Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 290
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Coleção SES
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cell ; 185(6): 1025-1040.e14, 2022 03 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148837

RESUMO

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, novel and traditional vaccine strategies have been deployed globally. We investigated whether antibodies stimulated by mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2), including third-dose boosting, differ from those generated by infection or adenoviral (ChAdOx1-S and Gam-COVID-Vac) or inactivated viral (BBIBP-CorV) vaccines. We analyzed human lymph nodes after infection or mRNA vaccination for correlates of serological differences. Antibody breadth against viral variants is lower after infection compared with all vaccines evaluated but improves over several months. Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies, but prior mRNA vaccination imprints serological responses toward Wuhan-Hu-1 rather than variant antigens. In contrast to disrupted germinal centers (GCs) in lymph nodes during infection, mRNA vaccination stimulates robust GCs containing vaccine mRNA and spike antigen up to 8 weeks postvaccination in some cases. SARS-CoV-2 antibody specificity, breadth, and maturation are affected by imprinting from exposure history and distinct histological and antigenic contexts in infection compared with vaccination.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19 , Centro Germinativo , Antígenos Virais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Vacinação
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 78(4): 871-877, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38356293

RESUMO

Children with very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) may respond differently to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization compared to healthy children or other patients with IBD. We recruited children with VEO-IBD <6 years of age and younger following receipt of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Demographics, IBD characteristics, medication use, adverse events (AEs) and IBD exacerbations were collected. Blood draws (optional) were obtained for measurement of antireceptor binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies following vaccination. Of 41 participants, none required emergency department visit or hospitalization due to AE, and only one experienced IBD exacerbation. Detectable antibody was present in 19/19 participants who provided blood sample; 6/7 participants (86%) had durable humoral response 12 months postvaccination. Children with VEO-IBD experience robust humoral immune response to COVID-19 immunization. Severe AEs were rare. These findings provide reassurance that children with VEO-IBD respond well and safely to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Criança , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina G , Anticorpos Antivirais
3.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 81(3): 364-367, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342000

RESUMO

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a subtype of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by a dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. Here, we report a previously healthy 38-year-old woman in whom aHUS developed after a COVID-19 vaccine booster. One day after receipt of a booster dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine, she felt ill. Because of persistent headache, nausea, and general malaise, she went to her general practitioner, who referred her to the hospital after detecting hypertension and acute kidney injury. A diagnosis of TMA was made. Her treatment consisted of blood pressure control, hemodialysis, plasma exchange, and respiratory support. Kidney biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of acute TMA. The patient was referred for treatment with eculizumab, and kidney function improved after initiation of this therapy. Genetic analysis revealed a pathogenic C3 variant. SARS-CoV-2 infection as a trigger for complement activation and development of aHUS has been described previously. In addition, there is one reported case of aHUS occurring after receipt of the adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, but, to our knowledge, this is the first case of aHUS occurring after a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a patient with an underlying pathogenic variant in complement C3. Given the time frame, we hypothesize that the vaccine probably was the trigger for development of aHUS in this patient.


Assuntos
Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica Atípica , COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica Atípica/genética , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica Atípica/diagnóstico , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Cephalalgia ; 43(10): 3331024231208110, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851648

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related headache characteristics and risk factors in migraine patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 732 migraine patients who had AstraZeneca Vaxzevria, Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty, or Moderna Spikevax vaccines. Participants provided information through questionnaires and headache diaries. Headache frequency before and after vaccination and factors associated with headache risk were examined. RESULTS: Approximately a third of patients reported increased headache the day after having primary and booster doses, with mean increase ± SD of 1.9 ± 1.2 and 1.8 ± 1.1 days/week, respectively. Proportions of migraine patients with headache (after vaccination vs. before vaccination) increased after having primary-dose Vaxzevria (35.3% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001) but not Spikevax (23.8% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.700) or Comirnaty (33.2% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.058). Headache proportion increased after having all three boosters (Vaxzevria 27.1% vs. 17.9% p = 0.003; Comirnaty 34.1% vs. 24.5% p = 0.009; Spikevax 35.2% vs. 24.8% p = 0.031). For primary dose with Vaxzevria and Comirnaty, headache risk increased on the vaccination day, peaked on the day after vaccination, and subsided within a week, while for Spikevax headache risk rose gradually after vaccination, peaked on the seventh post-vaccination day and subsided subsequently. For booster dose, headache risk generally increased on the vaccination day, peaked on the day after vaccination, and subsided gradually with fluctuating pattern within a month. Our study also showed that headache increased on the day before primary dose but not booster dose vaccination and it may be attributable to stress associated with having to undertake new vaccines. Multivariable analyses showed that depression was associated with headache. CONCLUSION: Prolonged headache with vaccine- and dose-specific headache pattern was found. Patients with higher risks of vaccine-related headache must be informed of the potential worsening headache.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Vacina BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas
5.
J Cutan Pathol ; 50(1): 24-28, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922892

RESUMO

We present a case of eosinophil-rich linear IgA bullous disease (LABD) following the administration of a messenger RNA COVID-19 booster vaccine. A 66-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 3-week history of a pruritic blistering rash characterized by fluid-filled bullae and multiple annular and polycyclic plaques. He was initially diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid based on a biopsy showing a subepidermal blister with numerous eosinophils. However, direct immunofluorescence studies showed linear IgA and IgM deposition along the basement membrane zone with no immunoreactivity for C3 or IgG. Additionally, indirect immunofluorescence was positive for IgA basement membrane zone antibody. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with LABD and initiated on dapsone therapy with resolution of his lesions at 3-month follow-up. This case illustrates the growing number of autoimmune blistering adverse cutaneous reactions from vaccination. Dermatopathologists should be aware that features of autoimmune blistering diseases can overlap and may not be distinguishable based on these histopathological findings alone. Confirmation with direct immunofluorescence and/or serological studies may be necessary for accurate diagnosis.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , COVID-19 , Dermatose Linear Bolhosa por IgA , Prurigo , Vacinas , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Dermatose Linear Bolhosa por IgA/patologia , Eosinófilos/patologia , Imunoglobulina A , Vesícula
6.
Neurol Sci ; 44(4): 1159-1161, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871181

RESUMO

This report describes the case of a 56-year-old male who developed unilateral right anterior thigh numbness which began 16 hours after receiving his second Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in the left deltoid. The numbness persisted and after one week a circular, raised, painless area with a red border appeared in the center of the anterior thigh which resolved after 2 weeks spontaneously. There was no clinical history or risk factors consistent with meralgia paresthetica. At his 6 month follow up the patient reported that his symptoms spontaneously resolved. While many other non-specific neurologic side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have been documented, this is the first case of meralgia paresthetica documented after a vaccine without any other risk factors for the syndrome. COVID vaccines should be considered as a potential cause of very localized peripheral neuropathy.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neuropatia Femoral , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuropatia Femoral/complicações , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Hipestesia/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Coxa da Perna , Parestesia/etiologia , Parestesia/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/etiologia
7.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(4): 660-663, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451284

RESUMO

With the introduction of large-scale COVID-19 vaccination programs, a variety of cutaneous manifestations have been described. We present two girls (ages 12 and 5 years) who developed erythema nodosum (EN) 3 and 14 days after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. While EN after COVID-19 vaccination has been reported in adults, it is can also occur in children.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Eritema Nodoso , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Eritema Nodoso/diagnóstico , Eritema Nodoso/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
8.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e42623, 2023 01 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603153

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The unprecedented speed of COVID-19 vaccine development and approval has raised public concern about its safety. However, studies on public discourses and opinions on social media focusing on adverse events (AEs) related to COVID-19 vaccine are rare. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze Korean tweets about COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax) after the vaccine rollout, explore the topics and sentiments of tweets regarding COVID-19 vaccines, and examine their changes over time. We also analyzed topics and sentiments focused on AEs related to vaccination using only tweets with terms about AEs. METHODS: We devised a sophisticated methodology consisting of 5 steps: keyword search on Twitter, data collection, data preprocessing, data analysis, and result visualization. We used the Twitter Representational State Transfer application programming interface for data collection. A total of 1,659,158 tweets were collected from February 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Finally, 165,984 data points were analyzed after excluding retweets, news, official announcements, advertisements, duplicates, and tweets with <2 words. We applied a variety of preprocessing techniques that are suitable for the Korean language. We ran a suite of analyses using various Python packages, such as latent Dirichlet allocation, hierarchical latent Dirichlet allocation, and sentiment analysis. RESULTS: The topics related to COVID-19 vaccines have a very large spectrum, including vaccine-related AEs, emotional reactions to vaccination, vaccine development and supply, and government vaccination policies. Among them, the top major topic was AEs related to COVID-19 vaccination. The AEs ranged from the adverse reactions listed in the safety profile (eg, myalgia, fever, fatigue, injection site pain, myocarditis or pericarditis, and thrombosis) to unlisted reactions (eg, irregular menstruation, changes in appetite and sleep, leukemia, and deaths). Our results showed a notable difference in the topics for each vaccine brand. The topics pertaining to the Pfizer vaccine mainly mentioned AEs. Negative public opinion has prevailed since the early stages of vaccination. In the sentiment analysis based on vaccine brand, the topics related to the Pfizer vaccine expressed the strongest negative sentiment. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the discrepancy between academic evidence and public opinions related to COVID-19 vaccination, the government should provide accurate information and education. Furthermore, our study suggests the need for management to correct the misinformation related to vaccine-related AEs, especially those affecting negative sentiments. This study provides valuable insights into the public discourses and opinions regarding COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Mídias Sociais , Feminino , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , República da Coreia , Análise de Sentimentos , Vacinas
9.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103723, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36502671

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study assessed the vertigo/dizziness in patients following COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2021 to June 2022, totaling 50 patients with dizzy spells following COVID-19 vaccination by AZ (AstraZeneca-Oxford University, AZD1222), BNT (Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT162b2) or Moderna (Moderna, mRNA-1273) vaccine were enrolled in this study. The interval from vaccination to the onset of vertigo/dizziness was compared with inter-episodic interval of vertigo/dizziness in the same patients, but without vaccination, during past one year (2020). RESULTS: The incidences of severe systemic complication per 106 shots were 0.86 for Moderna vaccine, 1.22 for AZ vaccine, and 1.23 for BNT vaccine. Conversely, rate of post-vaccination vertigo/dizziness was noted in the Moderna group (66 %), followed by the AZ group (20 %) and the BNT (14 %) group, meaning that type of COVID-19 vaccine may affect various organ systems. The median time to the onset of vertigo/dizziness following vaccination is 10d, which is consistent with the onset of IgG production, and significantly less than inter-episodic interval (84d) in the same patients without vaccination. CONCLUSION: Post-vaccination vertigo/dizziness can manifest as exacerbation of previous neurotological disorder. The median time to the onset of vertigo/dizziness following COVID-19 vaccination is 10d. Since the outcome is fair after supportive treatment, the immunomodulatory effect of the vaccines does not undermine the necessity of the COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacina BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vertigem/etiologia
10.
Radiol Med ; 128(10): 1217-1224, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37626156

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of axillary lymphadenopathy over established time ranges after COVID-19 vaccination and lymph node pathologic features (i.e. size increase and qualitative characteristics) in subjects undergoing axillary evaluation during a breast imaging examination. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The institutional review board approved this prospective study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: women undergoing mammography and breast ultrasound between July and October 2021; information about the COVID-19 vaccine and infection, if any. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: known metastatic lymphadenopathy. Participants were divided into 5 subgroups according to time between vaccine and imaging: < 6 weeks; 7-8 weeks; 9-10 weeks; 11-12 weeks; > 12 weeks. Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes was performed with ultrasound. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 285 women were included. Most of the patients underwent Moderna vaccine (n = 175, 61.4%). 63/285 patients had a previous history of breast cancer (22.1%). 13/17 (76.5%) patients with previous COVID-19 infection had no previous history of cancer, whereas 4/17 had a previous history of cancer (p < .001). 41/285 (14.4%) women showed lymphadenopathy, and they were significantly younger (46.9 ± 11.6 years) than women with borderline (54.0 ± 11.9 years) or no lymphadenopathy (57.3 ± 11.9 years) (p < .001). Lymphadenopathy and borderline lymphadenopathy were more frequently observed in the Moderna-vaccinated women and in the subgroup of patients evaluated < 6 weeks after vaccination (p < 0.001). The most common pathologic feature was cortical thickening, followed by complete or partial effacement of fatty hilum. CONCLUSION: A lymphadenopathy within 12 weeks after vaccination is a common finding particularly in younger women and after Moderna vaccine and no further assessment should be required.

11.
Aust Prescr ; 46(3): 60-63, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053809

RESUMO

Most Australian adults now have hybrid immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, referring to a combination of protection from previous vaccine doses and past infection. Protection from both vaccination and past infection wanes over time. Booster doses are recommended to ensure that those who are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 remain protected. The optimal timing of future booster doses to maintain adequate protection against severe illness is not yet known. Older age remains the most important risk factor for severe COVID-19, including in the current Omicron variant era. The original COVID-19 vaccines are monovalent vaccines based on the ancestral strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Bivalent vaccines have been developed based on earlier Omicron subvariants (BA.1 or BA.4-5) and the ancestral strain. These provide enhanced protection against severe illness from Omicron compared with the original monovalent vaccines. Updated monovalent vaccines based on a more recent Omicron subvariant (XBB.1.5) have been developed. COVID-19 vaccines have an excellent safety record, and serious adverse events are extremely rare.

12.
J Infect Dis ; 226(7): 1231-1236, 2022 09 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325158

RESUMO

Allergic symptoms after messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines occur in up to 2% of recipients. Compared to nonallergic controls (n = 18), individuals with immediate allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (n = 8) mounted lower immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) to multiple antigenic targets in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike following vaccination, with significantly lower IgG1 to full-length spike (P = .04). Individuals with immediate allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines bound Fcγ receptors similarly to nonallergic controls. Although there was a trend toward an overall reduction in opsonophagocytic function in individuals with immediate allergic reactions compared to nonallergic controls, allergic patients produced functional antibodies exhibiting a high ratio of opsonophagocytic function to IgG1 titer.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Imunoglobulina G , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e617-e622, 2022 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persons on chronic hemodialysis have a significantly diminished humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Whether this translates to reduced vaccine effectiveness (VE) is unknown. METHODS: We used the US Department of Veterans Affairs COVID-19 Shared Data Resource to identify all veterans who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between 26 January and 31 August 2021. Using International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, codes and attendance at a dialysis clinic/center, we identified those who were on chronic hemodialysis. We used a test-negative, case-control design using a doubly robust logistic regression model to determine the VE of the BNT-162b2 (Pfizer) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines in preventing confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Among 847 199 veterans tested for SARS-CoV-2 between 26 January and 31 August 2021, there were 6076 veterans on chronic hemodialysis. Among those, we identified 1270 cases (580 fully vaccinated) and 2959 controls (2120 fully vaccinated). The overall VE >14 days after the second dose in preventing documented infection was 68.2% (95% CI: 62.6-72.9%). VE was 68.9% (95% CI: 61.9-74.7%) for Pfizer BNT-162b2 and 66.7% (95% CI: 58.9-73.0%) for Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. There was no difference in VE by age (<70 vs >70 years), race, or sex. There were no events recorded in persons with a Charlson's comorbidity index score <2. CONCLUSIONS: VE of 2 doses of current mRNA vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons on chronic hemodialysis is lower than historic VE rates in the general population. Effects of additional doses in improving VE in this special population need further study.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Idoso , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Diálise Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
14.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(8): 1633-1641, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35798008

RESUMO

To identify demographic factors associated with delaying or not receiving a second dose of the 2-dose primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccine series, we matched 323 million single Pfizer-BioNTech (https://www.pfizer.com) and Moderna (https://www.modernatx.com) COVID-19 vaccine administration records from 2021 and determined whether second doses were delayed or missed. We used 2 sets of logistic regression models to examine associated factors. Overall, 87.3% of recipients received a timely second dose (≤42 days between first and second dose), 3.4% received a delayed second dose (>42 days between first and second dose), and 9.4% missed the second dose. Persons more likely to have delayed or missed the second dose belonged to several racial/ethnic minority groups, were 18-39 years of age, lived in more socially vulnerable areas, and lived in regions other than the northeastern United States. Logistic regression models identified specific subgroups for providing outreach and encouragement to receive subsequent doses on time.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Etnicidade , Humanos , Grupos Minoritários , RNA Mensageiro , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação
15.
J Clin Immunol ; 42(6): 1137-1150, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35713752

RESUMO

Immune responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines in primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) are largely unknown. We investigated antibody and CD4+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) before and after vaccination and associations between vaccine response and patients' clinical and immunological characteristics in PADs. The PAD cohort consisted of common variable immune deficiency (CVID) and other PADs, not meeting the criteria for CVID diagnosis (oPADs). Anti-S IgG, IgA, and IgG subclasses 1 and 3 increased after vaccination and correlated with neutralization activity in HCs and patients with oPADs. However, 42% of CVID patients developed such responses after the 2nd dose. A similar pattern was also observed with S-specific CD4+ T-cells as determined by OX40 and 4-1BB expression. Patients with poor anti-S IgG response had significantly lower levels of baseline IgG, IgA, CD19+ B-cells, switched memory B-cells, naïve CD8+ T-cells, and a higher frequency of EM CD8+ T-cells and autoimmunity compared to patients with adequate anti-S IgG responses. Patients with oPADs can develop humoral and cellular immune responses to vaccines similar to HCs. However, a subset of CVID patients exhibit impairment in developing such responses, which can be predicted by the baseline immune profile and history of autoimmunity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária , Vacinas , Anticorpos Antivirais , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Imunoglobulina A , Imunoglobulina G , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Vacinação , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
16.
J Med Virol ; 94(7): 2939-2961, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35229324

RESUMO

Accumulating evidence shows a progressive decline in the efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines such as Pfizer-BioNTech (mRNA BNT161b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) in preventing breakthrough infections due to diminishing humoral immunity over time. Thus, this review characterizes the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the second dose of a primary cycle of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. A systematic search of the literature was performed and a total of 18 articles (N = 15 980 participants) were identified and reviewed. The percent difference of means of reported antibody titers was then calculated to determine the decline in humoral response after the peak levels postvaccination. Findings revealed that the peak humoral response was reached at 21-28 days after the second dose, after which serum levels progressively diminished at 4-6-month postvaccination. Additionally, results showed that regardless of age, sex, serostatus, and presence of comorbidities, longitudinal data reporting antibody measurement exhibited a decline of both anti-receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G (IgG) and anti-spike IgG, ranging from 94% to 95% at 90-180 days and 55%-85% at 140-160 days, respectively, after the peak antibody response. This suggests that the rate of antibody decline may be independent of patient-related factors and peak antibody titers but mainly a function of time and antibody class/molecular target. Hence, this study highlights the necessity of more efficient vaccination strategies to provide booster administration in attenuating the effects of waning immunity, especially in the appearance of new variants of concerns.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Imunoglobulina G , RNA Mensageiro , Vacinação , Vacinas de mRNA
17.
J Med Virol ; 94(6): 2849-2854, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35187697

RESUMO

Outcomes of 109 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received at least one vaccine dose 14 or more days prior the disease onset were retrospectively compared to control cohort of 109 age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index-matched patients chosen among 2990 total hospitalized patients in our tertiary-level institution in a period from January to June 2021. Among 109 vaccinated patients, 84 patients were partially and 25 fully vaccinated. Vaccinated patients experienced significantly lower 30 days mortality (30% vs. 49%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56 [0.37-0.85]; p = 0.008), less frequently required high flow oxygen therapy (17% vs. 34%; HR: 0.45 [0.26-0.76]; p = 0.005), and mechanical ventilation (8% vs. 18%; HR: 0.41 [0.20-0.88]; p = 0.027) in comparison to the matched cohort of unvaccinated patients. More favorable survival was observed in patients receiving vector in comparison to messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine types in unadjusted analysis (30 days mortality 18% vs. 40%; HR: 0.45 [0.25-0.79]; p = 0.034). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis model both mRNA (HR: 0.59 [0.36-0.98]; p = 0.041) and vector vaccine types (HR: 0.30 [0.15-0.60]; p < 0.001) were associated with improved survival in comparison to unvaccinated patients, independently of age (HR: 1.03 [1.01-1.06]; p = 0.011), male sex (HR: 1.78 [1.14-2.76]; p = 0.010), severity of illness (HR: 2.06 [1.36-3.10]; p < 0.001) and functional status on admission (HR: 1.42 [1.07-1.85]; p = 0.013).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , RNA Mensageiro , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinação , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA
18.
J Med Virol ; 94(5): 1833-1845, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060149

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic that continues to cause numerous deaths to date. Four vaccines have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as of July 2021 to prevent the transmission of COVID-19: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. These vaccines have shown great efficacy and safety profile. One side effect that has been widely reported is post-COVID-19 vaccination lymphadenopathy. Due to the mimicry of the lymphadenopathy for metastases in some oncologic patients, there have been reports of patients who underwent biopsies that showed pathologic confirmation of benign reactive lymphadenopathy secondary to the COVID-19 vaccine. Therefore, understanding the incidence of lymphadenopathy post-COVID-19 vaccinations will help guide radiologists and oncologists in their management of patients, both present oncologic patients, and patients with concerns over their newly presenting lymphadenopathy. A systematic literature search was performed using several databases to identify relevant studies that reported lymphadenopathy post-COVID-19 vaccination. Our results revealed that several cases have been detected in patients undergoing follow-up fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography-computerized tomography scans where lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccine injection site show increased uptake of FDG. Thus, knowledge of the incidence of lymphadenopathy may help avoid unnecessary biopsies, interventions, and changes in management for patients, especially oncologic patients who are at risk for malignancies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Linfadenopatia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Linfadenopatia/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfadenopatia/etiologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/efeitos adversos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
19.
Heart Fail Rev ; 27(6): 2033-2043, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35449353

RESUMO

Clinical course and outcomes of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination remain variable. We retrospectively collected data on patients > 12 years old from 01/01/2021 to 12/30/2021 who received COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination and were diagnosed with myocarditis within 60 days of vaccination. Myocarditis cases were based on case definitions by authors. We report on 238 patients of whom most were male (n = 208; 87.1%). The mean age was 27.4 ± 16 (range 12-80) years. Females presented at older ages (41.3 ± 21.5 years) than men 25.7 ± 14 years (p = 0.001). In patients > 20 years of age, the mean duration from vaccination to symptoms was 4.8 days ± 5.5 days, but in < 20, it was 3.0 ± 3.3 days (p = 0.04). Myocarditis occurred most commonly after the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (n = 183; 76.45) and after the second dose (n = 182; 80%). Symptoms started 3.95 ± 4.5 days after vaccination. The commonest symptom was chest pain (n = 221; 93%). Patients were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 105; 58.3%), colchicine (n = 38; 21.1%), or glucocorticoids (n = 23; 12.7%). About 30% of the patients had left ventricular ejection fraction but more than half recovered the on repeat imaging. Abnormal cardiac MRIs were common; 168 patients (96% of 175 patients that had MRI) had late gadolinium enhancement, while 120 patients (68.5%) had myocardial edema. Heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy use was common (n = 27; 15%). Eleven patients had cardiogenic shock; and 4 patients required mechanical circulatory support. Five patients (1.7%) died; of these, 3 patients had endomyocardial biopsy/autopsy-confirmed myocarditis. Most cases of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis are mild. Females presented at older ages than men and duration from vaccination to symptoms was longer in patients > 20 years. Cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support was seen and mortality was low. Future studies are needed to better evaluate risk factors, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine myocarditis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Miocardite , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de mRNA/efeitos adversos , Miocardite/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , RNA Mensageiro , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Volume Sistólico , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Função Ventricular Esquerda
20.
Ann Hematol ; 101(9): 2053-2067, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780254

RESUMO

Prior studies of antibody response after full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematological patients have confirmed lower antibody levels compared to the general population. Serological response in hematological patients varies widely according to the disease type and its status, and the treatment given and its timing with respect to vaccination. Through probabilistic machine learning graphical models, we estimated the conditional probabilities of having detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 3-6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large cohort of patients with several hematological diseases (n= 1166). Most patients received mRNA-based vaccines (97%), mainly Moderna® mRNA-1273 (74%) followed by Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 (23%). The overall antibody detection rate at 3 to 6 weeks after full vaccination for the entire cohort was 79%. Variables such as type of disease, timing of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, age, corticosteroids therapy, vaccine type, disease status, or prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 are among the most relevant conditions influencing SARS-CoV-2-IgG-reactive antibody detection. A lower probability of having detectable antibodies was observed in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies within 6 months before vaccination (29.32%), whereas the highest probability was observed in younger patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (99.53%). The Moderna® mRNA-1273 compound provided higher probabilities of antibody detection in all scenarios. This study depicts conditional probabilities of having detectable antibodies in the whole cohort and in specific scenarios such as B cell NHL, CLL, MM, and cMPN that may impact humoral responses. These results could be useful to focus on additional preventive and/or monitoring interventions in these highly immunosuppressed hematological patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , COVID-19 , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa