Modification of carbapenemase inhibition test and comparison of its performance with NG-Test CARBA 5 for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

AIMS: Adequately and accurately identifying carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is vital for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy and implementing effective infection control measures. This study aims to optimize the phenotypic detection method of carbapenemase for routine diagnostics in clinical microbiology laboratories. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carbapenemase genes in 2665 non-duplicate CRE clinical strains collected from various regions of China were confirmed through whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The carbapenemase inhibition test (CIT) was conducted and interpreted using different methods and breakpoints, then compared with the NG-Test CARBA 5 for carbapenemase detection. The diagnostic performance of the CIT method was optimal when the carbapenemase types were determined by comparing the inhibition zone diameters of the imipenem disc with 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APB) plus ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to those of the imipenem disc with either APB or EDTA alone, with a breakpoint of 4 mm. The overall sensitivities of the current CIT, the modified CIT, and NG-Test CARBA 5 were 91.4%, 94.9%, and 99.9%, respectively. For detecting isolates co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs), the modified CIT method had higher sensitivity than the current method (70.0% vs. 53.3%), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.063). The NG-Test CARBA 5 showed excellent performance for multi-carbapenemases diagnosis, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing and standardizing the CIT method for clinical use is necessary. It has certain advantages in diagnosing multi-carbapenemase and rare carbapenemase production. However, for identifying common carbapenemase types, the NG-Test CARBA 5 demonstrated superior performance.

Evaluation of NG-Test CARBA 5 version 2, Cepheid Xpert Carba-R, and carbapenem inactivation methods in comparison to whole-genome sequencing for the identification of carbapenemases in non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG-Biotech) is a rapid in vitro multiplex immunoassay for the phenotypic detection and differentiation of the "big five" carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA-48-like, VIM, IMP, and NDM). Version 2 of this assay was evaluated alongside the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Inc.), the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), and the CIMTris assay, with a collection of carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli comprising 138 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 97 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used as the reference standard. For P. aeruginosa, NG-Test CARBA 5 produced an overall percentage agreement (OPA) with WGS of 97.1%, compared with 92.8% forXpert Carba-R and 90.6% for mCIM. For A. baumannii, as OXA-type carbapenemases (non-OXA-48) are not included, both the NG-Test CARBA 5 and Xpert Carba-R only had an OPA of 6.2%, while the CIMTris performed well with an OPA of 99.0%. The majority of A. baumannii isolates (95.9%) tested falsely positive for IMP on NG-Test CARBA 5; no IMP genes were found on WGS. No clear cause was found for this phenomenon; a cross-reacting protein antigen unique to A. baumannii is a possible culprit. NG-Test CARBA 5 performed well for carbapenemase detection in P. aeruginosa. However, results from A. baumannii isolates should be interpreted with caution.

Comparing the broth enrichment-multiplex lateral flow immunochromatographic assay with real time quantitative PCR for the rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms in rectal swabs.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing organism (CPO) intestinal carriers is essential for infection prevention and control. Molecular diagnostic methods can produce results in as little as 1 h, but require special instrumentation and are expensive. Therefore, it is urgent to find an alternative method. The broth enrichment-multiplex lateral flow immunochromatographic assay was recently reported, but using it to directly detect CPO intestinal carriers in rectal swabs still requires the evaluation of many samples. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of these two methods, and to explore the control measures of CPO infection. METHODS: Through CPO selective culture, PCR and DNA sequencing, 100 rectal swabs confirmed to be CPO-positive and 100 rectal swabs with negative results were collected continuously. After eluting the rectal swabs with saline, three aliquots were used: one for counting, one for detection by Xpert Carba-R, and one for culture in broth for 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 4 h, followed by NG-Test CARBA 5 assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of the NG-Test CARBA 5 method after different incubation times were calculated. The limit of detection (LoD) of this assay after 4 h broth incubation was estimated by examining the bacterial suspensions and simulated faecal suspensions prepared with CPOs producing different types of carbapenemases. RESULTS: Xpert Carba-R demonstrated a combined sensitivity of 99.0% and specificity of 98.0%. The sensitivity and specificity were higher than 90.0% for the different enzyme types. The specificities of five common carbapenemases detected by the broth enrichment NG-Test CARBA 5 combined method after different incubation times were 100%. The sensitivities increased with increasing incubation time. At 4 h, the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM), imipenemase (IMP), Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (VIM), and oxacillinase (OXA) -48 detection sensitivities were 93.0%, 96.3%, 100%, 100% and 85.7%, respectively. The LoDs were between 102 and 104 CFU/mL for all five enzymes after 4 h of incubation. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation highlighted that the broth enrichment-multiplex lateral flow immunochromatographic assay can be used as a new method for screening CPOs in rectal swabs.

Occurrence of multi-carbapenemases producers among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in vitro activity of combinations including cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and aztreonam in the COVID-19 era.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them. METHODS: A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates (n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution SensititreTM panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing. RESULTS: KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM (n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like (n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like (n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.

Application of a multiplex immunochromatographic assay for rapid identification of carbapenemases in a clinical microbiology laboratory: performance and turn-around-time evaluation of NG-test Carba 5.

BACKGROUND: Prompt and accurate identification of carbapenemase production is essential for appropriate treatment and infection control. NG-Test Carba 5 (termed herein "Carba 5"; NG Biotech, Guipry, France) is a multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the rapid phenotypic identification of five major carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like) from bacterial isolates. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Carba 5 and its impact on the turn-around-time in a clinical microbiology laboratory. RESULTS: Carba 5 was retrospectively evaluated using 78 carbapenemase producers and 23 non-carbapenemase producers confirmed by PCR and sequencing. The performance and time required for carbapenemase identification were prospectively evaluated using 47 carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, and the results were compared to those obtained using Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). For the bacterial isolates included in retrospective and prospective evaluation, the Carba 5 assay correctly identified 147 isolates except one isolate with a sensitivity of 99.13% (95% CI 95.25-99.98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 89.42-100%). The Carba 5 assay missed one VIM-1 among 13 VIM producers. The assay showed a sensitivity of 92.31% (95% CI 63.97-99.81%) for detecting VIM and 100% for detecting KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, and IMP. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R assay, Carba 5 exhibited 100% agreement and was more time-efficient (median time 24 min vs. 1 h 11 min). CONCLUSIONS: The Carba 5 assay has potential as an alternative to molecular methods for detecting major carbapenemases from bacterial isolates in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R, Carba 5 turns out to be more affordable and time-efficient while showing a comparable performance, and may accelerate therapeutic and infection control decisions.

Multiplex lateral flow immunochromatographic assay is an effective method to detect carbapenemases without risk of OXA-48-like cross reactivity.

BACKGROUND: It is essential to detect carriers of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in order to implement infection control measures. The objectives of this study was to evaluate the NG-Test® CARBA 5 (CARBA 5) assay for detection of five carbapenemases and to assess the cross reactivity of other OXA-type carbapenemases with the OXA-48-like specific antibodies. METHODS: A total of 197 Enterobacterales isolates were tested. To evaluate the cross reactivity, 73 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, harboring OXA-type variants, were tested. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) served as gold standard for carbapenemase identification. RESULTS: Excellent agreement was found between PCR and CARBA 5, for all but one isolate. The single false positive result (a blaSME positive S. marcescens isolate) was incorrectly positive for blaOXA-48 by CARBA 5. No cross reactivity was observed. The sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CARBA 5 assay is highly sensitive and specific and is recommended as a tool for the detection of the main carbapenemases of interest in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Comparison of the Xpert Carba-R and NG-Test CARBA5 for the detection of carbapenemases in an IMP-type carbapenemase endemic region in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: The real-time PCR assay Xpert Carba-R and the lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA5 were developed to detect 5 types of carbapenemase genes (blaIMP, blaKPC, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, and blaNDM). METHODS: We compared the diagnostic performance, turn-around time, and cost of these assays. Carbapenemase genes were defined using the Carba NP test, modified Carbapenem Inactivation Methods (mCIM), multiplex PCR, and whole-genome sequencing. We included clinical Enterobacterales isolates (n = 36) and nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolates (n = 17) collected from 16 acute-care hospitals in the Kinki region of Japan. RESULTS: Twenty-six of these 53 isolates were positive according to both of the Carba NP test and mCIM and, contained the following carbapenemase genes: blaIMP-1 (n = 3), blaIMP-6 (n = 1), blaIMP-19 (n = 12), blaIMP-26 (n = 1), blaIMP-41 (n = 2), blaIMP-66 (n = 2), blaNDM-1 (n = 3), and blaVIM-2 (n = 2). All of the remaining 27 isolates were negative according to the Carba NP test, mCIM, and multiplex PCR. The specificities of both assays were 100%. The sensitivity of the Xpert Carba-R assay was as low as 53.8% and that of the NG-Test CARBA5 was 92.3% because the former failed to detect all isolates with blaIMP-19 (n = 12) and the latter failed to detect isolates with blaIMP-66 (n = 2). Both assays can easily be performed in less than 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: The NG-Test CARBA5 assay was superior with regard to assay time and cost per sample. We propose the use of the NG-Test CARBA5 assay in clinical laboratories where IMP-type carbapenemases are endemic.

Evaluation of NG-Test Carba 5 for Rapid Phenotypic Detection and Differentiation of Five Common Carbapenemase Families: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Evaluation.

NG-Test Carba 5 is a rapid in vitro multiplex immunoassay for the phenotypic detection and differentiation of five common carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA-48-like, VIM, IMP, and NDM) directly from bacterial colonies. The assay is simple to perform and has recently received U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance. A method comparison study was performed at geographically diverse medical centers (n = 3) in the United States, where 309 Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were evaluated by NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France), the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), the EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method, and disk diffusion with carbapenems. Colonies from tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood (blood agar) and MacConkey agar were tested, and the results were compared to those obtained by a composite reference method. Additionally, a fourth medical center performed a medium comparison study by evaluating the performance characteristics of NG-Test Carba 5 from blood, MacConkey, and Mueller-Hinton agars with 110 isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa These results were compared to the expected genotypic and mCIM results. For the multicenter method comparison study, the overall positive percent agreement (PPA) and the overall negative percent agreement (NPA) of NG-Test Carba 5 with the composite reference method were 100% for both blood and MacConkey agars. The medium comparison study at the fourth site showed that the PPA ranged from 98.9% to 100% and that the NPA ranged from 95.2% to 100% for blood, MacConkey, and Mueller-Hinton agars. NG-Test Carba 5 accurately detected and differentiated five common carbapenemase families from Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa colonies on commonly used agar media. The results of this test will support a streamlined laboratory work flow and will expedite therapeutic and infection control decisions.

Comparison of ERIC carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae test, BD Phoenix CPO detect panel, and NG-test CARBA 5 for the detection of main carbapenemase types of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the performance of three commercial panels, the ERIC Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Test (ERIC CRE test), the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG CARBA 5), and the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel (CPO panel), for the detection of main types of carbapenemases among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). METHODS: We collected 502 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) demonstrating intermediate or resistant profiles to at least one carbapenem antibiotic (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem). Carbapenemase genes and their specific types were identified through multiplex PCR and sequencing methods. Subsequently, the ERIC CRE test, CPO panel, and NG CARBA 5 assay were conducted on these isolates, and the results were compared with those obtained from multiplex PCR. RESULTS: The results indicated that the ERIC CRE test exhibited an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.1% and 93.6%, respectively, which were comparable to 99.1% and 90.6% for the NG CARBA 5. However, the CPO panel demonstrated a sensitivity of only 56.2% in identifying Ambler classes, exhibiting the poorest sensitivity for class A. Moreover, while the ERIC CRE test outperformed the NG CARBA 5 in identifying multi-gene isolates with multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes, the CPO panel failed to accurately classify these isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the utilization of the ERIC CRE test as one of the methods for detecting carbapenemases in clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, further optimization is imperative for the CPO panel to enhance its accuracy in determining carbapenemase classification and address limitations in detecting multi-gene isolates.

Emergence of pandrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in dogs and cats: a cross-sectional study in Egypt.

One of the most important emerging health problems is the increasing role of animals in the rapid global rise in resistance to last-resort antibiotics, such as carbapenems. However, there is limited information on the role of pet animals in harboring and spreading pandrug-resistant (PDR) carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), especially in Egypt. This cross-sectional study was conducted to screen for CPE in healthy and diseased pets using phenotypic and molecular methods and the NG-Test CARBA 5 immunochromatographic assay. Rectal swabs were collected from 62 dogs and 48 cats, incubated overnight in tryptic soy broth containing 10 µg of meropenem disc and subsequently cultured on MacConkey agar supplemented with meropenem (1 mg/L). Sixty-six isolates (60.6%), including 56 Klebsiella pneumoniae, seven Escherichia coli, and three K. oxytoca isolates, were confirmed to be carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) by the disc diffusion method, broth microdilution test, CNPt-direct, and PCR assay targeting carbapenemase genes. Forty-three (65.2%) dogs and 23 (34.8%) cats carried CPE. Of these, 35 (70.0%) were healthy (including 27 dogs and 8 cats) and 31 (52.5%) were diseased (including 16 dogs and 15 cats). bla OXA-181 was the most common gene detected (42/66, 63.6%), followed by bla IMP (40/66, 60.6%), bla OXA-48-like (29/66, 43.9%), bla KPC and bla VIM (20/66, 30.3% each), and bla NDM (17/66, 25.8%). The identified genotypes were bla KPC-2, bla IMP-1, bla VIM-1, bla NDM-1, and bla NDM-5. The CARBA 5 assay showed higher sensitivity and specificity for the detection of NDM, OXA and KPC than that for VIM and IMP genes. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of CRE isolates revealed 20 PDR, 30 extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and 16 multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes. This study provides evidence of colonization with PDR CPE in dogs and cats. To manage the infection or colonization of pets in veterinary clinical settings, extended surveillance systems should be considered, and the use of critical antibiotics should be strictly controlled.

Comparison of Lateral Flow Immunochromatography and Phenotypic Assays to PCR for the Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria, a Multicenter Experience in Mexico.

The identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is important for treating and controlling hospital infections. The recommended methods for their identification require a long waiting time, technical training, and expertise. Lateral flow immunoassays such as NG-Test CARBA 5® overcome these needs. We analyzed 84 clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa from four different hospitals in a two-year period. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were confirmed with the broth dilution method. Evaluation of KPC, VIM, NDM, IMP, and OXA-48-like enzymes was performed and compared to NG-Test CARBA 5 and phenotypic assays. Enterobacterales represented 69% of isolates and P. aeruginosa represented 31%. Carbapenemase-producing strains were 51 (88%) of Enterobacterales and 23 (88.4%) of P. aeruginosa; 20 (34%) and 23 (88%) were Class B ß-lactamases, respectively. The NG-Test CARBA 5® assay for Enterobacterales showed high sensitivity (98%), specificity (100%), and PPV (100%); however, it did not for P. aeruginosa. The Kappa concordance coefficient was 0.92 for Enterobacterales and 0.52 for P. aeruginosa. NG-Test CARBA 5® is a fast and easy-to-use assay. In Enterobacterales, we found excellent agreement in our comparison with molecular tests. Despite the low agreement in P. aeruginosa, we suggest that this test could be used as a complementary tool.

Comparison of the NG-Test Carba 5, Colloidal Gold Immunoassay (CGI) Test, and Xpert Carba-R for the Rapid Detection of Carbapenemases in Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly recognized as an urgent public health concern. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases could provide insights into antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of three different methods, including the NG-test Carba 5, colloidal gold immunoassay (CGI) test, and Xpert Carba-R assay, for the rapid detection of five carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, IMP, OXA-48, and VIM). A total of 207 Gram-negative strains collected from patients and hospital sewages were tested. The presence or absence of carbapenemase genes in the whole-genome sequences was used as the gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of the above-mentioned three methods. Among the 192 strains carrying only one carbapenemase gene, the accuracies of the NG-Test Carba 5, CGI test, and Xpert Carba-R were 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01-98.72%), 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01-98.72%), and 97.92% (95% CI, 94.41-99.33%), respectively. Xpert Carba-R was able to detect all 13 types of KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123, with a detection sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI, 96.50-100.00%), a specificity of 100.00% (95% CI, 92.38-100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For IMP, Carba 5 was superior to the other two methods, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 71.66-100.00%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 97.38-100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For the remaining 15 strains carrying two or three kinds of carbapenemase genes, Carba 5 performed the best, which accurately identified all the target genes, followed by Xpert Carba-R (12/15, 80.00%) and the CGI test (10/15, 66.67%). Therefore, all three assays demonstrated reliable performances in carbapenemase detection, and Xpert Carba-R should be recommended for the detection of KPC variants, especially for patients at a high risk of infections caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains. IMPORTANCE: CRE was listed as one of the top three pathogens that are in critical need of new antibiotics by the WHO. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is important for antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In recent years, new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to cope with CRE challenges. CZA was effective against class A, class C, and some class D enzymes such as OXA-48-like. However, CZA-resistant KPC variants emerged at an alarming speed, which posed a new challenge for the accurate identification of KPC variants. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays, namely, NG-test Carba 5 and the CGI test, and the automated real-time quantitative PCR Xpert Carba-R in the rapid detection of carbapenemases. Notably, 13 types of KPC variants were enrolled in this study, which covered most KPC variants discovered in China. Carba-R was superior to NG-teat Carba 5 and the CGI test; it was able to detect all of the included KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123.

Evaluation of the NG-Test CARBA 5 Lateral Flow Assay with an IMP-27-Producing Morganella morganii and Other Morganellaceae.

An isolate of Morganella morganii (MMOR1) that tested susceptible to 3rd/4th-generation cephalosporins and intermediate to meropenem was characterized as positive for NDM and IMP carbapenemases by NG-Test CARBA 5. Our objective was to further investigate this result, given the inconsistent susceptibility profile and unusual epidemiological profile for our region. The MMOR1 isolate was retested for antimicrobial susceptibilities and characterized for carbapenemase production. MMOR1 tested susceptible to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, aztreonam, and ertapenem, and intermediate to meropenem and imipenem. The isolate tested positive by carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) and CIM+EDTA (eCIM) testing, indicating metallo-ß-lactamase production. The isolate tested negative for all carbapenemase genes on Xpert Carba-R, but positive for IMP on repeat testing of NG-Test CARBA 5. Whole-genome sequencing revealed MMOR1 contained blaIMP-27, but no other carbapenemase genes. Additional testing with NG-Test CARBA 5 revealed a false-positive NDM band when the assay was overloaded with test inoculum. Supplementary isolates were tested with an overloaded inoculum (n = 6 M. morganii; n = 1 P. mirabilis; n = 1 IMP-27-producing P. rettgeri; n = 1 IMP-1-producing E. coli; n = 1 K. pneumoniae), and two non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem non-susceptible M. morganii also generated a false-positive NDM band; though, this was not universal among this species. A dual IMP+/NDM+ M. morganii is an unusual result that should prompt additional investigation, especially in nonendemic regions and when the susceptibility profile is incompatible. IMP-27 is not detected by Xpert Carba-R but is variably detected by NG-Test CARBA 5. The microorganism inoculum used for NG-Test CARBA 5 must be carefully controlled for accurate results. IMPORTANCE The detection of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CP-CRE) is an important function of the clinical microbiology laboratory, where positive identifications have immediate implications for infection control and surveillance strategies in the inpatient setting and can inform appropriate selection of therapy among the various novel anti-CP-CRE agents. NG-Test CARBA 5 is a relatively new lateral flow assay used for detection of carbapenemases in CP-CRE. Here, we describe the characterization of a Morganella morganii isolate that generated a false-positive NDM carbapenemase detection by this assay, and perform bacterial test inoculum experiments with additional isolates to further investigate a cause of false-positive results using the NG-Test CARBA 5. While a lateral flow assay like the NG-Test CARBA 5 is a very desirable test format for clinical laboratories, there are pitfalls to avoid when performing this test and interpreting results, including recognizing an overloaded test assay, which could lead to false-positive results.

Evaluating NG-Test CARBA 5 Multiplex Immunochromatographic and Cepheid Xpert CARBA-R Assays among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates Associated with Bloodstream Infection.

Decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacterales is an emerging concern. Conventional methods with short turnaround times are crucial for therapeutic decisions and infection control. In the current study, we used the Xpert CARBA-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France) assays for carbapenemase detection in 214 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) blood isolates. We used the modified carbapenem inactivation method, conventional PCR, and sequencing to determine the production of five common carbapenemase families and their subtypes. We performed wzc-genotyping for all CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and multilocus sequence typing for all carbapenemase-producing CRE isolates to reveal their genetic relatedness. The results showed a sensitivity of 99.8% and a specificity of 100% by the Xpert assay, and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% by the NG-Test in detecting carbapenemases of 84 CRKP isolates with only one (VIM-1+IMP-8) failure in both tests. For CR-Escherichia coli, four carbapenemase-producing isolates were detected accurately for their subtypes. The two major clones of carbapenemase-producing CRKP isolates in Taiwan were ST11-K47 producing KPC-2 (n = 47) and ST11-K64 producing OXA-48-like (n = 9). Our results support the use of either test in routine laboratories for the rapid detection of common carbapenemases. Caution should be taken using the Xpert assay in areas with a high prevalence of CRE carrying blaIMP-8. IMPORTANCE Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are emerging worldwide, causing nosocomial outbreaks and even community-acquired infections since their appearance 2 decades ago. Our previous national surveillance of CPE isolates in Taiwan identified five carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA, NDM, VIM, and IMP) with the KPC-2 and OXA-48-like types predominant. Timely detection and classification of carbapenemases in CPE may be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control. Genetic detection methods using the Xpert CARBA-R assay and the immunochromatographic assay using the NG-Test CARBA 5 have been validated with the advantage of short turnaround time. Our study demonstrated that the NG and Xpert assays are convenient methods to accurately identify carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli blood isolates. Detecting IMP variants remains challenging, and the results of Xpert CARBA-R assay should be carefully interpreted.

Comparison of the Performance of Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Clinical Practice.

In order to investigate the diagnostic performance characteristics of four phenotypic assays in detecting carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), we collected the CRE strains from infected patients. The results of carbapenemase gene detection, blaKPC-2, blaOXA-23, blaNDM-1, blaNDM-4, blaNDM-5, blaIMP-4, and blaIMP-8, were used as a standard to evaluate the performances of combined disk test (CDT), modified carbapenem inactivation method(mCIM)/EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method(eCIM), NG-Test CARBA 5 (CARBA), and color developing immunoassay (CDI). The compliance of phenotype results based on CDT, mCIM/eCIM, CARBA, and CDI with genetic detection results was 94% (231/247), 95% (235/247), 98% (242/247), and 99% (246/247), respectively. CDT demonstrated a low specificity for carbapenemase detection, low negative predictive value (NPV), and low sensitivity for metallo-ß-lactamase (79%, 55%, and 88%, respectively); it also failed to accurately detect IMP. The mCIM/eCIM assay had serious problems in detecting OXA-23-like carbapenemases. The sensitivity and specificity of CARBA and CDI were higher than those of the first two methods. However, CARBA did not cover the detection of OXA-23, while CDI cannot detect IMP-8, resulting in low NPVs (70% and 88%, respectively). In conclusion, CARBA and CDI assays are highly accurate except individual rare genes and allow direct genotype detections. CDT and mCIM/eCIM assays are moderately accurate and can only distinguish serine-ß-lactamases from metallo-ß-lactamases. Laboratories should choose the appropriate method that meets their needs based on its characteristic.

MALDI-TOF MS-Based Approaches for Direct Identification of Gram-Negative Bacteria and BlaKPC-Carrying Plasmid Detection from Blood Cultures: A Three-Year Single-Centre Study and Proposal of a Diagnostic Algorithm.

The rapid identification of pathogens of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and the detection of antibiotic resistance markers are critically important for optimizing antibiotic therapy and infection control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two approaches based on MALDI-TOF MS technology for direct identification of Gram-negative bacteria and automatic detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producers using the Bruker MBT Subtyping IVD Module in a large routine laboratory over a three-year period. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed directly from blood culture (BC) bottles following bacterial pellet recovery by Rapid MBT Sepsityper® Kit and on blood agar 4-h subcultures. Automated detection of blaKPC-carrying pKpQIL-plasmid by Bruker MBT Subtyping Module was evaluated in BCs tested positive to K. pneumoniae or E. coli. The results were compared with those obtained with conventional reference methods. Among the 2858 (93.4%) monomicrobial BCs, the overall species identification rates of the Rapid Sepsityper and the short-term subculture protocols were 84.5% (n = 2416) and 90.8% (n = 2595), respectively (p < 0.01). Excellent specificity for KPC-producers identification were observed for both MALDI-TOF MS protocols. The pKpQIL plasmid-related peak was detected in overall 91 of the 120 (75.8%) KPC-producing isolates. Notably, 14 out of the 17 (82.3%) K. pneumoniae isolates carrying blaKPC variants associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance and tested negative by the immunocromatography assay, were correctly identified as KPC-producers by MALDI-TOF MS. In conclusion, combination of both Rapid Sepsityper and short-term subculture protocols may represent an optimal solution to promptly identify more than 95% of Gram-negative bacteria causing BSIs. MALDI Biotyper® platform enabled a reliable and robust automated detection of KPC producers in parallel with species identification. However, integration of molecular or immunocromatographic assays are recommended according to local epidemiology.

Evaluation of Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests for the Direct Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases and Carbapenemases in Enterobacterales Isolated from Positive Blood Cultures.

NG-Test CTX-M MULTI and NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech) are two rapid in vitro immunochromatographic assays that are widely used for the detection of the most common extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases in Enterobacterales. ESBL and carbapenemases are leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and their rapid detection from positive blood cultures is crucial for early initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy in bloodstream infections (BSI) involving antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this study, we developed a rapid workflow for positive blood cultures for direct identification of Enterobacterales by MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry, followed by detection of ESBL and carbapenemases using NG-Test CTX-M MULTI and NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech). The workflow was evaluated using Enterobacterales isolates (n = 114), primarily Klebsiella species (n = 50) and Escherichia coli (n = 40). Compared to the standard testing approach in our institution using BD Phoenix, our new testing approach demonstrates 100% sensitivity and specificity for organism identification and detection of ESBL and carbapenemases. Implementation of a rapid workflow in diagnostic microbiology laboratories will enable more effective antimicrobial management of patients with BSI due to ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE The incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is increasing at an alarming rate, for which only limited therapeutic options remain available. Rapid identification of these bacteria along with their antibiotic resistance mechanisms in positive blood cultures with Gram-negative bacteria will allow for early initiation of effective therapy and limit the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics in BSI (1). In this study we evaluated a combined approach of testing positive blood cultures directly, using MALDI-TOF MS followed by rapid immunochromatographic tests, for the detection of ESBLs and CPEs. Our approach demonstrates 100% sensitivity and specificity for the identification of Enterobacterales and detection of ESBLs and CPEs in positive blood culture with a turnaround time (TAT) of ≤60 min compared to a TAT of 48 h required by conventional culture and susceptibility testing methods.

Comparison of Four Carbapenemase Detection Methods for blaKPC-2 Variants.

Recently, various blaKPC-2 variants resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam have begun to emerge in clinical settings, but it is unclear which testing method is most appropriate for detecting these variants. Strains were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the broth microdilution method. Four carbapenemase detection methods, modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and EDTA carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM), APB/EDTA (carbapenemase inhibitor APB [3-aminophenylboronic acid] and EDTA enhancement method), NG-test Carba 5, and GeneXpert Carba-R were used to try to detect KPC-2 variants in 19 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Among those blaKPC-2 variants, blaKPC-33-, blaKPC-35-, blaKPC-71-, blaKPC-76-, blaKPC-78-, and blaKPC-79-positive isolates accounted for 26.3% (5/19), 15.8% (3/19), 5.3% (1/19), % 42.1% (8/19), 5.3% (1/19), and 5.3% (1/19), respectively. All 19 K. pneumoniae carrying blaKPC-2 variants showed resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICs:16 to >64 mg/L), and 14 strains were susceptible to imipenem (MICs: 0.25 to 1 mg/L). None of the blaKPC-2 variants could be detected using either the mCIM or the APB/EDTA method, while five strains carrying blaKPC-2 variants (blaKPC-35, blaKPC-78, and blaKPC-79) tested KPC positive when using NG-test Carba 5. However, GeneXpert Carba-R was able to detect blaKPC-2 variants (harboring blaKPC-33, blaKPC-35, blaKPC-71, blaKPC-76, blaKPC-78, and blaKPC-79) carried by all 19 K. pneumoniae. The emergence of new KPC variants poses an increased challenge for carbapenemase detection methods, and laboratories should use the appropriate assays to accurately detect these variants. IMPORTANCE Carbapenemase detection is essential for the appropriate treatment of CRE infections. Several clinical laboratories have begun using relevant carbapenemase assays such as mCIM and eCIM, the APB/EDTA method, NG-test Carba 5, and GeneXpert Carba-R to detect carbapenemases. Nevertheless, some of these methods may have limitations for detecting blaKPC-2 variants. Additionally, there has been little relevant research on evaluate the differences between these standard methods for detecting blaKPC-2 variants. Therefore, we investigated the reliability of these classic methods for assessing 19 K. pneumoniae with blaKPC-2 variants. Our results showed that none of the blaKPC-2 variants could be detected using either the mCIM or APB/EDTA method, while five strains (harboring blaKPC-35, blaKPC-78,and blaKPC-79) tested KPC positive when using NG-test Carba 5. GeneXpert Carba-R could detect six blaKPC-2 variants carried by all 19 K. pneumoniae. This study may be valuable for clinical laboratories in their efforts to test for various blaKPC-2 variants.

Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Simulated Blood Culture in 15 Minutes.

Bacteremia leading to sepsis and organ dysfunction is a life-threatening situation, leading to death of up to one fourth of the infected individuals around the world. One major challenge in the treatment of sepsis is the rising prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). In recent years, several molecular assays have been developed for the detection of CRE mechanisms, enabling rapid results reporting. We evaluated the performance of the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech) kit in detection of CRE in simulated blood cultures. Carbapenemase-producing (CP) CRE isolates (n = 38) and non-carbapenemase CRE (Non-CP) isolates (n = 10), previously identified using the routine methods practiced at the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Israel, were used in this analysis. Variable concentrations of the bacterial isolates were added to a suspension composed of human blood and saline, simulating the composition of a blood culture. Samples were then transferred to an anaerobic blood culture bottle and later tested with the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech) kit, that identifies the CRE mechanism within 15 min. The NG-Test CARBA 5 kit correctly identified 43 samples (89.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of the kits were 86.8% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, the NG-Test CARBA 5 kit is a reliable and accessible tool for the rapid diagnosis of CRE bloodstream infections.

Carbapenemase detection by NG-Test CARBA 5-a rapid immunochromatographic assay in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The global spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represents a serious public health concern as these organisms are associated with limited treatment options, high mortality rate and rapid transmissibility. The identification of carbapenemase remains a challenge in microbiological laboratories as no single method is perfect when considering cost, carbapenemase coverage, accuracy, handling complexity and TATs together. METHODS: NG-Test CARBA 5 assay and modified carbapenem inactivation method in conjunction with EDTA carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM/eCIM) were challenged with a collection of 299 molecularly characterized CRE isolates in China in order to evaluate the performance in detecting five major carbapenemases (bla KPC, bla NDM, bla VIM, bla IMP, and bla OXA-48) among Enterobacterales. RESULTS: NG-Test CARBA 5 detected all KPC-, NDM-, VIM- and OXA-48-producing isolates perfectly with a weak false-positive signal for NDM in an IMP-4 producer, which makes the specificity for NDM decreases to 99.6%. The overall specificity/sensitivity were 99.9%/100% for NG-Test CARBA 5. mCIM/eCIM achieved high specificity of 100%/100% and sensitivity of 99.6%/97.4%, with one S. marcescens isolate harboring VIM-2 undetected. CONCLUSIONS: Both NG-Test CARBA 5 and mCIM/eCIM showed excellent results in the tested carbapenemase (bla KPC, bla NDM, bla VIM, bla IMP, and bla OXA-48) detection compared with molecular genotypic test. As every assay has its own limitations, suitable methods should be combined for the establishment of the CRE diagnostic pathways.