Endovascular Transvenous versus Open Femoropopliteal Bypass.

Background and Objectives: Lower extremity arterial disease is one of the most prevalent manifestations of atherosclerosis. The results from numerous studies regarding the best revascularization method of an occluded superficial femoral artery have been conflicting. The aim of this study was to compare the patency of transvenous endovascular with open femoropopliteal bypass, both with vein and prosthetic grafts. To our knowledge, a direct patency comparison between transvenous endovascular and open femoropopliteal bypass has not been published. This could help elucidate which method is preferable and in which cases. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions were offered endovascular transvenous or open bypass. A total of 384 consecutive patients with PAD requiring surgical treatment were evaluated for inclusion in this study. Three-year follow-up data were collected for 52 endovascular procedures, 80 prosthetic grafts, and 44 venous bypass surgeries. Bypass patency was investigated by Duplex US every 6 months. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency for endovascular transvenous, autovenous, and prosthetic bypasses. Results: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency in venous group at 3 years was 70.5%, 77.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. In the endovascular transvenous group, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years was 46.2%, 69.2%, and 76.9%, respectively. The lowest patency rates at 3 years were noted in the prosthetic graft group with 22.5% primary, 26.6% primary-assisted, and 28.2% secondary patency. Conclusions: The saphenous vein is the best graft to perform in above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Transvenous endovascular bypass is a viable option with comparable primary-assisted and secondary patency. Primary patency is substantially lower for endovascular transvenous compared to venous bypass. Patients treated with endovascular transvenous bypass will require a significant number of secondary procedures to provide optimal patency. Prosthetic grafts should only be used if no other option for bypass is available.

Multiple concomitant arterial aneurysms in Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND: Behçet's disease (BD) is a rare form of systemic vasculitis that affects small to large vessels. It is characterized by mucocutaneous, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological manifestations. Large vessel involvement may occur in a third of cases. Veins are usually more affected than arteries. Furthermore aneurysms are the most frequent arterial complication. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old man presented with multiple arterial aneurysms. He had previous medical history of a right popliteal aneurysm treated with a reversed femoro-popliteal venous bypass, long-term steroids and immunosuppressive treatment. On admission, diagnostic computed tomography angiography revealed multiple aneurysms, including an 87 mm aneurysm of the femoro-popliteal bypass and an abdominal aortic and left common iliac artery aneurysm. He received an intensification of medical treatment with methylprednisolone and infliximab intravenous infusion. Aorto iliac artery aneurysms were treated by infrarenal bifurcated stent graft implantation. The aneurysm of the venous femoro-popliteal bypass was treated by explantation and prosthetic repair. One month later, he presented with acute right limb ischemia related to occlusion of the right limb of the stent graft despite anticoagulation which was treated by mechanical thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular BD can worsen the vascular outcome after surgery. Except in an urgent context, BD must be controlled before surgery. This case report illustrates the importance of combined medical and surgical management, with first BD activity control with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive treatment, then surgical or endovascular treatment.

Outcomes of autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of diabetes on outcomes of autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access in a large population-based cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the United States Renal Database System (2007-2014). The χ2 test, Student t-test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate maturation, interventions, patency, infection, and mortality. RESULTS: The study of 381,622 patients comprised 303,307 (79.5%) autogenous fistulas and 78,315 (20.5%) prosthetic grafts placed in 231,134 (60.6%) diabetic patients and 150,488 (39.4%) nondiabetic patients. There was decrease in maturation for diabetics compared to nondiabetics who received autogenous fistulas (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.88; P < .001) and prosthetic grafts (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < .001). Comparing diabetics vs nondiabetics, primary patency at 5 years was 19.4% vs 23.5% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 9.1% vs 11.2% (P < .001) for prosthetic grafts. Primary assisted patency at 5 years was 35.2% vs 38.7% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 17.2% vs 19.2% (P = .015) for prosthetic grafts. Secondary patency at 5 years was 44.8% vs 48.6% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 34.1% vs 36.8% (P = .002) for prosthetic grafts. There was 5% decrease in primary patency (aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.96; P < .001) for diabetics compared to nondiabetics who received autogenous fistulas. There was no difference in primary assisted and secondary patency for autogenous fistulas as well as primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency for prosthetic grafts in comparing diabetic to nondiabetic patients. There was also no significant difference in severe prosthetic graft infection between the groups (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.08; P = .90). There was a 19% increase in patient mortality for diabetic relative to nondiabetic autogenous fistula recipients (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.17-1.20; P < .001) and 12% increase for prosthetic graft recipients (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort of hemodialysis patients, diabetes mellitus was associated with a decrease in patient survival, access maturation, and primary fistula patency. In contrast, there was no association between diabetes and prosthetic graft patency and severe prosthetic graft infection warranting excision.

Long-term outcomes of lower extremity graft preservation using antibiotic beads in patients with early deep wound infections after major arterial reconstructions.

OBJECTIVE: Bypass graft preservation with wound sterilization using serial antibiotic bead exchange has been described in patients presenting with deep wound infections after extremity bypass. The long-term benefits of this approach remain poorly understood. We examined whether graft preservation and wound sterilization with antibiotic beads affect amputation rates and patient survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent operations for aortoiliac or infrainguinal aneurysmal or occlusive arterial disease were retrospectively analyzed. The Infection group included those with patent vascular grafts who developed Szilagyi class II or III deep wound infections within 90 days of index reconstruction and had no evidence of anastomotic or arterial bleeding. All patients in the infection group were managed with graft preservation using serial antibiotic bead exchange every 3 to 5 days until wound cultures became negative. This group was compared with a contemporary group of controls who underwent similar interventions but did not develop wound infections postoperatively. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival, defined as survival without major amputation. Secondary outcomes included major amputations and the occurrence of anastomotic pseudoaneurysms necessitating repair. Inverse propensity score weighting was used for risk adjustment between the groups. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, we treated 701 patients (infection, 68; controls, 633). Compared with controls, patients in the infection group had a higher body mass index (mean, 28.5 vs 26.3, P = .002) and more prosthetic conduits placed during the index reconstruction. Amputation-free survival for the infection vs the control group was 78 vs 76% at 2 years, 61 vs 66% at 4 years, and 51 vs 57% at 6 years postoperatively (log-rank test, P = .516). Freedom from major amputation for the infection vs the control group was 82 vs 86% at 2 years, 80 vs 82% at 4 years, and 80 vs 76% at 6 years postoperatively (log-rank test, P = .568). In the risk-adjusted model, the presence of treated infection did not affect amputation-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.82; P = .440) or major amputation (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = .949). Anastomotic pseudoaneurysms occurred only in the Infection group (4.4%; P = .001), and were treated with interposition grafts without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass graft preservation with wound sterilization using serial antibiotic bead exchange is associated with excellent limb salvage and survival rates, similar to those of noninfected wounds. With the use of this preservation strategy, close follow-up for timely detection of anastomotic pseudoaneurysms is recommended.

Obturator bypass using a ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft for inguinal graft infection.

OBJECTIVE: Inguinal vascular graft infections are high-risk events that cannot be controlled medically but require surgical intervention. This study reviewed the long-term clinical outcomes of obturator bypass using a ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft for inguinal graft infection. METHODS: A total of eight consecutive patients who underwent obturator bypass using a ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft for inguinal prosthetic graft infection at a single medical center between January 2006 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical procedure, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no perioperative death; however, there were three operative complications. On the 1st and 9th postoperative day, two patients underwent hematoma evacuation in the pelvic cavity, and the other patient underwent suture reinforcement for partial dehiscence of the distal anastomosis on the 49th postoperative day. The median length of hospital stay was 14.5 (range, 7-29) days. Only one graft occlusion was observed at postoperative month 40; however, there were no ischemic symptoms. There were no limb amputations and postoperative deaths during the long-term follow-up period. There were no infections of the previous residual and obturator bypass grafts and inguinal infection during the follow-up period of 49 (range, 7-154) months. CONCLUSION: Obturator bypass for inguinal graft infection is feasible and durable with excellent long-term outcomes. However, perioperative bleeding should be taken into consideration.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of infected prosthetic vascular grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of vascular prosthetic graft infection (VPGI) using a diagnostic accuracy test. METHODS: The MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases, from the earliest available date of indexing through March 31, 2018, were searched for results investigating the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of VPGI. We calculated the pooled sensitivities and specificities of included studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and obtained summary receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Across 10 studies (286 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98) without heterogeneity (I2 = 40.2; 95% CI, 0.0-84.4; P = .09), and pooled specificity was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81) without heterogeneity (I2 = 39.9; 95% CI, 0.0-84.3; P = .09). Likelihood ratio syntheses showed an overall positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI, 2.9-4.9) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.15). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 63 (95% CI, 23-173). The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed the area under the curve to be 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the high sensitivity and moderate specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of VPGI. The clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of VPGI should be validated through further large multicenter studies.

Vascular access for hemodialysis in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients ≥75 years old in the prospectively maintained United States Renal Database System who had an AVF or AVG placed for hemodialysis (HD) access between January 2007 and December 2011. Outcomes were mortality, conduit patency, maturation, time to catheter-free dialysis, and infection. A χ2 test, Student t-test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable Cox regression analysis were employed. RESULTS: Of the 124,421 patients studied, there were 19,173 (15%) AVF initiates, 4480 (4%) AVG initiates, 29,872 (24%) AVF converts, 10,712 (9%) AVG converts, and 59,824 (48%) patients who persisted on HD catheters. Compared with AVF initiates, relative mortality was significantly higher for AVG initiates (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.24; P < .001), AVF converts (aHR, 1.36; P < .001), AVG converts (aHR, 1.62; P < .001), and catheter-persistent patients (aHR, 2.23; P < .001). Primary patency (aHR, 1.21; P < .001) and primary assisted patency (aHR, 1.31; P < .001) were higher for AVF. Secondary patency was higher for AVGs within the first 4 months (aHR, 1.12; P < .001) but higher for AVFs beyond that time point (aHR, 1.25; P < .001). Maturation rate and median time to maturation were 80% vs 84% (P < .001) and 46 vs 26 days (P < .001) for AVF vs AVG. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive AVF remains the best mode of HD in elderly patients who can tolerate surgery. Patients who cannot tolerate pre-emptive surgery or have to initiate HD on an urgent basis with a catheter should convert to AVF when it is feasible if life expectancy is >4 months. If life expectancy is <4 months, surgical risk and quality of life should be considered in making the decision to persistently dialyze through HD catheter or to convert to AVG.

Cryopreserved Venous Allografts in Supra-inguinal Reconstructions: A Single Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a novel technique for supra-inguinal arterial reconstructions with cryopreserved femoral vein and caval allografts with a low re-infection rate and an acceptable graft re-intervention rate on early mid term analysis. METHODS: Patients treated from February 2012 to March 2018 with cryopreserved venous allograft reconstructions owing to infection in the supra-inguinal area were reviewed retrospectively. The primary end points were re-infection and the treatment related mortality rate. Secondary end points were 30 and 90 day and overall mortality and graft re-intervention rate. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients treated with cryopreserved venous allografts for infection in aorto-iliac area, 21 (91%) patients underwent reconstruction with cryopreserved femoral veins and two (9%) with vena cava. Indications for treatment were aortic graft infections (n = 12 [52%]), mycotic aneurysms (n = 5 [22%]), femorofemoral prosthetic infections (n = 3 [13%]), anastomotic pseudo-aneurysms (n = 2 [9%]), and aortic thrombosis with intestinal spillage (n = 1 [4%]). In hospital and 90 day mortality were 9% (n = 2); overall treatment related mortality during the median follow up of 15 months was 13% (n = 3). During the follow up, two allografts were re-operated on owing to anastomotic dilatation and one because of re-infection, resulting in a re-intervention rate of 13% (n = 3). None of the grafts was lost and there were no amputations. At the end of follow up 17 patients (74%) were alive. Kaplan-Meier estimation for survival was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57%-95%) at one year and 70% (95% CI 49%-91%) at two years. CONCLUSION: Cryopreserved venous allografts appear to be an infection resistant and reasonably safe reconstruction material in the aorto-iliac axis based upon the early mid term analysis from a single centre experience. Further research is needed to compare their performance with other biological reconstruction material.

Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the utilization and outcomes of vascular access for long-term hemodialysis in the United States and describes the impact of temporizing catheter use on outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patency, and associated patient survival for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts; for autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts placed after a temporizing catheter; and for hemodialysis catheters that remained in use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the United States during a 5-year period (2007-2011). The United States Renal Data System-Medicare matched national database was used to compare outcomes after pre-emptive autogenous fistulas, preemptive prosthetic grafts, autogenous fistula after temporizing catheter, prosthetic graft after temporizing catheter, and persistent catheter use. Outcomes were primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, maturation, catheter-free dialysis, severe access infection, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 73,884 (16%) patients who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistula, 16,533 (3%) who initiated hemodialysis with prosthetic grafts, 106,797 (22%) who temporized with hemodialysis catheter prior to autogenous fistula use, 32,890 (7%) who temporized with catheter prior to prosthetic graft use, and 246,822 (52%) patients who remained on the catheter. Maturation rate and median time to maturation were 79% vs 84% and 47 days vs 29 days for pre-emptively placed autogenous fistulas vs prosthetic grafts. Primary patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.28; P < .001) and primary assisted patency (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35-1.38; P < .001) were significantly higher for autogenous fistula compared with prosthetic grafts. Secondary patency was higher for autogenous fistulas beyond 2 months (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.40; P < .001). Severe infection (aHR, 9.6; 95% CI, 8.86-10.36; P < .001) and mortality (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.31; P < .001) were higher for prosthetic grafts compared with autogenous fistulas. Temporizing with a catheter was associated with a 51% increase in mortality (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.48-1.53; P < .001), 69% decrease in primary patency (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.31-0.32; P < .001), and 130% increase in severe infection (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.2-2.5; P < .001) compared to initiation with autogenous fistulas or prosthetic grafts. Mortality was 2.2 times higher for patients who remained on catheters compared to those who initiated hemodialysis with autogenous fistulas (aHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.21-2.28; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporizing catheter use was associated with higher mortality, higher infection, and lower patency, thus undermining the highly prevalent approach of electively using catheters as a bridge to permanent access. Autogenous fistulas are associated with longer time to catheter-free dialysis but better patency, lower infection risk, and lower mortality compared with prosthetic grafts in the general population.

Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection.

BACKGROUND: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI. METHODS: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8. RESULTS: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.

Predilation technique with balloon angioplasty to facilitate percutaneous groin access of large size sheath through scar tissue.

Purpose Percutaneous remote access for endovascular aortic repair is an advantageous alternative to open access. Previous surgery in the femoral region and the presence of synthetic vascular grafts in the femoral/iliac arteries represent major limitations to percutaneous remote access. The aim of this study was to evaluate an original technique used for enabling percutaneous remote access for thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair in patients with scar tissue and/or a vascular graft in the groin. Methods Twenty-five consecutive patients with a thoracic (11/25; 44%) or an aortic aneurysm (14/25; 66%) and with a synthetic vascular graft in the groin (16/25; 64%) or a redo groin access (9/25; 36%) were managed through the percutaneous remote access. In all patients, a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used to predilate the scar tissue and the femoral artery or the synthetic vascular graft after preclosing (ProGlide®; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In 10 patients, requiring a 20 Fr sheath, a 6 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used; and in the remaining 15, requiring a 24 Fr sheath, an 8 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon. Preclosing was exclusively performed using ProGlide®. Mean follow-up was 15 months. Results In all cases, stent-graft deployment was successful. There was one surgical conversion (4%; 1/25) due to bleeding from a femoral anastomosis. Two cases required additional percutaneous maneuvers (postclosing with another system in one patient and endoluminal shielding with stent-graft in the other patient). No pseudoaneurysm or access complication occurred during the follow-up. Conclusions Percutaneous access in redo groins with scar tissue and/or synthetic vascular graft using ultrasound-guided punction, preclosing with ProGlide® system and predilation with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon to introduce large size sheath as used for endovascular aortic repair showed to be feasible, safe and with few local complications.

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in a Prosthetic Aortic Graft.

We describe the case of a 70-year-old man with Marfan Syndrome who was found to have Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) within an ascending aortic graft, his native aortic arch and arch vessels. Ten years previously he had undergone a Bentall's Procedure for a dilated aortic root. He presented with a left middle cerebral artery stroke. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple filling defects within the aortic arch and branch vessels suggestive of thrombus. Following the stroke, his neurological deficit improved. A decision was made to perform an aortic arch replacement to reduce the risk of a further embolic event. Subsequent histopathology confirmed DLBCL. Intravascular DLBCL is an extremely rare entity but an important diagnosis to consider in patients with intra-aortic thrombus in proximity to prosthetic graft material.

Complete Ipsilateral Femoral Approach Using an Iliac Branch Device to Preserve a Sole Internal Iliac Artery After Aortic Stent-Graft Placement.

PURPOSE: To report implantation of an iliac branch device (IBD) for preserving antegrade blood flow to a sole internal iliac artery (IIA) via an ipsilateral approach during endovascular repair to reline an aortobi-iliac allograft. TECHNIQUE: The technique is described in a 55-year-old man with an enteric fistula involving an aortobi-iliac Y-prosthesis. After complete excision, the prosthesis was replaced by an allograft. Due to rebleeding and resuturing of the graft, total stent-graft relining of the allograft was planned with preservation of the sole left IIA using an iliac side branch (ZBIS). During introduction of a 12-F sheath over the allograft's neobifurcation to establish a femorofemoral through-and-through approach, the allograft ruptured. A compliant balloon was inflated to control the hemorrhage. The IBD was first fully deployed, followed by stent-graft relining. Consequently, stent-graft implantation in the left IIA using a crossover maneuver was no longer feasible, so a 0.035-inch super stiff wire was introduced through the IBD's 20-F sheath. A 12-mm semi-compliant balloon was inflated in the common iliac artery above the iliac branch to act as an abutment for a 7-F sheath to run over the stiff wire into the IIA for delivery/deployment of a stent-graft. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to use a complete ipsilateral femoral approach for IBD implantation after aortic stent-graft placement.

Aortic hybrid sutureless anastomosis on porcelain aorta.

PURPOSE: To describe a hybrid sutureless anastomosis technique between a prosthetic graft, an endograft, and a circumferentially calcified infrarenal aorta. TECHNIQUE: The technique is demonstrated in a 65-year-old man with flush distal aortoiliac occlusion and patent infrarenal porcelain aorta (IPA). After laparotomy, the IPA was occluded below the renal arteries by inflating an aortic balloon introduced via an axillary access. The IPA was transected in its distal part and aortic thrombectomy performed. A Zenith iliac extension was modified on a back table by cutting the terminal tip; the device was then was inserted and deployed into the IPA in a standard fashion and the sheath removed. A Dacron bifurcated graft was sutured in an end-to-end anastomosis to the endograft and terminal aorta. The 12-month computed tomography scan showed patency of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: This sutureless anastomosis technique seems safe and feasible and represents a valid alternative to standard surgical approaches in cases of heavy and circumferentially calcified infrarenal aorta.

[Dilemmas of the reconstruction of the major pelvic artery due to infectious aortic graft complication]. / A medencei veroér helyreállításának dilemmái szeptikus aortagraft esete kapcsán.

INTRODUCTION: In the pelvic region thrombendarterectomy and bypass procedures are the most commonly performed procedures to treat peripheral artery occlusive diseases with chronic, severe circulation failure caused by atherosclerosis. Biologic and synthetic grafts can also be used in bypass surgeries. Application of synthetic grafts can acutely increase the development of the infectious graft complication and its mortality is still between 70 and 75% in pelvic processes. We describe the difficulties and dilemmas of an infectious aortobifemoral graft. CASE PRESENTATION: 58-year-old female patient with right lower limb trophic ulcer underwent a DSA examination showing a bilateral iliac occlusion and aortobifemoral bypass surgery with Dacron graft implantation was performed. Re-occlusion and infection of the graft led to an in situ silver Dacron graft replacement. Due to the one-sided re-occlusion, a femoro-femoral crossover bypass surgery applying silver graft was performed. Despite the previously described procedures the infectious process got worse and autologous deep vein reconstruction was required beside the removal of the infectious synthetic grafts at the same time. DISCUSSION: There are local and extraanatomical solutions to reduce infectious graft complication. In pelvic infections bypass surgeries using autologous deep vein can show the best results. This procedure is the trustworthiest but also the most straining technique due to the extension of surgical time and increased blood loss. The proper surgical strategy should be selected on individual bases including cardiopulmonary load ability, patient age and technical/infrastructural possibilities.

Treatment of infected thoracic aortic prosthetic grafts with the in situ preservation strategy: a review of its history, surgical technique, and results.

For cardiothoracic surgeons prosthetic graft infection still represents a difficult diagnostic and treatment problem to manage. An aggressive surgical strategy involving removal and in situ replacement of all the prosthetic material combined with extensive removal of the surrounding mediastinal tissue remains technically challenging in any case. Mortality and morbidity rates following such a major and risky surgical procedure are high due to the nature of the aggressive surgical approach and multi-organ failure typically caused by sepsis. However, removal of the infected prosthetic graft in patients who had an operation to reconstruct the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch is not always possible or necessary for selected patients according to current alternative treatment options. Rather than following the traditional surgical concept of aggressive graft replacement nowadays a more conservative surgical approach with in situ preservation and coverage of the prosthetic graft by vascular tissue flaps can result in a good outcome. In this article, we review the relevant literature on this specific topic, particularly in terms of graft-sparing surgery for infected ascending/arch prosthetic grafts with special emphasis on staged treatment and the use of omentum transposition.

Aortic versus axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Research comparing the effectiveness of central aortic cannulation to axillary artery cannulation in repairing acute type A aortic dissection is limited and controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare early outcomes of central aortic cannulation versus axillary artery cannulation for surgery for acute aortic dissection type A. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to September 1, 2023. The primary endpoints were operative mortality and incidence of postoperative stroke. Secondary endpoints encompassed cardiopulmonary bypass time, myocardial ischemic time, hypothermic circulatory arrest time, postoperative temporary neurological dysfunction, combination of stroke and temporary neurological dysfunction, as well as the need for reexploration for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, and tracheotomy. A random-effect model was utilized to calculate the pooled effect size. RESULTS: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria, enrolling a total of 7204 patients (2760 underwent aortic cannulation and 4444 underwent axillary cannulation). The operative mortality and incidence of postoperative stroke did not show statistical differences between the two groups, with a pooled odds ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.55) and 1.17 (0.95-1.42), respectively. Similarly, none of the secondary endpoints exhibited significant statistical differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic cannulation can be a viable alternative to axillary artery cannulation for repair of acute aortic dissection type A, as both approaches present similar early clinical outcomes.

Human gelatin thrombin matrix with rifampin for the treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections.

We aim to describe and report on a novel graft preservation technique using a human gelatin thrombin matrix with rifampin for the treatment of vascular graft infections. Eight patients with vascular graft infections were included, one with bilateral infections, for a total of nine cases from January 2016 through June 2021. All the patients underwent wound exploration and placement of human gelatin thrombin matrix with rifampin. No deaths or allergic reactions had been reported at the 30-day follow-up, with only one major amputation. The graft and limb salvage rates were 77.8% at the 1-year follow-up. The mean time to a major amputation was 122 days, and the mean time to graft excision was 30 days.

Endovascular Revascularisation versus Open Surgery with Prosthetic Bypass for Femoro-Popliteal Lesions in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Aim: Complex atherosclerotic femoro-popliteal lesions have traditionally been treated with bypass surgery. A prosthetic graft is used to save the vein graft for more distal revascularisations or when a vein graft is unavailable. The endovascular approach has gained popularity and is offered as a first-line strategy for complex lesions. This study aimed to evaluate whether endovascular procedures can be used as a first-line treatment strategy for complex native femoro-popliteal lesions over open surgery with prosthetic bypass in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: This single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted between 2013 and 2021; it included patients with symptomatic PAD who required limb revascularisation at the femoro-popliteal segment and who had complex lesions. The primary endpoints analysed were technical success, primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (cdTLR), freedom from major adverse limb and cardiovascular events (MALE and MACE, respectively), freedom from limb loss, and survival. The secondary endpoints were length of in-hospital stay, and duration and costs of the procedure. Results: We identified 185 limbs among 174 suitable candidates for comparison, wherein 105 were treated with an endovascular procedure and 80 with a femoro-popliteal prosthetic bypass. Most patients in both groups presented with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, and >90% of them had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of >3. The endovascular group had more octogenarians (p = 0.02) and patients with coronary disease (p = 0.004). The median follow-up was 30 months. The technical failure rate for endovascular procedures was 4.7%, versus 0% in the open group (p = 0.047). Freedom from MACE was similar in both groups. The endovascular group showed superior primary patency (p < 0.0001), cdTLR (p < 0.0001), MALE (p < 0.0001), and freedom from limb loss (p = 0.0018) at 24 and 48 months. Further analysis performed for the open above-the-knee sub-group showed that the aforementioned endpoints were similar between the groups at 12 months and were better in the endovascular group at 24 and 48 months. Procedural time and in-hospital stay were longer in the open group than in the endovascular group (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The procedural cost in the endovascular group was 10-fold lower than that in the prosthetic bypass group. Conclusions: Endovascular procedures are safe for treating complex femoro-popliteal lesions in patients at a high risk for surgery and show better outcomes at 24 months than prosthetic bypasses do. The latter may be considered as an alternative should endovascular treatment fail.