Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model.

BACKGROUND: In 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensive. An alternative treatment in the form of subcutaneous depot buprenorphine became a viable option following a safety trial in 2020 - the UNLOC-T study. Depot preparation demonstrated advantages over current treatments as more difficult to divert and requiring fewer administrations. This paper reports the results of economic modelling of staffing costs in medication administration comparing depot buprenorphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine provision in UNLOC-T trial facilities. METHODS: The costing study adopted a micro-costing approach involving the synthesis of cost data from the UNLOC-T clinical trial as well as data collected from Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network records. Labour and materials data were collected during site observations and interviews. Costs were calculated from two payer perspectives: a) the New South Wales (state) government which funds custodial and health services; and b) the Australian Commonwealth government, which pays for medications. The analysis compared the monthly-per-patient cost for each of the three medications in trial-site facilities during July 2019. This was followed by simulation of depot buprenorphine implementation across the study population. Costs associated with medical assessment and reviews were excluded. RESULTS: The monthly-per-patient New South Wales government service costs of depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine were: $151, $379 and $1,529 respectively while Commonwealth government medication costs were $434, $80 and $525. The implementation simulation found that service costs of depot buprenorphine declined as patients transitioned from weekly to monthly administration. Costs of treatment using the other medications increased as patient numbers decreased alongside fixed costs. At 12 months, monthly-per-patient service costs for depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-which would be completely phased out by month 13-were $92, $530 and $2,162 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Depot buprenorphine was consistently the least costly of the treatment options. Future modelling could allow for dynamic patient populations and downstream impacts for participants and the state health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000942257 . Registered 4 June 2018.

Impact of recent drug use on the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir for HCV-infected people on opioid agonist therapy.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) use in drug users on opiate agonist therapy (OAT) is supported by the C-EDGE Co-STAR trial. SVR rates in this study were within those found in the rest of patients included by the EBR/GZR development programme. In clinical practice, however, efficacy could theoretically be lower. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the SVR rates of EBR/GZR among people who injected drugs (PWID) with and without OAT in clinical practice. Patients starting EBR/GZR included in the HEPAVIR-DAA (NCT02057003), recruiting HIV/HCV-coinfected patients or the GEHEP-MONO (NCT02333292), including HCV-monoinfected individuals, prospective cohorts were analysed. Overall SVR12 (ITT), discontinuations due to adverse effects and drop-outs were evaluated. The same analysis was carried out for PWID with and without OAT. 336 patients had started EBR/GZR and reached the SVR12 evaluation date. 318 [95%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 92%-98%] patients achieved SVR12. SVR12 was 97% (95% CI: 93%-99%, n/N = 141/145) among people who never used injecting drugs, 94% (95% CI: 88%-97%, n/N = 117/125) among PWIDs without OAT and 91% (95% CI: 81%-97%, n/N = 60/66) among PWIDs with OAT (p = 0.134). Five (1.5%) patients showed relapses, and two (0.6%) individuals showed viral breakthrough. The SVR12 rate for recent drug users was 69% (n/N = 18/26) compared with 97% (n/N = 276/284) for individuals without recent drug use (in the prior year) (p < 0.001). Among recent drug users, three (12%) showed relapses, and five (19%) were lost-to-follow-up. The SVR rates achieved with EBR/GZR were high in real-world conditions of use. However, PWID with recent drug use reach suboptimal response rates with EBR/GZR.

Engagement in Harm Reduction Strategies After Suspected Fentanyl Contamination Among Opioid-Dependent Individuals.

The evolving opioid epidemic in the United States has increased drug-related overdose rates exponentially (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Opioid overdose, 2020c, https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/otherdrugs.html#:~:text=Polysubstance%20drug%20use%20occurs%20with,or%20other%20non%2Dopioid%20substances ). Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, has recently fueled the epidemic, increasing overdose death rates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Drug overdose deaths involving fentanyl, 2011-2016, 2019a, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_03-508.pdf ). Harm reduction strategies (drug checking, naloxone administration, etc.) are at the forefront of preventing opioid-related overdoses in high-risk populations (Kennedy et al. in Drug Alcohol Depend 185:248-252, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.026 ; Laing et al. in Int J Drug Policy 62:59-66, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.001 ). Little is known, however, about how people who inject drugs (PWID) may modify their drug use behaviors after suspected fentanyl contamination in their drugs. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 105 opioid-dependent PWID enrolled in a methadone maintenance program. We assessed their willingness to engage in various harm reduction methods (i.e., slowing down drug use, not using drugs, carrying naloxone, using with someone who has naloxone) after suspected fentanyl contamination of their drugs. In a multivariable analysis, participants who were white, low-income, polysubstance users, and had previously experienced an overdose or had previously administered naloxone were more likely to report a willingness to engage in harm reduction measures. These findings provide an evidence-based understanding of PWID's engagement in harm reduction behaviors after suspecting potential fentanyl exposure as well as a basis for tailoring intervention strategies in the context of fentanyl-adulterated markets.

High efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for HCV-infected individuals with active drug use.

OBJECTIVES: Real world data on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) among active drug users are scarce. We evaluated the sustained virological response (SVR) rates of G/P among individuals with and without active drug use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Two ongoing prospective multicenter cohorts of individuals starting G/P were analyzed. Overall SVR intention-to-treat (ITT), discontinuations due to adverse effects and dropouts were evaluated. Results in patients with active, past and without active drug use were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 644 individuals started G/P and have reached the date of SVR evaluation. Of them, 613 (95.2%) individuals achieved SVR. There were two (0.3%) relapses, one (0.2%) discontinuation due to side effects and 35 (5.4%) dropouts. SVR rates for patients with active drug use, past drug use and those who never used drugs were 85.4%(n/N = 70/82), 96.1%(n/N = 320/333) and 97.4%(n/N = 223/229) respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustment by sex, age, HCV genotype and opioid agonist therapy, active drug use was the only factor independently associated with SVR (ITT) [adjusted OR (95%confidence interval): 0.29(0.09-0.99),p = 0.048]. CONCLUSIONS: Active drug use was independently associated with lower SVR rates to G/P, mainly due to voluntary dropout. G/P could be particularly beneficial in this scenario but specific strategies designed to increase the retention in care are needed.

Different drugs come with different motives: Examining motives for substance use among people who engage in polysubstance use undergoing methadone maintenance therapy (MMT).

BACKGROUND: Substance use motives (i.e., reasons for using a substance) are thought to be the most proximal variable leading to substance use. These motives have been described by various typologies, the most well known being the four-factor drinking motives model which separates motives into enhancement, social, coping, and conformity (Cooper, 1994). Although extensively studied in adult community samples, motives for use have less commonly been investigated among populations at a later stage of addiction, where polysubstance use is more common. Moreover, because the motives literature has largely focused on drinking motives, it is not clear whether existing findings can also be applied to other substances (Cooper et al., 2016). METHODS: Using Zero-inflated beta Bayesian linear mixed modeling, we investigated the stability of seven distinct substance use motives (enhancement, social, expansion, coping with anxiety, coping with depression, coping with withdrawal, and conformity) across six different drug categories (tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, opioids, stimulants, and tranquilisers) to determine the extent to which drug class can influence motive endorsement. One-hundred-and-thirty-eight methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) clients (F = 34.1%; M = 65.9%; age = 40.18 years) completed a novel short-form polysubstance motives questionnaire. RESULTS: External motives (i.e., conformity and social motives) were the most stable across drug categories, while all internal motives (i.e., enhancement, expansion, and all three coping motives) demonstrated varying levels of inter-drug variability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for prevention and intervention strategies among people who engage in polysubstance use, highlighting the importance of both universal and substance-specific programming.