Clinical Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing the subgroup of older, comorbid patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who will benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains challenging. Identifying risk factors for major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) post PCI may help define this cohort. The objective of this study was to describe contemporary outcomes of older patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI and identify pre-procedural risk factors for MACCE. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for 1,875 patients aged ≥80 years entered in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) who underwent PCI for NSTEACS between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. MACCE was a composite outcome comprising 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding, target lesion revascularisation or target vessel revascularisation; in-hospital cardiogenic shock or stent thrombosis; and new requirement for dialysis. Patient demographic data and pre-procedural comorbidities were compared between the groups with and without a MACCE. RESULTS: The rate of MACCE at 30 days was 8.0% (n=150). Thirty-day (30-day) mortality was 3.0% (n=57). Pre-procedural left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<45% (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.47-3.68; p<0.001) and eGFR≤30 mL/min/1.73m2 or renal replacement therapy (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.27-3.46; p<0.01) were independent predictors of a MACCE. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients presenting with NSTEACS who have left ventricular systolic dysfunction or renal impairment are at increased risk of MACCE post PCI. Randomised studies are required to determine if invasive management remains beneficial for these patents compared with medical therapy.

Comorbidity and low use of new antiplatelets in acute coronary syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of the new generation P2Y12 inhibitors (Ticagrelor and Prasugrel) with aspirin is the recommended therapy in acute NSTE-ACS patients, their current use in clinical practice remains quite low and might be related, among several variables, with increased comorbidity burden. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these treatments and whether their use could be associated with comorbidity. METHOD: A multicentric prospective registry was conducted at 8 Cardiac Intensive Care Units (October 2017-April 2018) in patients admitted with non ST elevation myocardial infarction. Antithrombotic treatment was recorded and the comorbidity risk was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. We created a multivariate model to identify the independent predictors of the use of new inhibitors of P2Y12. RESULTS: A total of 629 patients were included, median age 67 years, 23.2% women, 359 patients (57.1%) treated with clopidogrel and 40.6% with new P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor (228 patients, 36.2%) and prasugrel (30 patients, 4.8%). Among the patients with very high comorbidity (Charlson Score > 6) clopidogrel was the drug of choice (82.6%), meanwhile in patients with low comorbility (Charlson Score 0-1) was the ticagrelor or prasugrel (63.6%). Independent predictors of the use of ticagrelor or prasugrel were a low Charlson Comorbidity Index, a low CRUSADE score and the absence of prior bleeding. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet treatment with Ticagrelor or Pasugrel was low in patients admitted with NSTE-ACS. Comorbidity calculated with Charlson Comorbidity Index was a powerful predictor of the use of new generation P2Y12 inhibitors in this population.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Pivotal clinical trials found that ticagrelor reduced ischaemic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel, and also that the benefit gradually increased with the reduction in creatinine clearance. However, the underlying mechanisms remains poorly explored. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 60 hospitalized Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 ) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then followed by 90 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, then followed by 75 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the P2Y12 reactive unit (PRU) value assessed by VerifyNow at 30 days. The plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and clopidogrel and their active metabolites were measured in the first 10 patients in each group at baseline, and at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after the loading dose. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched between the two groups. Our results indicated a markedly lower PRU in patients treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel at 30 days (32.6 ± 11.29 vs. 203.7 ± 17.92; P < 0.001) as well as at 2 h, 8 h and 24 h after the loading dose (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX showed a similar time to reach maximum concentration (Cmax ) of 8 h, with the maximum concentration (Cmax ) of 355 (242.50-522.00) ng ml-1 and 63.20 (50.80-85.15) ng ml-1 , respectively. Both clopidogrel and its active metabolite approached the Cmax at 2 h, with a similar Cmax of 8.67 (6.64-27.75) ng ml-1 vs. 8.53 (6.94-15.93) ng ml-1 . CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor showed much more potent platelet inhibition in comparison with clopidogrel in patients with CKD and NSTE-ACS.

The Use of Oral Beta-Blockers and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: The role of beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndromes is mainly derived from studies including patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Little is known about the use of beta-blockers and associated long-term clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). METHODS: We analyzed short- and long-term clinical outcomes of 2921 patients with NSTEACS using or not oral beta-blockers in the first 24 h of the acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentation. The association between beta-blocker use and mortality was assessed using a propensity score adjusted analysis (N = 1378). RESULTS: Patients starting oral beta-blockers in the first 24 h of hospitalization, compared with patients who did not, had lower rates of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.74, P = 0.002) and higher mean survival times in the long-term follow-up (11.86±0.4 years vs. 9.92±0.39 years, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of beta-blockers in the first 24 h of patients presenting with NSTEACS was associated with better in-hospital and long-term mortality outcomes.

Anticoagulants in ischemia-guided management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The most recent joint guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) on the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are a result of a substantial and considered undertaking, and those involved deserve much recognition for their efforts. However, the handling of anticoagulants seems somewhat inadequate, and this is a highly-relevant matter when managing NSTE-ACS. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: Among areas of potential uncertainty, emergency medicine professionals might still be left wondering about the particulars of anticoagulant therapy when pursuing ischemia-guided management of NSTE-ACS (that is, managing NSTE-ACS without an intent for early invasive measures, such as coronary angiography and revascularization). This review seeks to provide insight into this question. DISCUSSION: Relevant clinical trials are appraised and translated into clinical context for emergency medicine professionals, including the implications of noteworthy advancements in the management of NSTE-ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Although current guidelines from the AHA and ACC suggest enoxaparin has better evidence than other anticoagulants in the setting of NSTE-ACS management, careful review of the evidence shows this is not actually clearly supported by the available evidence in the era of contemporary management. Unless and until better contemporary data emerge, emergency medicine professionals must carefully weigh the available evidence, its limitations, and the possible clinical implications of the various anticoagulant options when managing NSTE-ACS.

Risk stratification of patients undergoing medical therapy after coronary angiography.

AIM: We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of the SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score (SS) on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) undergoing medical therapy only. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the 13 819 patients enrolled in the ACUITY trial and undergoing coronary angiogram, 4491 patients were treated with medical therapy as the initial strategy. Of those, baseline SS and complete angiographic analysis were available in 1275 patients. Patients were divided in four groups based on the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequently, among patients with CAD, by SS. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and its individual components (death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization) were compared between groups. Among the 1275 patients, the mean SS was 3.5 ± 7.0 (range 0-45). SYNTAX score was 0 in 842 patients, >0 and ≤5 in 170, >5 and ≤11 in 119, and >11 in 144 patients. The 1-year rates of MACE were higher in patients with CAD and higher SS. By multivariable analysis, the SS was a strong predictor of all adverse ischaemic events, including mortality. By receiver operator characteristic analysis, an SS cut-off of 8 showed the best prognostic accuracy for death and MACE. CONCLUSION: In patients with NSTE ACS undergoing medical therapy, the SS, especially when >8, was shown to be a strong predictor of 1-year MACE, including mortality. This finding has important clinical implications for risk stratification of patients with NSTE ACS undergoing medical therapy after an initial angiogram.

Reduction of atherothrombotic burden before stent deployment in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Reduction of myocardial necrosis achieved with nose-dive manual thrombus aspiration (REMNANT) trial. A volumetric intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether thrombus aspiration (TA) reduces the atherosclerotic burden in culprit lesions and "facilitate" percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (S-PCI) among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). BACKGROUND: Evidence on the effects of TA adjunctive to S-PCI in NSTE-ACS is limited and controversial. METHODS: TA was defined "aggressive" when using 7F devices or a catheter/artery ratio >0.6, "conservative" with 6F, and a catheter/artery ratio ≤0.6. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed at baseline, after TA and after stent deployment. RESULTS: TA was accomplished in 61/76 patients (80%) with NSTE-ACS. The aspirated material was red thrombus in 23% and plaque fragments in 49% of cases. Compared with baseline, TA was associated with an 82% increase in minimal lumen diameter and a 15% reduction in diameter stenosis (P < 0.001 for both). After TA, IVUS documented a 24 and 16% increase in minimal lumen area and lumen volume, respectively (P < 0.001 for both), a 7% decrease in area stenosis through an 11% reduction of plaque + media volume (P < 0.001). When compared with "conservative", an "aggressive" TA was associated with a more pronounced reduction in percent area stenosis (P < 0.05) and an increase in percent stent expansion (P < 0.001). The plaque + media volume reduction after TA was correlated with stent expansion (r = 0.261, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Manual TA reduces atherothrombotic burden in culprit lesions of NSTE-ACS patients before S-PCI and, when deep plaque removal is obtained, TA optimizes subsequent stent expansion. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Simultaneous ST-elevation in lead augmented vector right (aVR) and III in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Background: The value of ST-elevation in lead augmented vector right (aVR) remains controversial in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the association of simultaneous ST-elevation in lead aVR and III with angiographic findings and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). Methods: In this observational study, patients who had been diagnosed with NSTEACS and presented with ST-elevation in lead aVR and without ST-elevation in any other two contiguous leads were enrolled from January 2018 to June 2019. Demographic, baseline clinical, angiographic and interventional characteristics as well as clinical outcomes were collected and recorded on standardized case report forms. Results: A total of 157 patients meeting the criteria were finally enrolled in this study and classified into two groups according to the presence of ST-elevation in lead III. Patients in the two groups were similar in average age and previous history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular diseases (all P>0.05). Patients with ST-elevation in lead III tended to present with myocardial hypertrophy in the echocardiography (P=0.02). The cases with ST-elevation in lead III showed higher high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT; P=0.08) and creatinine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB; P<0.01) whereas those without ST-elevation in lead III showed higher N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; P=0.02). Of note, patients with ST-elevation in lead III presented with more ST-depression in multiple leads [especially in lead I, augmented vector left (aVL), V3-V6] as well as higher degree of ST-depression (all P<0.05) and were more likely to develop multi-vessel and left main trunk (LM) lesions (P=0.04), with 20% of the cases having a LM lesion and 60% having triple vessel lesions. Patients with ST-elevation in lead III were at increased risk of 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), despite no significant statistical difference between the two groups (hazard ratio =1.29; P=0.26). Conclusions: The NSTEACS cases with simultaneous ST-elevation in lead III and aVR tended to present with more multiple leads with ST-depression, higher degree of ST-depression, and more LM or multi-vessel lesions, suggesting a broader range of severe myocardial ischemia. The concurrent presentation of ST-elevation in lead III and aVR may play a vital role in the diagnosis, risk-stratification, and prediction of poor prognosis during the management of NSTEACS patients.

Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various durations and de-escalation strategies of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have been tested in randomized controlled trials (RCT)s. However, evidence by specific ACS subtype is unknown. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in February 2023. RCTs on DAPT strategies included STEMI or NSTE-ACS patients with standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel or potent P2Y12 inhibitors, short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin, unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors or clopidogrel at one month, and guided selection with genotype or platelet function tests were identified. The primary outcome was the net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and clinically relevant bleeding events. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs with a combined total population of 24,745 STEMI and 37,891 NSTE-ACS patients were included. In STEMI patients, unguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a lower rate of NACE compared with standard DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors (HR:0.57; 95% CI:0.34-0.96) without increased risk of MACE. In NSTE-ACS patients, unguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a lower rate of NACE compared with the guided selection strategy (HR:0.65; 95% CI:0.47-0.90), standard DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors (HR:0.62; 95% CI:0.50-0.78) and standard DAPT using clopidogrel (HR:0.73; 95% CI:0.55-0.98) without increased risk of MACE. CONCLUSION: Unguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a reduced risk of NACE and may be the most effective DAPT strategy for STEMI and NSTE-ACS.

The guiding value of hybrid resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the correlation and agreement between resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR), and evaluate the guiding value of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Materials and methods: A total of 109 patients with NSTE-ACS (149 diseased vessels), who underwent an invasive physiological assessment in Cangzhou Central Hospital, Hebei Medical University, were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to May 2022. FFR ≤ 0.80 was used as the gold standard for coronary artery functional ischemia. We utilized the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the correlation and agreement between RFR and FFR. The diagnostic value of RFR predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 was evaluated in accordance with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, which was established according to determining the "gray zone" of RFR (FFR was further assessed using vasodilators only for diseased vessels in the "gray zone"), needed to afford over 95% global agreement with the FFR-only strategy. Results: Resting full-cycle ratio was significantly linearly linked with FFR (R 2 = 0.636, P < 0.001). The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity for RFR ≤ 0.89 predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 were 81.2, 70.8, and 86.1%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for RFR predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.881 (P < 0.001), and the cutoff value was 0.90. The "gray zone" of RFR was 0.85-0.93. The positive and negative predictive values of the hybrid RFR-FFR strategy were 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy exhibited an agreement of 96.0% with FFR and obviated the need for a vasodilator by 60.4%. Conclusion: Resting full-cycle ratio and FFR have high correlation and consistency. The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy highlights considerably enhanced agreement with the FFR-only strategy, whilst making the requirement of vasodilator administration less than a half.

Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index Is Associated With Vulnerable Plaque Components and Local Immune-Inflammatory Activation in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background The pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) is assessed using standard coronary computed tomography angiography, and it has emerged as a novel imaging biomarker of coronary inflammation. The present study assessed whether increased pericoronary FAI values on coronary computed tomography angiography were associated with vulnerable plaque components and their intracellular cytokine levels in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results A total of 195 lesions in 130 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were prospectively included. Lesion-specific pericoronary FAI, plaque components and other plaque features were evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography. Local T cell subsets and their intracellular cytokine levels were detected by flow cytometry. Lesions with pericoronary FAI values >-70.1 Hounsfield units exhibited spotty calcification (43.1% versus 25.0%, P=0.015) and low-attenuation plaques (17.6% versus 4.2%, P=0.016) more frequently than lesions with lower pericoronary FAI values. Further quantitative plaque compositional analysis showed that increased necrotic core volume (Pearson's r=0.324, P<0.001) and fibrofatty volume (Pearson's r=0.270, P<0.001) were positively associated with the pericoronary FAI, and fibrous volume (Pearson's r=-0.333, P<0.001) showed a negative association. An increasing proinflammatory intracellular cytokine profile was found in lesions with higher pericoronary FAI values. Conclusions The pericoronary FAI may be a reliable indicator of local immune-inflammatory response activation, which is closely related to plaque vulnerability. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04792047.

Invasive treatment strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Invasive treatment is commonly recommended for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). However, the efficacy of this approach in patients aged ≥80 years remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively assessed consecutive NSTE-ACS patients ≥80 years of age who were hospitalized at our cardiovascular center from December 2012 to July 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received invasive treatment (coronary angiography and, if indicated, revascularization) or not. Patients who died in the first 3 days after admission without receiving invasive treatment were excluded. The effect of invasive timed treatment was also explored by dividing patients into timely invasive or delayed invasive groups according to their risk classification. Multivariate COX regression, invasive probability weighting and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounding variables. The primary outcome was all-cause death during follow-up. Results: A total of 1,201 patients with a median age of 82.0 (IQR, 81.0-84.0) were divided into two groups: 656 (54.6%) patients in the invasive group and 545 (45.4%) patients in the conservative group. Follow-up survival information was available for up to 6 years (median 3.0 years). During the follow-up, 296 (24.6%) patients died. After adjusting for confounding variables, the invasive treatment strategy was significantly associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality (HR =0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, P=0.010). No difference was found between timely invasive and delayed invasive interventions with mortality (HR =0.92, 95% CI: 0.57-1.47, P=0.725). Conclusions: Invasive treatment was associated with lower mortality in patients ≥80 years of age with NSTE-ACS over a median of a 3-year follow-up. The invasive intervention time did not impact the outcome.

Temporal Trends in Invasive Management and In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

We analyzed data from 4 nationwide prospective registries of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) admitted to the Italian Intensive Cardiac Care Unit network between 2005 and 2014. Out of 26 315 patients with ACS enrolled, 13 073 (49.7%) presented a diagnosis of non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS and had creatinine levels available at hospital admission: 1207 (9.2%) had severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30), 3803 (29.1%) mild to moderate CKD (eGFR 31-59), and 8063 (61.7%) no CKD (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patients with severe CKD had worse clinical characteristics compared with those with mild-moderate or no kidney dysfunction, including all the key predictors of mortality (P < .0001) which became worse over time (all P < .0001). Over the decade of observation, a significant increase in percutaneous coronary intervention rates was observed in patients without CKD (P for trend = .0001), but not in those with any level of CKD. After corrections for significant mortality predictors, severe CKD (odds ratio, OR: 5.49; 95% CI: 3.24-9.29; P < .0001) and mild-moderate CKD (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.52-3.59; P < .0001) remained strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality. The clinical characteristics of patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD remain challenging and their mortality rate is still higher compared with patients without CKD.

Elevated Serum Levels of Soluble ST2 Are Associated With Plaque Vulnerability in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background: Recent studies have suggested that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2), an inflammation-related protein receptor, is associated with atherosclerotic diseases. This study aimed to investigate the potential predictive value of sST2 on plaque vulnerability by assessing whether elevated serum levels of sST2 are associated with vulnerable plaque features in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A total of 120 patients with non-ST-elevation ACS (167 lesions) were prospectively enrolled and evaluated by standard coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary angiography in this study. Serum sST2 levels were measured by ELISA (Presage® ST2 Assay Kit, Critical Diagnostics), and semiautomated software (QAngioCT, Medis) was used to quantify coronary plaques. Results: The included patients were divided into 4 groups by serum sST2 level quartiles. Volumetric analysis of the whole lesion revealed that patients with higher sST2 levels had a larger absolute necrotic core (NC) volume (Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, 86.16 ± 59.71 vs. 45.10 ± 45.80 mm3, P = 0.001; Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 2, 86.16 ± 59.71 vs. 50.22 ± 42.56 mm3, P = 0.002) and a higher NC percentage (Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, 35.16 ± 9.82 vs. 23.21 ± 16.18%, P < 0.001; Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 2, 35.16 ± 9.82% vs. 22.50 ± 14.03%, P < 0.001; Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 3, 35.16 ± 9.82% vs. 25.04 ± 14.48%, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed that serum sST2 levels were positively correlated with the NC (r = 0.323, P < 0.001) but negatively correlated with dense calcium (r = -0.208, P = 0.007). Furthermore, among those with plaque calcification, patients with spotty calcification exhibited higher serum sST2 levels than those with large calcification (26.06 ± 16.54 vs. 17.55 ± 7.65 ng/mL, P = 0.002). No significant differences in plaque components at the level of the minimal lumen area (MLA) were found among the groups. Conclusions: Serum sST2 levels were correlated with different coronary plaque components in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. A higher serum level of sST2 was correlated with plaque vulnerability. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04797819.

Prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: A report from SWEDEHEART.

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs). Octogenarians, however, were underrepresented in the pivotal trials. This study aimed to assess the effect of PCI in patients ≥80 years old. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from the SWEDEHEART registry for all hospital admissions at eight cardiac care centres within Västra Götaland County. Consecutive patients ≥80 years old admitted for NSTE-ACS between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. We performed instrumental variable analysis with propensity score. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days and one year after index hospitalization. During the study period 5200 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, 586 (11.2%) patients underwent PCI, the remaining 4613 patients were treated conservatively. Total mortality at 30 days was 19.4% (1007 events) and 39.4% (1876 events) at one year. Thirty-day mortality was 20.7% in conservatively treated patients and 8.5% in the PCI group (adjusted odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.97, p = 0.044). One-year mortality was 42.1% in the conservatively treated group and 16.3% in the PCI group (adjusted odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.36-2.51, p = 0.847). CONCLUSIONS: PCI in octogenarians with NSTE-ACS was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 30 days. However, this survival benefit was not sustained during the entire study-period of one-year.

Patient and system delays in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Early reperfusion for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is indicated by the European Society of Cardiology, while a timely invasive strategy is recommended for patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). This study aims to assess patient and system delays according to diagnosis and risk profile, and to identify predictors of prolonged delay. METHODS: We assembled a cohort of patients (n=939) consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the metropolitan area of Porto and one in the north-east region of Portugal, between August 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with time from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) ≥120 min was highest among high-risk NSTE-ACS (57.7%), followed by intermediate-risk NSTE-ACS (52.1%) and STEMI (43.3%). Regardless of diagnosis and risk stratification, use of own transportation and inability to interpret cardiac symptoms correctly were associated with prolonged delays. Regarding system delays, we found that 78.0% of patients with STEMI and 65.8% of patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS were treated in a timeframe exceeding the recommended limits. Admission to a non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospital, admission on weekends and complications at admission were associated with prolonged delays to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Due to both patient and system delays, a large proportion of STEMI and high-risk NSTE-ACS patients still fail to have access to timely reperfusion.

Invasive versus conservative strategy in acute coronary syndromes: The paradox in women's outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We explored benefits and risks of an early invasive compared with a conservative strategy in women versus men after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) using the ISACS-TC database. METHODS: From October 2010 to May 2014, 4145 patients were diagnosed as having a NSTE-ACS. We excluded 258 patients managed with coronary bypass surgery. Of the remaining 3887 patients, 1737 underwent PCI (26% women). The primary endpoint was the composite of 30-day mortality and severe left ventricular dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction <40% at discharge. RESULTS: Women were older and more likely to exhibit more risk factors and Killip Class ≥2 at admission as compared with men. In patients who underwent PCI, peri-procedural myocardial injury was not different among sexes (3.1% vs. 3.2%). Women undergoing PCI experienced higher rates of the composite endpoint (8.9% vs. 4.9%, p=0.002) and 30-day mortality (4.4% vs. 2.0%, p=0.008) compared with men, whereas those who managed with only routine medical therapy (RMT) did not show any sex difference in outcomes. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with favorable outcomes (adjusted HR for the composite endpoint: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91) in patients managed with RMT, but not in those undergoing PCI (adjusted HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.61-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a more favorable outcome in women than men when patients were managed with RMT. Women and men undergoing PCI have similar outcomes. These data suggest caution in extrapolating the results from men to women in an overall population of patients in the context of different therapeutic strategies.

Establishment of a hybrid risk model to predict major cardiac adverse events in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

The present study aimed to generate a hybrid risk model for the prediction of major cardiac adverse events (MACE) in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), by combining the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scoring system and the plasma concentration of N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (lgNT-proBNP). A total of 640 patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly divided into either the model-establishing group (409 patients) or the prediction model group (231 patients). The clinical endpoint event was MACE, including cardiogenic death, myocardial infarction and heart failure-induced readmission. Among the 409 patients in the model-establishing group, 26 (6.6%) experienced MACE. The hybrid risk model was calculated using the following equation: Hybrid risk model = GRACE score + 20 × logarithm (lg)NT-proBNP + 15, in which the area under the receiver operating curves (ROCs) for the GRACE score and lgNT-proBNP were 0.807 and 0.798, respectively. From the equation, the area under the ROC for the hybrid risk model was 0.843; thus suggesting that the hybrid risk model may be better able to predict the occurrence of MACE compared with either of its components alone. Following re-stratification, 6% of patients in the hybrid risk model were re-grouped. A total of 15 patients in the prediction model group experienced MACE (6.5%). The areas under the ROCs for the hybrid risk model and the GRACE scores for the prediction model group were 0.762 and 0.748, respectively. The results of the present study suggested that the lgNT-proBNP and GRACE score-established hybrid risk model may improve the accuracy by which MACE are predicted.

[Registry of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in a tertiary hospital (RESCATA-SEST registry)]. / Registro de síndromes coronarios agudos sin elevación del segmento ST en un centro hospitalario de tercer nivel de atención (estudio RESCATA-SEST).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical-epidemiologic profile and the process of care of the non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in a tertiary hospital. METHOD: We analyzed the clinical information, the risk stratification and diagnostic methods, the revascularization therapy and the prescription trends at discharge, of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes cared for in one year. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-three patients with mean age of 58 years were included (63% men). The largest number of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (88.6%) was found between 50 to 59 years of age. The most common risk factor was hypertension; 82.5% of the patients had a low-intermediate TIMI score; residual ischemia was demonstrated in 37% and coronary obstructions were seen in 80 patients (70%). In 90%, a percutaneous coronary intervention was performed, mainly with drug-eluting Stents (87.5%). At discharge, even though antiplatelet agents and statins were prescribed in more than 90%, other drugs were indicated in a few more than 50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes predominates in relatively young men, often with hypertension. To stratify risk, to look for residual ischemia and to revascularize with drug-eluting stents are common practices, but the evidence-based guidelines compliance is still suboptimal.

Efficacy and safety of standard-dose versus half-dose tirofiban in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: To explore the optimal dosage of tirofiban associated with double benefits of efficacy and safety in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: A total of 163 patients were included in this study (78 in SD group versus 85 in HD group). In SD (HD) group, tirofiban was administered intravenously with a bolus dose of 10 (5) µg/kg within 3 min and followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.15 (0.075) µg/kg/min for 48 h. Within 24 h on admission, patients underwent CAG or CAG+PCI. The angiographic results (initial TIMI, final TIMI/CTFC/TMPG) were evaluated. Platelet aggregation rate (PAR) was measured before and 2, 24, 48 h after bolus tirofiban. MACEs were evaluated at 7-day, 30-day, and 6-month follow-up. Bleeding was observed at 7 days. RESULTS: The proportions of TIMI grade 3 seemed higher in SD group before and after PCI followed by a better myocardial perfusion, but not statistically different (P = 0.26/0.08). PAR was lower in SD group than that in HD group at 2 h after bolus tirofiban (P = 0.03). MACEs were not statistically different at 7, 30 day, and 6 month in two groups. The incidence of minor bleeding was significantly lower in HD group than that in SD group (8.2% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.04). The risk of bleeding would increase under the conditions of decreased PAR, increased dose of tirofiban and decreased CCr. CONCLUSION: Half-dose tirofiban was not inferior to standard-dose in efficacy, what is more, half-dose tirofiban showed a better safety characteristic of lower bleeding risk. Therefore, half-dose tirofiban is recommended to patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing early PCI.