RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if a pediatric neurosurgical consultation for isolated linear skull fractures (ILSF) in pediatric patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of ≥14 changed their management. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective chart review at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center was performed. Exclusion criteria were age > 18 years, open, depressed, or skull base fractures, pneumocephalus, poly-trauma, any hemorrhage (intraparenchymal, epidural, subdural, subarachnoid), cervical spine fractures, penetrating head trauma, and initial GCS scores ≤13. Primary outcomes were neurosurgery recommendations to change acuity of care, obtain additional imaging studies, and perform invasive procedures. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics, injury type, transfer status, admitting service, length of hospital stay, consult location, and clinical course. RESULTS: There were 127 cases of ILSF meeting study criteria with an average age of 2.36 years. Unilateral parietal bone fracture was the most common injury (46.5%). Falls were the most common mechanism (81.1%). All patients received pediatric neurosurgical consultations within 24 h of hospital arrival. There were no neurosurgical recommendations to obtain additional imaging studies, change acuity of care, or perform invasive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Routine neurosurgical consultation in children with ILSF and GCS 14-15 does not appear to alter clinical management.
Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/normas , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected patient care across specialties. Ramifications for neurosurgery include substantial disruptions to surgical training and changes in nonurgent patient presentations to the emergency department. This study quantifies the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of emergency department patients who were referred to the neurosurgery department for further consultation and treatment and identifies and describes trends in the characteristics of these visits. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of neurosurgical consultations at a single high-volume institution for 28 call-day periods before and after the official announcement of the pandemic. Primary outcomes included consultations per call-day, patient presentation category, and patient admission. RESULTS: The neurosurgical service was consulted regarding 629 patients (367 male patients) during the study period, with 471 (75%) and 158 (25%) patients presenting before and after the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. The mean number of neurosurgical consultations per call-day was significantly lower in the COVID-19 period (5.6 consultations) compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (16.8 consultations) (P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient demographics, the rate of presentation for general nonurgent concerns, such as back pain, headaches, and other general weaknesses, significantly decreased (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.60 [0.47-0.77], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical consultations significantly decreased after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a substantially lower overall number of consultations necessitating operative interventions. Furthermore, the relative number of patients with nonemergent neurological conditions significantly decreased during the pandemic.