Improved nasal trumpet: "In-house" device to promote the healing of skin grafts in the anterior nasal nostril.

This technical note addresses the complexities of reconstructive surgery for malignant skin lesions in the lower nasal aperture and pericolumellar region. Traditional solutions, such as free skin grafts, face challenges in maintaining attachment to the surgical site without adequate support. Nasal packing, a common approach, obstructs the nasal opening and compromises air passage, hindering ventilation. The use of a nasal trumpet has proven beneficial in maintaining nasal patency in various cases, but it falls short of addressing the specific challenges posed by reconstructive surgery. The proposed solution involves a novel device comprising a nasal cannula, surgical sponge, and fine mesh gauze with 3% bismuth tribromophenate. This combination serves a triple purpose: the nasal cannula facilitates air passage, the surgical sponge applies controlled pressure around the nasal opening to aid graft adhesion, and the gauze with bismuth tribromophenate promotes wound healing and prevents infection. The assembled device is inserted into the nostril, anchored to the patient's skin with silk stitches. This innovative approach offers a practical solution for maintaining nasal patency, promoting graft adherence, and supporting wound healing in reconstructive surgery.

[Folded paramedian forehead flap - Surgical technique: About 17 patients]. / Lambeau frontal paramédian plicaturé ­ technique chirurgicale : à propos de 17 patients.

OBJECTIVE: In this article, we present our academic experience with the reconstruction of the dorsum and nasal tip by folded paramedian forehead flap described by F.J. Ménick (LFPP). We take a closer look at the technical aspects of this surgical technique and the aesthetic results at the donor sites. We compare our surgical technique with those reported in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A monocentric retrospective study was carried out on patients operated on by LFPP for surgical reconstructions of the nasal dorsum and nasal tip between January 2017 and December 2022. In each case, we analysed the typology of the type of substance loss for reconstruction, the type of reconstruction and the aesthetic result of reconstruction. A satisfaction survey on the aesthetic and functional results was sent to patients who had undergone LFPP reconstruction at 6 months post-op. RESULTS: There was no necrosis, even partial in any of the 17 cases of LFPP reconstruction. The average size of the substance loss was 3.5±0.6cm [2.5-5]. The number of aesthetic subunit (SUE) to be reconstructed was 2.6±0.9 [1-4]. The etiologies of substance loss were mainly related to skin tumors, including 58% basal cell carcinoma basal cell carcinoma (n=10), 24% squamous cell carcinoma (n=4), 6% adenoid cystic carcinoma adenoid cystic carcinoma (n=1) and 12% melanoma (n=2). The patients were very satisfied overall, both from a functional point of view with a questionnaire result of 89% (8.94±1.98 [2-10]), aesthetic, with a result of 87% (8.76±1.75 [3-10]). CONCLUSION: Among the various techniques for reconstructing the nasal pyramid, including paramedian 2-stage paramedian forehead flaps combined with a local flap of the internal lining, the technique of reconstruction described by J.F. Menick using a 3-stage paramedian folded flap is the most reliable option for complex nasal reconstructions with low donor-site morbidity.

The single-stage melolabial flap for internal lining of full thickness defects of the nasal ala.

BACKGROUND: Full-thickness defects of the nasal ala necessitate composite repair of the nasal lining, cartilage and soft tissue envelope. Repair of the nasal lining is particularly challenging due to access and geometry of this area. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the melolabial flap as a single stage operation for repair of full-thickness nasal ala defects. METHODS: Retrospective study of seven adult patients with full-thickness nasal ala defects who underwent melolabial flap repair. Complications and operative technique were recorded and described. RESULTS: Of the seven patients who underwent melolabial flap repair, each had excellent coverage of the defect postoperatively. There were two cases of mild ipsilateral congestion, and no revision procedures performed. CONCLUSION: The melolabial flap is a versatile reconstructive option for repair of the internal lining of the nasal ala, and in our series there were no significant complications or revision procedures performed.

Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different studies performed on nasal subunit reconstruction by either the nasolabial flap or the paramedian forehead flap have reported contradictory outcomes and complications, claiming one flap or the other as superior. This inconsistency has led to a gap in existing literature regarding the preferable flap for nasal reconstruction. Our aim was to statistically evaluate and compare these two flaps for nasal reconstruction, in terms of subunit preference, complications, and outcomes, using data from previous studies. METHODS: This systematic review is reported using PRISMA protocol and was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews. The literature search was done using "paramedian forehead flap", "nasolabial flap", "melolabial flap", "nasal reconstruction". Data regarding demography of study and population, subunit reconstructed, complications, and aesthetic outcomes were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL and summary of findings using GRADEpro GDT. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were included, and data from 2036 followed-up patients were extracted for the review. Meta-analysis was done on data from nine studies. Difference in alar reconstruction by forehead versus nasolabial flap is statistically significant [pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.3; 95% CI 0.01, 0.92; p = 0.72; I2 = 0%, n = 6 studies], while for dorsum and columella reconstruction the difference is not statistically significant. Risk of alar notching is marginally more in forehead flap, however difference in incidence of partial/complete flap necrosis, alar notching and hematoma/bleeding among the flaps is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Alar reconstruction is preferred by nasolabial flap. Complications are similar in both groups. Comparison of aesthetic outcome needs further exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Retrospective Study on the Reconstruction of Nasal Septal Mucosal Defects after Asian Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Nasal septal mucosal defects following rhinoplasty in Asian patients are uncommon complications. However, the reconstruction of such defects presents a challenging task in plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to present comprehensive surgical strategies for the reconstruction of nasal septal mucosal defect after rhinoplasty. METHODS: Thirteen cases presenting with nasal septal mucosal defects between January 2016 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The size, location, and severity of the defect as well as the extent of cartilage exposure were taken into consideration during evaluation, and surgical approaches were employed for repair accordingly. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire with visual analog scale (VAS) and nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE). RESULTS: The average postoperative follow-up period in this study group was 10.15 months. Reconstruction of nasal septal mucosal defects resulted in successful treatment for all patients. There was no evidence of flap failure or nasal valve stenosis. All patients were satisfied with the reconstruction outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The successful application of surgical techniques for nasal septal mucosal defects after rhinoplasty requires comprehensive consideration. The utilization of the retrograde-flow superior labial artery mucosal flap appears to be a secure, efficient, and effective technique for nasal septal mucosal defect reconstruction in rhinoplasty, particularly in cases with cartilage exposure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Anatomy and Design of Musculocutaneous Flaps in Nasal Reconstruction. / Anatomía y diseño de colgajos musculocutáneos en reconstrucción nasal.

The nose is a common site for skin tumors. The main arteries that supply the nose extend through the subcutaneous tissue. Submuscular dissection facilitates the design of safe, reliable musculocutaneous flaps that adapt well to the morphology of nasal defects. The diversity of these flaps makes them the first choice for reconstructing defects in more complex regions, such as the inner canthus of the eye and the nasal ala. We describe the surgical design of the procerus, V-Y nasalis, and lateral wall nasalis musculocutaneous flaps used to repair defects following tumor excision. The descriptions are illustrated by photographs taken by the authors during procedures and in cadaveric dissections.

Rare syringoid eccrine carcinoma of the upper lip and nasal base treated with resection and subsequent innovative reconstruction using an Abbé flap, turbinate flaps and three-stage forehead flap: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Although syringoma is a common benign tumour of the sudoriferous gland, there is also an extremely rare malignant form known as syringoid eccrine carcinoma (SEC). SEC usually exhibits slow growth with deep invasion and a frequent tendency to relapse. The treatment of choice is radical wide resection, which poses a difficult reconstructive problem, especially when the tumour is located in the centre of the face. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case, a 70-year-old man was diagnosed with an SEC at the same location as a benign syringoma of the upper lip and nasal base that had undergone primary excision 7 years prior. Primary radical resection was performed with immediate Abbé flap reconstruction. Nevertheless, histology revealed positive margins, and 3 additional re-excisions were needed to achieve clear margins. Four months after the initial resection, the patient had undergone an innovative reconstruction technique including not only the Abbé flap but also a turbinate flap harvested with functional endonasal surgery and a three-stage forehead flap. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a suspect malignant transformation of a benign syringoma after 7 years. In addition, from oncoplastic and reconstructive points of view, the bilateral use of the turbinate flap for reconstructing the intranasal lining of the alar base is unusual, and the use of functional endonasal surgery in nasal reconstruction for reducing the risk of damaging the vascular supply of the flap is innovative.

Free vascularized fascia lata flap for total columella reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Despite their relatively small size, columellar defects, including both external and internal elements, are exceedingly difficult to reconstruct. Local, regional, and distant flaps have been described for reconstruction. Herein, we present a novel technique for reconstruction of the columella using vascularized free fascia lata from the anterolateral thigh with structural replacement and skin grafting. METHODS: This novel technique utilizes a small anterolateral thigh flap, formed into vascularized fascia lata without the overlying subcutaneous fat or skin. The fascia lata is inset into the columellar and caudal septal defect after a cartilage framework is constructed and is microsurgically anastomosed to either distal facial or angular vessels. A skin graft from the ALT donor site is then secured over the fascia. RESULTS: This technique has been applied successfully in patients with either isolated columella or in multi-subunit reconstruction following total rhinectomy with no flap or reconstructive failures. Given the low morbidity of flap harvest and minimal access incisions, this has been reliably accomplished with short (1-2 day) hospital stays. CONCLUSION: Rapid and aesthetically acceptable reconstruction of total nasal columella defects in isolation or with additional nasal subunit reconstruction, is possible utilizing this novel technique. Here we discuss pearls and pitfalls of its use following surgical resection of malignancy.

Single-stage acellular dermal matrix reconstruction of defects in the nose and ears with exposed cartilage: a prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of soft tissue defects with exposed cartilage after tumor excision is challenging. Local flap reconstruction causes occasional scarring, especially in non-Caucasian populations. Scar treatment requires secondary procedures for aesthetic modifications. Two-step reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix addresses this issue and yields highly acceptable aesthetic resultsWe aimed to investigate the efficacy of an artificial dermal matrix cover using one-step reconstruction for defects with cartilage exposure. METHODS: From July 2018 to September 2020, seven patients were enrolled and underwent a single-stage operation using acellular dermal matrices. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months and the size of the wound, days to heal, patient satisfaction, and scar scale scores were recorded. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for an average of 25.7 months. The average time to heal was 23.4 days postoperatively. No hyperpigmentation, tumor recurrence, or retraction was noted. High acceptance and satisfaction with the outcome were observed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage reconstruction yielded high acceptance of aesthetic results similar to that in two-stage reconstruction. Less time and cost make this an effective and efficient treatment for soft tissue defects compared with traditional techniques.

Update on Rhinoplasty Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. The current study aimed to use bibliometric analysis to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate rhinoplasty research and determine the research trends and hotspots in this field. METHODS: Publications on rhinoplasty research were extracted from the web of science core collection database. VOSviewer1.6.18 was used to analyze the co-authorship, co-occurrence, the citations of countries, institutions, authors, and hotspot keywords, and the journals in which the studies were published. RESULTS: On April 8, 2022, 11,130 records of rhinoplasty research published between 1945 and 2021 were collected. Most of the retrieved studies were original research articles (n = 8309, 74.65%), and 1950 (17.52%) papers were available in an open-access format. The annual publication output increased annually. Research groups in the USA were the main contributors and had a strong academic reputation in this field. University of California System was the institution with the greatest contribution (4.17%, with 464 publications). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (1248 publications, 11.21%) published the most research in this field and was also the most frequently co-cited journal (33,894 citations, total link strength [TLS]: 722,672). R. J. Rohrich (140 publications) was the most prolific author and the most frequently co-cited author (2562 citations, TLS: 56,624). The following rhinoplasty research hotspots were identified: cleft rhinoplasty, nasal reconstruction, nasal tip, revision rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, nasal prosthesis, hyaluronic acid, and preservation rhinoplasty. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a general overview of the major directions in rhinoplasty research. Preservation rhinoplasty, rib graft, nonsurgical rhinoplasty, hyaluronic acid, FACE-Q, fillers, and three-dimensional technology may be future research hotspots. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nasal Reconstruction Using Rib Grafting with Cold Light Source Technology.

BACKGROUND: Although costal cartilage is a reliable source of cartilage for rhinoplasty and provides a strong scaffold for total nasal reconstruction, traditional collection techniques may cause complications at the donor site. In this paper, we report a simple and safe technique for harvesting full-length costal cartilage and its application in total nasal reconstruction. METHODS: From May 2018 to December 2020, 24 patients with nasal defects, including 16 females and eight males, received nasal reconstruction in the Rhinoplasty and Repair Center of the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Clinical outcomes were evaluated during the postoperative stay at the hospital and at the 6-30-month follow-up. RESULTS: The operative time of cartilage harvesting ranged from 30 to 60 min. The patients could walk freely one day after surgery. The average ± standard deviation of Visual Analog Scale scores for pain at the harvested site were 2.583 ± 0.717 (at rest) and 4.750 ± 0.794 (during coughing) 6 h after surgery. We observed no complications (e.g., pleural perforation, pneumothorax, or massive bleeding) due to rib grafts in any patients. During the 6-30 months of follow-up, all patients had complete healing of both donor and recipient sites. The surgical results were rated as satisfactory or good by the patients and surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: This new cold light source-assisted costal cartilage harvest technique allows full-length costal cartilage to be obtained for total nasal reconstruction, with minimal donor site complications, short operation time, fast postoperative recovery, and high satisfaction among patients and surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

[Nasal reconstruction: Decision tree based on 229 operated cases]. / Reconstruction des pertes de substances du nez : algorithme décisionnel à propos de 229 cas.

BACKGROUND: The Face is the most frequent localization for cutaneous carcinoma. The nose accounts for about 30% of these tumors. Nose tissue loss repair has to pursue 3 types of objectives: carcinologic, aesthetic and functional. The aim of this article is to identify a decision tree to guide the choice of surgical reconstruction technique based on localization and size of the defect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in Angers' CHU from 2013 to 2019 including 229 patients referred for cutaneous tumors excision in need of reconstruction. We analyzed the type of reconstruction, size of the tissue loss and localization of the defect in terms of nose aesthetic subunits. RESULTS: Among the 229 patients included, the most frequent localization was nose tip (32%). 44% of patients were reconstructed with skin grafts or composite graft, 56% with flaps (48% local flaps and 4% association of both methods). Limited central resections of nose tip were reconstructed with skingraft. The Rybka flap and bilobed flap were the preferred choice for lateral reconstruction of nose tip. Largest tip defects were reconstructed using Rieger flap or forehead flap. The dorsum was often reconstructed with local flap: glabellar on the upper part, Rieger on the lower part. Lateral side was perfectly reconstructed with island flap. Nose wings needed framework: composite graft was the judicious choice in case of limited tissue loss whereas forehead flap with framework or Schmid-Meyer flap were chosen for larger defects. CONCLUSION: Our past experience in nasal reconstruction has provided us with an original decision tree to guide surgeons in choosing the right reconstruction technique according to the size and localization of the defect.

Hybrid reconstruction of distal nasal defects.

We present hybrid reconstruction of distal lateral "through-and-through" nasal defects (skin, cartilage, and mucosa) due to resection of tumor and/or infection. Retrospective descriptive study. The study was performed in multicenter clinics between July 2011 and September 2016. 13 patients with full thickness distal nasal defects secondary to tumor and/or infection were included. Defects included dorsal and/or caudal septum, upper lateral cartilage, or inner/outer nasal valve. Caudal-based turn-in flaps were planned and used to repair inner lining of nasal cavity. Conchal and septal cartilages were used as cartilage grafts. Skin defects were reconstructed with lateral nasal artery perforator flaps. All flaps healed uneventfully, without flap loss. Nasal passage collapse, adhesion, or difficulty in breathing were not seen. No hematoma, infection, and deformity at cartilage graft donor areas was observed. During nasal reconstruction, it is mandatory to consider 3D complex and functional structure of nose. The repair of skin defects may not be enough for functional restoration. We believe that single step reconstruction of full thickness nasal defects through hybrid reconstruction may lead to anticipated successful results.

The role of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green dye in pedicle division with the paramedian forehead flap.

The paramedian forehead flap is considered the gold standard for nasal reconstruction following oncologic surgery. During the 21-day delay in two-stage surgery protocols, many patients report considerably reduced quality of life because of the pedicle. This prospective case series study examined the usefulness of near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence with indocyanine green (ICG) for flap perfusion assessment and identified variables associated with time to flap perfusion. Ten patients (mean age 75.3 ± 11.6 years) with diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (n = 9) or squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1) underwent intravenous indocyanine injection and NIR fluorescence imaging for assessment of flap vascularisation 2 to 3 weeks after stage 1 surgery. NIR fluorescence imaging showed 90% to 100% perfusion areas in all patients after 14 to 21 days. Early pedicle division occurred in two patients on postoperative days 14 and 16. One minor complication (wound healing disorder) was seen following flap takedown after 14 days. There were no associations between time to flap perfusion and defect size or flap area. NIR fluorescence imaging with ICG dye is a useful method for non-invasive perfusion assessment when used in conjunction with clinical assessment criteria. However, a decision for early pedicle division may raise risk of complications in specific patient groups and must therefore be made with great care.

Three-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flap Reconstruction of the Nose Using the Combination of Composite Septal Pivot Flap with The Turbinate Flap and L-Septal Cartilaginous Graft - a Case Report.

Nasal basal cell carcinomas are the most common malignant tumors of the facial skin, which predilectively affect areas exposed to sunlight, including the nasal area. After their radical removal, there is a variable complex defect of the affected area (defect of all 3 layers of the nose) or even a composite defect (it also occupies the adjacent soft tissues around the nose), which are usually used to reconstruct this area. A 73-year-old female patient with recurrent infiltrative basal cell carcinoma of the left nasal ala underwent four re-excisions before histologically verified free margins without the presence of the tumor. The result was a composite defect that occupied the top of the dome of the right nostril, the entire left half of the soft nose, including the base of the wing, part of the upper lip, and a defect of the adjacent face area of 9 × 5cm. In the first phase, the left cheek and upper lip were reconstructed by advancement French plasty and coverage of the two residual skin defects with full-thickness skin graft. One month later, during the second phase of reconstruction, the flap was re-elevated, shifted and rotated, and a three-stage nasal reconstruction was started using a composite septal pivotal flap and left turbinate flap for inner lining reconstruction, and the nasal skeleton was reconstructed with a cartilaginous L-graft from the 6th rib, septal and conchal cartilages. The skin cover of the nose was reconstructed with the left paramedian forehead flap, which was thinned during the second stage with the simultaneous widening of the bottom of the left nostril by the transposition flap, during the third stage the flap pedicle was removed. In the reconstruction of a complex defect of the nose and its surroundings, it is first necessary to create a stable platform on which the reconstruction of the nose itself will be performed. To achieve an excellent functional and aesthetic result of nose reconstruction, it is appropriate to use a three-stage forehead flap. In this paper, we describe a unique method of nasal reconstruction - a combination of a septal pivotal flap with a turbinate flap to reconstruct the inner lining in conjunction with an L-graft to ensure a stable nasal skeleton and forehead flap to reconstruct the skin cover.

[Rhinopoiesis after traumatic total amputation in childhood in an 11-year-old child]. / Rhinopoïese après amputation traumatique totale dans l'enfance chez un enfant de 11 ans.

Fortunately, traumatic total amputations of the nose are rare, especially in children. Their reconstructions generally require several operative steps, most often associating cartilaginous grafts (rib and/or concha), a free radial antebrachial flap for mucosal reconstruction and a frontal flap for the skin covering. These are therefore long and complex procedures requiring a trained surgical team and maximum patient adherence to their treatment plan. The clinical case described is that of an 11-year-old child presenting a sub-total amputation of the nose and having undergone reconstruction with skin expansion of the frontal flap due to a horizontal frontal scar of unknown origin and a particularly low hair implantation.

Laser hair removal following forehead flap for nasal reconstruction.

The forehead flap is a dependable option for nasal reconstruction owing to its reliability and anatomic likeness to nasal skin. For patients with low hairlines, the vertical design of the paramedian forehead flap can intrude into the scalp, thus incorporating hair into the nasal reconstruction. The inadequate length of the forehead flap or shift to an oblique design may result in eyebrow elevation and asymmetry. Therefore, laser hair removal (epilation) on the forehead flap has been proposed to improve esthetic results. An alexandrite laser (755 nm, 10 to 20 ms, 18-mm spot size) with a Dynamic Cooling Device™ (DCD™) cooling system was used for hair removal in 22 patients (16 male and 6 female patients) after nasal reconstructions using forehead flaps from December 2011 to September 2016. All patients received cryogen spray cooling laser treatment (CSC-LT). The mean follow-up period was 24 months, with a range between 18 and 50 months. The average duration of treatment was 1.8 months (range, 1-5 months). The energy density ranged from 14 to 18 J/cm2 with an average of 17.2 J/cm2. The number of treatments ranged from 2 to 4 (mean 2.8). Patients had satisfactory esthetic results over 11.1 months (range, 8-18 months). Residual white hairs were observed in 3 patients, and 4 patients had tiny black residual hairs without deteriorating cosmesis. Using an alexandrite laser to remove hair on the forehead is safe and reliable in nasal reconstruction with superior recipient site cosmesis.

[Options for reconstruction of nasal defects]. / Möglichkeiten der Defektrekonstruktion im Nasenbereich.

As far as aesthetic and functional aspects are concerned, local as well as regional flaps are mainly recommended for facial plastic surgery. A careful preoperative planning is essential. Adequate knowledge of various surgical options of reconstruction as well as their implementation into clinical practice are of utmost importance. The surgical procedure is selected on the basis of the patients' demands and the properties of the surgical site to which the selected technique must be adapted. The current review presents frequently used and recommendable methods for the reconstruction of nasal defects.

Reconstruction of the Nose: Management of Nasal Cutaneous Defects According to Aesthetic Subunit and Defect Size. A Review.

The nose represents the most common site for the presentation of cutaneous cancer, especially in sun-exposed areas: ala, dorsum, and tip. Even the smallest loss of substance can create aesthetic and psychosocial concerns for patients; therefore, surgeons who perform nasal reconstruction should be strictly confident with the pertinent surgical anatomy in order to tailor the procedure to the patient's condition and needs. Radical tumor excision and satisfactory aesthetic and functional results are primary targets. Restoring the original shape is the goal of any reconstruction: appropriate reshaping of three-dimensional geometry, proper establishment of symmetry, and excellent color and texture match to the adjacent structures are paramount features. Multiple options exist to re-establish functional and aesthetic integrity after surgical oncology; nevertheless, the management of nasal defects can be often challenging, and the gold standard is yet to be found. The current goal is to highlight some of the more common techniques used to reconstruct cutaneous defects of the nose with a specific focus on decision making based on the aesthetic subunit and defect size. The authors attempt to share common pitfalls and offer practical suggestions that they have found helpful in their clinical experience.

Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome.

Reconstruction of the complex anatomy and aesthetics of the midface is often a challenge. A careful understanding of this three-dimensional (3D) structure is necessary. Anticipating the extent of excision and its planning following oncological resections is critical. In the past over two decades, with the advances in microsurgical procedures, contributions toward the reconstruction of this area have generated interest. Planning using digital imaging, 3D printed models, osseointegrated implants, and low-profile plates, has favorably impacted the outcome. However, there are still controversies in the management: to use single composite tissues versus multiple tissues; implants versus autografts; vascularized versus nonvascularized bone; prosthesis versus reconstruction. This article explores the present available options in maxillary reconstruction and outlines the approach in the management garnered from past publications and experiences.