PARP inhibitor BMN-673 induced apoptosis by trapping PARP-1 and inhibiting base excision repair via modulation of pol-ß in chromatin of breast cancer cells.

PARP inhibitors emerged as clinically effective anti-tumor agents in combination with DNA damaging agents but the toxicity of DNA damaging agents and their off-target effects caused serious problems in cancer therapy. They confer cytotoxicity in cancer cells both by catalytic inhibition and trapping of PARP-1 at the DNA damage site. There is a lack of direct evidence to quantitatively determine the trapped PARP-1 in cellular DNA. Here, we have precisely evaluated the mechanism of PARP trapping mediated anti-cancer action of Quinacrine (QC), BMN-673, and their combination (QC + BMN-673) in breast cancer cells. We introduced a strategy to measure the cellular PARP trapping potentiality of BMN-673 in QC pretreated cells using a fluorescence-based assay system. It was found that QC+ BMN-673 induced apoptosis by triggering DNA damage in breast cancer cells. Treatment with QC + BMN-673 stimulated the expression of PARP-1 in the chromatin compared to that of PARP-2 and PARP-3. QC + BMN-673 treatment also caused a dose-dependent and time-dependent accumulation of PARP-1 and inhibition of PARylation in the chromatin. Upregulation of BER components (pol-ß and FEN-1), an unchanged HR and NHEJ pathway proteins, and reduction of luciferase activity of the cells transfected with R-p21-P (LP-BER) were noted in combined drug-treated cells. Interestingly, silencing of pol-ß resulted in unchanged PARP-1 trapping and PAR activity in the chromatin with increasing time after QC + BMN-673 treatment without altering APC and FEN-1 expression. Thus, our data suggested that the QC + BMN-673 augmented breast cancer cell death by pol-ß mediated repair inhibition primarily through trapping of PARP-1 besides PARP-1 catalytic inhibition.

KAT6A Condensates Impair PARP1 Trapping of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer.

Most clinical PARP inhibitors (PARPis) trap PARP1 in a chromatin-bound state, leading to PARPi-mediated cytotoxicity. PARPi resistance impedes the treatment of ovarian cancer in clinical practice. However, the mechanism by which cancer cells overcome PARP1 trapping to develop PARPi resistance remains unclear. Here, it is shown that high levels of KAT6A promote PARPi resistance in ovarian cancer, regardless of its catalytic activity. Mechanistically, the liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of KAT6A, facilitated by APEX1, inhibits the cytotoxic effects of PARP1 trapping during PARPi treatment. The stable KAT6A-PARP1-APEX1 complex reduces the amount of PARP1 trapped at the DNA break sites. In addition, inhibition of KAT6A LLPS, rather than its catalytic activity, impairs DNA damage repair and restores PARPi sensitivity in ovarian cancer both in vivo and in vitro. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate the role of KAT6A LLPS in fostering PARPi resistance and suggest that repressing KAT6A LLPS can be a potential therapeutic strategy for PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer.

A unified mechanism for PARP inhibitor-induced PARP1 chromatin retention at DNA damage sites in living cells.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) not only suppress PARP1 catalytic activity but also prolong its association to damaged chromatin. Here, through live-cell imaging, we quantify the alterations in PARP1 dynamics and activity elicited by seven PARPis over a wide range of concentrations to deliver a unified mechanism of PARPi-induced PARP1 chromatin retention. We find that gross PARP1 retention at DNA damage sites is jointly governed by catalytic inhibition and allosteric trapping, albeit in a strictly independent manner-catalytic inhibition causes multiple unproductive binding-dissociation cycles of PARP1, while allosteric trapping prolongs the lesion-bound state of PARP1 to greatly increase overall retention. Importantly, stronger PARP1 retention produces greater temporal shifts in downstream DNA repair events and superior cytotoxicity, highlighting PARP1 retention, a complex but precisely quantifiable characteristic of PARPis, as a valuable biomarker for PARPi efficacy. Our approach can be promptly repurposed for interrogating the properties of DNA-repair-targeting compounds beyond PARPis.

PARP-DNA trapping ability of PARP inhibitors jeopardizes astrocyte viability: Implications for CNS disease therapeutics.

There is emerging interest in the role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) in neurodegeneration and potential of its therapeutic targeting in neurodegenerative disorders. New generations of PARP inhibitors exhibit polypharmacological properties; they do not only block enzymatic activity with lower doses, but also alter how PARP-1 interacts with DNA. While these new inhibitors have proven useful in cancer therapy due to their ability to kill cancer cell, their use in neurodegenerative disorders has an opposite goal: cell protection. We hypothesize that newer generation PARP-1 inhibitors jeopardize the viability of dividing CNS cells by promoting DNA damage upon the PARP-DNA interaction. Using enriched murine astrocyte cultures, our study evaluates the effects of a variety of drugs known to inhibit PARP; talazoparib, olaparib, PJ34 and minocycline. Despite similar PARP enzymatic inhibiting activities, we show here that these drugs result in varied cell viability. Talazoparib and olaparib reduce astrocyte growth in a dose-dependent manner, while astrocytes remain unaffected by PJ34 and minocycline. Similarly, PJ34 and minocycline do not jeopardize DNA integrity, while treatment with talazoparib and olaparib promote DNA damage. These two drugs impact astrocytes similarly in basal conditions and upon nitrosative stress, a pathological condition typical for neurodegeneration. Mechanistic assessment revealed that talazoparib and olaparib promote PARP trapping onto DNA in a dose-dependent manner, while PJ34 and minocycline do not induce PARP-DNA trapping. This study provides unique insight into the selective use of PARP inhibitors to treat neurodegenerative disorders whereby inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity must occur without deleteriously trapping PARP onto DNA.

HMGA2 as a functional antagonist of PARP1 inhibitors in tumor cells.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitors alone or in combination with DNA damaging agents are promising clinical drugs in the treatment of cancer. However, there is a need to understand the molecular mechanisms of resistance to PARP1 inhibitors. Expression of HMGA2 in cancer is associated with poor prognosis for patients. Here, we investigated the novel relationship between HMGA2 and PARP1 in DNA damage-induced PARP1 activity. We used human triple-negative breast cancer and fibrosarcoma cell lines to demonstrate that HMGA2 colocalizes and interacts with PARP1. High cellular HMGA2 levels correlated with increased DNA damage-induced PARP1 activity, which was dependent on functional DNA-binding AT-hook domains of HMGA2. HMGA2 inhibited PARP1 trapping to DNA and counteracted the cytotoxic effect of PARP inhibitors. Consequently, HMGA2 decreased caspase 3/7 induction and increased cell survival upon treatment with the alkylating methyl methanesulfonate alone or in combination with the PARP inhibitor AZD2281 (olaparib). HMGA2 increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate and spare respiratory capacity and increased NAMPT levels, suggesting metabolic support for enhanced PARP1 activity upon DNA damage. Our data showed that expression of HMGA2 in cancer cells reduces sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and suggests that targeting HMGA2 in combination with PARP inhibition may be a promising new therapeutic approach.