The Source of Nasal Rustle (Nasal Turbulence): An Overview of Current Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Nasal rustle (also called nasal turbulence) refers to a loud distracting sound that sometimes occurs with audible nasal emission (ANE) during the production of pressure-sensitive consonants in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). This article examines evidence for two hypotheses of causality: vibration of the soft palate (velar flutter) and periodic motion of mucus above the velopharyngeal port (turbulent mucus). CONCLUSION: A review of the relevant literature shows inconclusive evidence to support velar flutter as a cause of nasal rustle. In contrast, clinical observations and research involving high-speed nasopharyngoscopy suggest that nasal rustle is the result of turbulent mucus above a small velopharyngeal opening. Therefore, it is our contention that a plausible explanation for nasal rustle is one of turbulent mucus and not velar flutter.

Cleft Summit 2022: The Impact of a Unified Voice.

OBJECTIVE: The inaugural Cleft Summit aimed to unite experts and foster interdisciplinary collaboration, seeking a collective understanding of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) management. DESIGN: An interactive debate and conversation between a multidisciplinary cleft care team on VPI management. SETTING: A two-hour discussion within a four-day comprehensive cleft care workshop (CCCW). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two global leaders from various cleft disciplines. INTERVENTIONS: Cleft Summit that allows for meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to reach consensus on a unified statement for VPI management. RESULTS: Participants agreed that a patient with significant VPI and a dynamic velum should first receive a surgery that lengthens the velum to optimize patient outcome. A global, multicenter prospective study should be done to test this hypothesis. CONCLUSION: The 1st Cleft Summit successfully distilled global expertise into actionable best-practice guidelines through iterative discussions, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and paving the way for a transformative multi-center prospective study on VPI care.

Submucous Cleft Palate (SMCP): Indications and Outcomes of Radical Muscle Dissection Palatoplasty in Children Under 4 Years of Age.

To delineate the indications, referral sources and outcomes of radical muscle dissection palate repair in the first 4 years of life for patients with submucous cleft palate (SMCP).This study presents a retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's management.All children were treated at Great Ormond Street Hospital, United Kingdom.Twenty-three children with nonsyndromic SMCP were included in this study.All participants underwent radical muscle dissection repair before their fourth birthday.Parameters analyzed included: referral sources, indications for referral, extent of anatomical abnormality, and postoperative outcomes.Paediatricians provided the largest proportion of referrals to the cleft lip and palate clinic (39%) due to the presence of cleft lip/palate on prenatal scans or during neonatal examination. Over half (n = 12, 52%) of patients had severe anatomical anomalies being in grade IV (score 8-9), with the classical triad present to some extent in all but 2 of the patients. The main indication for surgery was nasal regurgitation of food and liquid (n = 9, 35%) followed by hypernasality (n = 6, 21%), difficulty feeding (n = 3, 8%), and severe anatomical defect (n = 2; 4%). Postoperatively, the presenting complaint improved in the majority of cases.Nonsyndromic SMCP is often missed, though may present with nasal regurgitation, feeding problems, and/or hypernasality, though may be missed in nonsyndromic children. Early radical muscle dissection repair in the first 4 years of life is safe and effective, facilitating normal speech development.

Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual and Objective Measures of Resonance in Children with Cleft Palate: Effects of Intelligibility and Dysphonia.

To investigate the relationship between auditory-perceptual ratings of resonance and nasometry scores in children with cleft palate. Factors which may impact this relationship were examined including articulation, intelligibility, dysphonia, sex, and cleft-related diagnosis.Retrospective, observational cohort study.Outpatient pediatric cranio-facial anomalies clinic.Four hundred patients <18 years of age identified with CP ± L, seen for auditory-perceptual and nasometry evaluations of hypernasality as well as assessments of articulation and voice.Relationship between auditory-perceptual ratings of resonance and nasometry scores.Pearson's correlations indicated that auditory-perceptual resonance ratings and nasometry scores were significantly correlated across oral-sound stimuli on the picture-cued portion of the MacKay-Kummer SNAP-R Test (r values .69 to.72) and the zoo reading passage (r = .72). Linear regression indicated that intelligibility (p ≤ .001) and dysphonia (p = .009) significantly impacted the relationship between perceptual and objective assessments of resonance on the Zoo passage. Moderation analyses indicated that the relationship between auditory-perceptual and nasometry values weakened as severity of speech intelligibility increased (P < .001) and when children presented with moderate dysphonia (p ≤ .001). No significant impact of articulation testing or sex were observed.Speech intelligibility and dysphonia alter the relationship between auditory-perceptual and nasometry assessments of hypernasality in children with cleft palate. SLPs should be aware of potential sources of auditory-perceptual bias and shortcomings of the Nasometer when following patients with limited intelligibility or moderate dysphonia. Future study may identify the mechanisms by which intelligibility and dysphonia affect auditory-perceptual and nasometry evaluations.

Assessing the Agreement of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission Ratings Between Audio-Recordings and a Clinic Setting.

Assess agreement of hypernasality and audible nasal emission (ANE) ratings between audio-recordings and a clinic setting.Cross-sectional study using retrospective clinical recordings.Audio-recording ratings by two trained speech language pathologists.Percent agreement and intra- and inter-rater reliability of perceptual ratings.Intra-rater reliability (AC2) of 167 audio-recorded speech samples for the primary and secondary raters, respectively, was 0.82 and 0.79 for hypernasality; for ANE, it was 0.57 and 0.75. Inter-rater reliability was 0.77 for hypernasality and 0.63 for ANE. When comparing ratings made from audio-recording versus the original clinical ratings, intra-rater reliability was 0.85 and 0.61 (primary and secondary rater, respectively) for hypernasality and 0.21 and 0.34 for ANE.Ratings for hypernasality made from audio recordings were consistent with clinical evaluation, while ratings of ANE were not. ANE ratings made from audio recordings may not be a valid measure of velopharyngeal insufficiency speech characteristics.

The Role of Postoperative Nasal Stents in Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of postoperative nasal stenting in preserving nasal shape and preventing nostril stenosis in cleft rhinoplasty, and to develop a classification system for postoperative nasal stents. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches of scientific literature were conducted from 3 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, OVID). Primary evidence that described postoperative nasal stenting in cleft rhinoplasty were included. Exclusion criteria included secondary evidence, non-English articles, and studies focusing on preoperative nasal stents. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft lip/nose of any type were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Role in preservation of nasal shape & symmetry, role in prevention of nostril stenosis, complications with the use of postoperative nasal stent. RESULTS: Of the 13 articles, 9 papers described the preservation of nasal shape with nasal stents and three studies with a control group showed improved symmetry score. No studies evaluated the prevention of nostril stenosis; however, 2 studies reported improvement of nostril stenosis in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. The results of the included studies had significant heterogeneity. Nasal stents were classified into five types: Type I-spare parts assembled, Type II-prefabricated commercial, Type IIIa-patient specific 3D-printed static, Type IIIb-patient specific dynamic, and Type IV-internal absorbable. Total complications were 6.0%, including irritation (0.9%), infection (0.3%), and stent loss (4.6%). CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of consensus with postoperative nasal stents, this review suggests its safety and role in preserving shape and improving stenosis. Our classification system highlights variability and the need for better quality studies to determine the efficacy of nasal stents.

Repeat Buccal Flaps Successfully Reduce Hypernasality in a Patient with Cleft Palate.

Surgical intervention can contribute to the development of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) leading to hypernasality and regurgitation. In this case, a patient with a history of bilateral buccal flaps used for her primary CP repair presented to clinic with hypernasality and VPI as assessed by speech exam and imaging. She underwent repeat bilateral buccal flap palatal lengthening with division of the pedicles 3 months later. Three months after her division, her hypernasality score improved from moderate to mild and her posterior gap decreased. This study concluded buccal flaps can be used a second time for patients needing palatal revisions for VPI.

Using "Real-World Data" to Study Cleft Lip/Palate Care: An Exploration of Speech Outcomes from a Multi-Center US Learning Health Network.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a cleft-specific multi-site learning health network registry to describe variations in cleft outcomes by cleft phenotypes, ages, and treatment centers. Observed variations were assessed for coherence with prior study findings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data from 2019-2022. SETTING: Six cleft treatment centers collected data systematically during routine clinic appointments according to a standardized protocol. PARTICIPANTS: 714 English-speaking children and adolescents with non-syndromic cleft lip/palate. INTERVENTION: Routine multidisciplinary care and systematic outcomes measurement by cleft teams. OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech outcomes included articulatory accuracy measured by Percent Consonants Correct (PCC), velopharyngeal function measured by Velopharyngeal Competence (VPC) Rating Scale (VPC-R), intelligibility measured by caregiver-reported Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS), and two CLEFT-Q™ surveys, in which patients rate their own speech function and level of speech distress. RESULTS: 12year-olds exhibited high median PCC scores (91-100%), high frequency of velopharyngeal competency (62.50-100%), and high median Speech Function (80-91) relative to younger peers parsed by phenotype. Patients with bilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate reported low PCC scores (51-91%) relative to peers at some ages and low frequency of velopharyngeal competency (26.67%) at 5 years. ICS scores ranged from 3.93-5.0 for all ages and phenotypes. Speech Function and Speech Distress were similar across phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration of speech outcomes demonstrates the current ability of the cleft-specific registry to support cleft research efforts as a source of "real-world" data. Further work is focused on developing robust methodology for hypothesis-driven research and causal inference.

Nasality outcome in unilateral chronic rhinosinusitis following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In this study we aimed to investigate the prevalence of abnormal nasality in patients with unilateral rhinosinusitis and their nasality outcomes following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: A total of 42 patients with unilateral chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent unilateral FESS between April 2016 and November 2017 were enrolled. Questionnaires on sinonasal symptoms and nasality were recorded. The change in the nasalance score of vowels [a], [i] [u], nasal consonant [m], 2 nasal syllable repetitions, and 2 Chinese sentences were measured. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation. The patients were divided into two groups, wide opening surgery and limited surgery, according to the severity of the disease. RESULTS: Among 42 patients, the subjective reports showed that one-third of unilateral chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients had abnormal nasality preoperatively and significant improvement following FESS. The Lund-Mackay score was significantly negatively correlated with preoperative nasalance of [i] and positively correlated with change of nasalance of [i]. The increase in the value of [i] is statistically significant (p = 0.01) following FESS. In the further subgroup analysis, the change in nasalance was significant in the wide opening surgery group, but not in the limited surgery group. CONCLUSION: Although only one side of the nasal airway was involved, one-third of the patients reported abnormal nasality. In patients with more disease severity who underwent wide opening surgery, the nasalance significantly increased 1 year after FESS. The increase in the objective nasalance score was corresponded to a significant improvement of subjective self-reported nasality assessment postoperatively.

Covering Nasometer Microphones with Plastic Wrap for Infection Control Increases Retest Variability of Nasalance Scores.

The Nasometer is a popular instrument for the acoustic assessment of nasality. In light of the currently ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic, clinicians may have wondered about the infection control procedures for the Nasometer. The current research investigated whether nasalance scores are affected if the Nasometer 6450 microphone casings are covered with a material such as rolled polyvinyl chloride household wrap. For the experiment, pre-recorded sound files from two speakers were played back through a set of small loudspeakers. Nasalance scores from two baselines and three wrap cover conditions were compared. While there was no statistically significant condition effect in a repeated-measures analysis of variance, the within-condition cumulative differences in nasalance scores were 2 for the initial baseline, 42 for wrap cover 1, 24 for wrap cover 2, 78 for wrap cover 3, and 8 for the final baseline. Mean differences between the wrap cover and the baseline conditions were 8.2 to 15.3 times larger, and cumulative differences were 8.3 to 16.6 times larger than between the two baselines. Based on the higher cumulative and mean differences observed, clinicians should not cover Nasometer microphones with household wrap as this increases variability of nasalance scores. Since there is evidence that the COVID-19 virus can survive for some time on metal surfaces, clinicians should be mindful of the fact that the Nasometer microphone housings can only be cleaned superficially and should be handled with gloves to minimize any possible risk of touch transfer of pathogens to the next speaker or the clinician.

Velopharyngeal Characteristics in Aarskog-Scott Syndrome: A Case Report.

Aarskog-Scott syndrome (AAS), also known as facio-digito-genital syndrome, is a rare heterogenous syndrome characterized by facial dysmorphism, brachydactyly, and genetic abnormalities. Although severe craniofacial abnormalities have been reported in AAS, little is known about speech and resonance issues in AAS. Specifically, published data to date have only indicated reports of hypernasality associated with a cleft palate in AAS. This case report provides clinical and anatomic information surrounding hypernasal speech in the absence of an overt cleft palate in a patient with AAS.

Speech Outcomes of a National Cohort of Children with Orofacial Cleft at 5 and 10 Years of age.

OBJECTIVE: To assess speech outcomes at five and ten years of age in a nationwide study of children with orofacial cleft. DESIGN: Prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Children born with orofacial cleft and having primary surgery in New Zealand. Speech samples were available for 151 five-year-old, and 163 ten-year-old children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intelligibility, Acceptability, Velopharyngeal function, Hypernasality, Hyponasality, severity of airflow evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (using the standardised Rhinocleft assessment), and overall assessment of requirement for clinical intervention. RESULTS: A large proportion of five-year-old children had speech that was considered to be not completely intelligible, was not acceptable, and had inadequate velopharyngeal function. The noted deficiencies led to a clinical judgement that further speech and/or surgical intervention was required in 85% with cleft lip and palate, 65% with cleft palate and 26% with cleft lip. The proportion of children with poor speech outcomes in the ten-year-old children was lower, though of clinical importance, further intervention required for 25% with CLP, 15% with CP and 3% with CL. The number of sound production errors in both age groups followed the same pattern with fewest in those with CL and most in those with CLP. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of children with orofacial cleft were found to have poor speech outcomes requiring further treatment. The outcomes are poor compared to centres reported in the UK and Scandinavia. New Zealand requires a review of the current services for individuals born with cleft to improve speech outcomes and interdisciplinary care.

Conversion Furlow Palatoplasty and the Use of Preoperative Video Nasendoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes after conversion Furlow palatoplasty with and without routine preoperative flexible fiberoptic video nasendoscopy (FFVN). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Children's Hospital. PATIENTS: Greater than 3 years of age with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after straight-line palatoplasty requiring secondary surgery performed with a Furlow palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of children with and without routine FFVN prior to conversion Furlow palatoplasty for VPI after initial straight-line palatoplasty. Groups were compared for surgical timing, speech outcomes, and need for additional surgery after conversion Furlow palatoplasty. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent preoperative FFVN versus 29 without. Mean age at FFVN was 73.8 (SD 34) months. Mean age for secondary palatal surgery by conversion Furlow palatoplasty was 81.5 (SD 34.8) months with FFVN versus 73.4 (SD 34.0) months without FFVN. There was a significant difference (P < .001) for VPI diagnosis and time to surgery between the groups. Preoperative hypernasality ratings were similar between groups. Postoperatively 65.5% of FFVN and non-FFVN patients corrected to normal resonance. Only 6.9% of all patients rated moderate-severe hypernasality after surgery compared to 42.5% preoperatively. Of total, 5.7% of patients had unchanged hypernasality and only 1 patient rated worse. Seven patients ultimately required additional surgery in attempt to normalize their resonance. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative FFVN does not offer any advantage for improved outcomes in children undergoing conversion Furlow palatoplasty after straight-line repair. Routine preoperative FFVN was associated with increased time to surgery after diagnosis of VPI compared to those without FFVN.

Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate in the Amazon Region in Brazil: Speech Results and Sociodemographic Aspects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the speech outcomes in individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP) from the Amazon region and determine their correlation with sociodemographic factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, prospective, single-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary care institute in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. PATIENTS: Four hundred twenty individuals with CLP, aged 4 to 57 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The samples were judged by 3 speech pathologists experienced in the speech assessment of individuals with CLP. Hypernasality was scored using a 4-point scale, being 1 = absent, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe, and the active speech symptoms were classified as absent or present. The final score for each speech symptom was reached by consensus among the 3 examiners Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic data included origin, socioeconomic status, type of cleft, surgical technique employed, the age they underwent primary and secondary palatoplasty, and palatal fistula. RESULTS: Absence of hypernasality was observed in 41% of the individuals, 18% had mild, 28% moderate, and 13% severe hypernasality. Active speech symptoms were observed in 57% of the individuals. Significant correlations were found between speech outcomes and the variables such as origin, socioeconomic status, age at primary and secondary palatoplasty, and presence of fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals with repaired CLP from the Amazon region presented speech disorders, characterized by hypernasality and active errors. Patients living outside the state capital, of low socioeconomic level, underwent palatoplasty late and with presence of palatal fistula tended to have the worst speech outcomes.

Greater Palatal Cleft Width Predicts an Increased Risk for Unfavorable Outcomes in Cleft Palate Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of cleft width and cleft type on the need for secondary surgery and velopharyngeal competence from a longitudinal perspective. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. SETTING: A single multidisciplinary craniofacial team at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate and cleft palate only (n = 313) born from 1984 to 2002, treated with 2-stage palatal surgery, were reviewed. A total of 213 patients were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of initial cleft width and cleft type on secondary surgery. Assessment of hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and glottal articulation from routine follow-ups from 3 to 16 years of age. The assessments were compared with reassessments of 10% of the recordings. RESULTS: Cleft width, but not cleft type, predicted the need for secondary surgery, either due to palatal dehiscence or velopharyngeal insufficiency. The distribution of cleft width between the scale steps on a 4-point scale for hypernasality and audible nasal emission differed significantly at 5 years of age but not at any other age. Presence of glottal articulation differed significantly at 3 and 5 years of age. No differences between cleft types were seen at any age for any speech variable. CONCLUSIONS: Cleft width emerged as a predictor of the need for secondary surgery as well as more deviance in speech variables related to velopharyngeal competence during the preschool years. Cleft type was not related to the need for secondary surgery nor speech outcome at any age.

Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study of Revision Palatoplasty Versus Pharyngoplasty for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Cleft Palate Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To present the design and methodology for an actively enrolling comparative effectiveness study of revision palatoplasty versus pharyngoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). DESIGN: Prospective observational multicenter study. SETTING: Twelve hospitals across the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals who are 3-23 years of age with a history of repaired cleft palate and a diagnosis of VPI, with a total enrollment target of 528 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Revision palatoplasty and pharyngoplasty (either pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty), as selected for each participant by their treatment team. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome is resolution of hypernasality, defined as the absence of consistent hypernasality as determined by blinded perceptual assessment of a standard speech sample recorded twelve months after surgery. The secondary outcome is incidence of new onset obstructive sleep apnea. Statistical analyses will use propensity score matching to control for demographics, medical history, preoperative severity of hypernasality, and preoperative imaging findings. RESULTS: Study recruitment began February 2021. As of September 2022, 148 participants are enrolled, and 78 have undergone VPI surgery. Enrollment is projected to continue into 2025. Collection of postoperative evaluations should be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of results soon thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with VPI following cleft palate repair are being actively enrolled at sites across the US and Canada into a prospective observational study evaluating surgical outcomes. This study will be the largest and most comprehensive study of VPI surgery outcomes to date.

Effects of different calibration schedules on the test-retest differences of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6450.

Nasometry is used to assess nasality in speech but it is unclear whether overly frequent recalibration of the instrument adds measurement errors. The goal of the present research study was to describe the effect of the Nasometer 6450 calibration on the nasalance scores of repeated recordings. In a first experiment, the Nasometer calibration values stored in the computer's registry were manipulated to investigate the impact on nasalance scores. In the second experiment, a set of pre-recorded speech samples was re-recorded 40 times with a Nasometer 6450 in 4 different calibration regimens: Short-term repeated recordings without (R1) and with recalibration (R2C), and long-term repeated recordings over 10 days without (R3) and with recalibration (R4C). The first experiment showed that, compared to a calibration value of 1.0, a value of 0.9 resulted in nasalance scores that were on average 3 points lower while a calibration value of 1.1 resulted in scores that were 0.5 points higher. The results of the second experiment showed test-retest differences of less than 2 nasalance points for 91% of the data for a non-nasal stimulus. For a nasal stimulus, 91% of data were within 5 points for R3 and R4C. The results suggested that frequent recalibration of the Nasometer may slightly increase test-retest differences of nasalance scores. An alternative procedure for verifying microphone balance without recalibration is suggested.

Potential Effects of Rhinoplasty on Voice in Professional Voice Users.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surgical procedures involving the manipulation of the airway structure have the potential to affect the quality of voice by changing the resonance properties. Regarding this, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of rhinoplasty on the voice of professional voice users. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This cohort study was conducted on 30 professional voice users. For the purpose of the study, the patients completed the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). In addition, they were subjected to voice analysis that included the measurement of nasality in speech production (i.e., nasalance), using the nasometer II. Computerized speech lab was also utilized to examine vowels /e/ and /a/, each of which was sustained for 5 sec by the participants. RESULTS: The mean VHI scores were 8.5 ± 1.98 and 7.36 ± 1.71 before and after the surgery, respectively, indicating no significant difference between the two investigated stages (Z = - 0.53, P = 0.59). However, there was a significant difference between the patients with and without preoperative obstruction in terms of the VHI score (χ2 = 11.06, P = 0.004). With regard to orality, it had the mean values of 16.86 ± 7.45 and 15.22 ± 7.37 before and after the surgery, respectively. Furthermore, the mean values of nasality at the pre- and post-operation stages were 59.42 ± 6.04 and 56.28 ± 10.07, respectively. The comparison between the pre- and post-surgical orality and nasality revealed no significant difference (t = 1.226, P = 0.23 and t = 0.93, P = 0.36, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although rhinoplasty is supposed to affect voice and vocal resonation, the induced changes are not problematic for the professional voice users. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Computational Analysis of Olfactory Airspace in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the magnitude of olfactory recess opacity in patients with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity (uCLND). DESIGN: Subject-specific 3-dimensional reconstruction of the nasal airway anatomy was created from computed tomography images in 11 (4 males and 7 females) subjects with uCLND and 7 (3 males, and 4 females) normal subjects. The volume and surface area of each subject's unilateral and bilateral olfactory airspace was quantified to assess the impact of opacification. Qualitatively speaking, patients with 75% to 100% olfactory recess opacification were classified as extreme, 50% to 75% as severe, 25% to 50% as moderate, and 0% to 25% as mild. RESULTS: Of the 11 subjects with uCLND, 5 (45%) were classified as having extreme olfactory recess opacification, 3 (27%) subjects had severe opacification, and 3 (27%) subjects had moderate opacification. Mean (±SD) bilateral olfactory recess volume was significantly greater in normal subjects than in subjects with uCLND (0.9668 cm3 ± 0.4061 cm3 vs 0.3426 cm3 ± 0.1316 cm3; P < .001). Furthermore, unilateral olfactory airspace volumes for the cleft and non-cleft sides in subjects with uCLND were considerably less than unilateral olfactory volume in subjects with normal anatomy (uCLND cleft side = 0.1623 cm3 ± 0.0933 cm3; uCLND non-cleft side = 0.1803 cm3 ± 0.0938 cm3; normal = 0.4834 cm3 ± 0.2328 cm3; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a high prevalence of olfactory recess opacification among subjects with uCLND when compared to subjects with normal anatomy. The majority of subjects with uCLND had extreme olfactory recess opacity, which will likely influence their sense of smell.

Perceptual Speech Outcomes After Early Primary Palatal Repair in Ugandan Patients With Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To provide speech outcomes of English-speaking Ugandan patients with a cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L). DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Referral hospital for patients with cleft lip and palate in Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four English-speaking Ugandan children with a CP±L (15 boys, 9 girls, mean 8.4 years) who received palatal closure prior to 6 months of age and an age- and gender-matched control group of Ugandan children without cleft palate. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of speech outcomes of the patient and control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptual speech outcomes including articulation, resonance, speech understandability and acceptability, and velopharyngeal composite score (VPC-sum). Information regarding speech therapy, fistula rate, and secondary surgery. RESULTS: Normal speech understandability was observed in 42% of the patients, and 38% were judged with normal speech acceptability. Only 16% showed compensatory articulation. Acceptable resonance was found in 71%, and 75% of the patients were judged perceptually to present with competent velopharyngeal function based on the VPC-sum. Additional speech intervention was recommended in 25% of the patients. Statistically significant differences for all these variables were still observed with the control children (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, acceptable speech outcomes were found after early primary palatal closure. Comparable or even better results were found in comparison with international benchmarks, especially regarding the presence of compensatory articulation. Whether this approach is transferable to Western countries is the subject for further research.