The improved bioactive n-HA/PA66 cage versus the PEEK cage in anterior cervical fusion: results from a 6-year follow-up and a case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: The nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage, a bioactive nonmetal cage, is fabricated in a hollow cylindrical shape and has been widely used for decades with good clinical outcomes for anterior cervical fusion. However, there remain some radiological complications, such as a slightly high subsidence rate. To improve the clinical outcomes, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage now has been developed into a trapezoidal and wedge shape, a better biomechanical shape matching the cervical spine that is similar to that of the PEEK cage. However, there have been no long-term comparisons of the improved n-HA/PA66 cage and PEEK cage in anterior cervical reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with the improved n-HA/PA66 cage (n-HA/PA66 group) were matched with patients with the PEEK cage (PEEK group) by clinical presentation, segment, age and sex. All patients underwent a minimum of 6 years of follow-up. The radiographic parameters (cage subsidence, fusion status, cervical lordosis, and segmental sagittal alignment) and clinical parameters (10-point visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores) from patients were evaluated before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: The n-HA/PA66 and PEEK groups were well matched in terms of clinical presentation, segment, age, and sex at surgery. The n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cages had similar fusion rates at 6 months postoperatively (n-HA/PA66: 58.6% vs. PEEK: 51.7%, P = 0.455) and at the last follow-up (n-HA/PA66: 96.6% vs. PEEK: 93.1%, P = 0.402). The respective cage subsidence rates in the n-HA/PA66 and PEEK groups were 6.9 and 12.1% (P = 0.342). The correction of SA was similar between the groups at the final follow-up (n-HA/PA66: 4.29 ± 1.99 vs. PEEK: 3.99 ± 2.59 P = 0.464). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean cervical lordosis, visual analogue scale scores of the neck and arm, NDI scores, JOA scores or patients' overall satisfaction at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: After single-level ACDF, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage had similar excellent results in both radiological and clinical outcomes compared with the PEEK cage over 6 years of follow-up. According to these results, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage and the PEEK cage could be comparable for ACDF.

Vacuum plasma sprayed porous titanium coating on polyetheretherketone for ACDF improves the osteogenic ability: An in vitro and in vivo study.

Cervical degenerative disease is a common and frequently occurring disease, which seriously affects the health and quality of the life of patients worldwide. Anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion is currently recognized as the gold standard for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has become the prevailing material for cervical fusion surgery. Although PEEK has excellent biocompatibility, it is difficult to form bone connection at its bone-implant interface due to its low surface hydrophilicity and conductivity. It is widely accepted that Ti has excellent osteogenic activity and biocompatibility. In this study, a Ti-PEEK composite cage was prepared by coating Ti on the surface of a PEEK cage using a vacuum plasma spraying technique to enhance the osteogenic property of PEEK. The Ti-PEEK samples were evaluated in terms of their in vitro cellular behaviors and in vivo osteointegration, and the results were compared to a pure PEEK substrate. The skeleton staining and MTS assay indicated that the MC3T3-E1 cells spread and grew well on the surface of Ti-PEEK cages. The osteogenic gene expression and western blot analysis of osteogenic protein showed upregulated bone-forming activity of MC3T3-E1 cells in Ti-PEEK cages. Furthermore, a significant increase in new bone formation was demonstrated on Ti-PEEK implants in comparison with PEEK implants at 12 weeks in a sheep cervical spine fusion test. These results proved that the Ti-PEEK cage exhibited enhanced osseointegrative properties compared to the PEEK cage both in vitro and in vivo.

PLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare clinical results and fusion rates of uncoated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with titanium-coated PEEK cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomised study including 60 patients with one- or two-segment lumbar degenerative diseases. Patients received either titanium-coated PEEK cages (group A) or uncoated PEEK cages (group B). Fusion rates were evaluated on plain X-rays and CT scans after 6 and 12 months. Clinical follow-up (visual analogue scale, VAS; Oswestry Disability Index score, ODI; EQ-5D) was performed for 24 months. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (92%) (36 female, 19 male) had a complete follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic, peri- or intraoperative data between groups A and B. ODI, VAS and EQ-5D improved significantly (p < 0.001) after surgery without statistically significant differences between the two groups. Overall, 65 operated segments could be evaluated for fusion (group A: 29 segments, group B: 36 segments, p = 0.6). Osseous integration of the cage surface improved significantly (p < 0.001) in both groups between 6 and 12 months after surgery. At 12-month follow-up, neither radiolucency nor signs of instability or dislocation were noted. Fusion was present in CT scans as follows: (a) bone growth through cage pores (A: 100%, B: 100%); (b) bone growth outside the cages (A: 48%, B: 61%; p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: PEEK and titanium-coated PEEK cages for PLIF produce equally favourable clinical and radiological results up to 24 months post-surgery. The fusion rate was not different.

Stable osteosynthesis of cage in cage technique for surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of a displaced proximal humeral fracture is still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes at a long-term follow-up after fixation augmentation using peek (polyether-ether-ketone) cage and locking compression plate (LCP). METHODS: A total of 27 patients (average age 53.8 years, range 19-86 years) were treated with peek cage and LCP. All of them had a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 1 years. Outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score. Complications were also recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 28 months (range 12-48 months). The mean functional outcomes were as follows: CMS, 73.3 (range 61-86); DASH, 45.9 (range 27-68). A total of 4 patients had complications: osteonecrosis developed in one patient, loss of reduction was observed in 1 patient and stiffness was occurred in two patients. CONCLUSION: The use of peek cage and LCP has been a valuable option in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The complication rate was acceptable. Suitable void filler in the proximal humerus for reconstructing the medial column integrity attains mechanical stability in reducing the incidence of the complications.

Anterior column reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine with a new modular PEEK vertebral body replacement device: retrospective clinical and radiologic cohort analysis of 48 cases with 1.7-years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a new PEEK vertebral body replacement can maintain the sagittal alignment as an anterior column reconstruction device in thoracic and lumbar spinal defects due to trauma or tumor. METHODS: Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent a corpectomy between T5 and L5 due to trauma or tumor and were stabilized with the new PEEK vertebral body replacement, between 2013 and 2017. We excluded patients who underwent a corpectomy for infection or degenerative disease and patients without complete follow-up in our institution. The primary outcome was the bi-segmental kyphotic angle (BKA). Secondary outcomes were the assessment of pedicle screw loosening, cage height, and subsidence or tilting of the cage. The clinical outcomes were assessed through the COMI-Score, EuroQol-5D, and Karnofsky indexes. Bony fusion and complications were registered. RESULTS: After the surgery BKA decreased by 12.1° (p < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, we observed a mean loss of reduction of 1.6° (p = 0.002). This was accompanied by an increase in subsidence of 2.1 mm (p < 0.001) and mean tilting of the cage of 1.4° (p = 0.003). The height of the cage and other parameters did not experience any changes. Clinically, the COMI-Score (p = 0.02) and the EuroQol-5D Index (p = 0.012) showed significant improvement, same as Karnofsky-Index (p = 0.015) at final follow-up. The fusion rate according to Bridwell was 92.1%. The 2% late complications were related to implant malpositioning. CONCLUSION: The new PEEK expandable vertebral body replacement is effective and safe in thoracic and lumbar anterior column reconstruction in tumor and trauma diseases.

[Minimally invasive fusion in patients with multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: case report and literature review]. / Miniinvazivnyi spondilodez pri mnogourovnevom stenoze sheinogo otdela pozvonochnika (klinicheskoe nabliudenie i obzor literatury).

Age-related degenerative changes in osseocartilaginous structures of the cervical spine are found in 50% of middle-aged population that is able to work. Although most cases are asymptomatic, such changes as herniated intervertebral disks, marginal osteophyte formation, hypertrophied joint and ligaments are the reason for neurological symptoms and cause neck pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Surgical access to the cervical vertebrae and options for spinal decompression have long been known and standardized. There are also many methods (both anterior and posterior ones) for fixing the operated segments. This article describes minimally invasive anterior fusion used for patients with multilevel cervical spinal stenosis using zero-profile cages with a blocking mechanism. Statistical analysis of clinical efficacy of this treatment was also performed. It demonstrates that advantages of the chosen decompression and fixation method are as follows: it is minimally invasive and ensures that surgical trauma is minimal, so patients recover quickly.

Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes, radiographic results and fusion rate of ACDF between empty PEEK cages and PEEK cages packed with ß-tricalcium phosphate. METHODS: Forty-five patients were prospectively enrolled with cervical degenerative disc disease who requiring ACDF with a PEEK cage. 23 patients were randomised to the study group (empty cages) and 22 patients were in the control group (cages filled with ß-tricalcium phosphate). Both patient groups were fixed with a cervical locking plate. A CT scan was performed 12 months postoperatively and 24 months if not confirmed fused at 12 months to evaluate the status of fusion. Clinical status was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: 46 levels (97.88%) in the study group and 44 levels (97.77%) in the control group were confirmed as fused at 24 months. There was no significant difference between the fusion rates observed in the study and control groups (p = 0.82). There was no significant difference in JOA, ODI, or VAS scores at 24 months follow-up. The results showed that the members of the non-fusion group tended to be older than the individuals in the fusion group at 12 months, but was not significant in statistics. CONCLUSIONS: Similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes were achieved when using ACDF with PEEK cages and instrumentation, regardless of whether the cage was filled with bone substitute at 24 months follow-up. Fusion rates improved over time and are comparable between both groups. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

The safe use of long screws in L5/S1 stand-alone anterior interbody fusion for olisthesis cases.

BACKGROUND: Stand-alone anterior interbody fusion (STALIF) with poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages could offer a treatment option in olisthesis cases. The fixation of the PEEK-cage at the L5/S1 inferior endplate with long divergent screws however might endanger neural sacral structures, especially the S1 nerve root. If shorter screws are used, the achieved bony purchase might not be sufficient to resist the pull out and shear forces at the lumbosacral junction. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the use of long screws in PEEK-cages for olisthesis cases at the L5/S1 segment and its neurological complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 11 Patients (6 males) with a mean age of 47(± 15.1) years between 2013-2015 designated for an STALIF at the L5/S1 level were consecutively included in the present study. All patients had a Grade 1 or 2 slippage according to Meyerding. PEEK cages (SynFix-LR®, Depuy Synthes) were implanted with 30mm screws at the baseplate of L5/S1 in all patients. Perioperative and postoperative long-term complications were evaluated. Furthermore, radiological follow-up was performed (CT-scan at 6 months, X-ray at 6, 12 and 24 months). RESULTS: 6 patients suffered from an isthmic, 1 from a degenerative olisthesis. 4 patients with iatrogenic spondylolisthesis were included. Pre-operative radiculopathy was noted in 10 patients. 9 patients with pre-operative radiculopathy showed relief of symptoms until the last follow-up after 24 months. Fusion was achieved in all patients after 6 months. No screw-displacement, breakage or violation of the neural foramen was noted. Furthermore, no implant failure or pull-out fractures were seen. CONCLUSION: In this investigation, no complication due to the use of long divergent locking screws was noted. In addition, the majority of patients showed permanent relief of radiculopathy symptoms at the 2 years follow-up. This study demonstrates the safe usage of long divergent locking screws in the baseplate of L5/S1 in anterior interbody fusion at the L5/S1 level.

Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparing titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages.

OBJECTIVES: To study clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who had undergone the procedure of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages for cervical disc prolapse. METHODS: This is a retrospective/non-randomized study which was conducted at the Combined Military Hospital Peshawar. Study interval was four years from 1st October, 2010 to 31st September, 2014. Total number of included patients were 149. All of the patients had undergone the procedure of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages. All of the patients had plain MRI cervical spine done for diagnosis of anterior cervical disc prolapse. RESULTS: Most of the patients had stenosis at the C5 / C6 (PEEK cage group 63% and titanium cage group 47.6%) and C6 / C7 (PEEK cage group 15.38% and titanium cage group 19.04%) cervical level. Bi-level involvement was also seen. In the patients who complained of brachialgia, total resolution of symptoms was seen after the operation. Three (2.01%) of the patients in titanium cage group, who presented with axial neck pain, continued to complain of pain after the operation. Four (2.6%) of the patients in PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cage group and 2 (1.3%) in titanium cage group complained of pain at the donor site (iliac crest). Fusion rate was 100% with both titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages at one year. CONCLUSION: Results with titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages are excellent. There was no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcome between two groups of patients (p > 0.05). Fusion rate was 100% at one year with both cages.

Unilaterally posterior lumbar interbody fusion with double expandable peek cages without pedicle screw support for lumbar disc herniation.

OBJECTIVES: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is usually bilateral procedure, and it is combined with posterior by bilateral pedicle screw support or with fixation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the surgical outcomes of simple discectomy and PLIF without pedicle screw support in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients with single segment LDH were operated between February 2010 and June 2013. 40 patients were treated with simple discectomy (Group 1) and 20 patients were treated with PLIF using double expandable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages without instrumentation (Group 2) unilaterally. Pain and function were evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before and 18 months after surgery. Besides, PLIF patients were evaluated with computerized tomography (CT) scan of lumbar vertebra for the evaluation of the height of the disc, instability and fusion. RESULTS: Both leg and low back pain VAS scores were significantly improved 18 months after surgery in both of the groups (p<0.001). Significant decrease in VAS low back pain scores was seen in group 2 when compared to group 1 (p<0.001). Height of the intervertebral disc space was preserved and no instability was detected in group 2. No recurrence and 80% fusion rate was achieved in group 2. CONCLUSION: This study showed that unilateral PLIF intervention with double expandable PEEK cages without pedicle screw support would be sufficient in the management of single segment lumbar disc herniation in patients whom are thought to have lumbar stabilization.

A prospective clinical and radiographic 12-month outcome study of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease utilizing a novel viable allogeneic, cancellous, bone matrix (trinity evolution™) with a comparison to historical controls.

PURPOSE: This multicenter clinical study was performed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Trinity Evolution(®) (TE), a viable cellular bone allograft, in combination with a PEEK interbody spacer and supplemental anterior fixation in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: In a prospective, multi-center study, 31 patients that presented with symptomatic cervical degeneration at one vertebral level underwent ACDF with a PEEK interbody spacer (Orthofix, Inc., Lewisville, TX, USA) and supplemental anterior fixation. In addition all patients had the bone graft substitute, Trinity Evolution (Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Edison, NJ, USA), placed within the interbody spacer. At 6 and 12 months, radiographic fusion was evaluated as determined by independent radiographic review of angular motion (≤4°) from flexion/extension X-rays combined with presence of bridging bone across the adjacent endplates on thin cut CT scans. In addition other metrics were measured including function as assessed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and neck and arm pain as assessed by individual Visual Analog Scales (VAS). RESULTS: The fusion rate for patients using a PEEK interbody spacer in combination with TE was 78.6 % at 6 months and 93.5 % at 12 months. When considering high risk factors, 6-month fusion rates for patients that were current or former smokers, diabetic, overweight or obese/extremely obese were 70 % (7/10), 100 % (1/1), 70 % (7/10), and 82 % (9/11), respectively. At 12 months, the fusion rates were 100 % (12/12), 100 % (2/2), 100 % (11/11) and 85 % (11/13), respectively. Neck function, and neck/arm pain were found to significantly improve at both time points. No serious allograft related adverse events occurred and none of the 31 patients had subsequent additional cervical surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing single-level ACDF with TE in combination with a PEEK interbody spacer and supplemental anterior fixation had a high rate of fusion success without serious allograft-related adverse events.

Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of a new zero-profile anchored spacer called the ROI-C in anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, radiological outcomes and complications of multilevel ACDF with the ROI-C or with the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate. From April 2011 to April 2014, 60 patients with MCSM were operated on using ACDF, with the ROI-C in 28 patients and PEEK cages with an anterior plate in 32 patients. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and clinical and radiological results were compared between the ROI-C group and the cage-plate group. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 23.8 ± 6.6 months, ranging from 12 to 36 months. At the first month and the last follow-up, the neck disability index (NDI) scores were decreased, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were significantly increased, compared with the presurgical measurements in both groups. There were no significant differences in NDI scores or JOA scores between the two groups (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the operation time, blood loss and the presence of dysphagia (P < 0.05). In addition, the cervical Cobb angle and disk height showed significant corrections, compared to those measured before the operation. There was no adjacent disc degeneration observed in the ROI-C group, and one patient with skip levels showed disc degeneration of the normal level between the skip levels in the cage-plate group. The degeneration rate of the cage-plate group was 3.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: The primary clinical and radiographic efficacies of both ROI-C and cages with plates in ACDF for MCSM were satisfactory; both approaches could improve and maintain cervical lordosis and disk height. However, the ROI-C was associated with a simpler operation, a shorter operation time, less blood loss, and a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia compared to the PEEK cage with an anterior plate.

Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients treated with a PEEK cage compared to those treated with an autologous cage using the lumbar spinous process and laminae (ACSP). METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease were randomly assigned to either a PEEK cage (group A, n = 34) or an ACSP (group B, n = 35). Monosegmental PLIF was performed in all patients. Mean lumbar lordosis, mean disc height, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, functional outcomes, fusion rates and complication rates were recorded and compared. The patients were followed postoperatively for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Successful radiographic fusion was documented in all patients. No flexion-extension hypermobility or pedicle screw loosening or breakage occurred during the follow-up period. No significant difference existed between the 2 groups when comparing the mean lumbar lordosis, mean disc height, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, functional outcomes, fusion rates or complication rates. Overall satisfactory results were achieved in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the ACSP appears to be equally as safe and effective as the PEEK cage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN25558534 . Retrospectively registered 16/02/2016.

Superior load-to-failure in an all-suture anchor system for all-inside meniscal repair compared to a PEEK-cage anchor system in an experimental cadaveric test setting.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a latest generation all-suture anchor repair device (ASARD) for meniscal repair with that of a latest generation PEEK-cage anchor repair device (PCARD) in an experimental setting using cadaveric menisci. Methods: Twenty-six menisci were obtained from the knees of fresh body donors. Artificially created meniscal lesions were treated randomly, using a single stitch with either an ASARD or a PCARD. Cyclic biomechanical testing, utilising a universal material testing machine and following an established protocol, was carried out and load-to-failure (LTF), displacement, stiffness, and mode-of-failure (MOF) reported. Results: Mean LTF was found to be 61% higher in the ASARD group at 107.10 N (standard deviation [SD], 42.34), compared to 65.86 N (SD, 27.42) in the PCARD group with statistical significance (p = 0.022). The ASARD exhibited a trend towards higher stiffness (10.35 N; SD, 3.92 versus 7.78 N; SD; 3.59) and higher displacement at cycles one, 100, and 499 (1.64, 3.27, and 4.17 mm versus 0.93, 2.19, and 2.83 mm) compared to the PCARD. Cheese wiring was the most common mode-of-failure in both groups (76.9%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that an ASARD shows a higher mean LTF than a PCARD when compared in an experimental biomechanical setting. Level of evidence: Level III.

The Influence of Titanium-coated Poryetheretherketone Cages in Fusion Status after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation (CBT-PLIF) shows potential for reducing adjacent segmental disease. Previously, our investigations revealed a relatively lower fusion rate with the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CP) cages in CBT-PLIF compared with traditional pedicle screw fixation (PS-PLIF) using CP cages. This study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TP) cages can enhance fusion outcomes in CBT-PLIF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 consecutive patients who underwent CBT-PLIF with TP cages (TP group) and 89 patients who underwent CBT-PLIF with CP cages (CP group). Fusion status was assessed using computed tomography at 1 year postoperatively and dynamic plain radiographs at 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in fusion rates were observed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively between the TP group (86.8% and 89.7%, respectively) and the CP group (77.5% and 88.8%, respectively). Notably, the CP group exhibited a significant improvement in fusion rate from 1 to 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.002), while no significant improvement was observed in the TP group. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of temporal changes in fusion rates reveals that only the TP group achieved a peak fusion rate 1 year postoperatively. This implies that TP cages may enhance the fusion process even after CBT-PLIF. Nevertheless, the definitive efficacy of TP cages for CBT-PLIF remains uncertain in the context of overall fusion rates.

Clinical Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage vs. PEEK Cage.

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be a clinically efficient and cost-effective method for treating patients with degenerative cervical spine conditions. New intervertebral implant products are being developed to improve fusion and stability while decreasing complications. This study assesses the effectiveness of Tritanium C (Tri-C) Anterior Cervical Cage (Stryker) in the treatment of degenerative disk disease (DDD) of the cervical spine compared with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data prospectively collected from two institutions. Patients who underwent ACDFs for DDD using either the Tri-C cage or PEEK cage were identified. The patients' demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. PROs included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain. The primary outcomes included 3- and 12-month PROs as well as the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. The radiographic outcomes included rates of subsidence, cage movement, and successful fusion within 12 months. Multivariate linear regression models were run to identify variables predictive of 12-month PROs. Results: A total of 275 patients who underwent ACDF were included in this study and were divided into two groups: PEEK (n=213) and Tri-C (n=62). Both groups showed improvement in neck and arm pain and NDI postoperatively. When Tri-C and PEEK were compared, no significant differences were observed in the 3- or 12-month changes in neck or arm pain or NDI. Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. Regression analysis revealed that Tri-C vs. PEEK was not a significant predictor of any outcome. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the use of porous titanium Tri-C cage during ACDFs is an effective method for managing cervical DDD in terms of PROs, perioperative morbidity, and radiologic parameters. No significant difference was observed in any clinical outcome between patients undergoing ACDF using the Tri-C cage and those in whom the PEEK cage was used. Level of Evidence: III.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 Bioactive Glass Ceramic or Polyetheretherketone Cage Filled with Hydroxyapatite/ß-Tricalcium Phosphate: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

A CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass-ceramic (BGS-7) spacer provides high mechanical stability, produces a chemical bond to the adjacent endplate, and facilitates fusion after spine surgery. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial aimed to evaluate the radiographic outcomes and clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a BGS-7 spacer for treating cervical degenerative disorders. Thirty-six patients underwent ACDF using a BGS-7 spacer (Group N), and 40 patients underwent ACDF using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disorders. The spinal fusion rate was assessed 12 months postoperatively using three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and dynamic radiographs. Clinical outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, visual analog scale scores for neck and arm pain, and scores from the neck disability index (NDI), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12v2). All participants were randomly assigned to undergo ACDF using either a BGS-7 spacer or PEEK cage filled with HA and ß-TCP. The primary outcome was the fusion rate on CT scan image at 12 months after ACDF surgery based on a per-protocol strategy. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were also assessed. The 12-month fusion rates for the BGS-7 and PEEK groups based on CT scans were 81.8% and 74.4%, respectively, while those based on dynamic radiographs were 78.1% and 73.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Neck pain, arm pain, NDI, EQ-5D, and SF-12v2 scores significantly improved postoperatively, with no significant differences between the groups. No adverse events were observed in either group. In ACDF surgery, the BGS-7 spacer showed similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes as PEEK cages filled with HA and ß-TCP.

Effects of Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inter body spacers have been widely used in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery; however, it is not clear whether one implant shows superior clinical outcomes compared with the other. This systematic review and meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the radiologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: Extensive literature searches were conducted on online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Library, until January 2023. The present study adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool were used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, encompassing 8020 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The results indicate that structural allografts show a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.37; P ＝0.03; I2 = 71%). In addition, the structural allograft group also had a lower pseudarthrosis rate (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80; P = 0.009; I2 = 75%) and reoperation rate (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; P = 0.007; I2 = 38%). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis show that structural allograft has a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. In addition, structural allograft has a lower pseudarthrosis rate and reoperation rate.

Endoscopic Resection and Decompression for Lateral Displacement of Cage after Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Report from a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Lateral displacement of cage is a rarely seen complication of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). To the best of our knowledge, this complication has always been revised with posterior open surgery. However, open surgery often associates with large trauma and long period of recovery. CASE PRESENTATION: In the case presented, a 64-year-old male patient with lateral displacement of cage which consequently caused neurological symptoms after OLIF, was reported and surgically revised with an endoscopic resection and decompression technique. The surgery was performed through a posterolateral approach which was similar to transforaminal approach, with estimated blood loss of 45mL and whole operation time of 70 min. Neurological symptoms were disappeared after operation immediately and the patient was discharged 2 days later. He reported no symptoms other than mild weakness of the lower back at the last follow-up of 12 months. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic decompression technique may be an effective alternative to surgically treat lateral displacement of cage after OLIF with advantages of minimal invasion and quick recovery.

Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is performed worldwide with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium (Ti) cages for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. The aim of this study was to compare radiologic outcomes between a PEEK and three-dimensional-printed titanium (3DP-Ti) cage after TLIF with >1 year of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases who underwent TLIF operation were included in this study. Intervertebral disc height and whole lumbar lordosis were measured and evaluated from the preoperative stage to the final follow-up. Subsidence of the cage was indicated if the cage sunk into the adjacent vertebral body or if there was a reduction in height of the fused segment by ≥3 mm during the postoperative follow-up. Migration of the cage was determined as the displacement of the interbody cage by ≥2 mm during the postoperative period. Fusion status was assessed at the 1 year and final follow-up using standard methods. RESULTS: Both disc height and lumbar lordosis were well maintained throughout the study period, and no significant differences were observed between PEEK and 3DP-Ti groups. Both PEEK and 3DP-Ti cages demonstrated low rates of cage subsidence, with no significant difference was noted. A significant cage migration rate was observed in the PEEK group and the revision operation was required for 2 patients. The fusion rate of this study was not found to be statistically significant, although the 3DP-Ti cage was known to have an improved fusion rate than PEEK cage after lumbar interbody fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic results suggest that the 3DP-Ti cage may be a better interbody cage for TLIF than is the PEEK cage.