Retained metal fragments following esophageal button battery impaction.

Button battery (BB) impaction in the esophagus requires immediate endoscopic removal and meticulous follow-up, including serial cross-sectional imaging, preferably with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, BBs quickly degrade in the esophagus, and metallic fragments may remain in the injured mucosa following removal. This metallic debris can cause thermal injury during MRI, potentially aggravating local injury. We aimed to explore whether such metallic fragments could be identified on imaging following BB removal. In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of children (0-18 years) presenting with BB impaction in the esophagus between 2014 and 2020. Endoscopy reports and imaging studies were blindly reviewed by a pediatric gastroenterologist and a pediatric radiologist. Of 161 cases of battery ingestion, 14 (8%) underwent endoscopy, and in 9 (5%) a BB was impacted in the esophagus. The median time from ingestion to BB removal was 8 h (range 2-48 h). The median time from removal to CT was 44 h (range 0.5-104 h). BB appearance ranged from mild corrosion to visible debris. Pre-removal plain films showed irregular battery contour suggesting corrosion (5/7 plain films). In 7/9 CT scans (78%), high-attenuation esophageal content (median 266HU (range 140-1151)), which may represent metallic debris, was identified. Five patients had a follow-up CT which still showed gradual resolution of the high-attenuation content.Conclusions: we describe a new finding on CT following BB removal which might represent metallic debris. Clinicians should be aware of these findings which potentially may be harmful during MRI used in the ongoing assessment of esophageal injury. What is Known: • Button batteries are a dangerous pediatric foreign body with potentially fatal vascular complications. What is New: • Metallic debris was identified on computerized tomography following button battery removal in most children. • We bring to attention this new finding which may affect clinical management, as minimal metallic content can cause burns during MRI.

Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty.

The purpose of this article is to describe the use of ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of painful joint arthroplasty. Ultrasound plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of the painful joint arthroplasty, especially given its unique dynamic capabilities, convenience, and high resolution. Ultrasound guidance is also instrumental for procedures in both diagnosing and in select cases, treating the painful joint arthroplasty. Topics to be discussed in this article include trends in arthroplasty placement, benefits of the use of ultrasound overall, and ultrasound evaluation of periprosthetic joint infections. We will also review the sonographic findings with dissociated/displaced components and adverse reaction to metallic debris including metallosis, trunnionosis, and metal-on-metal pseudotumors. Additionally, we will discuss ultrasound evaluation of tendon pathologies with arthroplasties, including dynamic maneuvers to evaluate for tendon impingement/snapping. Finally, we will cover ultrasound-guided joint arthroplasty injection indications and precautions. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound is preferred over MRI in patients with joint arthroplasty and plays a crucial role in diagnosis, especially given its unique dynamic capabilities, convenience and high resolution. • It is especially beneficial for US-guided aspiration in periprosthetic joint infections; effectively used to evaluate periprosthetic fluid collections, facilitating differentiation between abscesses and aseptic collections, and tracking sinus tracts. • Recently, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections has shifted focus to biomarkers in the periprosthetic fluid, specifically α-defensin, which has a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing infection. • Cutibacterium acnes is a major pathogen responsible for shoulder arthroplasty infections, often presenting with normal laboratory values and since slow growing, must be kept for a minimum of 14 days.

The contribution of the histopathological examination to the diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions in arthroplasty.

The histopathological examination of the periprosthetic soft tissue and bone has contributed to the identification and description of the morphological features of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR)/adverse reactions to metallic debris (ARMD). The need of a uniform vocabulary for all disciplines involved in the diagnosis and management of ALTR/ARMD and of clarification of the parameters used in the semi-quantitative scoring systems for their classification has been considered a pre-requisite for a meaningful interdisciplinary evaluation.This review of key terms used for ALTR/ARMD has resulted in the following outcomes: (a) pseudotumor is a descriptive term for ALTR/ARMD, classifiable in two main types according to its cellular composition defining its clinical course; (b) the substitution of the term metallosis with presence of metallic wear debris, since it cannot be used as a category of implant failure or histological diagnosis; (c) the term aseptic lymphocytic-dominated vasculitis- associated lesion (ALVAL) should be replaced due to the absence of a vasculitis with ALLTR/ALRMD for lymphocytic-predominant and AMLTR/AMRMD for macrophage-predominant reaction.This review of the histopathological classifications of ALTR/ARMD has resulted in the following outcomes: (a) distinction between cell death and tissue necrosis; (b) the association of corrosion metallic debris with adverse local lymphocytic reaction and tissue necrosis; (c) the importance of cell and particle debris for the viscosity and density of the lubricating synovial fluid; (d) a consensus classification of lymphocytic infiltrate in soft tissue and bone marrow; (e) evaluation of the macrophage infiltrate in soft tissues and bone marrow; (f) classification of macrophage induced osteolysis/aseptic loosening as a delayed type of ALTR/ARMD; (g) macrophage motility and migration as possible driving factor for osteolysis; (h) usefulness of the histopathological examination for the natural history of the adverse reactions, radiological correlation, post-marketing surveillance, and implant registries.The review of key terms used for the description and histopathological classification of ALTR/ARMD has resulted in a comprehensive, new standard for all disciplines involved in their diagnosis, clinical management, and long-term clinical follow-up. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:399-419. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210013.

Metallic wear debris may regulate CXCR4 expression in vitro and in vivo.

CXCR4, the chemokine receptor for CXCL12, also known as SDF-1 (stromal cell derived factor-1), has been shown to play a pivotal role in bone metastasis, inflammatory, and autoimmune conditions but has not been investigated in periprosthetic osteolysis. We co-cultured osteoblast-like cells with increasing concentrations of metallic (Co-35Ni-20Cr-10Mo and Co-28Cr-6Mo) and Co-ions simulating wear debris. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting were used to quantify gene and protein expression of CXCR4. The expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and the effects of AMD3100 (bicyclam) on both CXCR4 and TNF-α expression among these cells was investigated. RT-PCR showed an increase in CXCR4 mRNA (7.5-fold for MG63 and 4.0-fold for SaOs-2 cells) among cells co-cultured with metal alloy particles. Western blotting showed a time-dependent increase in protein expression of CXCR4. The attempted blockade of CXCR4 by its known competitive receptor agonist AMD3100 led to a significant inhibition TNF-α mRNA expression. Immunohistochemistry showed CXCR4 positivity among patients with failed metal-on-metal hip replacements and radiographic evidence of osteolysis. Our data collectively suggest that the CXCR4 chemokine is upregulated in a dose- and time-dependent manner in the presence of metallic wear debris.

Metal on metal total hip arthroplasty and a large groin mass: Not always adverse reaction to metallic debris.

Due to their improved wear rates, Metal-on-metal bearings have been increasingly used in the past decade by orthopaedic surgeons carrying out total hip arthroplasty. However there is increasing evidence that there are significant complications associated with such implants. One well documented complication is that of metallic debris leading to pseudotumour formation, however there is less known about associations with other tumours within the pelvis. We present two cases where an intra-pelvic mass in patients with metal-on-metal implants were diagnosed as being of a different aetiology. This highlights the need for careful assessment of such patients in order to guide appropriate management.

Electron Microprobe Analysis and Tissue Reaction around Titanium Alloy Spinal Implants.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of tissue surrounding titanium alloy spinal implants was performed using histological and electron microprobe analysis. PURPOSE: To identify the metal debris generated by spinal implants, and then to evaluate the electron microprobe analysis results and the histological response of soft tissue surrounding the spinal implants. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Microscopic metal particles from the soft tissue surrounding joint arthroplasty have been shown to activate a macrophage response that leads to bone resorption and increased inflammation. The effect of unintended wear particles in spinal instrumentation remains a clinical concern. METHODS: Ten patients (average age, 51.3 years), 6 men and 4 women, who had undergone previous lumbar fusions using pedicle screw instrumentation and who were now undergoing revision surgery were included in the study. The tissues obtained from the adjacent area of these implants were analyzed by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscope. After the removing the spinal implants, the changes of back pain and the spinal fusion were assessed. RESULTS: There were metal particles in the soft tissue in 7 cases. Histological finding observed mild chronic inflammation surrounding the deposition of the metal particles and the anti Cotrel-Dubousset 68 positive macrophages were observed at tissue adjacent to the metal particles in 5 patients. Scanning electron microscopy of the specimens showed metallic debris within the tissue and mapping of the metallic particles revealed the distribution of titanium in the tissue in 5 cases. Nine patients had successful relief of back pain after removing the spinal implants. Improvement of the back pain may be an association macrophage response rather than the metal particle. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metallic particles generated from spinal implants may serve as the impetus for a late-onset inflammatory response and late operative site pain.

Electron Microprobe Analysis and Tissue Reaction around Titanium Alloy Spinal Implants

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of tissue surrounding titanium alloy spinal implants was performed using histological and electron microprobe analysis. PURPOSE: To identify the metal debris generated by spinal implants, and then to evaluate the electron microprobe analysis results and the histological response of soft tissue surrounding the spinal implants. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Microscopic metal particles from the soft tissue surrounding joint arthroplasty have been shown to activate a macrophage response that leads to bone resorption and increased inflammation. The effect of unintended wear particles in spinal instrumentation remains a clinical concern. METHODS: Ten patients (average age, 51.3 years), 6 men and 4 women, who had undergone previous lumbar fusions using pedicle screw instrumentation and who were now undergoing revision surgery were included in the study. The tissues obtained from the adjacent area of these implants were analyzed by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscope. After the removing the spinal implants, the changes of back pain and the spinal fusion were assessed. RESULTS: There were metal particles in the soft tissue in 7 cases. Histological finding observed mild chronic inflammation surrounding the deposition of the metal particles and the anti Cotrel-Dubousset 68 positive macrophages were observed at tissue adjacent to the metal particles in 5 patients. Scanning electron microscopy of the specimens showed metallic debris within the tissue and mapping of the metallic particles revealed the distribution of titanium in the tissue in 5 cases. Nine patients had successful relief of back pain after removing the spinal implants. Improvement of the back pain may be an association macrophage response rather than the metal particle. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metallic particles generated from spinal implants may serve as the impetus for a late-onset inflammatory response and late operative site pain.