagnostic aspects, emphasizing the radiological findings described until now.

Ramp lesion repair via dual posteromedial arthroscopic portals: A cadaveric feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Ramp lesions are found in 16% to 40% of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The repair technique traditionally involves using a suture hook through a posteromedial portal, with the arthroscope positioned in the intercondylar view via an antero-lateral portal. Ramp lesions may be difficult to visualize and repair, even with a 70° arthroscope. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of suturing ramp lesions via dual posteromedial portals for the arthroscope and instruments. HYPOTHESIS: Dual posteromedial arthroscopic portals allow good visualisation and high-quality suturing of ramp lesions, without inducing specific iatrogenic injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used 11 fresh cadaver knees. Two posteromedial portals were created under visualisation via an arthroscope introduced through an antero-lateral portal: one was the traditional instrumental portal and the other, located more proximally, was the optical portal. A 2-cm long ramp lesion was created. A suture hook was used to place one or two stitches of PDS n°0 suture. A probe was used to test the quality and stability of the suturing. The posteromedial plane was then dissected to evaluate the anatomical relationships of the portals. RESULTS: The dual posteromedial approach allowed the visualisation and hook suturing of the ramp lesions in all 11 cases. A single stitch was placed in 4 cases and two stitches in 7 cases. The suture was always of good quality and stable when tested with the probe. The dissection found no injuries to nerves, blood vessels, or tendons. CONCLUSION: Ramp lesions can be repaired through a dual posteromedial arthroscopic approach. This surgical technique provides good visibility of these lesions and allows high-quality suturing, with no specific iatrogenic injuries. It is an alternative to ramp lesion repair via a single posteromedial portal, which can be challenging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, experimental study with no control group.

Is there a good agreement between MRI readers for Thaunat's classification in arthroscopically-proven meniscal ramp lesions?

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the reproducibility by MRI of an arthroscopically-based classification for meniscal ramp lesions. We hypothesize that MRI would present good interobserver and intraobserver reliability to evaluate meniscal ramp lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty MRI of the knee with arthroscopically-proven meniscal ramp lesions were independently assessed by two skilled musculoskeletal radiologists and a third-year radiology resident. Reading was performed in a randomized and anonymous manner, in two steps, with a minimum of 1-month interval between each. Cohen's kappa coefficient statistic was used to analyze intra and interobserver reading agreement. Associate findings were also categorized. RESULTS: From 20 subjects, 17 were male, with mean age of 35 years. MRI reading showed type IV ramp lesion as most prevalent with eight cases (37%), followed by type V - four (21%), type I - four (20%), type III - three, (16%) and type II - one (6%). Regarding ramp lesion types, intraobserver agreement was substantial for both skilled readers (Kappa = 0.72), and moderate for the less experienced reader (Kappa = 0.51); interobserver agreement was moderate. Results between most experienced readers were also analyzed in two categories: stable (types I and II) and unstable (types III, IV and V), also resulting in moderate agreement (Kappa = 0.54). Intraobserver agreement was substantial for both readers (Kappa = 0.68). The most common associate findings were joint effusion (85%), posteromedial capsular structures injury (60%), and medial meniscus extrusion (60%). CONCLUSION: The arthroscopy classification for meniscal ramp lesions stability adapted for MRI has good reproducibility when applied by trained musculoskeletal radiologists.

Risk Factors for Ramp Lesions of the Medial Meniscus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Failure to appropriately identify and repair medial meniscal ramp lesions at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may result in increased anterior tibial translation and internal rotation, increasing the risk for graft failure. Knowledge of the risk factors leading to the development of ramp lesions may enhance clinicians' vigilance in specific ACL-deficient populations and subsequently repair of these lesions at the time of ACLR. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors tested for associations with ramp lesions and to determine which were significantly associated with the presence of ramp lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in April 2020. Data pertaining to study characteristics and reported risk factors for ramp lesions were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird binary random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between risk factors and ramp lesions by generating effect estimates in the form of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Qualitative analysis was performed to describe risk factors that were variably reported. RESULTS: The review included 12 studies with 8410 patients. The overall pooled prevalence of ramp lesions was 21.9% (range, 9.0%-41.7%). A total of 45 risk factors were identified, of which 8 were explored quantitatively. There was strong evidence to support that posteromedial tibial edema on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.27-3.56; P = .004), age <30 years (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.23-3.22; P = .002), and complete ACL tears (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.41-6.20; P = .004) were risk factors for ramp lesions. There was moderate evidence to support that male sex (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.36-1.83; P < .001) and concomitant lateral meniscal tears (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.13; P = .009) were risk factors for ramp lesions. Chronic ACL injury (≥24 months) demonstrated minimal evidence as a risk factor (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.14-1.74; P = .001). No significant associations were determined between contact injury or revision ACLR and the presence of ramp lesions. CONCLUSION: Significant associations between male sex, age <30 years, posteromedial tibial edema on MRI, concomitant lateral meniscal tears, complete ACL tears, injury chronicity, and the presence of ramp lesions were found. Contact injury and revision ACLR were not significantly associated with the presence of ramp lesions.