Prognostic superiority of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index over pretreatment whole-body volumetric-metabolic FDG-PET/CT metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of whole-body maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ), whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (TLG) at pretreatment (18) F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who had undergone FDG-PET/CT before rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) immunochemotherapy were retrospectively included. All FDG-avid lesions in each patient were segmented using semi-automated software to calculate whole-body SUVmax , whole-body MTV, and whole-body TLG values. Cox regression analyses were used to determine the associations of whole-body SUVmax , whole-body MTV, whole-body TLG, and dichotomized National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) risk group (low risk vs. high risk) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: On univariate Cox regression analysis, only the NCCN-IPI was a significant predictor of PFS (P = 0.024), and only the NCCN-IPI and whole-body MTV were significant predictors of OS (P = 0.039 and P = 0.043, respectively). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, only the NCCN-IPI remained an independent predictive factor of PFS (P = 0.024) and OS (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Whole-body SUVmax , whole-body MTV, and whole-body TLG do not provide any prognostic information in DLBCL beyond that which can already be obtained by the NCCN-IPI. Therefore, the NCCN-IPI remains the most important prognostic tool in this disease.

Value of total lesion glycolysis and cell-of-origin subtypes for prognostic stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the added prognostic value of baseline metabolic volumetric parameters and cell of origin subtypes to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. METHODS: A total of 184 consecutive de novo nodal DLBCL patients who underwent baseline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier estimates were generated to evaluate the clinical, biological, and PET/CT parameters' prognostic value. The Cox proportional hazards model was performed to examine the potential independent predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 35 months, the 3-year PFS and OS were 65.2% and 73.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), cell-of-origin subtypes, and NCCN-IPI were both PFS and OS predictors. High TLG (≥1,852), non-germinal center B (non-GCB), as well as high NCCN-IPI (≥4), were shown to be independently significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS after multivariate analysis. Based on the number of risk factors (high TLG, non-GCB, and high NCCN-IPI), a revised risk model was designed, and the participants were divided into four risk groups with very different outcomes, in which the PFS rates were 89.7%, 66.2%, 51.7%, and 26.7% (χ2=30.179, P<0.001), and OS rates were 93.1%, 73.8%, 56.7%, and 43.3%, respectively (χ2=23.649, P<0.001), respectively. Compared with the NCCN-IPI alone, the revised risk model showed a stronger ability to reveal further discrimination among subgroups, especially for participants with very unfavorable survival outcomes (PFS: χ2=9.963, P=0.002; OS: χ2=4.166, P=0.041, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TLG, cell-of-origin subtypes, and NCCN-IPI are independent prognostic survival factors in DLBCL patients. Moreover, the revised risk model composed of the number of risk factors (high TLG, non-GCB, and high NCCN-IPI) can stratify patients better than the NCCN-IPI, especially for patients at high risk, which suggests its potential integration into decision making for personalized medicine.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcome in obese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant MYC and BCL2 expression, cell of origin (COO), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network international prognostic index (NCCN-IPI) are commonly used for risk assessment and treatment decision in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although obesity has been shown to be of predictive value in DLBCL patients, it remains unclear whether it retains its prognostic relevance after those aforementioned novel factors being taken into consideration. METHODS: Patients with DLBCL were identified retrospectively in a single institute and data were collected through electronic databases and pharmacy records. RESULTS: Fifteen (17.6%) out of the 85 patients with DLBCL in our cohort were categorized as obese. They had lower platelet counts, were younger and more likely to harbor either BCL2- or MYC-overexpressing tumors. The NCCN-IPI scores, COO, and other clinical parameters were not significantly different between obese and non-obese patients. In spite that obesity adversely affected the treatment response to immunochemotherapy, multivariate analysis showed that only NCCN-IPI risk categories [hazard ratio (HR) 2.83 for high-intermediate or high-risk, versus low-intermediate or low-risk, P=0.034] and BCL2/MYC expressional status (HR 4.12 for BCL2high and/or MYChigh, versus both low expressors, P=0.004) independently predicted progression-free survival (PFS) outcome, whereas obesity lost its prognostic value in this regard (HR 1.81 for obese patients, P=0.242). Similarly, high-intermediate to high NCCN-IPI risk (HR 3.11, P=0.034) and increased expression in either BCL2 or MYC (HR 5.63, P=0.001) both portended an inferior overall survival (OS), but the presence of obesity did not affect the outcome (HR 1.65, P=0.352). CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated that, for the first time, obesity increases the frequency of BCL2- or MYC-overexpressing tumors in patients with DLBCL.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification in patients with primary intestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with an R-CHOP-like regimen.

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PI-DLBCL) patients has not been determined. This prompted us to explore the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification in patients with PI-DLBCL treated with an R-CHOP-like regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three PI-DLBCL patients who underwent baseline PET/CT between January 2010 and May 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were computed using the 41% SUVmax thresholding method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as endpoints to evaluate prognosis. RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 3-117 months (29.0 ± 25.5 months), high TLG, non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) and high National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) were significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS. TLG, cell-of-origin and NCCN-IPI were independent predictors of PFS, and both TLG and NCCN-IPI were independent predictors of OS. The grading system was based on the number of risk factors (high TLG, non-GCB, high NCCN-IPI) and patients were divided into 4 risk groups (PFS: χ2 = 33.858, P < 0.001; OS: χ2 = 29.435, P < 0.001): low-risk group (none of the 3 risk factors, 18 patients); low-intermediate risk group (1 risk factor, 24 patients); high-intermediate risk group (2 risk factors, 16 patients); and high-risk group (all 3 risk factors, 15 patients). CONCLUSIONS: High TLG, non-GCB and high NCCN-IPI can identify a subset of PI-DLBCL patients with inferior survival outcomes. Furthermore, the grading system can identify PI-DLBCL patient groups with markedly different prognoses, which might contribute to the adjustment of the therapeutic regime.

[Prognostic significance of NCCN-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy].

Objective: To validate the prognostic value of NCCN-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis in 162 PTCL patients who were initially diagnosed and treated in Rui Jin Hospital from January 2003 to May 2013 was conducted. Baseline characteristics were collected, and survival analysis was performed according to the IPI and NCCN-IPI model. Results: The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and progression free survival (PFS) rate were 33% and 20%, with median OS and PFS of 17.0 months and 9.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated ECOG score (PFS: HR=2.418, 95%CI 1.535-3.809, P<0.001; OS: HR=2.347, 95%CI 1.435-3.839, P= 0.001) , specific extra-nodal sites (PFS: HR=1.800, 95%CI 1.216-2.665, P=0.003; OS: HR=1.608, 95% CI 1.054-2.454, P=0.027) and pathology type (PFS: HR=0.424, 95% CI 0.184-0.975, P=0.043; OS: HR=0.276, 95% CI 0.087-0.877, P=0.029) were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS for the patients with PTCL. The survival rates of low risk patients based on NCCI-IPI were remarkably higher than the counterparts based on IPI (5-year OS 74% vs 54%, χ(2)=5.041, P=0.025, 5-year PFS 50% vs 38%, χ(2)= 5.295, P=0.021) . NCCN-IPI was outstanding to identify the subgroup of low risk patients with PTCL, who may benefit from conventional chemotherapy such as CHOP or CHOP-like regimen. Conclusion: NCCN-IPI is more powerful for low risk PTCL patients and a strong supplement for IPI.

The Enhanced International Prognostic Index for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognostic value of the enhanced International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for Asian patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated in the rituximab era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 176 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the different risk groups were discriminated by the International Prognostic Index (IPI), the revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) and the NCCN-IPI. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 18 months, at 3 years, the OS was 73% and the PFS was 65%. The 3-year OS for the 4 NCCN-IPI risk groups were 91% versus 80% versus 57% versus 45% (P < 0.001); the 3-year PFS were 77% versus 72% versus 56% versus 26% (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS of the 4 risk groups discriminated by the IPI ranged from 85-55% (P < 0.001); the 3-year PFS ranged from 81-41% (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS of the 3 distinct prognostic groups by the R-IPI ranged from 86-51% (P < 0.001); the 3-year PFS ranged from 86-47% (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS and PFS of the high-risk group according to the NCCN-IPI were lower than the IPI and R-IPI. Using the NCCN-IPI, the outcomes among the risk groups spanned a large range, and the survival of the high-risk group was significantly different from the high-intermediate risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The NCCN-IPI is a clinically useful prognostic index for patients with DLBCL treated in the rituximab era, especially for high-risk patients.

Prognostic significance of NCCN-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy / 中华血液学杂志

Objective@#To validate the prognostic value of NCCN-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy.@*Methods@#A retrospective analysis in 162 PTCL patients who were initially diagnosed and treated in Rui Jin Hospital from January 2003 to May 2013 was conducted. Baseline characteristics were collected, and survival analysis was performed according to the IPI and NCCN-IPI model.@*Results@#The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and progression free survival (PFS) rate were 33% and 20%, with median OS and PFS of 17.0 months and 9.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated ECOG score (PFS: HR=2.418, 95%CI 1.535-3.809, P<0.001; OS: HR=2.347, 95%CI 1.435-3.839, P= 0.001) , specific extra-nodal sites (PFS: HR=1.800, 95%CI 1.216-2.665, P=0.003; OS: HR=1.608, 95% CI 1.054-2.454, P=0.027) and pathology type (PFS: HR=0.424, 95% CI 0.184-0.975, P=0.043; OS: HR=0.276, 95% CI 0.087-0.877, P=0.029) were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS for the patients with PTCL. The survival rates of low risk patients based on NCCI-IPI were remarkably higher than the counterparts based on IPI (5-year OS 74% vs 54%, χ2=5.041, P=0.025, 5-year PFS 50% vs 38%, χ2= 5.295, P=0.021) . NCCN-IPI was outstanding to identify the subgroup of low risk patients with PTCL, who may benefit from conventional chemotherapy such as CHOP or CHOP-like regimen.@*Conclusion@#NCCN-IPI is more powerful for low risk PTCL patients and a strong supplement for IPI.