Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity predicts aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) exhibiting aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior are the rare subset that progress after surgery, conventional medical therapies, and an initial course of radiation and are characterized by unrelenting growth and/or metastatic dissemination. Two groups of patients with PitNETs were sequenced: a prospective group of patients (n = 66) who consented to sequencing prior to surgery and a retrospective group (n = 26) comprised of aggressive/higher risk PitNETs. A higher mutational burden and fraction of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was found in the aggressive, treatment-refractory PitNETs compared to the benign tumors (p = 1.3 × 10-10 and p = 8.5 × 10-9, respectively). Within the corticotroph lineage, a characteristic pattern of recurrent chromosomal LOH in 12 specific chromosomes was associated with treatment-refractoriness (occurring in 11 of 14 treatment-refractory versus 1 of 14 benign corticotroph PitNETs, p = 1.7 × 10-4). Across the cohort, a higher fraction of LOH was identified in tumors with TP53 mutations (p = 3.3 × 10-8). A machine learning approach identified loss of heterozygosity as the most predictive variable for aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior, outperforming the most common gene-level alteration, TP53, with an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96). Aggressive, treatment-refractory PitNETs are characterized by significant aneuploidy due to widespread chromosomal LOH, most prominently in the corticotroph tumors. This LOH predicts treatment-refractoriness with high accuracy and represents a novel biomarker for this poorly defined PitNET category.

[Aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas: modern classification, advances and prospects in treatment]. / Agressivnye opukholi i kartsinomy gipofiza: sovremennaya klassifikatsiya, dostizheniya i perspektivy v lechenii.

Despite slow growth of most pituitary tumors and high rates of total resection and/or effective therapy, pituitary neoplasms are characterized by aggressive behavior with high growth rate, frequent relapses and resistance to standard treatments in 10% of cases. In modern WHO classifications of tumors of the central nervous system, endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors, the authors propose the definition «pituitary neuroendocrine tumor¼ instead of previous «pituitary adenoma¼ and «metastasizing pituitary neuroendocrine tumor¼ instead of «pituitary carcinoma¼. Currently, there are no effective prognostic markers of aggressive tumors. This complicates early diagnosis. It is proposed to apply a five-stage prognostic classification based on proliferation rate (including mitotic count, Ki-67 index and p53 immunoexpression) and morphometric markers of invasiveness for all resected pituitary neoplasms. This approach would be valuable for earlier detection of aggressive tumors and pituitary carcinomas. Compression of visual pathways, third ventricle and brain stem due to rapid growth of aggressive tumors usually requires redo surgeries with subsequent radiotherapy. Hormonally active tumors require therapy with somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists in maximum possible doses. Chemotherapy with temozolomide as first-line option is recommended if standard treatment is ineffective. Alternative treatment includes peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), molecular targeted therapy (bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, everolimus and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors) and immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors). Considering the need for combined treatment, these cases should always be discussed by a multidisciplinary team (neurosurgeon, endocrinologist, radiotherapist, oncologist, pathologist) with necessary qualifications and experience in treating these patients. Treatment of aggressive tumors and pituitary carcinomas is becoming an active and rapidly developing direction in neurosurgery, endocrinology and oncology.

The treatment of aggressive prolactinomas with everolimus.

INTRODUCTION: Aggressive prolactinomas are life-limiting tumors without a standard of care treatment option after the oral alkylator, temozolomide, fails to provide tumor control. METHODS: We reviewed an institutional database of pituitary tumors for patients with aggressive prolactinomas who progressed following treatment with a dopamine receptor agonist, radiotherapy and temozolomide. Within this cohort, we identified four patients who were treated with everolimus and we report their response to this therapy. Treatment response was determined by a neuroradiologist, who manually performed volumetric assessment and determined treatment response by Response Assessments in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. RESULTS: Three of four patients who were treated with everolimus had a biochemical response to therapy and all patients derived a clinically meaningful benefit based upon suppression of tumor growth. While the best overall response as assessed by RANO criteria was stable disease for the four patients, a minor regression in tumor size was appreciated in two of the four patients. CONCLUSION: Everolimus is an active agent in the treatment of prolactinomas that warrants further investigation.

Metastatic pituitary tumors: an institutional case series.

PURPOSE: Pituitary carcinomas are a rare entity that respond poorly to multimodal therapy. Patients follow a variable disease course that remains ill-defined. METHODS: We present an institutional case series of patients treated for pituitary carcinomas over a 30-year period from 1992 to 2022. A systematic review was conducted to identify prior case series of patients with pituitary carcinomas. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with a mean age at pituitary carcinoma diagnosis of 52.5 years (standard deviation [SD] 19.4) met inclusion criteria. All 14 patients had tumor subtypes confirmed by immunohistochemistry and hormone testing, with the most common being ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas (n = 12). Patients had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.4 years (range 0.7-10.0) and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.4 years (range 2.3-24.0) from pituitary adenoma diagnosis. Median PFS and OS were 0.6 years (range 0.0-2.2) and 1.5 years (range 0.1-9.6) respectively upon development of metastases. Most patients (n = 12) had locally invasive disease to the cavernous sinus, dorsum sellae dura, or sphenoid sinus prior to metastasis. Common sites of metastasis included the central nervous system, liver, lung, and bone. In a pooled analysis including additional cases from the literature, treatment of metastases with chemotherapy or a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.02), while failing to significantly improve OS (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Pituitary carcinomas are highly recurrent, heterogenous tumors with variable responses to treatment. Multidisciplinary management with an experienced neuro-endocrine and neuro-oncology team is needed given the unrelenting nature of this disease.

Medical therapy for refractory pituitary adenomas.

INTRODUCTION: Refractory pituitary adenomas are those that have progressed following standard of care treatments. Medical therapy options for these challenging tumors are limited. PURPOSE: To review the landscape of tumor directed medical therapies and off-label investigational approaches for refractory pituitary adenomas. METHODS: Literature on medical therapies for refractory adenomas was reviewed. RESULTS: The established first-line medical therapy for refractory adenomas is temozolomide, which importantly may increase survival, but clinical trial data are still needed to clearly establish its efficacy, identify biomarkers of response, and clarify eligibility and outcome criteria. Other therapies for refractory tumors have only been described in case reports and small case series. CONCLUSION: There are currently no approved non-endocrine medical therapies for refractory pituitary tumors. There is an urgent need for identifying effective medical therapies and studying them in multi-center clinical trials.

Epidemiology of common and uncommon adult pituitary tumors in the U.S. according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification.

PURPOSE: To examine the contemporary epidemiology of adult pituitary tumors with a particular focus on uncommon tumor types, using the 2017 WHO Classification of pituitary tumors. METHODS: Adult patients presenting with a pituitary or sellar tumor between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the U.S. National Cancer Database, with tumor type categorized according to the 2017 WHO classification. Descriptive epidemiological statistics were evaluated and reported for all pituitary tumor types and subtypes. RESULTS: 113,349 adults with pituitary tumors were identified, 53.0% of whom were female. The majority of pituitary tumors were pituitary adenomas (94.0%), followed by craniopharyngiomas (3.8%). Among pituitary adenomas, whereas 71.6% of microadenomas presented in females, only 46.7% of macroadenomas and 41.3% of giant adenomas did (p < 0.001). For craniopharyngiomas, 71.2% were adamantinomatous and 28.8% were papillary, with adamantinomatous tumors associated with Black non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (ORadj = 2.44 vs. White non-Hispanic, 99.9 %CI = 1.25-4.75, p < 0.001) in multivariable analysis. The remaining 0.7% (n = 676) of pathology-confirmed pituitary tumor types were composed of: 21% tumors of the posterior pituitary, 16% chordomas, 11% pituitary carcinomas (i.e. adenohypophyseal histology with metastasis; herein most frequently to bone), 10% meningiomas, 8% germ cell tumors, 7% hematolymphoid (largely DLBCLs), and 4% neuronal/paraneuronal (largely gangliogliomas). Pituitary carcinomas and posterior pituitary tumors demonstrated a male predilection (62.2% and 56.0%, respectively), whereas sellar meningiomas predominated in females (84.1%). Age, race/ethnicity, tumor size, and overall survival further varied across uncommon pituitary tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a detailed contemporary dissection of the epidemiology of common and uncommon adult pituitary tumors in the context of WHO2017.

A case of aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumour with extremely rapid progression: possible diagnostic value of TERT promoter methylation.

Most pituitary adenoma/neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET) are histologically benign and grow slowly; however, a subset of these tumours exhibit a more aggressive clinical course characterized by local invasiveness and early recurrence. These high-risk PitNETs often require multiple surgeries and radiation over several years and may eventually acquire carcinomatous characteristics, such as metastasis in some cases. Herein, we report a rare case of PitNET causing oculomotor paresis with extremely rapid recurrence only 3 months after initial surgery, followed by lethal liver metastasis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings were consistent with typical PitNETs, other than moderate invasion of the cavernous sinus. Pathological examination of the specimen obtained from the initial transsphenoidal surgery revealed increased mitosis and elevated rates of cells positive for Ki-67 and p53. Based on the immunohistochemical assessment for transcription factors and pituitary hormones, the diagnosis was determined to be a silent sparsely granulated corticotroph PitNET with focal malignant transformation. Aggressive features represented by Ki-67 and p53 positivity were more robust in recurrent and metastatic specimens, but hormone immunostaining was decreased. Epigenetic analysis revealed methylation of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter in the tumour, resulting in TERT upregulation. Despite extensive research, markers for distinguishing extremely aggressive PitNETs have not been determined. Although further analysis is needed, our case demonstrates the possible usefulness of assessing TERT promoter methylation status in the stratification of recurrence risk in extremely high-risk variants of PitNET.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Pituitary Carcinoma.

A pituitary carcinoma (PC) is a rare neoplasm, accounting for only 0.2% of pituitary tumors, and is defined by the presence of noncontiguous metastatic disease. Its management requires a multimodal approach including surgery, irradiation, and medical therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by means of the Gamma Knife or CyberKnife may be considered potentially useful in such cases. It has mainly been applied for localized metastases and symptomatic lesions, but it may also be effective in control of aggressive tumor growth at the primary site after sufficient surgical debulking of the lesion. Given the infrequency of PC and their heterogeneous nature with regard to the histopathological type, local extension, and location of metastases, large clinical series have not been compiled to date. While, in such cases, SRS is certainly not curative and does not prevent disease progression, it is quite reasonable to incorporate this treatment option into a multimodal management strategy and apply it judiciously at the treating clinician's discretion on a case-by-case basis.

Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: current practices, controversies, and perspectives, on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (APT) account for 10% of pituitary tumors. Their management is a rapidly evolving field of clinical research and has led pituitary teams to shift toward a neuro-oncological-like approach. The new terminology "Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors" (PitNet) that was recently proposed to replace "pituitary adenomas" reflects this change of paradigm. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a state of the art of actual knowledge, controversies, and recommendations in the management of APT. We propose an overview of current prognostic markers, including the recent five-tiered clinicopathological classification. We further establish and discuss the following recommendations from a neurosurgical perspective: (i) surgery and multi-staged surgeries (without or with parasellar resection in symptomatic patients) should be discussed at each stage of the disease, because it may potentialize adjuvant medical therapies; (ii) temozolomide is effective in most patients, although 30% of patients are non-responders and the optimal timeline to initiate and interrupt this treatment remains questionable; (iii) some patients with selected clinicopathological profiles may benefit from an earlier local radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy; (iv) novel therapies such as VEGF-targeted therapies and anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD1 immunotherapies are promising and should be discussed as 2nd or 3rd line of treatment. Finally, whether neurosurgeons have to operate on "pituitary adenomas" or "PitNets," their role and expertise remain crucial at each stage of the disease, prompting our community to deal with evolving concepts and therapeutic resources.

Aggressive pituitary adenoma in the context of Lynch syndrome: a case report and literature review on this rare coincidence.

PURPOSE: Lynch Syndrome (LS) is a cancer-predisposing condition resulting from hereditary mutation of DNA mismatch repair genes. Gastrointestinal, urogenital, and endometrial carcinomas are well-known to predominantly occur in LS patients. In contrast, there are only few reports on brain tumours in the context of LS and to date intracranial tumour manifestation appear to be rather coincidental. METHODS: We present the case of a 56-year-old female developing aggressive lactotroph pituitary adenoma following a history of multiple Lynch-associated malignomas and having a confirmed MSH2 mutation. Furthermore, we performed a literature review via PubMed using the search terms 'Lynch Syndrome', 'HNPCC', 'MMR mutation' combined with 'intracranial tumour', 'sellar tumour', 'pituitary adenoma', or 'pituitary carcinoma', focusing on other reported cases and treatment regimens. RESULTS: A handful of studies have indicated an increased frequency of brain tumours in the context of LS, predominantly glioblastoma and less frequently low-grade glioma or other brain tumours. Based on our literature review, we summarized the known instances of pituitary adenoma in LS patients, including the present case. Furthermore, we reviewed the common recommendation of using temozolomide (TMZ) for treatment of aggressive pituitary adenoma or carcinoma and found strong indication that it might be insufficient in LS patients, while PD-1 blockade could be a promising treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with our case, there is a growing body of evidence that intracranial tumours and in particular those of the sellar region might be more prevalent in LS patients than previously assumed, due to their genetic profile substantially affecting viability and efficacy of treatment options. Clinical signs of aggressive tumour growth in combination with irresponsiveness to standard treatment in case of recurrence should lead to further diagnostic measures, because revelation of germline MMR mutations would call for an extended screening for other neoplastic manifestations and would markedly influence further treatment.

Definition and diagnosis of aggressive pituitary tumors.

Pituitary adenomas are considered benign tumors, but approximately 10% of them can have an aggressive behavior and more rarely (0.2%) can present metastasis, being classified as pituitary carcinomas. Aggressive adenomas are generally large and invasive tumors that present unusually rapid growth and/or that grow irrespective of conventional treatment with surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, large tumors, as well as invasive tumors are not always aggressive, with this definition being possible only after clinical follow-up of these tumors, with growth rate and response to therapies being key points to its diagnosis. The correct identification and diagnosis of aggressive adenomas is of great importance as they are associated with great morbidity and increased mortality.

Are aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas two sides of the same coin? Pathologists reply to clinician's questions.

Pituitary adenohypophyseal tumors are considered as benign and termed "adenomas". However, many tumors are invasive and a proportion of these exhibit an "aggressive behavior" with premature death due to progressive growth. Only very rare (0.2%) tumors with metastases are considered malignant and termed "carcinomas". Taking into account this variability in behavior and the oncological definition, pathologists have proposed changing the term adenoma to tumor. Here we explain why use the term tumor instead of adenoma and identify tumor characteristics, associated with a high risk for poor prognosis. In a cohort of 125 tumors with aggressive behavior (APT) and 40 carcinomas with metastases (PC), clinical and pathological features were very similar. The comparison of this cohort (APT+PC) with a reference surgical cohort of 374 unselected patients clearly shows that the two cohorts differ greatly, especially the percentage of tumors with Ki67 ≥ 10% (35%vs3%; p < 0.001). A five-tiered prognostic classification, associating invasion and proliferation, identified grade 2b tumors (invasive and proliferative), with a high risk of recurrence/progression. Because half of the APT+ PC tumors have a Ki67 index ≥10%, and 80% of them show 2 or 3 positive markers of proliferation, we suggest that tumors that are clinically aggressive, invasive and highly proliferative with a Ki67 ≥ 10%, represent tumors with malignant potential. The percentage of grade 2b tumors, suspected of malignancy, which will become aggressive tumors or carcinomas is unknown. It is probably very low, but higher than 0.2% in surgical series. Early identification and active treatment of these aggressive tumors is needed to decrease morbidity and prolong survival.

Temozolomide therapy for aggressive pituitary tumours - current understanding and future perspectives.

The use of temozolomide (TMZ) for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours (APT) has revolutionised clinical practice in this field with significantly improved clinical outcomes and long-term survival. Its use is now well established however a large number of patients do not respond to treatment and recurrence after cessation of TMZ is common. A number of challenges remain for clinicians such as appropriate patient selection, treatment duration and the role of combination therapy. This review will examine the use of TMZ to treat APT including mechanism of action, treatment regimen and duration; biomarkers predicting response to treatment and patient selection; and current evidence for administration of TMZ in combination with other agents.

Aggressive prolactinomas: how to manage?

PURPOSE: Aggressive prolactinomas are defined as radiologically invasive tumors which cannot be cured by surgery, and that have an unusually rapid rate of tumor growth despite dopamine agonist treatment and surgery. In some cases, metastasis occurs, defining prolactin carcinoma which is the second most frequent pituitary carcinoma. METHODS: A literature search was performed to review the available data on the treatment of aggressive pituitary prolactinomas or carcinomas. RESULTS: When optimal standard therapies (high dose cabergoline, surgery and radiotherapy) failed, temozolomide, an alkylating drug, is currently the best option, allowing to control tumor growth in about 50% of treated prolactinomas and improving overall survival of these patients. However, long-term complete response occurs in a limited subgroup of tumors. Alternative drugs could be discussed in a subset of aggressive prolactinomas either before temozolomide (pasireotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy…) or after temozolomide failure. CONCLUSION: Despite the significant improvement obtained with the use of temozolomide, a need for alternative drugs persists since a majority of these tumors are resistant or will recur during the follow-up. Patients suffering from such a rare condition should have access to clinical trials available for other types of rare cancers, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy.

Long-course temozolomide in aggressive pituitary adenoma: real-life experience in two tertiary care centers and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Aggressive pituitary adenomas (APAs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are challenging for their invasive nature, resistance to treatment and recurrences. Temozolomide (TMZ) is used with benefit and well-tolerated toxicity profile in APAs and PCs. In most studies patients received ≤ 12 cycles but the best length of treatment is debated since other options after discontinuation are scarce and a second course is mainly unsuccessful. METHODS: We report outcomes of 8 patients with APAs and PCs treated with TMZ for more than 12 continuous cycles with a literature review. Data were retrospectively collected from Padua and Milan University Hospitals. TMZ was used as a single agent (150-200 p.o. mg/m2 daily, 5/28 days) for 14 to 45 cycles. RESULTS: Eight patients (7 M), 7 APAs and 1 PC. Previous treatments included neurosurgery and radiotherapy in all cases except two giant masses (ACTH-silent APA and prolactinoma). No patient had progression disease (PD) during long-term treatment nor toxicities. No one had complete response (CR) but four had partial response (PR). Four ACTH+ tumors maintained stable disease (SD) but the secretion pattern improved in all. After drug withdrawal, three had delayed PD (2 after 18 and one after 29 months, all ACTH+); two are still in SD. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ may be useful and well-tolerated in APAs and PCs as a long-term therapy. PR appears within the first cycles with no escape throughout the treatment; most patients achieve SD. We suggest extended protocols particularly in responsive ACTH+ PAs and PCs, when further therapies may be unsuccessful.

Pituitary carcinomas: review of the current literature and report of atypical case.

Introduction: Pituitary carcinomas are poorly understood, rare entities. They are distinguished from adenomas not by histopathological features but rather by the presence of metastases.Objective: We discuss the diagnosis, mechanism of dissemination and pathogenesis based on a review of the literature and illustrated by a singular case.Case Report: A 59-year-old male presented with a dural-based posterior fossa lesion. He had been diagnosed with a pituitary chromophobe adenoma 43 years earlier that was treated at the time with surgery and radiation therapy. A presumptive diagnosis of a radiation-induced meningioma was made and surgery was recommended. At surgery the tumour resembled a pituitary adenoma. Histopathology, laboratory findings, and the patient's medical history confirmed the final diagnosis of a prolactin-secreting pituitary carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the longest reported interval between the pituitary adenoma and metastatic lesion diagnosis (43 years).Conclusion: Management should be tailored to individual patient and may include a combination of treatments (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormone-targeted therapy). Functionally active tumours may be monitored with hormone levels as tumour markers.

Corticotrophic pituitary carcinoma with cervical metastases: case series and literature review.

PURPOSE: Pituitary tumors are the second most common intracranial tumors, however, pituitary carcinoma is a rare clinical entity which represents only 0.1-0.2% of all pituitary tumors. Diagnosis of pituitary carcinoma requires the presence of metastasis. Early identification of pituitary carcinoma is difficult, and only recently have guidelines been published for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors. We present two cases from our institution, with a review of other cases available in literature in order to better characterize this rare disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of two patients with pituitary carcinoma treated at a tertiary medical center was performed. The MEDLINE database was searched for all cases of pituitary carcinoma. Information for age at diagnosis, sex, pituitary tumor type, latency period from pituitary tumor to presentation of carcinoma, sites of metastasis, number of surgical therapies, radiation and chemotherapy, and survival after diagnosis were collected. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies were available for review for a total of 72 unique cases. The average age at diagnosis was 46.3 years. The most common tumors were ACTH-secreting (34.7%), Prolactin-secreting (23.6%), and Null Cell (15.3%). The average latency period from pituitary tumor diagnosis to metastasis was 9 years. All patients underwent surgical therapy during their treatment, with an average of 2.76 procedures. The mortality rate was 54.8% with average time to death after diagnosis of approximately 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary carcinoma is a rare disease with high mortality rate and is a diagnostic and treatment challenge. Further study is required but is difficult due to its low incidence.

Temozolomide therapy in patients with aggressive pituitary adenomas or carcinomas.

Temozolomide is effective in some patients with progressive pituitary adenoma or carcinoma. We report a survey study of Italian patients treated with Temozolomide because of aggressive pituitary adenoma or carcinoma resistant to standard therapies. Italian endocrinologists were surveyed and asked to participate into the study. A questionnaire was sent to all those who agreed and had used Temozolomide in at least one patient with pituitary tumor. Database was closed in December 2013. A literature review was also performed. Thirty-one patients were included into the analysis. Mean age at start of Temozolomide treatment was 58.3 ± 1.9 years (± standard error). Six of the 31 (19.4%) Italian patients had a pituitary carcinoma. Twenty-five patients (80.6%) had disease control during Temozolomide treatment, while 6 patients (19.4%) had disease progression. Median follow-up after beginning Temozolomide was 43 months. Thirteen patients had tumor growth after stopping Temozolomide. The 2-year progression-free survival was 47.7% (95% CI 29.5-65.9%), while the 2-year disease control duration was 59.1% (95% CI 39.1-79.1%). Eleven patients died of progressive disease and other two patients of unrelated causes. The 2-year and 4-year overall survival rates were 83.9% (95% CI 70.7-97.1%) and 59.6% (95% CI 40.0-79.2%), respectively. Temozolomide is an additional effective therapeutic option for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors. The drug is well tolerated and causes few severe adverse effects. Recurrence of the tumor can occur after an initial positive response and usually portends a grim outcome.

Radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for the management of extraneural metastases in pituitary carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary carcinomas (PC) are uncommon neuroendocrine tumors, accounting for 0.1 % of all pituitary tumors. The diagnosis of PC is based on the presence of metastases from a pituitary adenoma, and not by local invasion or pathological features alone. PC is typically resistant to therapy, with a median overall survival of only 31 months. There is no standard treatment for PC, but maximal safe resection and radiation are performed when possible. Encouraging preliminary data on the use of temozolomide (TMZ)-based therapy has been previously reported. METHODS: We report the response to therapy and safety of radiation with concurrent temozolomide (RT/TMZ) in 2 adult patients with heavily pretreated PC and extraneural metastases. RESULTS: Both patients had prior history of pituitary macroadenoma. At the time of diagnosis of PC, Ki-67 % was 24.2 and 10 %, with positive p53 staining in one case. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, liver and bone. Case-1 received RT/TMZ to the tumor bed in the skull base and to the metastases in the cervical lymph nodes. Case-2 received RT/TMZ to recurrent tumor involving portacaval lymph nodes. Both patients achieved excellent long-term control of the sites of treated extraneural metastases, with no significant acute or delayed toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: RT/TMZ was safely delivered and might provide sustained control of extraneural metastases in PC. Although this retrospective report has limitations, RT/TMZ can be considered as a therapeutic option for the management of extraneural metastases in PC.

Paradoxical and atypical responses to pasireotide in aggressive ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.

PURPOSE: Pasireotide is the only pituitary targeted medication registered for the treatment of Cushing's disease. Drug efficacy data are largely based on a major prospective study in which the vast majority of patients had microadenomas. The purpose of this study was to summarize results of pasireotide treatment of ACTH secreting macroadenomas from our center. METHODS: Retrospective review of data extracted from clinical files. RESULTS: Three patients presented with large and invasive macroadenomas that required several surgical interventions and radiotherapy treatments. Patient 1 is a 57 year-old male who developed an extreme (27-fold) paradoxical response of urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels as measured 2 weeks after pasireotide institution, which increased further (71-fold) in response to dose increment but decreased to baseline levels after treatment interruption. Patient 2 is a 44 year old woman with a long standing (26 years) ACTH-secreting carcinoma metastatic to bone and after bilateral adrenalectomy. After an initial excellent response to pasireotide treatment, ACTH levels escaped suppression and a further rebound was noted 6 weeks after treatment interruption. Patient 3 is a 53 year old man that after escape from temozolomide therapy was started on pasireotide and rapidly responded by almost normalizing UFC excretion after 4 weeks, but returned to baseline UFC levels after four additional weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We describe as yet unreported atypical responses to pasireotide treatment in patients with aggressive ACTH-secreting tumors. Increased vigilance is recommended during pasireotide treatment of such patients.