Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
1.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 23(1): 541, 2022 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513983

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing is gaining in popularity and offers many advantages over short-read sequencing. The higher information content in long reads is useful for a variety of metagenomics analyses, including taxonomic classification and profiling. The development of long-read specific tools for taxonomic classification is accelerating, yet there is a lack of information regarding their relative performance. Here, we perform a critical benchmarking study using 11 methods, including five methods designed specifically for long reads. We applied these tools to several mock community datasets generated using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) HiFi or Oxford Nanopore Technology sequencing, and evaluated their performance based on read utilization, detection metrics, and relative abundance estimates. RESULTS: Our results show that long-read classifiers generally performed best. Several short-read classification and profiling methods produced many false positives (particularly at lower abundances), required heavy filtering to achieve acceptable precision (at the cost of reduced recall), and produced inaccurate abundance estimates. By contrast, two long-read methods (BugSeq, MEGAN-LR & DIAMOND) and one generalized method (sourmash) displayed high precision and recall without any filtering required. Furthermore, in the PacBio HiFi datasets these methods detected all species down to the 0.1% abundance level with high precision. Some long-read methods, such as MetaMaps and MMseqs2, required moderate filtering to reduce false positives to resemble the precision and recall of the top-performing methods. We found read quality affected performance for methods relying on protein prediction or exact k-mer matching, and these methods performed better with PacBio HiFi datasets. We also found that long-read datasets with a large proportion of shorter reads (< 2 kb length) resulted in lower precision and worse abundance estimates, relative to length-filtered datasets. Finally, for classification methods, we found that the long-read datasets produced significantly better results than short-read datasets, demonstrating clear advantages for long-read metagenomic sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our critical assessment of available methods provides best-practice recommendations for current research using long reads and establishes a baseline for future benchmarking studies.


Assuntos
Metagenoma , Metagenômica , Metagenômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Benchmarking , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos
2.
Mol Ecol ; 30(3): 855-873, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33301628

RESUMO

Although most predators are generalists, the majority of studies on the association between prey availability and prey consumption have focused on specialist predators. To investigate the role of highly generalist predators in a complex food web, we measured the relationships between prey consumption and prey availability in two common arthropodivorous bats. Specifically, we used high-throughput amplicon sequencing coupled with a known mock community to characterize seasonal changes in little brown and big brown bat diets. We then linked spatiotemporal variation in prey consumption with quantitative prey availability estimated from intensive prey community sampling. We found that although quantitative prey availability fluctuated substantially over space and time, the most commonly consumed prey items were consistently detected in bat diets independently of their respective abundance. Positive relationships between prey abundance and probability of consumption were found only among prey groups that were less frequently detected in bat diets. While the probability of prey consumption was largely unrelated to abundance, the community structure of prey detected in bat diets was influenced by the local or regional abundance of prey. Observed patterns suggest that while little brown and big brown bats maintain preferences for particular prey independently of quantitative prey availability, total dietary composition may reflect some degree of opportunistic foraging. Overall, our findings suggest that generalist predators can display strong prey preferences that persist despite quantitative changes in prey availability.


Assuntos
Quirópteros , Animais , Dieta , Cadeia Alimentar , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Comportamento Predatório
3.
New Phytol ; 228(3)2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32531109

RESUMO

Recent studies have questioned the use of high-throughput sequencing of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region to derive a semi-quantitative representation of fungal community composition. However, comprehensive studies that quantify biases occurring during PCR and sequencing of ITS amplicons are still lacking. We used artificially assembled communities consisting of 10 ITS-like fragments of varying lengths and guanine-cytosine (GC) contents to evaluate and quantify biases during PCR and sequencing with Illumina MiSeq, PacBio RS II and PacBio Sequel I technologies. Fragment length variation was the main source of bias in observed community composition relative to the template, with longer fragments generally being under-represented for all sequencing platforms. This bias was three times higher for Illumina MiSeq than for PacBio RS II and Sequel I. All 10 fragments in the artificial community were recovered when sequenced with PacBio technologies, whereas the three longest fragments (> 447 bases) were lost when sequenced with Illumina MiSeq. Fragment length bias also increased linearly with increasing number of PCR cycles but could be mitigated by optimization of the PCR setup. No significant biases related to GC content were observed. Despite lower sequencing output, PacBio sequencing was better able to reflect the community composition of the template than Illumina MiSeq sequencing.


Assuntos
Micobioma , Composição de Bases , Sequência de Bases , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Análise de Sequência de DNA
4.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 19(1): 399, 2018 Nov 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30390617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the analysis of a large number of metagenomic sequences costs heavy computing resources and takes long time, we examined a selected small part of metagenomic sequences as "sample"s of the entire full sequences, both for a mock community and for 10 different existing metagenomics case studies. A mock community with 10 bacterial strains was prepared, and their mixed genome were sequenced by Hiseq. The hits of BLAST search for reference genome of each strain were counted. Each of 176 different small parts selected from these sequences were also searched by BLAST and their hits were also counted, in order to compare them to the original search results from the full sequences. We also prepared small parts of sequences which were selected from 10 publicly downloadable research data of MG-RAST service, and analyzed these samples with MG-RAST. RESULTS: Both the BLAST search tests of the mock community and the results from the publicly downloadable researches of MG-RAST show that sampling an extremely small part from sequence data is useful to estimate brief taxonomic information of the original metagenomic sequences. For 9 cases out of 10, the most annotated classes from the MG-RAST analyses of the selected partial sample sequences are the same as the ones from the originals. CONCLUSIONS: When a researcher wants to estimate brief information of a metagenome's taxonomic distribution with less computing resources and within shorter time, the researcher can analyze a selected small part of metagenomic sequences. With this approach, we can also build a strategy to monitor metagenome samples of wider geographic area, more frequently.


Assuntos
Metagenoma , Metagenômica , Composição de Bases/genética , Sequência de Bases , Anotação de Sequência Molecular , Filogenia , Tamanho da Amostra
5.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(9): 2515-2528, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020914

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Despite the input of microbiome research, a group of 20 bacteria continues to be the focus of periodontal diagnostics and therapy. The aim of this study was to compare three commercial kits and laboratory-developed primer pairs for effectiveness in detecting such periodontopathogens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen bacterial mock communities, consisting of 16 randomly assembled bacterial strains, were used as reference standard for testing kits and primers. Extracted DNA from mock communities was analyzed by PCR in-house with specific primers and forwarded for analysis to the manufacturer's laboratory of each of the following kits: ParoCheck®Kit 20, micro-IDent®plus11, and Carpegen® Perio Diagnostik. RESULTS: The kits accurately detected Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia/Prevotella nigrescens, Parvimonas micra, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Campylobacter rectus/showae, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus mutans, and Veillonella parvula. The in-house primers for F.nucleatum were highly specific to subtypes of the respective periopathogen. Other primers repeatedly detected oral pathogens not present in the mock communities, indicating reduced specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The commercial kits used in this study are reliable tools to support periodontal diagnostics. Whereas the detection profile of the kits is fixed at a general specificity level, the design of primers can be adjusted to differentiate between highly specific strains. In-house primers are more error-prone. Bacterial mock communities can be established as a reference standard for any similar testing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The tested kits render good results with selected bacterial species. Primers appear to be less useful for routine clinical diagnostics and of limited applicability in research. Basic information about the periodontopathogens identified in this study supports clinical decision-making.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Doenças Periodontais/microbiologia , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
6.
Sci Total Environ ; 927: 172281, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588740

RESUMO

Metabarcoding has been widely accepted as a useful tool for biodiversity assessment based on eDNA. The method allows for the detection of entire groups of organisms in a single sample, making it particularly applicable in aquatic habitats. The high sensitivity of the molecular approaches is especially beneficial in detecting elusive and rare fish species, improving biodiversity assessments. Numerous biotic and abiotic factors that affect the persistence and availability of fish DNA in surface waters and therefore affecting species detectability, have been identified. However, little is known about the relationship between the total fish DNA concentration and the detectability of differential abundant species. In this study three controlled mock-community DNA samples (56 individual samples) were analyzed by (i) metabarcoding (MiSeq) of 12S rDNA (175 bp) and by (ii) total freshwater fish DNA quantification (via qPCR of 12S rDNA). We show that the fish DNA quantity affects the relative abundance of species-specific sequences and the detectability of rare species. In particular we found that samples with a concentration between 1000 pg/µL down to 10 pg/µL of total fish DNA revealed a stable relative frequency of DNA sequences obtained for a specific fish species, as well as a low variability between replicates. Additionally, we observed that even in complex mock-community DNA samples, a total fish DNA concentration of 23 pg/µL was sufficient to reliably detect all species in every replicate, including three rare species with proportions of ≤0.5 %. We also found that the DNA barcode similarity between species can affect detectability, if evenness is low. Our data suggest that the total DNA concentration of fish is an important factor to consider when analyzing and interpreting relative sequence abundance data. Therefore, the workflow proposed here will contribute to an ecologically and economically efficient application of metabarcoding in fish biodiversity assessment.


Assuntos
Biodiversidade , Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico , Peixes , Água Doce , Animais , Peixes/genética , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , DNA/análise
7.
Mol Ecol Resour ; : e13991, 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38979877

RESUMO

The use of short-read metabarcoding for classifying microeukaryotes is challenged by the lack of comprehensive 18S rRNA reference databases. While recent advances in high-throughput long-read sequencing provide the potential to greatly increase the phylogenetic coverage of these databases, the performance of different sequencing technologies and subsequent bioinformatics processing remain to be evaluated, primarily because of the absence of well-defined eukaryotic mock communities. To address this challenge, we created a eukaryotic rRNA operon clone-library and turned it into a precisely defined synthetic eukaryotic mock community. This mock community was then used to evaluate the performance of three long-read sequencing strategies (PacBio circular consensus sequencing and two Nanopore approaches using unique molecular identifiers) and three tools for resolving amplicons sequence variants (ASVs) (USEARCH, VSEARCH, and DADA2). We investigated the sensitivity of the sequencing techniques based on the number of detected mock taxa, and the accuracy of the different ASV-calling tools with a specific focus on the presence of chimera among the final rRNA operon ASVs. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations and best practice protocols for how to cost-effectively obtain essentially error-free rRNA operons in high-throughput. An agricultural soil sample was used to demonstrate that the sequencing and bioinformatic results from the mock community also translates to highly diverse natural samples, which enables us to identify previously undescribed microeukaryotic lineages.

8.
R Soc Open Sci ; 11(1): 231129, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204788

RESUMO

The gut mycobiome plays an important role in the health and disease of the human gut, but its exact function is still under investigation. While there is a wealth of information available on the bacterial community of the human gut microbiome, research on the fungal community is still relatively limited. In particular, technical methodologies for mycobiome analysis, especially the DNA extraction method for human faecal samples, varied in different studies. In the current study, two commercial kits commonly used in DNA extraction, the QIAamp® Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit and DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit, and one manual method, the International Human Microbiome Standards Protocol Q, were compared. Furthermore, the effectiveness of two different bead-beating machines, the Mini-Beadbeater-16 and FastPrep-24TM 5G, was compared in parallel. A mock fungal community with a known composition of fungal strains was also generated and included to compare different DNA extraction methods. Our results suggested that the method using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit and Mini-Beadbeater-16 provides the best results to extract DNA from human faecal samples. Based on our data, we propose a standard operating procedure for DNA extraction from human faecal samples for mycobiome analysis.

9.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 24(4): e13937, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363053

RESUMO

As the scope of plant eDNA metabarcoding diversifies, so do the primers, markers and methods. A wealth of primers exists today, but their comparative evaluation is lacking behind. Similarly, multi-marker approaches are recommended but debates persist regarding barcode complementarity and optimal combinations. After a literature compilation of used primers, we compared in silico 102 primer pairs based on amplicon size, coverage and specificity, followed by an experimental evaluation of 15 primer pairs on a mock community sample covering 268 plant species and genera, and about 100 families. The analysis was done for the four most common plant metabarcoding markers, rbcL, trnL, ITS1 and ITS2 and their complementarity was assessed based on retrieved species. By focusing on existing primers, we identify common designs, promote alternatives and enhance prior-supported primers for immediate applications. The ITS2 was the best-performing marker for flowering vascular plants and was congruent to ITS1. However, the combined taxonomic breadth of ITS2 and rbcL surpassed any other combination, highlighting their high complementarity across Streptophyta. Overall, our study underscores the significance of comprehensive primer and barcode evaluations tailored to metabarcoding applications.


Assuntos
DNA Ambiental , Magnoliopsida , Humanos , Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico/métodos , DNA Espaçador Ribossômico/genética , Plantas/genética , Magnoliopsida/genética
10.
Microbiome Res Rep ; 2(2): 14, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38047277

RESUMO

Inclusion and investigation of technical controls in microbiome sequencing studies is important for understanding technical biases and errors. Here, we present chkMocks, a general R-based tool that allows researchers to compare the composition of mock communities that are processed along with samples to their theoretical composition. A visual comparison between experimental and theoretical community composition and their correlation is provided for researchers to assess the quality of their sample processing workflows.

11.
Microbiologyopen ; 12(5): e1383, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877657

RESUMO

Receiving the same results from repeated analysis of the same sample is a basic principle in science. The inability to reproduce previously published results has led to discussions of a reproducibility crisis within science. For studies of microbial communities, the problem of reproducibility is more pronounced and has, in some fields, led to a discussion on the very existence of a constantly present microbiota. In this study, DNA from 44 bovine milk samples were extracted twice and the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced in two separate runs. The FASTQ files from the two data sets were run through the same bioinformatics pipeline using the same settings and results from the two data sets were compared. Milk samples collected maximally 2 h apart were used as replicates and permitted comparisons to be made within the same run. Results show a significant difference in species richness between the two sequencing runs although Shannon and Simpson's diversity was the same. Multivariate analyses of all samples demonstrate that the sequencing run was a driver for variation. Direct comparison of similarity between samples and sequencing run showed an average similarity of 42%-45% depending on whether binary or abundance-based similarity indices were used. Within-run comparisons of milk samples collected maximally 2 h apart showed an average similarity of 39%-47% depending on the similarity index used and that similarity differed significantly between runs. We conclude that repeated DNA extraction and sequencing significantly can affect the results of a low microbial biomass microbiota study.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Leite , Animais , Bactérias/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Microbiota/genética , DNA
12.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 928353, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36844394

RESUMO

Introduction: The gut microbiome is an integral partner in host health and plays a role in immune development, altered nutrition, and pathogen prevention. The mycobiome (fungal microbiome) is considered part of the rare biosphere but is still a critical component in health. Next generation sequencing has improved our understanding of fungi in the gut, but methodological challenges remain. Biases are introduced during DNA isolation, primer design and choice, polymerase selection, sequencing platform selection, and data analyses, as fungal reference databases are often incomplete or contain erroneous sequences. Methods: Here, we compared the accuracy of taxonomic identifications and abundances from mycobiome analyses which vary among three commonly selected target gene regions (18S, ITS1, or ITS2) and the reference database (UNITE - ITS1, ITS2 and SILVA - 18S). We analyze multiple communities including individual fungal isolates, a mixed mock community created from five common fungal isolates found in weanling piglet feces, a purchased commercial fungal mock community, and piglet fecal samples. In addition, we calculated gene copy numbers for the 18S, ITS1, and ITS2 regions of each of the five isolates from the piglet fecal mock community to determine whether copy number affects abundance estimates. Finally, we determined the abundance of taxa from several iterations of our in-house fecal community to assess the effects of community composition on taxon abundance. Results: Overall, no marker-database combination consistently outperformed the others. Internal transcribed space markers were slightly superior to 18S in the identification of species in tested communities, but Lichtheimia corymbifera, a common member of piglet gut communities, was not amplified by ITS1 and ITS2 primers. Thus, ITS based abundance estimates of taxa in piglet mock communities were skewed while 18S marker profiles were more accurate. Kazachstania slooffiae displayed the most stable copy numbers (83-85) while L. corymbifera displayed significant variability (90-144) across gene regions. Discussion: This study underscores the importance of preliminary studies to assess primer combinations and database choice for the mycobiome sample of interest and raises questions regarding the validity of fungal abundance estimates.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Micobioma , Animais , Suínos , Micobioma/genética , Fungos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Fezes/microbiologia , DNA Fúngico/genética
13.
DNA Res ; 30(3)2023 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37253538

RESUMO

To quantify the biases introduced during human gut microbiome studies, analyzing an artificial mock community as the reference microbiome is indispensable. However, there are still limited resources for a mock community which well represents the human gut microbiome. Here, we constructed a novel mock community comprising the type strains of 18 major bacterial species in the human gut and assessed the influence of experimental and bioinformatics procedures on the 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We found that DNA extraction methods greatly affected the DNA yields and taxonomic composition of sequenced reads, and that some of the commonly used primers for 16S rRNA genes were prone to underestimate the abundance of some gut commensal taxa such as Erysipelotrichia, Verrucomicrobiota and Methanobacteriota. Binning of the assembled contigs of shotgun metagenomic sequences by MetaBAT2 produced phylogenetically consistent, less-contaminated bins with varied completeness. The ensemble approach of multiple binning tools by MetaWRAP can improve completeness but sometimes increases the contamination rate. Our benchmark study provides an important foundation for the interpretation of human gut microbiome data by providing means for standardization among gut microbiome data obtained with different methodologies and will facilitate further development of analytical methods.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Humanos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Fluxo de Trabalho , Microbiota/genética , Metagenoma , Metagenômica/métodos
14.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1151907, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37138601

RESUMO

Recent advances in new molecular biology methods and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized metabarcoding studies investigating complex microbial communities from various environments. The inevitable first step in sample preparation is DNA extraction which introduces its own set of biases and considerations. In this study, we assessed the influence of five DNA extraction methods [B1: phenol/chloroform/isoamyl extraction, B2 and B3: isopropanol and ethanol precipitations, respectively-both modifications of B1, K1: DNeasy PowerWater Kit (QIAGEN), K2: modified DNeasy PowerWater Kit (QIAGEN) and direct PCR approach (P) that completely circumvents this step on community composition and DNA yield of mock and marine sample communities from the Adriatic Sea]. B1-B3 methods generally produced higher DNA yields and more similar microbial communities, but with higher interindividual variability. Each method demonstrated significant differences in a specific community structure, where rare taxa seem to play a crucial role. There was not one superior method closest to the theoretically expected mock community composition, they all demonstrated skewed ratios, but in a similar way which might be attributed to other factors, such as primer bias or 16S rRNA gene count for specific taxa. Direct PCR represents an interesting approach when high throughput in sample processing is required. We emphasize the importance of making a cautious decision about the choice of the extraction method or direct PCR approach, but even more importantly its consistent application throughout the study.

15.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 22(3): 1065-1085, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695878

RESUMO

Metabarcoding is an important tool for understanding fungal communities. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA is the accepted fungal barcode but has known problems. The large subunit (LSU) rDNA has also been used to investigate fungal communities but available LSU metabarcoding primers were mostly designed to target Dikarya (Ascomycota + Basidiomycota) with little attention to early diverging fungi (EDF). However, evidence from multiple studies suggests that EDF comprise a large portion of unknown diversity in community sampling. Here, we investigate how DNA marker choice and methodological biases impact recovery of EDF from environmental samples. We focused on one EDF lineage, Zoopagomycota, as an example. We evaluated three primer sets (ITS1F/ITS2, LROR/LR3, and LR3 paired with new primer LR22F) to amplify and sequence a Zoopagomycota mock community and a set of 146 environmental samples with Illumina MiSeq. We compared two taxonomy assignment methods and created an LSU reference database compatible with AMPtk software. The two taxonomy assignment methods recovered strikingly different communities of fungi and EDF. Target fragment length variation exacerbated PCR amplification biases and influenced downstream taxonomic assignments, but this effect was greater for EDF than Dikarya. To improve identification of LSU amplicons we performed phylogenetic reconstruction and illustrate the advantages of this critical tool for investigating identified and unidentified sequences. Our results suggest much of the EDF community may be missed or misidentified with "standard" metabarcoding approaches and modified techniques are needed to understand the role of these taxa in a broader ecological context.


Assuntos
Fungos , Viés , Primers do DNA/genética , DNA Fúngico/genética , DNA Espaçador Ribossômico/genética , Fungos/genética , Filogenia
16.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 22(4): 1440-1453, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863036

RESUMO

Fish eDNA metabarcoding is usually performed from filtered water samples. The volume of filtered water depends on the study scope and can rapidly become time consuming according to the number of samples that have to be processed. To avoid time allocated to filtration, passive DNA samplers have been used to recover fish eDNA from marine environments faster. In freshwater ecosystems, aquatic biofilms were used to catch eDNA from macroinvertebrates. Here, we test the capacity of aquatic biofilms to entrap fish eDNA in a large lake and, therefore, the possibility to perform fish eDNA metabarcoding from this matrix compared to the traditional fish eDNA approach from filtered water samples. Methodological aspects of the use of aquatic biofilms for fish eDNA metabarcoding (e.g. PCR replicates, biological replicates, bioinformatics pipeline, reference database and taxonomic assignment) were validated against a mock community. When using biofilms from habitats sheltered from wind and waves, biofilm and water approach provided similar inventories. Richness and diversity were comparable between both approaches. Approaches differed only for rare taxa. Our results illustrate the capacity of aquatic biofilms to act as passive eDNA samplers of fish eDNA and, therefore, the possibility to use biofilms to monitor fish communities efficiently from biofilms. Furthermore, our results open up avenues of research to study a diversity of biological groups (among which bioindicators as diatoms, macroinvertebrates and fish) from eDNA isolated from a single environmental matrix reducing sampling efforts, analysis time and costs.


Assuntos
Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico , Ecossistema , Animais , Biodiversidade , Biofilmes , Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Peixes/genética , Lagos
17.
Genes (Basel) ; 13(10)2022 Sep 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36292643

RESUMO

It is known that data from both 16S and shotgun metagenomics studies are subject to biases that cause the observed relative abundances of taxa to differ from their true values. Model community analyses, in which the relative abundances of all taxa in the sample are known by construction, seem to offer the hope that these biases can be measured. However, it is unclear whether the bias we measure in a mock community analysis is the same as we measure in a sample in which taxa are spiked in at known relative abundance, or if the biases we measure in spike-in samples is the same as the bias we would measure in a real (e.g., biological) sample. Here, we consider these questions in the context of 16S rRNA measurements on three sets of samples: the commercially available Zymo cells model community; the Zymo model community mixed with Swedish Snus, a smokeless tobacco product that is virtually bacteria-free; and a set of commercially available smokeless tobacco products. Each set of samples was subject to four different extraction protocols. The goal of our analysis is to determine whether the patterns of bias observed in each set of samples are the same, i.e., can we learn about the bias in the commercially available smokeless tobacco products by studying the Zymo cells model community?


Assuntos
Microbiota , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Microbiota/genética , Metagenômica/métodos , Bactérias/genética , Viés
18.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 878696, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369490

RESUMO

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01934.].

19.
Curr Protoc ; 2(9): e533, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36066286

RESUMO

Microbiomes provide critical functions that support animals, plants, and ecosystems. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has become an essential tool for the cultivation-independent study of microbiomes found in diverse environments, but requires effective and meaningful controls. One such critical control is a mock microbial community, which is used as a positive control for nucleic acid extraction, marker gene amplification, and sequencing. While mock community standards can be purchased, they can be costly and often include only medically relevant microbial strains that are not expected to be major players in non-human microbiomes. As an alternative, it is possible to design and construct a do-it-yourself (DIY) mock community, which can then be used as a positive control that is specifically customized to the protocol needs of a particular study system. In this article, we describe protocols to select appropriate microbial strains for the construction of a mock community. We first describe the steps to verify the identity of community members via Sanger sequencing. Then, we provide guidance on assembling and storing the DIY mock community as viable whole cells. This includes steps to create standard growth curves referenced to plate counts for each member, so that the community members can be quantified and later compared in terms of their "expected versus returned" relative contributions after sequencing. We also describe appropriate methods for the cryostorage of the fully assembled mock community as viable whole cells, so that they can be used as a unit in a microbiome analysis, from the lysis and nucleic acid extraction steps onwards. Finally, we provide an example of returned data and interpretation of DIY mock community sequences, discussing how to assess possible contamination and identify protocol biases for particular members. Overall, DIY mock communities serve to determine success and possible bias in a cultivation-independent microbiome analysis. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Strain identification and verification using Sanger sequencing Basic Protocol 2: Creation of glycerol stocks of each mock community strain for long-term cryostorage Basic Protocol 3: Assessment of strain freezer viability without cryoprotectant Basic Protocol 4: Creation of standard curve to determine CFU/ml of a liquid culture as a function of optical density Basic Protocol 5: Full mock community assembly using community concentration calculations and standard curves.


Assuntos
Bactérias , Microbiota , Animais , Bactérias/genética , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Microbiota/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos
20.
Biotechniques ; 73(1): 34-46, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35713407

RESUMO

Microbial communities contain a broad phylogenetic diversity of organisms; however, the majority of methods center on describing bacteria and archaea. Fungi are important symbionts in many ecosystems and are potentially important members of the human microbiome, beyond those that can cause disease. To expand our analysis of microbial communities to include data from the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, five candidate DNA extraction kits were compared against our standardized protocol for describing bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene amplicon- and shotgun metagenomics sequencing. The results are presented considering a diverse panel of host-associated and environmental sample types and comparing the cost, processing time, well-to-well contamination, DNA yield, limit of detection and microbial community composition among protocols. Across all criteria, the MagMAX Microbiome kit was found to perform best. The PowerSoil Pro kit performed comparably but with increased cost per sample and overall processing time. The Zymo MagBead, NucleoMag Food and Norgen Stool kits were included.


Assuntos
Metagenômica , Microbiota , Bactérias/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Metagenômica/métodos , Microbiota/genética , Filogenia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa