Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study.

Background and Aims: Regional anesthesia techniques have attributed a multimodal dimension to pain management after breast surgery. The intercostal approach to paravertebral block has been gaining interest, becoming an alternative to conventional paravertebral block, devoid of complexities in its approach, being recognized as the proximal intercostal block. Parallel to the widespread acceptance of fascial plane blocks in breast surgery, pectoralis II block has emerged as being non-inferior to paravertebral block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two independent fascial plane blocks, proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block, in breast conservation surgery. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized control, pilot study included 40 patients, randomly allocated among two groups: proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block. Results: The pectoralis II block group had significantly lower pain scores at rest in the immediate postoperative period but became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group in the late postoperative period. Pain scores on movement though were lower at 0 h postoperatively and became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group subsequently. Although the pectoralis II group had earlier recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit, the overall time to discharge from the hospital was comparable and not influential. Both groups had high patient satisfaction scores and similar perioperative opioid consumption. Sedation, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative nausea vomiting scores were comparable. Conclusion: Fascial plane blocks in the form of pectoralis II and proximal intercostal block facilitate pain alleviation, early return to shoulder arm exercise, and enhanced recovery, which should render them to be incorporated into multimodal interdisciplinary pain management in breast conservation surgery.

A prospective, randomized comparison of ultrasonographic visualization of proximal intercostal block vs paravertebral block.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic paravertebral blockade is an accepted anesthetic and analgesic technique for breast surgery. However, real-time ultrasound visualization of landmarks in the paravertebral space remains challenging. We aimed to compare ultrasound-image quality, performance times, and clinical outcomes between the traditional parasagittal ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and a modified approach, the ultrasound-guided proximal intercostal block. METHODS: Women with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy (n = 20) were randomized to receive either paravertebral (n = 26) or proximal intercostal blocks (n = 32) under ultrasound-guidance with 2.5 mg/kg ropivacaine prior to surgery. Block ultrasound images before and after needle placement, and anesthetic injection videoclips were saved, and these images and vidoes independently rated by separate novice and expert reviewers for quality of visualization of bony elements, pleura, relevant ligament/membrane, needle, and injectate spread. Block performance times, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption were also recorded. RESULTS: Composite visualization scores were superior for proximal intercostal compared to paravertebral nerve block, as rated by both expert (p = 0.008) and novice (p = 0.01) reviewers. Notably, both expert and novice rated pleural visualization superior for proximal intercostal nerve block, and expert additionally rated bony landmark and injectate spread visualization as superior for proximal intercostal block. Block performance times, needle depth, opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal intercostal block yielded superior visualization of key anatomical landmarks, possibly offering technical advantages over traditional paravertebral nerve block. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02911168. Registred on the 22nd of September 2016.

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Sympathetic Blockade by Proximal Intercostal Block in Electrical Storm Patients.

BACKGROUND: Electrical storm (ES) patients who fail standard therapies have a high mortality rate. Previous studies report effective management of ES with bedside, ultrasound-guided percutaneous stellate ganglion block (SGB). We report our experience with sympathetic blockade administered via a novel alternative approach: proximal intercostal block (PICB). Compared with SGB, this technique targets an area typically free of other catheters and support devices, and may pose less strict requirements for anticoagulation interruption, along with lower risk of focal neurological side effects. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to describe the safety and efficacy of PICB in patients with refractory ES. METHODS: We reviewed our institutional data on ES patients who underwent PICB between January 2018 and February 2023 to analyze procedural safety and short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 15 consecutive patients with ES underwent PICB during this period. Of those, 11 patients (73.3%) were maintained on PICB alone, and 4 patients (26.6%) were maintained on combined block with SGB and PICB. Overall, 72.7% patients who were maintained on PICB alone and 77.8% patients who were maintained on bilateral PICB had excellent arrhythmia suppression. After PICB, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), with 93.3% of patients receiving PICB having no implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock until discharge or heart transplant. Anticoagulation was continued in all patients and there were no procedure-related complications. Apart from mild transient neurological symptoms seen in 3 patients, no significant neurological or hemodynamic sequelae were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory ES, continuous PICB provided safe and effective sympathetic block (77.8% ventricular arrhythmia suppression), achievable without interruption of anticoagulation, and without significant side effects.