[Emotions in chronic pain : Changes in the course of day clinic interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy]. / Emotionen bei chronifiziertem Schmerz : Veränderungen im Verlauf einer tagesklinischen interdisziplinären multimodalen Schmerztherapie.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The present study examined the extent to which emotional experience and emotional competence (EC) change in people with chronic pain during interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT). METHODS: The study included N = 184 adult German-speaking individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain. They completed a day clinic IMPT. The frequency of specific emotions (anger, etc.) and EC was assessed at three measurement time points using the Questionnaire for Emotion-Specific Self-Assessment of Emotional Competencies (ERSQ-ES) and the Emotional Competency Questionnaire (ECQ). The course results were analyzed descriptively, inferentially, and using linear regression. RESULTS: Positive emotions were experienced more frequently (effect size r = 0.40; p < 0.001) and negative emotions less frequently (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) at end of therapy. The experience of anger decreased particularly strongly (r = 0.52; p < 0.001). Self-assessed EC did not change during the IMPT (χ2ECQ_total (2) = 0.09; p = 0.956). EC largely explained the variance in the frequency experience of positive (R2 = 0.468) and negative emotions (R2 = 0.390). DISCUSSION: Improvements in patient-reported frequencies of positive and negative emotions during IMPT were demonstrated. Further research should validate these results using a control group. Even though no explicit increase in competence was perceivable for the studied subjects, EC had a high predictive value for emotion frequency. Future therapy designs and evaluations should focus more on changes of emotional experience.

Night time heart rate predicts next-day pain in fibromyalgia and primary back pain.

Introduction: Primary chronic pain is pain that persists for over 3 months without associated measurable tissue damage. One of the most consistent findings in primary chronic pain is its association with autonomic hyperactivation. Yet whether the autonomic hyperactivation causes the pain or results from it is still unclear. It is also unclear to what extent autonomic hyperactivation is related to experienced pain intensity in different subtypes or primary chronic pain. Objectives: Our first aim was to test lagged relationships between the markers of autonomic activation (heart rate) and pain intensity to determine its directionality. The main question here was whether autonomic biomarkers predict pain intensity or whether pain intensity predicts autonomic biomarkers. The second aim was to test whether this relationship is different between people with primary back pain and people with fibromyalgia. Methods: Sixty-six patients with chronic pain were observed over an average of 81 days. Sleep heart rate and heart rate variability were measured with a wearable sensor, and pain intensity was assessed from daily subjective reports. Results: The results showed a predictive relationship between sleep heart rate and next-day pain intensity (P < 0.05), but not between daily pain intensity and next night heart rate. There was no interaction with the type of chronic pain. Conclusions: These findings suggest that autonomic hyperactivation, whether stress-driven or arising from other causes, precedes increases in primary chronic pain. Moreover, the present results suggest that autonomic hyperactivation is a common mechanism underlying the pain experience in fibromyalgia and chronic back pain.

A systematic review of the biopsychosocial dimensions affected by chronic pain in children and adolescents: identifying reliable and valid pediatric multidimensional chronic pain assessment tools.

Pediatric chronic pain is a complex experience that is often challenging to describe and measure. Multidimensional tools that evaluate the biopsychosocial impact of chronic pain in pediatric patients can help clinicians to prioritize and tailor interdisciplinary pain care; yet, the psychometric value and clinical utility of such tools has not yet been systematically studied in the literature. The purpose of this review was to identify multidimensional biopsychosocial tools used in pediatric chronic pain, synthesize their reliability and validity evidence, and draw on this evidence to describe the relationships between chronic pain and biopsychosocial domains. The search involved 2 phases to (1) identify eligible tools and (2) conduct a measured forward citation search of tool development articles. Tool eligibility was guided by the Multidimensional Biobehavioral Model of Pediatric Pain and study eligibility was focused on primary chronic pain diagnoses unrelated to disease. Data extraction was focused on reliability and validity evidence of eligible tools, guided by the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Results yielded 6 tools that included 64 eligible studies, highlighting 84 significant relationships between pain and functional interference across 11 biopsychosocial variables. All tools were shown to have good internal consistency and evidence of validity, primarily through relationships to other variables. Of the 6 tools, the most brief and easy to use were the most under studied. Further psychometric research is warranted for these tools to investigate their clinical utility and psychometric properties in guiding and prioritizing pain care for children and adolescents.

Clinical differences in a multidisciplinary pediatric pain unit between primary and secondary chronic pain.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain affects an important part of the pediatric population in developed countries. secondary chronic pain (SCP) can have a well-defined medical cause, but primary chronic pain (PCP) can have an unknown etiology. In Spain, there is as yet no information on the clinical differences between patients treated in multidisciplinary units. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical records of patients seen in 2018 at the Children's Chronic Pain Unit in University La Paz Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included, (age between 3 and 19 years), with a mean age of 12.4 (SD = 4.1) years, mostly female (55%), with a mean duration of pain of 11.3 (SD = 10.4) months. A comparison of patients with PCP (n = 31) and SCP (n = 61) showed that both groups, on average, presented intense pain (X = 5.9; SD = 2.2; range = 0-10), with similar duration and functional repercussions, although PCP was less likely to be associated with neuropathic descriptors than SCP (p = 0.040), and was more extensive (p < 0.001). Both groups received similar treatment, based on rehabilitation, psychotherapy, invasive techniques and analgesic medication, although patients in the PCP group received less analgesic medication (gabapentinoids and opioids) than the SCP (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Patients treated in a multidisciplinary Child Pain Unit for PCP or SCP present a very similar clinical profile, though with differences in the number and type of analgesic drugs used. This shows the importance of etiologic diagnosis for adequate pharmacological treatment.

The autoimmune aetiology of unexplained chronic pain.

Chronic pain is the leading cause of life years lived with disability worldwide. The aetiology of most chronic pain conditions has remained poorly understood and there is a dearth of effective therapies. The WHO ICD-11 has categorised unexplained chronic pain states as 'chronic primary pains' (CPP), which are further defined by their association with significant distress and/or dysfunction. The new mechanistic term, 'nociplasticic pain' has been developed to illustrate their presumed generation by a structurally intact, but abnormally functioning nociceptive system. Recently, researchers have unravelled the surprising, ubiquitous presence of pain-sensitising autoantibodies in four investigated CPP indicating autoimmune causation. In persistent complex regional pain syndrome, fibromyalgia syndrome, chronic post-traumatic limb pain, and non-inflammatory joint pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis, passive transfer experiments have shown that either IgG or IgM antibodies from patient-donors cause symptoms upon injection to rodents that closely resemble those of the clinical disorders. Targets of antibody-binding and downstream effects vary between conditions, and more research is needed to elucidate the molecular and cellular details. The central nervous system appears largely unaffected by antibody binding, suggesting that the clinically evident CNS symptoms associated with CPP might arise downstream of peripheral processes. In this narrative review pertinent findings are described, and it is suggested that additional symptom-based disorders might be examined for the contribution of antibody-mediated autoimmune mechanisms.

Diferencias clínicas entre los pacientes con dolor crónico primario y secundario atendidos por una unidad multidisciplinar de dolor crónico infantil / Clinical differences in a multidisciplinary pediatric pain unit between primary and secondary chronic pain

Introducción: El dolor crónico afecta a un porcentaje significativo de la población pediátrica en los países desarrollados, y puede tener una causa médica bien definida en el dolor crónico secundario (DCS), o desconocida en el dolor crónico primario (DCP). En España, hasta el momento, no existe información acerca de las diferencias clínicas de los pacientes atendidos en unidades multidisciplinarias. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de las historias clínicas de los pacientes atendidos en 2018 por la Unidad de Dolor Crónico Infantil del Hospital Universitario La Paz. Resultados: Se incluyeron los 92 pacientes atendidos, con edades comprendidas entre 2 y 19 años, y una edad media de 12,4 (SD=4,1) años, mayoritariamente de sexo femenino (55%) y una duración media del dolor de 11,3 (SD=10,4) meses. Los resultados de comparar pacientes con DCP (n=31) y DCS (n=61) mostraron que ambos grupos presentaban dolor medio con una gran intensidad (x=5,9; SD=2,2; rango=0-10), con duración y repercusión funcional similares, aunque el DCP se asoció menos a descriptores de tipo neuropático que el DCS (p=0,040) y era más extenso en su localización (p<0,001). Ambos grupos recibieron similar tratamiento basado en rehabilitación, psicoterapia, técnicas invasivas y tratamiento con medicación analgésica, aunque los pacientes del grupo DCP recibieron menos medicaciones analgésicas (gabapentinoides y opiáceos) que el DCS (p=0,011). Conclusión: Los pacientes con DCP o DCS, aunque tengan un perfil clínico similar, presentan diferencias en el número y tipo de analgésicos empleados, lo que avalaría la importancia del diagnóstico de la causa para adecuar el tratamiento farmacológico subsiguiente.(AU)

Introduction: Chronic pain affects an important part of the pediatric population in developed countries. secondary chronic pain (SCP) can have a well-defined medical cause, but primary chronic pain (PCP) can have an unknown etiology. In Spain, there is as yet no information on the clinical differences between patients treated in multidisciplinary units. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the clinical records of patients seen in 2018 at the Children's Chronic Pain Unit in University La Paz Hospital. Results: A total of 92 patients were included (age between 3 and 19 years), with a mean age of 12.4 (SD=4.1) years, mostly female (55%), with a mean duration of pain of 11.3 (SD=10.4) months. A comparison of patients with PCP (n=31) and SCP (n=61) showed that both groups, on average, presented intense pain (X=5.9; SD=2.2; range=0-10), with similar duration and functional repercussions, although PCP was less likely to be associated with neuropathic descriptors than SCP (p=.040), and was more extensive (p<.001). Both groups received similar treatment, based on rehabilitation, psychotherapy, invasive techniques and analgesic medication, although patients in the PCP group received less analgesic medication (gabapentinoids and opioids) than the SCP (p=.011). Conclusion: Patients treated in a multidisciplinary Child Pain Unit for PCP or SCP present a very similar clinical profile, though with differences in the number and type of analgesic drugs used. This shows the importance of etiologic diagnosis for adequate pharmacological treatment.(AU)